Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Anesth Analg ; 132(2): 420-429, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33264119

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diastolic dysfunction is a risk factor for postoperative major cardiovascular events. During anesthesia, patients with diastolic dysfunction might experience impaired hemodynamic function and worsening of diastolic function, which in turn, might be associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications.We aimed to investigate whether patients with diastolic dysfunction require higher doses of norepinephrine during general anesthesia. Furthermore, we aimed to examine the association between the grade of diastolic dysfunction and the E/e' ratio during anesthesia. A high E/e' ratio corresponds to elevated filling pressures and is an important measure of impaired diastolic function. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study at a German university hospital from February 2017 to September 2018. Patients aged ≥60 years and undergoing general anesthesia (ie, propofol and sevoflurane) for elective noncardiac surgery were enrolled. Exclusion: mitral valve disease, atrial fibrillation, and implanted mechanical device.The primary outcome parameter was the administered dose of norepinephrine within 30 minutes after anesthesia induction (µg·kg-1 30 min-1). The secondary outcome parameter was the change of Doppler echocardiographic E/e' from ECHO1 (baseline) to ECHO2 (anesthesia). Linear models and linear mixed models were used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients were enrolled, and 200 patients (75 female) were included in the final analysis. Diastolic dysfunction at baseline was not associated with a higher dose of norepinephrine during anesthesia (P = .6953). The grade of diastolic dysfunction at baseline was associated with a decrease of the E/e' ratio during anesthesia (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence for an association between diastolic dysfunction and impaired hemodynamic function, as expressed by high vasopressor support during anesthesia. Additionally, our findings suggest that diastolic function, as expressed by the E/e' ratio, does not worsen during anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, General , Norepinephrine/administration & dosage , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Function, Left , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Diastole , Echocardiography, Doppler , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging
3.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 900850, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35845063

ABSTRACT

Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is associated with pulmonary edema in septic patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in adult septic patients between October 2018 and May 2019. We performed repeated echocardiography and lung ultrasound examinations within the first 7 days after diagnosis of sepsis. We defined LVDD according to the 2016 recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and-for sensitivity analysis-according to an algorithm which has been validated in septic patients. We quantified pulmonary edema using the lung ultrasound score (LUSS), counting B-lines in four intercostal spaces. Results: We included 54 patients. LVDD was present in 51 (42%) of 122 echocardiography examinations. The mean (±SD) LUSS was 11 ± 6. There was no clinically meaningful association of LVDD with LUSS (B = 0.55 [95%CI: -1.38; 2.47]; p = 0.571). Pneumonia was significantly associated with higher LUSS (B = 4.42 [95%CI: 0.38; 8.5]; p = 0.033). Conclusion: The lack of a clinically meaningful association of LVDD with LUSS suggests that LVDD is not a major contributor to pulmonary edema in septic patients. Trial Registration: NCT03768752, ClinicalTrials.gov, November 30th, 2018 - retrospectively registered.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL