Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 156
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Cell ; 173(3): 624-633.e8, 2018 04 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29656892

ABSTRACT

CTLA-4 immune checkpoint blockade is clinically effective in a subset of patients with metastatic melanoma. We identify a subcluster of MAGE-A cancer-germline antigens, located within a narrow 75 kb region of chromosome Xq28, that predicts resistance uniquely to blockade of CTLA-4, but not PD-1. We validate this gene expression signature in an independent anti-CTLA-4-treated cohort and show its specificity to the CTLA-4 pathway with two independent anti-PD-1-treated cohorts. Autophagy, a process critical for optimal anti-cancer immunity, has previously been shown to be suppressed by the MAGE-TRIM28 ubiquitin ligase in vitro. We now show that the expression of the key autophagosome component LC3B and other activators of autophagy are negatively associated with MAGE-A protein levels in human melanomas, including samples from patients with resistance to CTLA-4 blockade. Our findings implicate autophagy suppression in resistance to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma, suggesting exploitation of autophagy induction for potential therapeutic synergy with CTLA-4 inhibitors.


Subject(s)
CTLA-4 Antigen/genetics , CTLA-4 Antigen/immunology , Epigenesis, Genetic , Germ-Line Mutation , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antigens, Neoplasm/genetics , Antigens, Neoplasm/immunology , Autophagy , Cell Line, Tumor , DNA Methylation , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Immunotherapy , Ipilimumab/pharmacology , Male , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma-Specific Antigens/genetics , Melanoma-Specific Antigens/immunology , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/immunology
2.
Cell ; 175(4): 984-997.e24, 2018 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30388455

ABSTRACT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) produce durable responses in some melanoma patients, but many patients derive no clinical benefit, and the molecular underpinnings of such resistance remain elusive. Here, we leveraged single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) from 33 melanoma tumors and computational analyses to interrogate malignant cell states that promote immune evasion. We identified a resistance program expressed by malignant cells that is associated with T cell exclusion and immune evasion. The program is expressed prior to immunotherapy, characterizes cold niches in situ, and predicts clinical responses to anti-PD-1 therapy in an independent cohort of 112 melanoma patients. CDK4/6-inhibition represses this program in individual malignant cells, induces senescence, and reduces melanoma tumor outgrowth in mouse models in vivo when given in combination with immunotherapy. Our study provides a high-resolution landscape of ICI-resistant cell states, identifies clinically predictive signatures, and suggests new therapeutic strategies to overcome immunotherapy resistance.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/antagonists & inhibitors , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6/antagonists & inhibitors , Melanoma/immunology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Tumor Escape , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Cell Line, Tumor , Female , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Male , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/therapy , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Middle Aged , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology
3.
Int J Cancer ; 2024 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38975881

ABSTRACT

This study investigated whether adjuvant treatments in stage III cutaneous melanoma (CM) influenced patterns of recurrence. Patients with primary (n = 1033) or relapsed CM (n = 350) who received adjuvant therapies with Nivolumab (N), Pembrolizumab (P), or Dabrafenib and Trametinib (D + T) were extracted from the prospective multicenter real-world skin cancer registry ADOReg. Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), organ-specific DMFS, and overall survival (OS). For primary cases, D + T indicated an improved PFS (1- and 2-year PFS: 90.9%; 82.7%) as compared to P (81.0%, 73.9%; p = .0208), or N (83.8%, 75.2%; p = .0539). BRAF-mutated(mut) CM demonstrated significantly lower PFS (p = .0022) and decreased DMFS (p = .0580) when treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) instead of D + T. Besides, NRAS-mut CM tended to perform worse than wt CM upon ICI (PFS: p = .1349; DMFS: p = .0540). OS was similar between the groups. Relapsed cases showed decreased PFS, DMFS, and OS in comparison to primary (all: p < .001), without significant differences between the subgroups. Organ-specific DMFS was significantly altered for primary cases with bone (p = .0367) or brain metastases (p = .0202). In relapsed CM, the frequency of liver (D + T: 1.5%; P: 12%; N: 9%) and LN metastases (D + T: 1.5%; P: 12%; N: 10.2%) was significantly lower with adjuvant D + T than ICI. NRAS-mut CM showed increased recurrence in primary and relapsed cases. These data show that adjuvant D + T is superior to ICI in primary BRAF-mut CM.

