ABSTRACT
The fungal microbiota (mycobiota) is an integral part of the complex multikingdom microbial community colonizing the mammalian gastrointestinal tract and has an important role in immune regulation1-6. Although aberrant changes in the mycobiota have been linked to several diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease3-9, it is currently unknown whether fungal species captured by deep sequencing represent living organisms and whether specific fungi have functional consequences for disease development in affected individuals. Here we developed a translational platform for the functional analysis of the mycobiome at the fungal-strain- and patient-specific level. Combining high-resolution mycobiota sequencing, fungal culturomics and genomics, a CRISPR-Cas9-based fungal strain editing system, in vitro functional immunoreactivity assays and in vivo models, this platform enables the examination of host-fungal crosstalk in the human gut. We discovered a rich genetic diversity of opportunistic Candida albicans strains that dominate the colonic mucosa of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Among these human-gut-derived isolates, strains with high immune-cell-damaging capacity (HD strains) reflect the disease features of individual patients with ulcerative colitis and aggravated intestinal inflammation in vivo through IL-1ß-dependent mechanisms. Niche-specific inflammatory immunity and interleukin-17A-producing T helper cell (TH17 cell) antifungal responses by HD strains in the gut were dependent on the C. albicans-secreted peptide toxin candidalysin during the transition from a benign commensal to a pathobiont state. These findings reveal the strain-specific nature of host-fungal interactions in the human gut and highlight new diagnostic and therapeutic targets for diseases of inflammatory origin.
Subject(s)
Fungi , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Microbiota , Mycobiome , Animals , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Candida albicans , Fungi/genetics , Fungi/pathogenicity , Genetic Variation , Humans , Immunity , Inflammation , MammalsABSTRACT
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) results from a dysregulated interaction between the microbiota and a genetically susceptible host. Genetic studies have linked TNFSF15 polymorphisms and its protein TNF-like ligand 1A (TL1A) with IBD, but the functional role of TL1A is not known. Here, we found that adherent IBD-associated microbiota induced TL1A release from CX3CR1+ mononuclear phagocytes (MNPs). Using cell-specific genetic deletion models, we identified an essential role for CX3CR1+MNP-derived TL1A in driving group 3 innate lymphoid cell (ILC3) production of interleukin-22 and mucosal healing during acute colitis. In contrast to this protective role in acute colitis, TL1A-dependent expression of co-stimulatory molecule OX40L in MHCII+ ILC3s during colitis led to co-stimulation of antigen-specific T cells that was required for chronic T cell colitis. These results identify a role for ILC3s in activating intestinal T cells and reveal a central role for TL1A in promoting ILC3 barrier immunity during colitis.
Subject(s)
Colitis/immunology , Immunity, Innate/immunology , Lymphocytes/immunology , Microbiota/immunology , Tumor Necrosis Factor Ligand Superfamily Member 15/immunology , Adult , Aged , Animals , Colitis/genetics , Colitis/metabolism , Female , Humans , Immunity, Innate/genetics , Interleukins/genetics , Interleukins/immunology , Interleukins/metabolism , Intestinal Mucosa/immunology , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Intestinal Mucosa/microbiology , Lymphocyte Activation/genetics , Lymphocyte Activation/immunology , Lymphocytes/metabolism , Male , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Mice, Transgenic , Microbiota/physiology , Middle Aged , Phagocytes/cytology , Phagocytes/immunology , Phagocytes/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Tumor Necrosis Factor Ligand Superfamily Member 15/genetics , Tumor Necrosis Factor Ligand Superfamily Member 15/metabolism , Young Adult , Interleukin-22ABSTRACT
Whether or not populations diverge with respect to the genetic contribution to risk of specific complex diseases is relevant to understanding the evolution of susceptibility and origins of health disparities. Here, we describe a large-scale whole-genome sequencing study of inflammatory bowel disease encompassing 1,774 affected individuals and 1,644 healthy control Americans with African ancestry (African Americans). Although no new loci for inflammatory bowel disease are discovered at genome-wide significance levels, we identify numerous instances of differential effect sizes in combination with divergent allele frequencies. For example, the major effect at PTGER4 fine maps to a single credible interval of 22 SNPs corresponding to one of four independent associations at the locus in European ancestry individuals but with an elevated odds ratio for Crohn disease in African Americans. A rare variant aggregate analysis implicates Ca2+-binding neuro-immunomodulator CALB2 in ulcerative colitis. Highly significant overall overlap of common variant risk for inflammatory bowel disease susceptibility between individuals with African and European ancestries was observed, with 41 of 241 previously known lead variants replicated and overall correlations in effect sizes of 0.68 for combined inflammatory bowel disease. Nevertheless, subtle differences influence the performance of polygenic risk scores, and we show that ancestry-appropriate weights significantly improve polygenic prediction in the highest percentiles of risk. The median amount of variance explained per locus remains the same in African and European cohorts, providing evidence for compensation of effect sizes as allele frequencies diverge, as expected under a highly polygenic model of disease.
