ABSTRACT
Anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) immunotherapy reinvigorates CD8 T cell responses in patients with cancer but PD-1 is also expressed by other immune cells, including follicular helper CD4 T cells (Tfh) which are involved in germinal centre responses. Little is known, however, about the effects of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy on noncancer immune responses in humans. To investigate this question, we examined the impact of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy on the Tfh-B cell axis responding to unrelated viral antigens. Following influenza vaccination, a subset of adults receiving anti-PD-1 had more robust circulating Tfh responses than adults not receiving immunotherapy. PD-1 pathway blockade resulted in transcriptional signatures of increased cellular proliferation in circulating Tfh and responding B cells compared with controls. These latter observations suggest an underlying change in the Tfh-B cell and germinal centre axis in a subset of immunotherapy patients. Together, these results demonstrate dynamic effects of anti-PD-1 therapy on influenza vaccine responses and highlight analytical vaccination as an approach that may reveal underlying immune predisposition to adverse events.
Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Adult , Humans , Immunity, Humoral , Seasons , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer , VaccinationABSTRACT
The clinical benefit of T cell immunotherapies remains limited by incomplete understanding of T cell differentiation and dysfunction. We generated an epigenetic and transcriptional atlas of T cell differentiation from healthy humans that included exhausted CD8 T cells and applied this resource in three ways. First, we identified modules of gene expression and chromatin accessibility, revealing molecular coordination of differentiation after activation and between central memory and effector memory. Second, we applied this healthy molecular framework to three settings-a neoadjuvant anti-PD1 melanoma trial, a basal cell carcinoma scATAC-seq dataset, and autoimmune disease-associated SNPs-yielding insights into disease-specific biology. Third, we predicted genome-wide cis-regulatory elements and validated this approach for key effector genes using CRISPR interference, providing functional annotation and demonstrating the ability to identify targets for non-coding cellular engineering. These studies define epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of human T cells and illustrate the utility of interrogating disease in the context of a healthy T cell atlas.
Subject(s)
Epigenomics , Lymphocyte Activation , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Epigenesis, Genetic , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation/geneticsABSTRACT
Therapeutic blocking of the PD1 pathway results in significant tumor responses, but resistance is common. We demonstrate that prolonged interferon signaling orchestrates PDL1-dependent and PDL1-independent resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and to combinations such as radiation plus anti-CTLA4. Persistent type II interferon signaling allows tumors to acquire STAT1-related epigenomic changes and augments expression of interferon-stimulated genes and ligands for multiple T cell inhibitory receptors. Both type I and II interferons maintain this resistance program. Crippling the program genetically or pharmacologically interferes with multiple inhibitory pathways and expands distinct T cell populations with improved function despite expressing markers of severe exhaustion. Consequently, tumors resistant to multi-agent ICB are rendered responsive to ICB monotherapy. Finally, we observe that biomarkers for interferon-driven resistance associate with clinical progression after anti-PD1 therapy. Thus, the duration of tumor interferon signaling augments adaptive resistance and inhibition of the interferon response bypasses requirements for combinatorial ICB therapies.
Subject(s)
CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/therapy , Radioimmunotherapy , Animals , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Heterografts , Humans , Interferons/immunology , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Mice , Neoplasm Transplantation , STAT1 Transcription Factor , T-Lymphocytes/immunologyABSTRACT
CD8+ T cell exhaustion is a major barrier to current anti-cancer immunotherapies. Despite this, the developmental biology of exhausted CD8+ T cells (Tex) remains poorly defined, restraining improvement of strategies aimed at "re-invigorating" Tex cells. Here, we defined a four-cell-stage developmental framework for Tex cells. Two TCF1+ progenitor subsets were identified, one tissue restricted and quiescent and one more blood accessible, that gradually lost TCF1 as it divided and converted to a third intermediate Tex subset. This intermediate subset re-engaged some effector biology and increased upon PD-L1 blockade but ultimately converted into a fourth, terminally exhausted subset. By using transcriptional and epigenetic analyses, we identified the control mechanisms underlying subset transitions and defined a key interplay between TCF1, T-bet, and Tox in the process. These data reveal a four-stage developmental hierarchy for Tex cells and define the molecular, transcriptional, and epigenetic mechanisms that could provide opportunities to improve cancer immunotherapy.
Subject(s)
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Epigenesis, Genetic/immunology , Neoplasms/immunology , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , Transcription, Genetic/immunology , Animals , B7-H1 Antigen/genetics , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/cytology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Epigenesis, Genetic/genetics , Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alpha/genetics , Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alpha/immunology , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/immunology , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/therapy , T-Box Domain Proteins/genetics , T-Box Domain Proteins/immunology , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic/geneticsABSTRACT
Metastatic melanoma is an aggressive disease, despite recent improvements in therapy. Eradicating all melanoma cells even in drug-sensitive tumors is unsuccessful in patients because a subset of cells can transition to a slow-cycling state, rendering them resistant to most targeted therapy. It is still unclear what pathways define these subpopulations and promote this resistant phenotype. In the current study, we show that Wnt5A, a non-canonical Wnt ligand that drives a metastatic, therapy-resistant phenotype, stabilizes the half-life of p53 and uses p53 to initiate a slow-cycling state following stress (DNA damage, targeted therapy, and aging). Inhibiting p53 blocks the slow-cycling phenotype and sensitizes melanoma cells to BRAF/MEK inhibition. In vivo, this can be accomplished with a single dose of p53 inhibitor at the commencement of BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. These data suggest that taking the paradoxical approach of inhibiting rather than activating wild-type p53 may sensitize previously resistant metastatic melanoma cells to therapy.
Subject(s)
Melanoma/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , Wnt-5a Protein/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Humans , MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases/metabolism , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Mutation/drug effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Sulfonamides/pharmacology , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/physiologyABSTRACT
Exhausted CD8+ T (Tex) cells in chronic infections and cancer have limited effector function, high co-expression of inhibitory receptors and extensive transcriptional changes compared with effector (Teff) or memory (Tmem) CD8+ T cells. Tex cells are important clinical targets of checkpoint blockade and other immunotherapies. Epigenetically, Tex cells are a distinct immune subset, with a unique chromatin landscape compared with Teff and Tmem cells. However, the mechanisms that govern the transcriptional and epigenetic development of Tex cells remain unknown. Here we identify the HMG-box transcription factor TOX as a central regulator of Tex cells in mice. TOX is largely dispensable for the formation of Teff and Tmem cells, but it is critical for exhaustion: in the absence of TOX, Tex cells do not form. TOX is induced by calcineurin and NFAT2, and operates in a feed-forward loop in which it becomes calcineurin-independent and sustained in Tex cells. Robust expression of TOX therefore results in commitment to Tex cells by translating persistent stimulation into a distinct Tex cell transcriptional and epigenetic developmental program.
Subject(s)
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/pathology , Epistasis, Genetic , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic , Animals , Calcineurin/metabolism , Calcium Signaling , Feedback, Physiological , Female , Gene Expression Regulation/immunology , Genotype , Immunologic Memory , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , NFATC Transcription Factors/metabolism , Tumor EscapeABSTRACT
In this Letter, two relevant references were omitted; see the accompanying Amendment for details. The original Letter has not been corrected.
ABSTRACT
Tumour cells evade immune surveillance by upregulating the surface expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which interacts with programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor on T cells to elicit the immune checkpoint response1,2. Anti-PD-1 antibodies have shown remarkable promise in treating tumours, including metastatic melanoma2-4. However, the patient response rate is low4,5. A better understanding of PD-L1-mediated immune evasion is needed to predict patient response and improve treatment efficacy. Here we report that metastatic melanomas release extracellular vesicles, mostly in the form of exosomes, that carry PD-L1 on their surface. Stimulation with interferon-γ (IFN-γ) increases the amount of PD-L1 on these vesicles, which suppresses the function of CD8 T cells and facilitates tumour growth. In patients with metastatic melanoma, the level of circulating exosomal PD-L1 positively correlates with that of IFN-γ, and varies during the course of anti-PD-1 therapy. The magnitudes of the increase in circulating exosomal PD-L1 during early stages of treatment, as an indicator of the adaptive response of the tumour cells to T cell reinvigoration, stratifies clinical responders from non-responders. Our study unveils a mechanism by which tumour cells systemically suppress the immune system, and provides a rationale for the application of exosomal PD-L1 as a predictor for anti-PD-1 therapy.