4.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(43)2021 10 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34670835

ABSTRACT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) have revolutionized the treatment of melanoma patients. Based on early studies addressing the mechanism of action, it was assumed that PD-1 blockade mostly influences T cell responses at the tumor site. However, recent work has demonstrated that PD-1 blockade can influence the T cell compartment in peripheral blood. If the activation of circulating, tumor-reactive T cells would form an important mechanism of action of PD-1 blockade, it may be predicted that such blockade would alter either the frequency and/or the breadth of the tumor-reactive CD8 T cell response. To address this question, we analyzed CD8 T cell responses toward 71 melanoma-associated epitopes in peripheral blood of 24 melanoma patients. We show that both the frequency and the breadth of the circulating melanoma-reactive CD8 T cell response was unaltered upon PD-1 blockade. In contrast, a broadening of the circulating melanoma-reactive CD8 T cell response was observed upon CTLA-4 blockade, in concordance with our prior data. Based on these results, we conclude that PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade have distinct mechanisms of action. In addition, the data provide an argument in favor of the hypothesis that anti-PD-1 therapy may primarily act at the tumor site.


Subject(s)
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/immunology , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/blood , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Female , Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2/blood , Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2/immunology , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Kinetics , Lymphocyte Activation/drug effects , Lymphocyte Activation/immunology , Male , Melanoma-Specific Antigens/blood , Melanoma-Specific Antigens/immunology , Middle Aged , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta/blood , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta/immunology , Receptors, CXCR5/blood , Receptors, CXCR5/immunology
5.
Lancet ; 400(10358): 1117-1129, 2022 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36099927

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The IMMUNED trial previously showed significant improvements in recurrence-free survival for adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab as well as for adjuvant nivolumab alone in patients with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease after resection or radiotherapy. Here, we report the final analysis, including overall survival data. METHODS: IMMUNED was an investigator-sponsored, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm, phase 2 trial conducted in 20 academic medical centres in Germany. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease after surgery or radiotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks), nivolumab monotherapy (nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks), or matching placebo, for up to 1 year. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints were time-to-recurrence, overall survival, progression-free survival or recurrence-free survival 2 (in patients in the placebo group who crossed over to nivolumab monotherapy after experiencing disease recurrence), and safety endpoints. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02523313), and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 2, 2015, and Nov 20, 2018, 175 patients were enrolled in the study, and 167 were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=56), nivolumab plus ipilimumab-matching placebo (n=59), or double placebo control (n=52). At a median follow-up of 49·2 months (IQR 34·9-58·1), 4-year recurrence-free survival was 64·2% (95% CI 49·2-75·9) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, 31·4% (19·7-43·8) in the nivolumab alone group, and 15·0% (6·7-26·6) in the placebo group. The hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group versus placebo was 0·25 (97·5% CI 0·13-0·48; p<0·0001), and for the nivolumab group versus placebo was 0·60 (0·36-1·00; p=0·024). Median overall survival was not reached in any treatment group. The HR for overall survival was significantly in favour of the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group versus placebo (HR 0·41; 95% CI 0·17-0·99; p=0·040), but not for the nivolumab group versus placebo (HR 0·75; 0·36-1·56; p=0·44). 4-year overall survival was 83·8% (95% CI 68·8-91·9) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, 72·6% (57·4-83·2) in the nivolumab alone group, and 63·1% (46·9-75·6) in the placebo group. The median progression-free survival or recurrence-free survival 2 of patients in the placebo group who crossed over to nivolumab monotherapy after experiencing disease recurrence was not reached (95% CI 21·2 months to not reached). Rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events remained largely unchanged compared with our previous report, occurring in 71% (95% CI 57-82) of the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, and 29% (95% CI 17-42) of patients receiving nivolumab alone. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Both active regimens continued to show significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with placebo in patients with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease who were at high risk of recurrence. Overall survival was significantly improved for patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with placebo. Use of subsequent anti-PD-1-based therapy was high in patients in the placebo group after recurrence and most likely impacted the overall survival comparison of nivolumab alone versus placebo. The recurrence-free and overall survival benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab over placebo reinforces the change of practice already initiated for the treatment of patients with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease. FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Nivolumab , Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Ipilimumab/adverse effects , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Nivolumab/adverse effects
6.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(5): 884-893, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36433671