Subject(s)
Calbindin 2/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/genetics , Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype/genetics , Black or African American/genetics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colitis, Ulcerative/genetics , Colitis, Ulcerative/pathology , Crohn Disease/genetics , Crohn Disease/pathology , Female , Gene Frequency , Genome-Wide Association Study , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/pathology , Male , Multifactorial Inheritance/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , White People/genetics , Whole Genome SequencingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and a history of cancer, retrospective studies have suggested that exposure to immunosuppressive agents does not increase the risk of incident (recurrent or new) cancer compared with unexposed patients. SAPPHIRE is a prospective registry aimed at addressing this issue. METHODS: Since 2016, patients with IBD and confirmed index cancer before enrollment were followed up annually. Patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation at enrollment, or recurrent cancer within 5 years, were excluded. The primary outcome was development of incident cancer related to exposure to immunosuppressive medications. RESULTS: Among 305 patients (47% male, 88% white), the median age at IBD diagnosis and cancer were 32 and 52 years, respectively. Index cancers were solid organ (46%), dermatologic (32%), gastrointestinal (13%), and hematologic (9%). During a median follow-up period of 4.8 years, 210 patients (69%) were exposed to immunosuppressive therapy and 46 patients (15%) developed incident cancers (25 new, 21 recurrent). In unadjusted analysis, the crude rate of incident cancer in unexposed patients was 2.58 per 100 person-years vs 4.78 per 100 person-years (relative risk, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.92-3.73) for immunosuppression-exposed patients. In a proportional hazards model adjusting for sex, smoking history, age and stage at index malignancy, and nonmelanoma skin cancer, no significant association was found between receipt of immunosuppression and incident cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.69-2.90), or with any major drug class. CONCLUSIONS: In this interim analysis of patients with IBD and a history of cancer, despite numerically increased adjusted hazard ratios, we did not find a statistically significant association between subsequent exposure to immunosuppressive therapies and development of incident cancers.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic condition that may require long-term treatment. We report the final efficacy and safety results of the UNIFI long-term extension study of ustekinumab in patients with UC through 4 years. METHODS: Ustekinumab induction responders who completed 44 weeks of maintenance treatment and agreed to enter the long-term extension continued their subcutaneous maintenance therapy (90 mg ustekinumab every 8 or 12 weeks [q8w or q12w] or placebo). Starting at week 56, randomized patients could receive dose adjustment to 90 mg q8w. Symptoms and adverse events were assessed through the study; endoscopic assessment was conducted at week 200. RESULTS: Of the 348 patients randomized to subcutaneous ustekinumab at maintenance baseline (q8w and q12w combined), 55.2% were in symptomatic remission at week 200. A greater proportion of biologic-naive patients (67.2% [117/174]) were in symptomatic remission than those with a history of biologic failure (41.6% [67/161]). Among patients in symptomatic remission at week 200, 96.4% were corticosteroid-free. Of the 171 patients with endoscopic evaluation at week 200, 81.6% (71/87) in the q12w group and 79.8% (67/84) in the q8w group had endoscopic improvement. From weeks 156 to the final safety visit (up to week 220), no deaths, major adverse cardiovascular events, or tuberculosis occurred in patients receiving ustekinumab. Nasopharyngitis, UC worsening, and upper respiratory tract infections were the most frequently reported adverse events. DISCUSSION: The long-term efficacy of ustekinumab maintenance in patients with UC was confirmed through 4 years. No new safety signals were observed. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02407236.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA improves the quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis by the removal of diseased large bowel and preservation of the natural route of defecation. Although the surgery may improve preexisting extraintestinal manifestations in the joints, skin, and eyes, extraintestinal manifestations, particularly primary sclerosing cholangitis, can persist after colectomy. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review of diagnosis and treatment of liver, joint, skin, and eye manifestations in patients with restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA for ulcerative colitis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database. STUDY SELECTION: Relevant articles on primary sclerosing cholangitis and extraintestinal manifestations in ileal pouches published between January 2001 and July 2023 in English were included on the basis of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. INTERVENTION: Diagnosis and treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis and extraintestinal manifestations in patients with restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association between primary sclerosing cholangitis, extraintestinal manifestations, and inflammatory disorders of the pouch and their management. RESULTS: Primary sclerosing cholangitis and extraintestinal manifestations are associated with pouchitis, particularly chronic pouchitis. Primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with chronic pouchitis, enteritis, and possible pouch neoplasia. However, the disease severity and course of primary sclerosing cholangitis and pouchitis do not appear to be parallel. Despite the fact that oral vancomycin or budesonide have been used to treat primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated pouchitis, their impact on the disease course of primary sclerosing cholangitis is not known. Biological therapy for chronic inflammatory disorders of the pouch may also be beneficial for the concurrent extraintestinal manifestations of the joints, skin, and eyes. However, studies on the correlation between the severity of inflammatory pouch disorders and the severity of joint, skin, and eye diseases are lacking. LIMITATIONS: This is a qualitative, not quantitative, review of case series and case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Primary sclerosing cholangitis and extraintestinal manifestations of the joints, skin, and eyes appear to be associated with inflammatory disorders of the ileal pouch. Although the treatment of pouchitis does not seem to affect the disease course of primary sclerosing cholangitis, effective therapy of inflammatory pouch disorders, particularly with biologics, likely benefits concurrent disorders of the joints, skin, and eyes. See video from the symposium .
Subject(s)
Cholangitis, Sclerosing , Colitis, Ulcerative , Pouchitis , Proctocolectomy, Restorative , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/complications , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/surgery , Humans , Proctocolectomy, Restorative/adverse effects , Proctocolectomy, Restorative/methods , Pouchitis/etiology , Pouchitis/therapy , Pouchitis/diagnosis , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery , Colonic Pouches/adverse effects , Eye Diseases/etiology , Skin Diseases/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Active-comparator trials are important to inform patient and physician choice. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with either ustekinumab or adalimumab in biologic-naive patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, active-comparator, phase 3b trial (SEAVUE) at 121 hospitals or private practices in 18 countries. We included biologic-naive patients aged 18 years or older with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of 220-450, who had not responded to or were intolerant to conventional therapy (or were corticosteroid dependent) and had at least one ulcer of any size at baseline endoscopic evaluation. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; via an interactive web response system) to receive ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg intravenously on day 0, then 90 mg subcutaneously once every 8 weeks) or adalimumab (160 mg on day 0, 80 mg at 2 weeks, then 40 mg once every 2 weeks, subcutaneously) through week 56. Study treatments were administered as monotherapy and without dose modifications. Patients, investigators, and study site personnel were masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were in clinical remission (CDAI score <150) at week 52 in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03464136, and EudraCT, 2017-004209-41. FINDINGS: Between June 28, 2018, and Dec 12, 2019, 633 patients were assessed for eligibility and 386 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ustekinumab (n=191) or adalimumab (n=195). 29 (15%) of 191 patients in the ustekinumab group and 46 (24%) of 195 in the adalimumab group discontinued study treatment before week 52. There was no significant difference between the ustekinumab and adalimumab groups in the occurrence of the primary endpoint; at week 52, 124 (65%) of 191 patients in the ustekinumab group versus 119 (61%) of 195 in the adalimumab group were in clinical remission (between-group difference 4%, 95% CI -6 to 14; p=0·42). Safety for both groups was consistent with previous reports. Serious infections were reported in four (2%) of 191 patients in the ustekinumab group and five (3%) of 195 in the adalimumab group. No deaths occurred through week 52 of the study. INTERPRETATION: Both ustekinumab and adalimumab monotherapies were highly effective in this population of biologic-naive patients, with no difference in the primary outcome between the drugs. FUNDING: Janssen Scientific Affairs.