Subject(s)
B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , Exosomes/metabolism , Immune Tolerance/immunology , Melanoma/immunology , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology , Tumor Escape/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , B7-H1 Antigen/blood , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Case-Control Studies , Cell Line, Tumor , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Immune Tolerance/drug effects , Interferon-gamma/blood , Interferon-gamma/immunology , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/pathology , Mice , Mice, Nude , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prognosis , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Tumor Escape/drug effects , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
Despite the success of monotherapies based on blockade of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) in human melanoma, most patients do not experience durable clinical benefit. Pre-existing T-cell infiltration and/or the presence of PD-L1 in tumours may be used as indicators of clinical response; however, blood-based profiling to understand the mechanisms of PD-1 blockade has not been widely explored. Here we use immune profiling of peripheral blood from patients with stage IV melanoma before and after treatment with the PD-1-targeting antibody pembrolizumab and identify pharmacodynamic changes in circulating exhausted-phenotype CD8 T cells (Tex cells). Most of the patients demonstrated an immunological response to pembrolizumab. Clinical failure in many patients was not solely due to an inability to induce immune reinvigoration, but rather resulted from an imbalance between T-cell reinvigoration and tumour burden. The magnitude of reinvigoration of circulating Tex cells determined in relation to pretreatment tumour burden correlated with clinical response. By focused profiling of a mechanistically relevant circulating T-cell subpopulation calibrated to pretreatment disease burden, we identify a clinically accessible potential on-treatment predictor of response to PD-1 blockade.
Subject(s)
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/immunology , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology , Tumor Burden/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/cytology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Female , Humans , Ki-67 Antigen/immunology , Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism , Male , Melanoma/blood supply , Melanoma/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Phenotype , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Targeted BRAF inhibition (BRAFi) and combined BRAF and MEK inhibition (BRAFi and MEKi) therapies have markedly improved the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma. Unfortunately, the efficacy of these treatments is often countered by the acquisition of drug resistance. Here we investigated the molecular mechanisms that underlie acquired resistance to BRAFi and to the combined therapy. Consistent with previous studies, we show that resistance to BRAFi is mediated by ERK pathway reactivation. Resistance to the combined therapy, however, is mediated by mechanisms independent of reactivation of ERK in many resistant cell lines and clinical samples. p21-activated kinases (PAKs) become activated in cells with acquired drug resistance and have a pivotal role in mediating resistance. Our screening, using a reverse-phase protein array, revealed distinct mechanisms by which PAKs mediate resistance to BRAFi and the combined therapy. In BRAFi-resistant cells, PAKs phosphorylate CRAF and MEK to reactivate ERK. In cells that are resistant to the combined therapy, PAKs regulate JNK and ß-catenin phosphorylation and mTOR pathway activation, and inhibit apoptosis, thereby bypassing ERK. Together, our results provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying acquired drug resistance to current targeted therapies, and may help to direct novel drug development efforts to overcome acquired drug resistance.
Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/genetics , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Signal Transduction/drug effects , p21-Activated Kinases/metabolism , Animals , Apoptosis/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Enzyme Activation/drug effects , Female , Humans , JNK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases/chemistry , JNK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases/metabolism , MAP Kinase Signaling System/drug effects , Melanoma/enzymology , Mice , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases/chemistry , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases/metabolism , Phosphorylation/drug effects , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-raf/chemistry , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-raf/metabolism , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , beta Catenin/chemistry , beta Catenin/metabolism , p21-Activated Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , p21-Activated Kinases/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For patients with melanoma, gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events are common after receipt of anti-CTLA4 therapy. These present difficult decision points regarding whether to discontinue therapy. Detailing the situations in which colitis might predict for improved survival and how this is affected by discontinuation or resumption of therapy can help guide clinical decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IV melanoma receiving anti-CTLA4 therapy from 2008 to 2019 were analyzed. Immune-related colitis treated with ≥50 mg prednisone or equivalent daily or secondary immunosuppression was included. Moderate colitis was defined as receipt of oral glucocorticoids only; severe colitis was defined as requiring intravenous glucocorticoids or secondary immunosuppression. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 171 patients received monotherapy, and 91 received dual checkpoint therapy. In the monotherapy group, 25 patients developed colitis and a nonsignificant trend toward improved OS was observed in this group. Notably, when colitis was categorized as none, moderate or severe, OS was significantly improved for moderate colitis only. This survival difference was not present after dual checkpoint therapy. There were no differences in known prognostic variables between groups, and on multivariable analysis neither completion of all ipilimumab cycles nor resumption of immunotherapy correlated with OS, while the development of moderate colitis did significantly affect OS. CONCLUSION: This single-institution retrospective series suggests moderate colitis correlates with improved OS for patients with stage IV melanoma treated with single-agent anti-CTLA4, but not dual agent, and that this is true regardless of whether the immune-checkpoint blockade is permanently discontinued.