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Choosing the adequate systemic treatment for melanoma is driven by clinical parameters and personal preferences. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the impact of disease and treatment on the daily life of patients receiving systemic therapy for melanoma. METHODS: A German-wide, cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at 13 specialized skin cancer centres from 08/2020 to 03/2021. A questionnaire was distributed to assess patients' perception of disease and symptoms, the impact of their current treatment on quality of life (QOL) and activities, adverse events (AEs), therapeutic visits, as well as believe in and satisfaction with their current systemic melanoma treatment. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were rated on a continuous numerical rating scale or selected from a given list. RESULTS: Four hundred and fourteen patients with systemic melanoma therapy were included. 359 (87%) received immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and 55 (13%) targeted therapy (TT). About 1/3 of patients were adjuvantly treated, the remaining because of unresectable/metastatic melanoma. In subgroup analyses, only in the adjuvant setting, TT patients reported a significant decrease in their treatment associated QOL compared to patients with ICI (p = 0.02). Patients with TT were 1.9 times more likely to report AEs than patients with ICI, a difference being significant just for the adjuvant setting (p = 0.01). ICI treatment intervals differed significantly between adjuvant and unresectable/metastatic setting (p = 0.04), though all patients, regardless of their specific ICI drug, evaluated their treatment frequency as adequate. TT patients with dabrafenib/trametinib (n = 37) or encorafenib/binimetinib (n = 15) did not differ regarding the strain of daily pill intake. Patients older than 63 years rated various PROs better than younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients evaluated their treatment mainly positively. ICI might be preferred over TT regarding QOL and patient-reported AEs in the adjuvant setting. Older melanoma patients appeared to be less impacted by their disease and more satisfied with their treatment.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Quality of Life , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Melanoma/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology
7.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(9): 4215-4223, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37272953

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Local failure and distant metastases occur frequently in sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM). Response rates to chemotherapy are low and targetable mutations are rarely detected. However, there is increasing data indicating efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). The aim of this retrospective monocenter study was to assess the mutational landscape and to evaluate the outcome of surgical treatment and ICI in SNMM in a real-world setting. METHODS: Thirty-eight SNMM patients being treated between 1999 and 2020 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Survival curves were generated according to Kaplan-Meier and compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Local failure was seen in 60% of patients treated in a curative intent. Overall, 24% of all patients suffered from regional and 66% from distant metastases. Next generation sequencing revealed mutations of BRAF, NRAS and KRAS. One out of three patients treated with a primary ICI showed a complete response (CR) and two showed progressive disease. Eleven patients received ICI as a palliative treatment. CR could be observed in three patients and stable disease in one patient. In the whole study population, the 5-year overall survival rate (OS) was 26%. OS was better for patients who received ICI during the course of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrences and distant metastases are frequent in SNMM. Durable CR could be observed after primary and palliative ICI. Therefore, ICI in a palliative, adjuvant or even neoadjuvant setting might play a promising role in SNMM therapy while targetable mutations are rarely detected.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/genetics , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/drug therapy , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/genetics , Combined Modality Therapy
8.
Anal Chem ; 94(41): 14214-14222, 2022 10 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36194871

ABSTRACT

Mass spectrometry-based immunopeptidomics enables the comprehensive identification of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) peptides from a cell culture as well as from tissue or tumor samples and is applied for the identification of tumor-specific and viral T-cell epitopes. Although mass spectrometry is generally considered an "unbiased" method for MHC peptide identification, the physicochemical properties of MHC peptides can greatly influence their detectability. Here, we demonstrate that highly hydrophobic peptides are lost during sample preparation when C18 solid-phase extraction (SPE) is used for separating MHC peptides from proteins. To overcome this limitation, we established an optimized protocol involving restricted access material (RAM). Compared to C18-SPE, RAM-SPE improved the overall MHC peptide recovery and extended the landscape of mass spectrometry-detectable MHC peptides toward more hydrophobic peptides.


Subject(s)
Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte , Major Histocompatibility Complex , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Peptides/chemistry , Solid Phase Extraction/methods
9.
Nature ; 532(7598): 250-4, 2016 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27042933

ABSTRACT

Cancer is a disease of ageing. Clinically, aged cancer patients tend to have a poorer prognosis than young. This may be due to accumulated cellular damage, decreases in adaptive immunity, and chronic inflammation. However, the effects of the aged microenvironment on tumour progression have been largely unexplored. Since dermal fibroblasts can have profound impacts on melanoma progression, we examined whether age-related changes in dermal fibroblasts could drive melanoma metastasis and response to targeted therapy. Here we find that aged fibroblasts secrete a Wnt antagonist, sFRP2, which activates a multi-step signalling cascade in melanoma cells that results in a decrease in ß-catenin and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), and ultimately the loss of a key redox effector, APE1. Loss of APE1 attenuates the response of melanoma cells to DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species, rendering the cells more resistant to targeted therapy (vemurafenib). Age-related increases in sFRP2 also augment both angiogenesis and metastasis of melanoma cells. These data provide an integrated view of how fibroblasts in the aged microenvironment contribute to tumour progression, offering new possibilities for the design of therapy for the elderly.


Subject(s)
Aging/metabolism , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/pathology , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Neoplasm Metastasis , Tumor Microenvironment , Adult , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Culture Media, Conditioned/pharmacology , DNA Damage , DNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) Lyase/metabolism , Disease Progression , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Humans , Indoles/pharmacology , Indoles/therapeutic use , Male , Melanoma/blood supply , Melanoma/genetics , Mice , Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor/metabolism , Middle Aged , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Neovascularization, Pathologic , Oxidative Stress , Phenotype , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Sulfonamides/pharmacology , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Vemurafenib , Wnt Signaling Pathway , Wnt1 Protein/antagonists & inhibitors , beta Catenin/metabolism
10.
Lancet ; 395(10236): 1558-1568, 2020 05 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32416781

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab and ipilimumab, alone or in combination, are widely used immunotherapeutic treatment options for patients with advanced-ie, unresectable or metastatic-melanoma. This criterion, however, excludes patients with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease. We therefore aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy versus a placebo in this patient population. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial in 20 German academic medical centres. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease after surgery or radiotherapy. Key exclusion criteria included uveal or mucosal melanoma, previous therapy with checkpoint inhibitors, and any previous immunosuppressive therapy within the 30 days before study drug administration. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using a central, interactive, online system, to the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group (1 mg/kg of intravenous nivolumab every 3 weeks plus 3 mg/kg of intravenous ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by 3 mg/kg of nivolumab every 2 weeks), nivolumab monotherapy group (3 mg/kg of intravenous nivolumab every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab-matching placebo during weeks 1-12), or double-matching placebo group. The primary endpoint was the recurrence-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The results presented in this report reflect the prespecified interim analysis of recurrence-free survival after 90 events had been reported. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02523313, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Sept 2, 2015, and Nov 20, 2018, 167 patients were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=56), nivolumab (n=59), or placebo (n=52). As of July 2, 2019, at a median follow-up of 28·4 months (IQR 17·7-36·8), median recurrence-free survival was not reached in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, whereas median recurrence-free survival was 12·4 months (95% CI 5·3-33·3) in the nivolumab group and 6·4 months (3·3-9·6) in the placebo group. The hazard ratio for recurrence for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group versus placebo group was 0·23 (97·5% CI 0·12-0·45; p<0·0001), and for the nivolumab group versus placebo group was 0·56 (0·33-0·94; p=0·011). In the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, recurrence-free survival at 1 year was 75% (95% CI 61·0-84·9) and at 2 years was 70% (55·1-81·0); in the nivolumab group, 1-year recurrence-free survival was 52% (38·1-63·9) and at 2 years was 42% (28·6-54·5); and in the placebo group, this rate was 32% (19·8-45·3) at 1 year and 14% (5·9-25·7) at 2 years. Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 71% (95% CI 57-82) of patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and in 27% (16-40) of those in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade led to treatment discontinuation in 34 (62%) of 55 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and seven (13%) of 56 in the nivolumab group. Three deaths from adverse events were reported but were considered unrelated to the study treatment. INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant therapy with nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab increased recurrence-free survival significantly compared with placebo in patients with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease. The rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in both active treatment groups were higher than the rates reported in previous pivotal trials done in advanced melanoma with measurable disease. FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Ipilimumab/administration & dosage , Melanoma/drug therapy , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Humans , Ipilimumab/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Progression-Free Survival
11.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 70(7): 2087-2093, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33439294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine cutaneous malignancy with poor prognosis. In Europe, approved systemic therapies are limited to the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab. For avelumab-refractory patients, efficient and safe treatment options are lacking. METHODS: At three different sites in Germany, clinical and molecular data of patients with metastatic MCC being refractory to the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab and who were later on treated with combined IPI/NIVO were retrospectively collected and evaluated. RESULTS: Five patients treated at three different academic sites in Germany were enrolled. Three out of five patients investigated for this report responded to combined IPI/NIVO according to RECIST 1.1. Combined immunotherapy was well tolerated without any grade II or III immune-related adverse events. Two out of three responders to IPI/NIVO received platinum-based chemotherapy in between avelumab and combined immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: In this small retrospective study, we observed a high response rate and durable responses to subsequent combined immunotherapy with IPI/NIVO in avelumab-refractory metastatic MCC patients. In conclusion, our data suggest a promising activity of second- or third-line PD-1- plus CTLA-4-blockade in patients with anti-PD-L1-refractory MCC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Ipilimumab/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate
12.
J Cutan Pathol ; 48(11): 1335-1341, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gap junctions consisting of connexins (Cx) are fundamental in controlling cell proliferation, differentiation, and cell death. Cx43 is the most broadly expressed Cx in humans and is attributed an important role in skin tumor development. Its role in cutaneous vascular neoplasms is yet unknown. METHODS: Fifteen cases each of cutaneous angiosarcoma (cAS), Kaposi sarcoma (KS), and cherry hemangioma (CH) were assessed by immunohistochemistry for expression of Cx43. Expression pattern, intensity, and percentage of positively stained cells were analyzed. Solid basal cell carcinomas served as positive and healthy skin as negative controls. RESULTS: Most cases of cAS presented with a strong Cx43 staining of almost all tumor cells, whereas endothelia of KS showed medium expression and CH showed mostly weak expression. In comparison with KS or cAS, the staining intensity of CH was significantly lower (P ≤ 0.001). All tissue sections of both cAS and KS were characterized by a mostly diffuse, cytoplasmic staining pattern of the vascular endothelia. None of those showed nuclear staining. CONCLUSION: The high-to-intermediate expression of Cx43 observed in all cases of cAS and KS suggests that this Cx may play a role in the development of malignant vascular neoplasms and serve as a helpful diagnostic marker.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Connexin 43/metabolism , Neoplasms, Vascular Tissue/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cytoplasm/metabolism , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
13.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(7): e20708, 2021 07 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34255646

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent years have been witnessing a substantial improvement in the accuracy of skin cancer classification using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNNs perform on par with or better than dermatologists with respect to the classification tasks of single images. However, in clinical practice, dermatologists also use other patient data beyond the visual aspects present in a digitized image, further increasing their diagnostic accuracy. Several pilot studies have recently investigated the effects of integrating different subtypes of patient data into CNN-based skin cancer classifiers. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review focuses on the current research investigating the impact of merging information from image features and patient data on the performance of CNN-based skin cancer image classification. This study aims to explore the potential in this field of research by evaluating the types of patient data used, the ways in which the nonimage data are encoded and merged with the image features, and the impact of the integration on the classifier performance. METHODS: Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, and ScienceDirect were screened for peer-reviewed studies published in English that dealt with the integration of patient data within a CNN-based skin cancer classification. The search terms skin cancer classification, convolutional neural network(s), deep learning, lesions, melanoma, metadata, clinical information, and patient data were combined. RESULTS: A total of 11 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All of them reported an overall improvement in different skin lesion classification tasks with patient data integration. The most commonly used patient data were age, sex, and lesion location. The patient data were mostly one-hot encoded. There were differences in the complexity that the encoded patient data were processed with regarding deep learning methods before and after fusing them with the image features for a combined classifier. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates the potential benefits of integrating patient data into CNN-based diagnostic algorithms. However, how exactly the individual patient data enhance classification performance, especially in the case of multiclass classification problems, is still unclear. Moreover, a substantial fraction of patient data used by dermatologists remains to be analyzed in the context of CNN-based skin cancer classification. Further exploratory analyses in this promising field may optimize patient data integration into CNN-based skin cancer diagnostics for patients' benefits.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Dermoscopy , Humans , Melanoma/diagnosis , Neural Networks, Computer , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis
14.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 100(13): adv00174, 2020 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32449784

ABSTRACT

The approval of BRAF and MEK inhibitors has significantly improved treatment outcomes for patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. The 3 first-line targeted therapy trials have provided similar results, and thus the identification of predictive biomarkers may generate a more precise basis for clinical decision-making. Elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) has already been determined as a strong prognostic factor. Therefore, this indirect analysis compared subgroups with elevated baseline LDH across the pivotal targeted therapy trials co-BRIM, COMBI-v and COLUMBUS part 1. The Bucher method was used to compare progression-free survival, objective response rate and overall survival indirectly. The results show a non-significant risk reduction for progression in the subgroup with elevated baseline LDH receiving vemurafenib plus cobimetinib compared with dabrafenib plus trametinib and encorafenib plus binimetinib. Although an indirect comparison, these data might provide some guidance for treatment recommendations in melanoma patients with elevated LDH.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Humans , Lactate Dehydrogenases , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/genetics , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Pyridones , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/genetics
15.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(9): e18091, 2020 09 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32915161

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early detection of melanoma can be lifesaving but this remains a challenge. Recent diagnostic studies have revealed the superiority of artificial intelligence (AI) in classifying dermoscopic images of melanoma and nevi, concluding that these algorithms should assist a dermatologist's diagnoses. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether AI support improves the accuracy and overall diagnostic performance of dermatologists in the dichotomous image-based discrimination between melanoma and nevus. METHODS: Twelve board-certified dermatologists were presented disjoint sets of 100 unique dermoscopic images of melanomas and nevi (total of 1200 unique images), and they had to classify the images based on personal experience alone (part I) and with the support of a trained convolutional neural network (CNN, part II). Additionally, dermatologists were asked to rate their confidence in their final decision for each image. RESULTS: While the mean specificity of the dermatologists based on personal experience alone remained almost unchanged (70.6% vs 72.4%; P=.54) with AI support, the mean sensitivity and mean accuracy increased significantly (59.4% vs 74.6%; P=.003 and 65.0% vs 73.6%; P=.002, respectively) with AI support. Out of the 10% (10/94; 95% CI 8.4%-11.8%) of cases where dermatologists were correct and AI was incorrect, dermatologists on average changed to the incorrect answer for 39% (4/10; 95% CI 23.2%-55.6%) of cases. When dermatologists were incorrect and AI was correct (25/94, 27%; 95% CI 24.0%-30.1%), dermatologists changed their answers to the correct answer for 46% (11/25; 95% CI 33.1%-58.4%) of cases. Additionally, the dermatologists' average confidence in their decisions increased when the CNN confirmed their decision and decreased when the CNN disagreed, even when the dermatologists were correct. Reported values are based on the mean of all participants. Whenever absolute values are shown, the denominator and numerator are approximations as every dermatologist ended up rating a varying number of images due to a quality control step. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study show that AI support can improve the overall accuracy of the dermatologists in the dichotomous image-based discrimination between melanoma and nevus. This supports the argument for AI-based tools to aid clinicians in skin lesion classification and provides a rationale for studies of such classifiers in real-life settings, wherein clinicians can integrate additional information such as patient age and medical history into their decisions.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence/standards , Dermatologists/standards , Dermoscopy/methods , Diagnostic Imaging/classification , Melanoma/diagnostic imaging , Skin Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Internet , Melanoma/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 18(8): 795-807, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32761894

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has far-reaching direct and indirect medical consequences. These include both the course and treatment of diseases. It is becoming increasingly clear that infections with SARS-CoV-2 can cause considerable immunological alterations, which particularly also affect pathogenetically and/or therapeutically relevant factors. Against this background we summarize here the current state of knowledge on the interaction of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 with mediators of the acute phase of inflammation (TNF, IL-1, IL-6), type 1 and type 17 immune responses (IL-12, IL-23, IL-17, IL-36), type 2 immune reactions (IL-4, IL-13, IL-5, IL-31, IgE), B-cell immunity, checkpoint regulators (PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4), and orally druggable signaling pathways (JAK, PDE4, calcineurin). In addition, we discuss in this context non-specific immune modulation by glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate, antimalarial drugs, azathioprine, dapsone, mycophenolate mofetil and fumaric acid esters, as well as neutrophil granulocyte-mediated innate immune mechanisms. From these recent findings we derive possible implications for the therapeutic modulation of said immunological mechanisms in connection with SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. Although, of course, the greatest care should be taken with patients with immunologically mediated diseases or immunomodulating therapies, it appears that many treatments can also be carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic; some even appear to alleviate COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/immunology , Cytokine Release Syndrome/prevention & control , Cytokines/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/drug effects , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , COVID-19/therapy , Cytokine Release Syndrome/immunology , Humans , Immunotherapy , Th1 Cells/drug effects , Th1 Cells/immunology , Th17 Cells/drug effects , Th17 Cells/immunology
17.
Cancer ; 125(4): 586-600, 2019 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30561760

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasing knowledge of cancer genomes has triggered the development of specific targeted inhibitors, thus providing a valuable therapeutic pool. METHODS: In this report, the authors analyze the presence of targetable alterations in 136 tumor samples from 92 patients with melanoma using a comprehensive approach based on targeted DNA sequencing and supported by RNA and protein analysis. Three topics of high clinical relevance are addressed: the identification of rare, activating alterations; the detection of patient-specific, co-occurring single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variations (CNVs) in parallel pathways; and the presence of cancer-relevant germline mutations. RESULTS: The analysis of patient-matched blood and tumor samples was done with a custom-designed gene panel that was enriched for genes from clinically targetable pathways. To detect alterations with high therapeutic relevance for patients with unknown driver mutations, genes that are untypical for melanoma also were included. Among all patients, CNVs were identified in one-third of samples and contained amplifications of druggable kinases, such as CDK4, ERBB2, and KIT. Considering SNVs and CNVs, 60% of patients with metastases exhibited co-occurring activations of at least 2 pathways, thus providing a rationale for individualized combination therapies. Unexpectedly, 9% of patients carry potentially protumorigenic germline mutations frequently affecting receptor tyrosine kinases. Remarkably two-thirds of BRAF/NRAS wild-type melanomas harbor activating mutations or CNVs in receptor tyrosine kinases. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the integrated analysis of SNVs, CNVs, and germline mutations reveals new druggable targets for combination tumor therapy.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , GTP Phosphohydrolases/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Melanoma/pathology , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Mutation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/genetics , DNA Copy Number Variations , Follow-Up Studies , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Melanoma/genetics , Prognosis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics
18.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 68(5): 765-772, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30806748

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway as well as programmed death 1 receptor (PD-1) blockade was shown to prolong overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF)-mutant melanoma. However, due to the lack of head-to-head trials, it remains unclear if one of these therapeutic approaches should be preferred in first-line therapy. Here, we present a retrospective analysis comparing anti-PD-1 monotherapy with BRAF/MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK) combined inhibition used as first-line agents in a real-world clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data, routine blood counts and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels of 301 patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma harboring an activating mutation in BRAF (V600E/K) were included. Of these, 106 received anti-PD-1 antibodies, while 195 patients were treated with a selective BRAF inhibitor combined with an MEK inhibitor as palliative first-line therapy. Patients were sub-grouped according to previously described predictive and prognostic markers. RESULTS: OS was significantly longer in patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy compared to patients receiving combined MAPK inhibitors. Subsequent therapies were comparable among these groups. The difference in OS was less pronounced in patients with high LDH levels and visceral metastatic spread. CONCLUSION: First-line treatment with a PD-1 blocking antibody might be associated with longer OS than first-line inhibition of the MAPK pathway in patients with advanced melanoma harboring mutant BRAF. These hypothesis-generating data need to be confirmed or rejected in prospective, randomized trials.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Humans , Melanoma/mortality , Neoplasm Metastasis , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology , Proto-Oncogene Mas , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/antagonists & inhibitors , Retrospective Studies , Signal Transduction , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL