Right Care for Children: Top Five Do's and Don'ts.

Underuse and overuse of medical interventions, failure to use interventions known to be effective, and provision of tests or interventions in which benefits do not exceed harms are types of low-value care. The Lown Institute's Right Care Alliance Children's Health Council identified five "do" recommendations that highlight underuse and five "don't" recommendations that highlight overuse in children's health care. The five "do" recommendations include: do provide access to long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents, do use nonpharmacologic interventions first for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, do discuss quality of life for children with complex medical conditions using a shared decision-making model and access resources such as palliative care subspecialists, do promote childhood literacy development by providing free, age-appropriate books in clinical settings, and do screen for socioeconomic status of the patient and family and provide access to community health and wellness resources. The five "don't" recommendations include: don't routinely prescribe antibiotics in children two to 12 years of age with a middle ear infection, don't perform computed tomography of the head for children with minor head trauma, don't use albuterol in children with bronchiolitis, don't routinely screen for hyperlipidemia in children and adolescents, and don't routinely perform preparticipation sports evaluations. These 10 examples of underuse and overuse were identified with the intent of improving health care value and promoting "Right Care."

A novel approach to reducing admissions for children with sickle cell disease in pain crisis through individualization and standardization in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) is frequent in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) creating significant burden on patients, families, and emergency departments (ED). The objective of the project was to reduce the admission rate for children with SCD presenting to our ED with VOC by >20% within 6 months of initiating individualized pain plans (IPP). METHODS: A multi-disciplinary quality improvement team was assembled. A Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) format was employed. The IPP document was created in a unique folder within the electronic medical record. IPPs were created through retrospective chart review for our 80 highest resource users. Pediatric residents, ED residents, and ED attending physicians were instructed on use of the IPPs. Our study measured the presence of an IPP, adherence to the IPP, and time to opiate administration. Our primary outcome was admission rate. Length of stay and 72-hr return to the ED were assessed as balancing measures. RESULTS: Overall, admission rate decreased by 24% following implementation compared with the previous 5 years (P = 0.046). IPPs were created for 78% of patients and followed by ED staff in 86% of visits. Admission rate was significantly lower for patients receiving a second opiate dose within 45 min of the first dose (P < 0.01). There was no difference in readmission rate or 72-hr return rate to ED. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents an effective strategy to reduce admission rate for children with SCD presenting with VOC. Shorter time to second opiate dosing was also associated with reduced risk of admission.

Improving Time to Stat Intravenous Antibiotic Administration: An 8-Year Quality Initiative.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prompt antibiotics have been shown to improve outcomes in pediatric sepsis, which continues to be a leading cause of death in children. We describe the quality improvement (QI) efforts of a single academic children's hospital to improve antibiotic timeliness. METHODS: Using the electronic health record, we report time from order to the administration of stat intravenous (IV) antibiotics from 2012 to 2020 using statistical process control charts. We describe QI interventions initiated over the study period. These include the formation of a Pediatric Sepsis Committee, routine use of automated dispensing machines for stat IV antibiotics, creation of sepsis order sets, manual and automated sepsis screening implementation, participation in national sepsis QI collaboratives, creation of difficult intravenous access guidelines, and an automated notification system for charge nurses. As a balancing measure, we assessed stat IV antibiotic use normalized to total emergency department visits and inpatient days. RESULTS: Multiple quality improvement interventions were initiated and sustained under the direction of the hospital Pediatric Sepsis Committee. We improved our stat IV antibiotics given within 1 hour of order from 33% in 2012 to 77% in 2019 and maintained this through the end of the study period in July 2020. CONCLUSIONS: By using a multipronged quality improvement approach, we demonstrated consistent and sustained improvement in the timely administration of stat IV antibiotics over an 8-year period at our institution. Further study is needed to assess whether this is associated with reduced length of stay or improved survival in children with sepsis.

Aligning Patient Safety and Stewardship: A Harm Reduction Strategy for Children.

Purpose of review: Review important patient safety and stewardship concepts and use clinical examples to describe how they align to improve patient outcomes and reduce harm for children. Recent findings: Current evidence indicates that healthcare overuse is substantial. Unnecessary care leads to avoidable adverse events, anxiety and distress, and financial toxicity. Increases in antimicrobial resistance, venous thromboembolism, radiation exposure, and healthcare costs are examples of patient harm associated with a lack of stewardship. Studies indicate that many tools can increase standardization of care, improve resource utilization, and enhance safety culture to better align safety and stewardship. Summary: The principles of stewardship and parsimonious care can improve patient safety for children.

Patient, Provider, and Health Care System Characteristics Associated With Overuse in Bronchiolitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends against the routine use of ß-agonists, corticosteroids, antibiotics, chest radiographs, and viral testing in bronchiolitis, but use of these modalities continues. Our objective for this study was to determine the patient, provider, and health care system characteristics that are associated with receipt of low-value services. METHODS: Using the Virginia All-Payers Claims Database, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of children aged 0 to 23 months with bronchiolitis (code J21, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision) in 2018. We recorded medications within 3 days and chest radiography or viral testing within 1 day of diagnosis. Using Poisson regression, we identified characteristics associated with each type of overuse. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of children with bronchiolitis received ≥1 form of overuse, including 9% corticosteroids, 17% antibiotics, 20% ß-agonists, 26% respiratory syncytial virus testing, and 18% chest radiographs. Commercially insured children were more likely than publicly insured children to receive a low-value service (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.30; P < .0001). Children in emergency settings were more likely to receive a low-value service (aPR 1.24; 95% CI: 1.15-1.33; P < .0001) compared with children in inpatient settings. Children seen in rural locations were more likely than children seen in cities to receive a low-value service (aPR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.11-1.29; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Overuse in bronchiolitis remains common and occurs frequently in emergency and outpatient settings and rural locations. Quality improvement initiatives aimed at reducing overuse should include these clinical environments.