Subject(s)
Colitis , Melanoma , Colitis/chemically induced , Colitis/complications , Colitis/drug therapy , Humans , Ipilimumab/adverse effects , Melanoma/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Steroids/therapeutic useABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Oncologists may overestimate prognosis for patients with cancer, leading to delayed or missed conversations about patients' goals and subsequent low-quality end-of-life care. Machine learning algorithms may accurately predict mortality risk in cancer, but it is unclear how oncology clinicians would use such algorithms in practice. METHODS: The purpose of this qualitative study was to assess oncology clinicians' perceptions on the utility and barriers of machine learning prognostic algorithms to prompt advance care planning. Participants included medical oncology physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) practicing in tertiary and community practices within a large academic healthcare system. Transcripts were coded and analyzed inductively using NVivo software. RESULTS: The study included 29 oncology clinicians (19 physicians, 10 APPs) across 6 practice sites (1 tertiary, 5 community) in the USA. Fourteen participants had previously had exposure to an automated machine learning-based prognostic algorithm as part of a pragmatic randomized trial. Clinicians believed that there was utility for algorithms in validating their own intuition about prognosis and prompting conversations about patient goals and preferences. However, this enthusiasm was tempered by concerns about algorithm accuracy, over-reliance on algorithm predictions, and the ethical implications around disclosure of an algorithm prediction. There was significant variation in tolerance for false positive vs. false negative predictions. CONCLUSION: While oncologists believe there are applications for advanced prognostic algorithms in routine care of patients with cancer, they are concerned about algorithm accuracy, confirmation and automation biases, and ethical issues of prognostic disclosure.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Oncologists , Algorithms , Humans , Machine Learning , Medical Oncology , Neoplasms/therapy , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has not been studied for invasive melanomas treated with Mohs micrographic surgery using frozen-section MART-1 immunohistochemical stains (MMS-IHC). The primary objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for SLNB in a cohort of patients who had invasive melanoma treated with MMS-IHC. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who had primary, invasive, cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS-IHC at a single academic center between March 2006 and April 2018. The primary outcomes were the rates of documenting discussion and performing SLNB in patients who were eligible based on NCCN guidelines. Secondary outcomes were the rate of identifying the sentinel lymph node and the percentage of positive lymph nodes. RESULTS: In total, 667 primary, invasive, cutaneous melanomas (American Joint Committee on Cancer T1a-T4b) were treated with MMS-IHC. The median patient age was 69 years (range, 25-101 years). Ninety-two percent of tumors were located on specialty sites (head and/or neck, hands and/or feet, pretibial leg). Discussion of SLNB was documented for 162 of 176 (92%) SLNB-eligible patients, including 127 of 127 (100%) who had melanomas with a Breslow depth >1 mm. SLNB was performed in 109 of 176 (62%) SLNB-eligible patients, including 102 of 158 melanomas (65%) that met NCCN criteria to discuss and offer SLNB and 7 of 18 melanomas (39%) that met criteria to discuss and consider SLNB. The sentinel lymph node was successfully identified in 98 of 109 patients (90%) and was positive in 6 of those 98 patients (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Combining SLNB and MMS-IHC allows full pathologic staging and confirmation of clear microscopic margins before reconstruction of specialty site invasive melanomas. SLNB can be performed accurately and in compliance with consensus guidelines in patients with melanoma using MMS-IHC.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Sentinel Lymph Node , Skin Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Mohs Surgery , Retrospective Studies , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
Immune checkpoint inhibitors result in impressive clinical responses, but optimal results will require combination with each other and other therapies. This raises fundamental questions about mechanisms of non-redundancy and resistance. Here we report major tumour regressions in a subset of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with an anti-CTLA4 antibody (anti-CTLA4) and radiation, and reproduced this effect in mouse models. Although combined treatment improved responses in irradiated and unirradiated tumours, resistance was common. Unbiased analyses of mice revealed that resistance was due to upregulation of PD-L1 on melanoma cells and associated with T-cell exhaustion. Accordingly, optimal response in melanoma and other cancer types requires radiation, anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-L1/PD-1. Anti-CTLA4 predominantly inhibits T-regulatory cells (Treg cells), thereby increasing the CD8 T-cell to Treg (CD8/Treg) ratio. Radiation enhances the diversity of the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of intratumoral T cells. Together, anti-CTLA4 promotes expansion of T cells, while radiation shapes the TCR repertoire of the expanded peripheral clones. Addition of PD-L1 blockade reverses T-cell exhaustion to mitigate depression in the CD8/Treg ratio and further encourages oligoclonal T-cell expansion. Similarly to results from mice, patients on our clinical trial with melanoma showing high PD-L1 did not respond to radiation plus anti-CTLA4, demonstrated persistent T-cell exhaustion, and rapidly progressed. Thus, PD-L1 on melanoma cells allows tumours to escape anti-CTLA4-based therapy, and the combination of radiation, anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-L1 promotes response and immunity through distinct mechanisms.