Subject(s)
Biological Products , Crohn Disease , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Remission Induction , Treatment Outcome , Ustekinumab/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an emerging treatment modality for ulcerative colitis (UC). Several randomized controlled trials have shown efficacy for FMT in the treatment of UC, but a better understanding of the transferable microbiota and their immune impact is needed to develop more efficient microbiome-based therapies for UC. METHODS: Metagenomic analysis and strain tracking was performed on 60 donor and recipient samples receiving FMT for active UC. Sorting and sequencing of immunoglobulin (Ig) A-coated microbiota (called IgA-seq) was used to define immune-reactive microbiota. Colonization of germ-free or genetically engineered mice with patient-derived strains was performed to determine the mechanism of microbial impact on intestinal immunity. RESULTS: Metagenomic analysis defined a core set of donor-derived transferable bacterial strains in UC subjects achieving clinical response, which predicted response in an independent trial of FMT for UC. IgA-seq of FMT recipient samples and gnotobiotic mice colonized with donor microbiota identified Odoribacter splanchnicus as a transferable strain shaping mucosal immunity, which correlated with clinical response and the induction of mucosal regulatory T cells. Colonization of mice with O splanchnicus led to an increase in Foxp3+/RORγt+ regulatory T cells, induction of interleukin (IL) 10, and production of short chain fatty acids, all of which were required for O splanchnicus to limit colitis in mouse models. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides the first evidence of transferable, donor-derived strains that correlate with clinical response to FMT in UC and reveals O splanchnicus as a key component promoting both metabolic and immune cell protection from colitis. These mechanistic features will help enable strategies to enhance the efficacy of microbial therapy for UC. Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT02516384.
Subject(s)
Bacteroidetes/immunology , Colitis/therapy , Colon/microbiology , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Intestinal Mucosa/microbiology , Animals , Bacteroidetes/genetics , Bacteroidetes/metabolism , Clinical Trials as Topic , Colitis/immunology , Colitis/metabolism , Colitis/microbiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Colitis, Ulcerative/immunology , Colitis, Ulcerative/metabolism , Colitis, Ulcerative/microbiology , Colon/immunology , Colon/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Forkhead Transcription Factors/metabolism , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/immunology , Germ-Free Life , Humans , Immunity, Mucosal , Immunoglobulin A/genetics , Immunoglobulin A/metabolism , Intestinal Mucosa/immunology , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Intraepithelial Lymphocytes/immunology , Intraepithelial Lymphocytes/metabolism , Intraepithelial Lymphocytes/microbiology , Metagenome , Metagenomics , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 1, Group F, Member 3/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/microbiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: End points to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are evolving. Given the heterogeneity in current outcome measures, harmonizing end points in a core outcome set for randomized controlled trials is a priority for drug development in inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Candidate outcome domains and outcome measures were generated from systematic literature reviews and patient engagement surveys and interviews. An iterative Delphi process was conducted to establish consensus: panelists anonymously voted on items using a 9-point Likert scale, and feedback was incorporated between rounds to refine statements. Consensus meetings were held to ratify the outcome domains and core outcome measures. Stakeholders were recruited internationally, and included gastroenterologists, colorectal surgeons, methodologists, and clinical trialists. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients and 53 experts participated. Patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, endoscopy, biomarkers, and safety were considered core domains; histopathology was an additional domain for UC. In CD, there was consensus to use the 2-item patient-reported outcome (ie, abdominal pain and stool frequency), Crohn's Disease Activity Index, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, and co-primary end points of symptomatic remission and endoscopic response. In UC, there was consensus to use the 9-point Mayo Clinic Score, fecal urgency, Robarts Histopathology Index or Geboes Score, fecal calprotectin, and a composite primary end point including both symptomatic and endoscopic remission. Safety outcomes should be reported using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary collaboration involving patients and clinical experts has produced the first core outcome set that can be applied to randomized controlled trials of CD and UC.