Family perspectives on the transition from active treatment to survivorship for children with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Completing therapy for childhood cancer is an exciting milestone. However, this adjustment can be extremely stressful for patients and their families as they transition from cancer patient to survivor. A better understanding of the patient and family experience and their needs during this transition is crucial for developing guidelines and leveraging support for future patients and families. PROCEDURE: Participants were recruited from across the United States using a maximum variation sampling strategy. Families were eligible if they had a child diagnosed with cancer before age 15 and had completed treatment at least 1 year prior to their interview. Participants completed a 90-180-minute semi-structured interview either in person or virtually. Interviews focused on the experiences of getting a diagnosis, experiences with treatment, information seeking, impact of cancer on the family, social support, and transitions to survivorship. Inductive thematic analysis revealed a wide variety of themes. This paper examines the transition from active cancer therapy into survivorship. RESULTS: Identified primary themes included (i) feelings about transitioning off therapy; (ii) coping with lingering effects; and (iii) experiences of transitioning off therapy and survivorship care. Subthemes highlighted the need for more support for both patients and families during this transition. CONCLUSION: Patients and families desire more support during the transition off therapy. Suggestions included access to additional resources, earlier transition to receiving survivorship care, and more holistic survivorship care. Further research is needed to determine best models and feasibility of delivering this desired support to all patients and families.

'Never once was I thinking the c-word': Parent perspectives on the facilitators and barriers to getting a childhood cancer diagnosis.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the facilitators and barriers of getting from 'something's not right' to a childhood cancer diagnosis from the perspective of parents living in the United States of America. BACKGROUND: It is common for families to experience long trajectories from when they first notice symptoms to receiving a childhood cancer diagnosis. Understanding this trajectory within the social and cultural contexts of the United States healthcare system is the first step in developing strategies for reducing this timeframe and mitigating some of the psychosocial impact for parents in receiving a childhood cancer diagnosis. This study examines the interpretations and meanings parents attributed to their child's symptoms, their decisions regarding seeking medical care, interactions with healthcare providers and the time course of events. DESIGN: An inductive qualitative inquiry. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured interviews with 55 participants representing 39 unique cases of childhood cancer were conducted. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. COREQ guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Participants described multiple barriers and facilitators in their path to receiving a childhood cancer diagnosis. Facilitators included noticing something 'wasn't right' and physician in agreement that symptoms were unusual; acute symptoms requiring action; advocating for a diagnosis; and obtaining a second opinion. Barriers included parents having to interpret symptoms in the context of daily life; physician dismissiveness even when symptoms persisted; and not feeling they could question their physician's assessment. CONCLUSION: Families experience multiple facilitators and barriers in their trajectory to receiving a childhood cancer diagnosis. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Understanding the path to diagnosis from the parent perspective may increase opportunities for shared decision-making. Clinician educational modules that include family perspectives may improve patient/parent-provider relationships. PARTICIPANT CONTRIBUTION: Participants described their family's cancer journey through narrative storytelling. Participants had the opportunity to review and make edits to their transcript.

The Impact of Structural and Meso-Level Factors on Caregiver Coping Abilities When Supporting a Child with Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Family caregivers of children diagnosed with cancer often experience periods of significant stress. We provide an in-depth examination of the impacts of structural (health care and leave policies) and meso-level (organizations and communities/social networks) factors on caregiver coping during childhood cancer treatment. We conducted a secondary analysis of a comprehensive qualitative dataset examining the impacts of structural and meso-level factors on caregiver coping from in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 49 caregivers representing 38 unique cases of childhood cancer. Using a modified grounded theory approach, transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Caregivers experienced multiple and often intersecting structural and meso-level factors, both facilitating and impeding their ability to cope during their child's cancer treatment. Our analysis revealed the following themes: having few out-of-pocket medical expenses, access to paid time off from employment, and support from one's health system, organizations, or community/social networks fostered caregiver coping. Significant financial burdens due to cancer treatment, having to take unpaid leave from employment, remaining employed regardless of one's circumstances, and lack of support from one's health system, organizations, or community/social networks hindered caregiver coping. Our findings point to several policies that may ease caregiver burden and facilitate caregiver coping during childhood cancer treatment.

Patient narratives representing patient voices to inform research: a pilot qualitative study.

We are investigating the feasibility and effectiveness of establishing a library of patient narratives to inform patient-centered research in the U.S. Veterans Affairs organization. Using qualitative methods, we conducted a needs assessment of 15 researchers and then interviewed and videotaped 11 veterans with traumatic brain injury or diabetes. We developed a method for displaying the narratives to researchers modeled after a UK initiative called DIPEx and then performed preliminary usability testing. We found that it is not only feasible to provide researchers with patient narratives that could help guide their research, but that similar narratives might be useful to practitioners, health system decision makers, and other patients as well.