Subject(s)
B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Cell Cycle Checkpoints/drug effects , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/radiotherapy , T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , T-Lymphocytes/radiation effects , Animals , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Female , Humans , Melanoma/pathology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/drug effects , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/immunology , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes/cytology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/drug effects , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/radiation effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has transformed melanoma treatment, but optimal sequencing of ICB and surgery for clinically evident nodal metastasis remains undefined. We evaluated adjuvant-only (AT) and neoadjuvant/adjuvant (NAT) ICB with respect to survival outcomes in this patient population. METHODS: Patients who underwent lymphadenectomy (1 January 2011 to 31 July 2018) and received perioperative ICB at an academic center were identified. AT was defined as postoperative ICB, and NAT was defined as one to two cycles of ICB prior to resection with continuation of therapy following surgery. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were estimated. RESULTS: Of 59 patients, 18 (31%) received AT and 41 (69%) received NAT. The AT and NAT groups did not differ in age (median 53 vs. 62 years, p = 0.16) or stage (IIIB 33% vs. 29%, IIIC 56% vs. 68%, IIID 11% vs. 2%, p = 0.34). Although 3-year DFS did not differ significantly by treatment sequencing (NAT vs. AT, hazard ratio [HR] 0.56, p = 0.17), NAT was associated with improved 3-year DDFS (HR 0.38, p = 0.028). Of 39 NAT patients with evaluable pathologic response, 23 (59%) and 5 (13%) had a pathologic partial response (pPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR), respectively. Patients with pPR/pCR experienced improved 3-year DFS (HR 0.16, p = 0.001), LRFS (HR 0.17, p = 0.003), and DDFS (HR 0.26, p = 0.029) compared with those with no response. Three-year MSS did not differ significantly by response (p = 0.062). CONCLUSION: NAT may be associated with improved 3-year DDFS compared with AT sequencing, and allows for early assessment of pathologic response. Further prospective evaluation of treatment sequencing is warranted.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Melanoma/drug therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint and BRAF-targeted inhibitors have demonstrated significant survival benefits for advanced melanoma patients within the context of clinical trials. We sought to determine their impact on overall survival (OS) at a population level in order to better understand the current landscape for patients diagnosed with clinical stage III melanoma. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using the National Cancer Database. Patients diagnosed with clinical stage III melanoma were categorized by diagnosis year into two cohorts preceding the advent of novel therapies (P1: 2004-2005, P2: 2008-2009) and a contemporary group (P3: 2012-2013). OS was estimated using standard time-to-event statistical methods. RESULTS: Of 3720 patients, 525 (14%) were diagnosed in P1, 1375 (37%) in P2, and 1820 (49%) in P3. Median age at diagnosis increased over time (58, 59, and 61 years in P1, P2, and P3, respectively, P = 0.004). OS increased between P2 (median 49.3 months) and P3 (median 58.2 months, Bonferroni-corrected log-rank P < 0.001) but did not differ between P1 (median 50.5 months) and P2 (Bonferroni-corrected log-rank P > 0.99). These differences persisted on multivariable analysis. OS improved for patients diagnosed in P3 compared with P1 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.76, P < 0.001] but not P2 compared with P1 (HR 0.96, P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: OS has significantly improved nationally for patients newly diagnosed with clinical stage III melanoma in the era of novel melanoma therapies. OS outcomes will likely continue to evolve as these agents are increasingly utilized in the adjuvant setting. These data may help to better inform affected patients with respect to prognosis.