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Biomarkers , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Chronic Disease , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Consensus , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/therapy , Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with quiescent disease are similar to the general population. Data from the Pregnancy Inflammatory bowel disease And Neonatal Outcomes (PIANO) registry have demonstrated the safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFs) agents and thiopurines in pregnancy. The objective of this study was to provide information from the PIANO registry on maternal and fetal outcomes in patients exposed to the newer biologics ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ). METHODS: In this multicenter prospective observational study, we included pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and a diagnosis of IBD. Questionnaires were administered to women at study intake, each subsequent trimester, delivery, and at 4, 9, and 12 months after birth. Bivariate analyses were utilized to determine the independent effects of specific drug classes on outcomes. The exposure cohorts were VDZ, UST, anti-TNFs, immunomodulators, and combination with anti-TNFs and immunomodulators. All were compared to no exposure and to biologics/immunomodulators. RESULTS: There were 1669 completed pregnancies with 1610 live births. Maternal mean age was 32.1 (SD 4.6) years at delivery with 66 VDZ and 47 UST exposed. Women on UST were more likely to have Crohn's disease. There was no increased risk of spontaneous abortion, small for gestational age, low birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit stay, congenital malformations, or intrauterine growth restriction with in utero VDZ or UST exposure. The rate of preterm birth was lower (0.0%) for UST-exposed as compared to other groups including VDZ (13.8%), anti-TNF (8.2%), combination therapy (14.2%), immunomodulator (12.3%), and unexposed (9.7%)(p = 0.03). Rates of serious infections at birth, 4 months, and within the first 12 months of life were comparable among all groups. Nonserious infections were lower at 12 months in UST exposed pregnancies. There was no increased risk signal for placental complications in the VDZ cohort. UST infant concentrations at birth were increased whereas VDZ concentrations were overall decreased compared to maternal serum drug concentration. CONCLUSION: This analysis of UST and VDZ exposure during pregnancy suggests no increase in complications compared to TNFs, immunomodulators and combination TNFs/immunomodulators. No signal was found for increased placental events with either therapy. Continuation of UST and VDZ throughout pregnancy is recommended.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: This study used a retrospective, multicenter, multinational consortium of UST-treated CD patients. Data included patient demographics, disease phenotype, disease activity, treatment history, and concomitant medications. Cumulative rates of clinical, steroid-free, endoscopic, and radiographic remissions were assessed using time-to-event analysis, and clinical predictors were assessed by using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. Serious infections and adverse events were defined as those requiring hospitalization or treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 1,113 patients (51.8% female, 90% prior antitumor necrosis factor exposure) were included, with a median follow-up of 386 days. Cumulative rates of clinical, steroid-free, endoscopic, and radiographic remissions at 12 months were 40%, 32%, 39%, and 30%, respectively. Biologic-naive patients achieved significantly higher rates of clinical and endoscopic remissions at 63% and 55%, respectively. On multivariable analyses, prior antitumor necrosis factor (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.99) and vedolizumab exposure (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.88) were independently associated with lower likelihoods of achieving endoscopic remission. In patients who experienced loss of remission, 77 of 102 (75%) underwent dose optimization, and 44 of 77 (57%) achieved clinical response. An additional 152 of 681 patients (22.3%) were dose-optimized because of primary nonresponse incomplete response to UST, of whom 40.1% (61 of 152) responded. Serious infections occurred in 3.4% of patients while other noninfectious adverse events (lymphoma [n = 1], arthralgia [n = 6], rash [n = 6], headache [n = 3], hepatitis [n = 3], hair loss [n = 3], neuropathy [n = 1], and vasculitis [n = 1]) occurred in 2.4% of patients. DISCUSSION: UST represents a safe and effective treatment option for CD, with 40% of patients from a highly refractory cohort achieving clinical remission by 12 months. The greatest treatment effect of UST was seen in biologic-naive patients, and dose escalation may recapture clinical response.
Subject(s)
Biological Products , Crohn Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Ustekinumab/adverse effects , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Remission Induction , Treatment Outcome , Necrosis/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The serum-based endoscopic healing index (EHI) test identifies endoscopic Crohn's disease (CD) activity. Data are lacking on the relationship between EHI with other endpoints. We assessed the relationship between EHI and the simplified Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on patients with CD with either an EHI or fecal calprotectin (FCAL) within 90 days of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using area under the receiver operator characteristics. Proportions with any, severe, and terminal ileum MR inflammation were compared above/below identified thresholds for both EHI and FCAL. RESULTS: A total of 241 MREs paired to either EHI or FCAL from 155 patients were included. Both EHI and FCAL had similar accuracy to diagnose inflammation (area under the receiver operator characteristics: EHI: 0.635 to 0.651, FCAL: 0.680 to 0.708). Optimal EHI values were 42 and 26 for inflammation on MRE and endoscopy, respectively. Patients with EHI ≥42 (100% vs. 63%, P=0.002), FCAL >50 µg/g (87% vs. 64%, P<0.001) and FCAL >250 µg/g (90% vs. 75%, P=0.02) had higher rates of simplified Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity ≥1 compared with lower values. EHI differentiated ileitis numerically more than FCAL (delta: 24% to 25% vs. 11% to 21%). Patients with FCAL ≥50 µg/g had higher rates of severe inflammation compared with FCAL <50 µg/g (75% vs. 47%, P<0.001), whereas smaller differentiation existed for EHI threshold of 42 (63% vs. 49%, P=0.35). CONCLUSION: Both EHI and FCAL were specific in their confirmation of inflammation and disease activity on MRE in patients with CD. However, MRE-detected inflammation was frequently present in the presence of low EHI and FCAL in similar proportions.
ABSTRACT
Immunization against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 reduces transmission1,2 and severe outcomes. However, little is known regarding the impact of immune-mediated diseases and immunosuppressive medications on the efficacy of vaccination. Vaccination immunity is transient, with breakthrough cases increasing at longer time intervals since the last dose.3,4 Although there are data on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine on early seroconversion in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD),5 no data in the same cohort exist describing the durability of these antibodies over time. We sought to investigate the impact of IBD and its therapies on postvaccination antibody response and kinetics of immunogenicity decline, because these findings may better inform clinical guidelines and recommendations on precautions and booster vaccination.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Antibodies, Viral/therapeutic use , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Chronic Disease , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , VaccinationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize emerging data on the safety and effectiveness of dual biologic therapy in combination or with tofacitinib in patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Through a systematic search of multiple electronic databases through November 9, 2020, we identified cohort studies or case series (>10 patients) reporting the safety and effectiveness of simultaneous use of biologic agents in combination or with tofacitinib in patients with IBD. Rates of adverse events, clinical remission, and endoscopic remission were synthesized using pooled data, and we identified factors associated with successful dual therapy. RESULTS: We identified 30 studies reporting 288 trials of dual biologic or small molecule therapy in 279 patients (76% Crohn's disease; median duration of treatment 24 weeks (IQR25-IQR75 1332)). The main indications for dual therapy included medically refractory IBD (81%) and concurrent extra-intestinal manifestations or rheumatologic disease (12%). The most common combinations of dual therapy included tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists & anti-integrins (48%), ustekinumab & anti-integrins (19%); 61% of patients had previously failed at least one of the two therapies used in combination. Over a median follow-up of 32 weeks (IQR25-IQR75 24-52), pooled rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 31% (95% CI, 13%-54%) and 6.5% (95% CI, 2.1%-13.1%); pooled rates of clinical and endoscopic remission were 59% (95% CI, 42%-74%), and 34% (95% CI, 23%-46%), respectively. 12% (95% CI, 4%-24%) of patients required surgery. Rates of success were higher in patients on dual therapy due to EIM. Heterogeneity was not significant for endoscopic response (P = .88, I2 = 0%), endoscopic remission (P = .44, I2 = 0%), and malignancy (P = .87, I2 = 0%). However, significant heterogeneity existed for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Dual biologic or small molecule therapy may be a possible option in highly selected, refractory IBD patients at specialized centers. Higher quality combination of therapies with a significant improvement in the quality of data is required prior to more widespread use.
Subject(s)
Biological Products , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/chemically induced , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Ustekinumab/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Disability in patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) after total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is not well understood. The aim of this study was to compare disability in patients with IPAA vs medically managed UC, and identify predictors of disability. METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional study performed at 5 academic institutions in New York City. Patients with medically or surgically treated UC were recruited. Clinical and socioeconomic data were collected, and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disability Index (IBD-DI) was administered to eligible patients. Predictors of moderate-severe disability (IBD-DI ≥35) were assessed in univariable and multivariable models. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients with IPAA and 128 patients with medically managed UC completed the IBD-DI. Among patients with IPAA and UC, 35 (37.2%) and 30 (23.4%) had moderate-severe disability, respectively. Patients with IPAA had significantly greater IBD-DI scores compared with patients with medically managed UC (29.8 vs 17.9; P < .001). When stratified by disease activity, patients with active IPAA disease had significantly greater median IBD-DI scores compared with patients with active UC (44.2 vs 30.4; P = .01), and patients with inactive IPAA disease had significantly greater median IBD-DI scores compared with patients with inactive UC (23.1 vs 12.5; P < .001). Moderate-severe disability in patients with IPAA was associated with female sex, active disease, and public insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IPAA have higher disability scores than patients with UC, even after adjustment for disease activity. Female sex and public insurance are predictive of significant disability in patients with IPAA.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Colitis , Colonic Pouches , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Proctocolectomy, Restorative , Colitis/etiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/etiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery , Colonic Pouches/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Proctocolectomy, Restorative/adverse effects , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study compared the effectiveness of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD) to the Mediterranean diet (MD) as treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) with mild to moderate symptoms. METHODS: Adult patients with CD and with mild-to-moderate symptoms were randomly assigned 1:1 to consume the MD or SCD for 12 weeks. For the first 6 weeks, participants received prepared meals and snacks according to their assigned diet. After 6 weeks, participants were instructed to follow the diet independently. The primary outcome was symptomatic remission at week 6. Key secondary outcomes at week 6 included fecal calprotectin (FC) response (FC <250 µg/g and reduction by >50% among those with baseline FC >250 µg/g) and C-reactive protein (CRP) response (high-sensitivity CRP <5 mg/L and >50% reduction from baseline among those with high-sensitivity CRP >5 mg/L). RESULTS: The study randomized 194 patients, and 191 were included in the efficacy analyses. The percentage of participants who achieved symptomatic remission at week 6 was not superior with the SCD (SCD, 46.5%; MD, 43.5%; P = .77). FC response was achieved in 8 of 23 participants (34.8%) with the SCD and in 4 of 13 participants (30.8%) with the MD (P = .83). CRP response was achieved in 2 of 37 participants (5.4%) with the SCD and in 1 of 28 participants (3.6%) with the MD (P = .68). CONCLUSIONS: The SCD was not superior to the MD to achieve symptomatic remission, FC response, and CRP response. CRP response was uncommon. Given these results, the greater ease of following the MD and other health benefits associated with the MD, the MD may be preferred to the SCD for most patients with CD with mild to moderate symptoms. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03058679.
Subject(s)
Crohn Disease/diet therapy , Diet, Mediterranean , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Crohn Disease/blood , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Crohn Disease/microbiology , Diet, Mediterranean/adverse effects , Dietary Carbohydrates/adverse effects , Feces/chemistry , Feces/microbiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Remission Induction , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis who develop neoplasia or fail medical therapy and require colectomy, restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA is often indicated. Although often well tolerated, IPAA can be complicated by cuffitis or inflammation of the remaining rectal cuff. Although much has been published on this subject, there is no clear and comprehensive synthesis of the literature regarding cuffitis. METHODS: Our systematic literature review analyzes 34 articles to assess the frequency, cause, pathogenesis, diagnosis, classification, complications, and treatment of cuffitis. RESULTS: Cuffitis occurs in an estimated 10.2% to 30.1% of pouch patients. Purported risk factors include rectal cuff length >2 cm, pouch-rectal anastomosis, stapled anastomosis, J-pouch configuration, 2- or 3-stage IPAA, preoperative Clostridium difficile infection, toxic megacolon, fulminant colitis, preoperative biologic use, medically refractory disease, immunomodulator/steroids use within 3 months of surgery, extraintestinal manifestations of IBD, and BMI <18.5 kg/m2 at the time of colectomy. Adverse consequences associated with cuffitis include decreased quality-of-life scores, increased risk for pouchitis, pouch failure, pouch excision, and pouch neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Given the similarities between pouchitis and cuffitis, diagnosis and treatment of cuffitis should proceed according to the International Ileal Pouch Consortium guidelines. This review found that the majority of the current literature fails to distinguish between classic cuffitis (a form of reminant ulcerative proctitis) and nonclassic cuffitis (resulting from other causes). Further work is needed to distinguish the unique risk factors and endoscopic characteristics associated with each subtype, and further randomized clinical trials should be conducted to strengthen the evidence for treatment options.
Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli , Colitis, Ulcerative , Colonic Pouches , Pouchitis , Proctocolectomy, Restorative , Humans , Pouchitis/diagnosis , Pouchitis/etiology , Pouchitis/therapy , Proctocolectomy, Restorative/adverse effects , Colonic Pouches/adverse effects , Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Delays in biologic or small molecule medication administration are associated with increased adverse events, hospitalization, and surgery in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We evaluated the impact of a quality improvement (QI) intervention on the time to administration of biologics or small molecules (TABS) in IBD. METHODS: Data were retrospectively extracted for IBD patients prescribed biologics or small molecules from a convenience sample of providers participating in an accredited QI educational intervention (baseline cohort). Subsequent to the intervention, data were prospectively collected from patients prescribed these medications (postintervention cohort). Dates related to steps between a treatment decision to medication administration were collected. The primary outcome compared TABS in baseline and postintervention cohorts. RESULTS: Eighteen physicians provided survey and patient data for 200 patients in each cohort (n=400). The median time to medication administration (TABS) decreased from baseline to postintervention cohorts (30 vs. 26 d, P=0.04). Emergency room visits before medication administration also decreased (25.5% vs. 12.5%, P=0.001). Similar numerical TABS reductions were observed in subgroups limited to physicians providing patients to both cohorts and for individual medications prescribed. Primary contributors to delays included filling prescriptions subsequent to insurance approval and dispensation subsequent to this. CONCLUSIONS: A QI intervention successfully reduced medication administration times (TABS) by accelerating provider-dependent steps. This intervention was associated with reduced emergency room visits. We propose TABS as a quality metric to assess the effective delivery of therapies in IBD. Further evaluation of QI interventions, patient education on prescription drug insurance, and quality metrics are warranted.
Subject(s)
Biological Products , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Biological Products/adverse effects , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Quality Improvement , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: An immune component of inflammatory bowel disease is up-regulated tumor necrosis factor-like ligand 1A (TL1A). Anti-TL1A antibodies such as PF-06480605, a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, may have therapeutic potential. METHODS: This Phase 2a, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study (TUSCANY) evaluated safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity in PF-06480605-treated participants with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Participants received 500 mg intravenous PF-06480605 every 2 weeks, 7 doses total, with a 3-month follow-up period. Primary safety and efficacy endpoints were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and week 14 endoscopic improvement (EI) (Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 or 1), respectively. Secondary endpoints included total soluble TL1A (free/drug-bound) (sTL1A), incidence of anti-drug and neutralizing antibodies, PF-06480605 concentrations, and changes in fecal calprotectin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Histology was assessed at week 14. RESULTS: The study enrolled 50 participants; 42 completed. Of 109 treatment-emergent AEs, 18 were treatment-related. The most common AEs were UC disease exacerbation and arthralgia (6 participants each). Four serious AEs, no deaths, and no malignancies were reported. Week 14 EI was observed in a statistically significant proportion of participants (38.2% [uniformly minimum-variance unbiased estimator, per protocol population]). Minimal histologic disease was observed after treatment (Robarts Histopathology Index ≤5: 33.3%; Geboes Index ≤3.2: 47.6%). sTL1A increase over time from baseline indicated sustained target engagement. Forty-one participants (82%) tested positive for anti-drug antibodies and 5 (10%) for neutralizing antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: PF-06480605 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and statistically significant EI in participants with moderate to severe UC, warranting further study in a larger participant cohort. Tissue histopathology analyses support this conclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT02840721.