Health-related quality of life after combined liver and kidney transplantation in children.

While reduced HRQOL following isolated organ transplantation has been previously reported, there are no data in the context of children following CLKT. Twenty-three children who underwent CLKT at our institution were included in the study. The indication for CLKT was PH1 in 13 patients and ARPKD in 10 patients. Quantification of HRQOL was facilitated through the use of the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale. The results of the study were compared to healthy children and published data of children who had undergone LTx or KTx. The CLKT samples' child self-report showed good HRQOL. No statistically significant difference was found between the patients with PH1 and patients with ARPKD (P=.4). Compared to healthy children, a significant difference in the total scale score, the physical health score, and the school functioning was reported. HRQOL did not differ significantly when compared to patients following isolated LTx or KTx. To improve HRQOL after CLKT, a focus on patients' physical health, educational performances, and overall quality of life is crucial. Thus, coordinated medical care across disciplines and psychological and social support is essential to achieve this goal.

Long-term outcome after combined or sequential liver and kidney transplantation in children with infantile and juvenile primary hyperoxaluria type 1.

Introduction: Combined or sequential liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT/SLKT) restores kidney function and corrects the underlying metabolic defect in children with end-stage kidney disease in primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1). However, data on long-term outcome, especially in children with infantile PH1, are rare. Methods: All pediatric PH1-patients who underwent CLKT/SLKT at our center were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Eighteen patients (infantile PH1 n = 10, juvenile PH1 n = 8) underwent transplantation (CLKT n = 17, SLKT n = 1) at a median age of 5.4 years (1.5-11.8). Patient survival was 94% after a median follow-up of 9.2 years (6.4-11.0). Liver and kidney survival-rates after 1, 10, and 15 years were 90%, 85%, 85%, and 90%, 75%, 75%, respectively. Age at transplantation was significantly lower in infantile than juvenile PH1 (1.6 years (1.4-2.4) vs. 12.8 years (8.4-14.1), P = 0.003). Median follow-up was 11.0 years (6.8-11.6) in patients with infantile PH1 vs. 6.9 years (5.7-9.9) in juvenile PH1 (P = 0.15). At latest follow-up kidney and/or liver graft loss and/or death showed a tendency to a higher rate in patients with infantile vs. juvenile PH1 (3/10 vs. 1/8, P = 0.59). Discussion: In conclusion, the overall patient survival and long-term transplant outcome of patients after CLKT/SLKT for PH1 is encouraging. However, results in infantile PH1 tended to be less optimal than in patients with juvenile PH1.