Discharge Criteria Decrease Variability and Improve Efficiency.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of discharge criteria on discharge readiness and length of stay (LOS). Discharge inefficiency is a common barrier to hospital flow, affecting admissions, discharges, cost, patient satisfaction, and quality of care. Our center identified increasing discharge efficiency as a method to improve flow and better meet the needs of our patients. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was assembled to examine discharge efficiency and flow. Discharge criteria were created for the 3 most common diagnoses on the hospital medicine service then expanded to 10 diagnoses 4 months into the project. Discharge workflow was evaluated through swim lane mapping, and barriers were evaluated through fishbone diagrams and a key driver diagram. Progress was assessed every 2 weeks through statistical process control charts. Additional interventions included provider education, daily review of criteria, and autotext added to daily notes. Our primary aim was to increase the percentage of patients discharged within 3 hours of meeting discharge criteria from 44% to 75% within 12 months of project implementation. RESULTS: Discharge within 3 hours as well as 2 hours of meeting criteria improved significantly, from 44% to 87% and from 33% to 78%, respectively. LOS for the 10 diagnoses decreased from 2.89 to 1.47 days, with greatest gains seen for patients with asthma, pneumonia, and bronchiolitis without a change in the 30-day readmission rate. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge criteria for common diagnoses may be an effective way to decrease variability and improve LOS for hospitalized children.

Things We Do For No Reason™: Routine Blood Culture Acquisition for Children Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Inspired by the ABIM Foundation's Choosing Wisely® campaign, the "Things We Do for No Reason™" (TWDFNR) series reviews practices that have become common parts of hospital care but may provide little value to our patients. Practices reviewed in the TWDFNR series do not represent "black and white" conclusions or clinical practice standards but are meant as a starting place for research and active discussions among hospitalists and patients. We invite you to be part of that discussion.

Learning from Each Other: A Multisite Collaborative to Reduce Electrolyte Testing.

Inpatient electrolyte testing rates vary significantly across pediatric hospitals. Despite evidence that unnecessary testing exists, providers still struggle with reducing electrolyte laboratory testing. We aimed to reduce serum electrolyte testing among pediatric inpatients by 20% across 5 sites within 6 months. METHODS: A national quality improvement collaborative evaluated standardized interventions for reducing inpatient serum electrolyte testing at 5 large tertiary and quaternary children's hospitals. The outcome measure was the rate of electrolyte laboratory tests per 10 patient-days. The interventions were adapted from a previous single-site improvement project and included cost card reminders, automated laboratory plans via electronic medical record, structured rounds discussions, and continued education. The collaborative utilized weekly conference calls to discuss Plan, Do, Study, Act cycles, and barriers to implementation efforts. RESULTS: The study included 17,149 patient-days across 5 hospitals. The baseline preintervention electrolyte laboratory testing rate mean was 4.82 laboratory tests per 10 patient-days. Postimplementation, special cause variation in testing rates shifted the mean to 4.19 laboratory tests per 10 patient-days, a 13% reduction. There was a wide variation in preintervention electrolyte testing rates and the effectiveness of interventions between the hospitals participating in the collaborative. CONCLUSIONS: This multisite improvement collaborative was able to rapidly disseminate and implement value improvement interventions leading to a reduction in electrolyte testing; however, we did not meet our goal of 20% testing reduction across all sites. Quality improvement collaboratives must consider variation in context when adapting previously successful single-center interventions to a wide variety of sites.

Change Theory Contributes to Choosing Wisely for Immune Thrombocytopenia.

OBJECTIVES: Despite 2011 guidelines in which it is suggested that treatment of acute immune thrombocytopenia purpura (aITP) is not needed for patients without significant bleeding, only 14% of children treated for aITP have bleeding symptoms. Our aim was to decrease the percentage of children with first-episode aITP who were unnecessarily treated by 50% within 12 months of guideline implementation. METHODS: An intervention was designed by using the precaution-adoption-process model. A standard-of-practice meeting was organized and focused on clinician readiness for change. After education on current evidence and common cognitive errors, consensus clinical guidelines were created. After implementation, an article in a statewide professional newsletter was published to educate community providers. Unnecessary treatment (UT) was defined as treatment of any patient who only had bruising and/or self-resolving nose bleeds. Statistical process control charts were used to track progress, midline shifts were determined by Nelson's rules, and hospital costs were derived from administrative billing data. RESULTS: One hundred children with aITP were seen from January 2013 to September 2018. UT decreased from 70% to a sustained rate of <30% (P = .008), including a mean of 7% over the past 12 months. The admission rate decreased from 100% to 52% (P = .013), and the total percentage of patients treated decreased from 100% to 48% (P = .016), with both numbers continuing to decline. No adverse bleeding events occurred. An estimated 12 admissions, 4 readmissions, and 5 adverse events were avoided annually. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated successful improvement in UT of aITP through an educational intervention informed by the precaution-adoption-process model change theory.