Subject(s)
Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Melanoma/therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: BRAF inhibition has improved overall survival in patients with BRAF mutant melanoma, but this is associated with a range of known and predictable cutaneous side effects, including squamous cell carcinomas associated with RAS mutations. METHODS: We identified three severely dysplastic nevi, one atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferation, and four melanoma in situ lesions, newly arising in four patients undergoing treatment with vemurafenib. To characterize mutations in these atypical melanocytic lesions, we used a custom iPlex panel detecting 74 mutations in 13 genes known to play a role in melanoma pathogenesis. RESULTS: We identified an NRAS mutation at codon 61 (Q61R) and a rare BRAF exon 11 mutation (G466A) in atypical melanocytic lesions that arose in patients treated with vemurafenib. CONCLUSION: There appears to be development or accelerated growth of atypical melanocytic lesions in the setting of BRAF inhibition. Our results underscore the need for careful surveillance for melanocytic lesions in patients on BRAF inhibitor therapy and shed light on potential mechanisms for melanoma pathogenesis in the context of BRAF pathway blockade. Further studies are warranted to show a causal relationship.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , GTP Phosphohydrolases/genetics , Melanoma/drug therapy , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Neoplasms, Second Primary/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Vemurafenib/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Mutation , Neoplasms, Second Primary/chemically induced , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/chemically induced , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Melanoma, Cutaneous MalignantABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the potential ocular toxicity of a combined BRAF inhibition (BRAFi) + MEK inhibition (MEKi) + hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) regime used to treat metastatic BRAF mutant melanoma. METHODS: Patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma and BRAF V600E mutations (n = 11, 31-68 years of age) were included. Treatment was with oral dabrafenib, 150 mg bid, trametinib, 2 mg/day, and HCQ, 400 mg to 600 mg bid. An ophthalmic examination, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, near-infrared and short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence, and static perimetry were performed at baseline, 1 month, and q/6 months after treatment. RESULTS: There were no clinically significant ocular events; there was no ocular inflammation. The only medication-related change was a separation of the photoreceptor outer segment tip from the apical retinal pigment epithelium that could be traced from the fovea to the perifoveal retina noted in 9/11 (82%) of the patients. There were no changes in retinal pigment epithelium melanization or lipofuscin content by near-infrared fundus autofluorescence and short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence, respectively. There were no inner retinal or outer nuclear layer changes. Visual acuities and sensitivities were unchanged. CONCLUSION: BRAFi (trametinib) + MEKi (dabrafenib) + HCQ causes very frequent, subclinical separation of the photoreceptor outer segment from the apical retinal pigment epithelium without inner retinal changes or signs of inflammation. The changes suggest interference with the maintenance of the outer retinal barrier and/or phagocytic/pump functions of the retinal pigment epithelium by effective MEK inhibition.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Macula Lutea/pathology , Melanoma/drug therapy , Oximes/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pyridones/adverse effects , Pyrimidinones/adverse effects , Retinal Diseases , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , MAP Kinase Kinase 1/antagonists & inhibitors , Male , Melanoma/genetics , Middle Aged , Oximes/therapeutic use , Photoreceptor Cells/pathology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/antagonists & inhibitors , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Pyrimidinones/therapeutic use , Retinal Diseases/chemically induced , Retinal Diseases/pathology , Retinal Pigment Epithelium/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase I trial evaluating pembrolizumab+hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) for patients with metastatic cancers. METHODS: There were two strata (12 patients each): (i) NSCLC/melanoma progressing on prior anti-PD-1 therapy, (ii) other cancer types; anti-PD-1-naive. Patients received 6 cycles of pembrolizumab, starting 1 week before HFRT. Patients had ≥2 lesions; only one was irradiated (8 Gy × 3 for first half; 17 Gy × 1 for second half in each stratum) and the other(s) followed for response. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients, 20 (83%) had treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (all grade 1 or 2). There were eight grade 3 AEs, none treatment related. There were no dose-limiting toxicities or grade 4/5 AEs. Stratum 1: two patients (of 12) with progression on prior PD-1 blockade experienced prolonged responses (9.2 and 28.1 months). Stratum 2: one patient experienced a complete response and two had prolonged stable disease (7.4 and 7.0 months). Immune profiling demonstrated that anti-PD-1 therapy and radiation induced a consistent increase in the proliferation marker Ki67 in PD-1-expressing CD8 T cells. CONCLUSIONS: HFRT was well tolerated with pembrolizumab, and in some patients with metastatic NSCLC or melanoma, it reinvigorated a systemic response despite previous progression on anti-PD-1 therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02303990 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ).