The oxygen reactivity index indicates disturbed local perfusion regulation after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral autoregulation (CA) can be impaired in patients with delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The Pressure Reactivity Index (PRx, correlation of blood pressure and intracranial pressure) and Oxygen Reactivity Index (ORx, correlation of cerebral perfusion pressure and brain tissue oxygenation, PbtO2) are both believed to estimate CA. We hypothesized that CA could be poorer in hypoperfused territories during DCI and that ORx and PRx may not be equally effective in detecting such local variances. METHODS: ORx and PRx were compared daily in 76 patients with aSAH with or without DCI until the time of DCI diagnosis. The ICP/PbtO2-probes of DCI patients were retrospectively stratified by being in or outside areas of hypoperfusion via CT perfusion image, resulting in three groups: DCI + /probe + (DCI patients, probe located inside the hypoperfused area), DCI + /probe- (probe outside the hypoperfused area), DCI- (no DCI). RESULTS: PRx and ORx were not correlated (r = - 0.01, p = 0.56). Mean ORx but not PRx was highest when the probe was located in a hypoperfused area (ORx DCI + /probe + 0.28 ± 0.13 vs. DCI + /probe- 0.18 ± 0.15, p < 0.05; PRx DCI + /probe + 0.12 ± 0.17 vs. DCI + /probe- 0.06 ± 0.20, p = 0.35). PRx detected poorer autoregulation during the early phase with relatively higher ICP (days 1-3 after hemorrhage) but did not differentiate the three groups on the following days when ICP was lower on average. ORx was higher in the DCI + /probe + group than in the other two groups from day 3 onward. ORx and PRx did not differ between patients with DCI, whose probe was located elsewhere, and patients without DCI (ORx DCI + /probe- 0.18 ± 0.15 vs. DCI- 0.20 ± 0.14; p = 0.50; PRx DCI + /probe- 0.06 ± 0.20 vs. DCI- 0.08 ± 0.17, p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: PRx and ORx are not interchangeable measures of autoregulation, as they likely measure different homeostatic mechanisms. PRx represents the classical cerebrovascular reactivity and might be better suited to detect disturbed autoregulation during phases with moderately elevated ICP. Autoregulation may be poorer in territories affected by DCI. These local perfusion disturbances leading up to DCI may be more readily detected by ORx than PRx. Further research should investigate their robustness to detect DCI and to serve as a basis for autoregulation-targeted treatment after aSAH.

Intraarterial Nimodipine Versus Induced Hypertension for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia: A Modified Treatment Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Rescue treatment for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after subarachnoid hemorrhage can include induced hypertension (iHTN) and, in refractory cases, endovascular approaches, of which selective, continuous intraarterial nimodipine (IAN) is one variant. The combination of iHTN and IAN can dramatically increase vasopressor demand. In case of unsustainable doses, iHTN is often prioritized over IAN. However, evidence in this regard is largely lacking. We investigated the effects of a classical (iHTN+IAN) and modified (IANonly) treatment protocol for refractory DCI in an observational study. METHODS: Rescue treatment for DCI was initiated with iHTN (target >180 mm Hg systolic) and escalated to IAN in refractory cases. Until July 2018, both iHTN and IAN were offered in cases refractory to iHTN alone. After protocol modification, iHTN target was preemptively lowered to >120 mm Hg when IAN was initiated (IANonly). Primary outcome was noradrenaline demand. Secondary outcomes included noradrenaline-associated complications, brain tissue oxygenation, DCI-related infarction and favorable 6-month outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 4-5). RESULTS: N=29 and n=20 patients were treated according to the classical and modified protocol, respectively. Protocol modification resulted in a significant reduction of noradrenaline demand (iHTN+IAN 0.70±0.54 µg/kg per minute and IANonly 0.26±0.20 µg/kg per minute, P<0.0001) and minor complications (15.0% versus 48.3%, unadjusted odds ratio, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.05-0.79]; P<0.05) with comparable rates of major complications (20.0% versus 20.7%, odds ratio, 0.96 [0.23-3.95]; P=0.95). Incidence of DCI-related infarction (45.0% versus 41.1%, odds ratio, 1.16 [0.37-3.66]; P=0.80) and favorable clinical outcome (55.6% versus 40.0%, odds ratio, 1.88 [0.55-6.39]; P=0.32) were similar. Brain tissue oxygenation was significantly higher with IANonly (26.6±12.8, 39.6±15.4 mm Hg; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Assuming the potential of iHTN to be exhausted in case of refractory hypoperfusion, additional IAN may serve as a last-resort measure to bridge hypoperfusion in the DCI phase. With close monitoring, preemptive lowering of pressure target after induction of IAN may be a safe alternative to alleviate total noradrenaline load and potentially reduce complication rate.

Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure During Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES: The recommendation of induced hypertension for delayed cerebral ischemia treatment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has been challenged recently and ideal pressure targets are missing. A new concept advocates an individual cerebral perfusion pressure where cerebral autoregulation functions best to ensure optimal global perfusion. We characterized optimal cerebral perfusion pressure at time of delayed cerebral ischemia and tested the conformity of induced hypertension with this target value. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: University hospital neurocritical care unit. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with invasive neuromonitoring (20 with delayed cerebral ischemia, 19 without delayed cerebral ischemia). INTERVENTIONS: Induced hypertension greater than 180 mm Hg systolic blood pressure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Changepoint analysis was used to calculate significant changes in cerebral perfusion pressure, optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, and the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure 48 hours before delayed cerebral ischemia diagnosis. Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure increased 30 hours before the onset of delayed cerebral ischemia from 82.8 ± 12.5 to 86.3 ± 11.4 mm Hg (p < 0.05). Three hours before delayed cerebral ischemia, a changepoint was also found in the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (decrease from -0.2 ± 11.2 to -7.7 ± 7.6 mm Hg; p < 0.05) with a corresponding increase in pressure reactivity index (0.09 ± 0.33 to 0.19 ± 0.37; p < 0.05). Cerebral perfusion pressure at time of delayed cerebral ischemia was lower than in patients without delayed cerebral ischemia in a comparable time frame (cerebral perfusion pressure delayed cerebral ischemia 81.4 ± 8.3 mm Hg, no delayed cerebral ischemia 90.4 ± 10.5 mm Hg; p < 0.05). Inducing hypertension resulted in a cerebral perfusion pressure above optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (+12.4 ± 8.3 mm Hg; p < 0.0001). Treatment response (improvement of delayed cerebral ischemia: induced hypertension+ [n = 15] or progression of delayed cerebral ischemia: induced hypertension- [n = 5]) did not correlate to either absolute values of cerebral perfusion pressure or optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, nor the resulting difference (cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.69]; optimal cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.97]; and the difference of cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure [p = 0.51]). CONCLUSIONS: At the time of delayed cerebral ischemia occurrence, there is a significant discrepancy between cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure with worsening of autoregulation, implying inadequate but identifiable individual perfusion. Standardized induction of hypertension resulted in cerebral perfusion pressures that exceeded individual optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in delayed cerebral ischemia patients. The potential benefit of individual blood pressure management guided by autoregulation-based optimal cerebral perfusion pressure should be explored in future intervention studies.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage-justifiable in light of long-term outcome?

PURPOSE: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is a potentially lifesaving procedure in refractory intracranial hypertension, which can prevent death from brainstem herniation but may cause survival in a disabled state. The spectrum of indications is expanding, and we present long-term results in a series of patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of previously registered data including all patients treated for SAH between 2010 and 2018 in a single institution. Patients treated with decompressive hemicraniectomy due to refractory intracranial hypertension were identified. Clinical outcome was assessed by means of the Glasgow outcome scale after 12 months. RESULTS: Of all 341 SAH cases, a total of 82 (24.0%) developed intracranial hypertension. Of those, 63 (18.5%) patients progressed into refractory ICP elevation and were treated with DHC. Younger age (OR 0.959, 95% CI 0.933 to 0.984; p = 0.002), anterior aneurysm location (OR 0.253, 95% CI 0.080 to 0.799; 0.019; p = 0.019), larger aneurysm size (OR 1.106, 95% CI 1.025 to 1.194; p = 0.010), and higher Hunt and Hess grading (OR 1.944, 95% CI 1.431 to 2.641; p < 0.001) were independently associated with the need for DHC. After 1 year, 10 (15.9%) patients after DHC were categorized as favorable outcome. Only younger age was independently associated with favorable outcome (OR 0.968 95% CI 0.951 to 0.986; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Decompressive hemicraniectomy, though lifesaving, has only a limited probability of survival in a clinically favorable condition. We identified young age to be the sole independent predictor of favorable outcome after DHC in SAH.

An Innovative Telemedical Network to Improve Infectious Disease Management in Critically Ill Patients and Outpatients (TELnet@NRW): Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based infectious disease and intensive care management is more relevant than ever. Medical expertise in the two disciplines is often geographically limited to university institutions. In addition, the interconnection between inpatient and outpatient care is often insufficient (eg, no shared electronic health record and no digital transfer of patient findings). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to establish and evaluate a telemedical inpatient-outpatient network based on expert teleconsultations to increase treatment quality in intensive care medicine and infectious diseases. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (February 2017 to January 2020) to establish a telemedicine inpatient-outpatient network among university hospitals, hospitals, and outpatient physicians in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Patients aged ≥18 years in the intensive care unit or consulting with a physician in the outpatient setting were eligible. We provided expert knowledge from intensivists and infectious disease specialists through advanced training courses and expert teleconsultations with 24/7/365 availability on demand respectively once per week to enhance treatment quality. The primary outcome was adherence to the 10 Choosing Wisely recommendations for infectious disease management. Guideline adherence was analyzed using binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 159,424 patients (10,585 inpatients and 148,839 outpatients) from 17 hospitals and 103 outpatient physicians were included. There was a significant increase in guideline adherence in the management of Staphylococcus aureus infections (odds ratio [OR] 4.00, 95% CI 1.83-9.20; P<.001) and in sepsis management in critically ill patients (OR 6.82, 95% CI 1.27-56.61; P=.04). There was a statistically nonsignificant decrease in sepsis-related mortality from 29% (19/66) in the control group to 23.8% (50/210) in the intervention group. Furthermore, the extension of treatment with prophylactic antibiotics after surgery was significantly less likely (OR 9.37, 95% CI 1.52-111.47; P=.04). Patients treated by outpatient physicians, who were regularly participating in expert teleconsultations, were also more likely to be treated according to guideline recommendations regarding antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infections (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.16-1.56; P<.001) and asymptomatic bacteriuria (OR 9.31, 95% CI 3.79-25.94; P<.001). For the other recommendations, we found no significant effects, or we had too few observations to generate models. The key limitations of our study include selection effects due to the applied on-site triage of patients as well as the limited possibilities to control for secular effects. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine facilitates a direct round-the-clock interaction over broad distances between intensivists or infectious disease experts and physicians who care for patients in hospitals without ready access to these experts. Expert teleconsultations increase guideline adherence and treatment quality in infectious disease and intensive care management, creating added value for critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03137589; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03137589.

Revisiting the Timeline of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Toward a Temporal Risk Profile.

BACKGROUND: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is one of the main determinants of clinical outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The classical description of risk for DCI over time is currently based on the outdated concept of angiographic vasospasm. The goal of this study was to assess the temporal risk profile of DCI, defined by extended clinical and radiological criteria, as well as the impact the time point of DCI onset has on clinical outcome. METHODS: All patients with aneurysmal SAH referred to a single tertiary care center between 2010 and 2018 were considered for inclusion. This study was designed as a retrospective cohort analysis and data were extracted from existing patient files. In conscious patients, DCI was diagnosed clinically, and in unconscious patients, diagnosis was based on perfusion computed tomography imaging and multimodal neuromonitoring. Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale scores were assessed after 12 months and compared between patients with early (< day 7) and late (≥ day 7) DCI onset. RESULTS: The median delay from day of the hemorrhage (day 0) until detection of the first DCI event was 7.0 days, with an interquartile range of 5 days. The probability of DCI development over time demonstrated a bimodal distribution with a peak risk on day 5 (0.084; confidence interval 0.05.5-0.122) and a second peak on day 9 (0.077; confidence interval 0.045-0.120). A total of 27 patients (15.6%) suffered dominant hemispheric or severe bilateral DCI-related infarctions, resulting in the withdrawal of technical life support. Of those, the majority (20 patients, 22.2%) presented with early DCI onset (vs. late onset: 7 patients, 8.4%; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The risk profile of DCI over time mirrors the description of angiographic vasospasm; however, it comes with an added timely delay of 1 to 2 days. Early occurrence of DCI (before day 7) is associated with a higher infarct load and DCI-related mortality. Although the exact causal relationship remains to be determined, the time point of DCI onset may serve as an independent prognostic criterion in decision-making.

Incremental Versus Immediate Induction of Hypertension in the Treatment of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a common complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and contributes to unfavorable outcome. In patients with deterioration despite prophylactic nimodipine treatment, induced hypertension (iHTN) can be considered, although the safety and efficacy of induction are still a matter of debate. In this study, two iHTN treatment algorithms were compared with different approaches toward setting pressure targets. METHODS: In a cohort of 325 consecutive patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, 139 patients were treated by induced hypertension as a first tier treatment. On diagnosing DCI, blood pressure was raised via norepinephrine infusion in 20-mm Hg increments in 37 patients (iHTNincr), whereas 102 patients were treated by immediate elevation to systolic pressure above 180 mm Hg (iHTNimm). Treatment choice was based on personal preference of the treating physician but with a gradual shift away from incremental elevation. Both groups were evaluated for DCI-caused infarction, the need of additional endovascular rescue treatment, the occurrence of pressor-treatment-related complications, and clinical outcome assessed by the extended Glasgow outcome scale after 12 months. RESULTS: The rate of refractory DCI requiring additional rescue therapy was comparable in both groups (48.9% in iHTNincr, 40.0% in iHTNimm; p = 0.332). The type of induced hypertension was not independently associated with the occurrence of DCI-related infarction in a logistic regression model (odds ratio 1.004; 95% confidence interval 0.329-3.443; p = 0.942). Similar rates of pressor-treatment-related complications were observed in both treatment groups. Favorable outcome was reached in 44 (43.1%) patients in the immediate vs. 10 (27.0%) patients in the incremental treatment group (p = 0.076). However, only Hunt and Hess grading was identified as an independent predictor variable of clinical outcome (odds ratio 0.422; 95% confidence interval 0.216-0.824; p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate induction of hypertension with higher pressure targets did not result in a lower rate of DCI-related infarctions but was not associated with a higher complication rate compared with an incremental approach. Future tailored blood pressure management based on patient- and time-point-specific needs will hopefully better balance the neurological advantages versus the systemic complications of induced hypertension.

Treatment of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Good-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Any Role for Invasive Neuromonitoring?

BACKGROUND: Good-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (Hunt and Hess 1-2) is generally associated with a favorable prognosis. Nonetheless, patients may still experience secondary deterioration due to delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), contributing to poor outcome. In those patients, neurological assessment is challenging and invasive neuromonitoring (INM) may help guide DCI treatment. METHODS: An observational analysis of 135 good-grade SAH patients referred to a single tertiary care center between 2010 and 2018 was performed. In total, 54 good-grade SAH patients with secondary deterioration evading further neurological assessment, were prospectively enrolled for this analysis. The cohort was separated into two groups: before and after introduction of INM in 2014 (pre-INMSecD: n = 28; post-INMSecD: n = 26). INM included either parenchymal oxygen saturation measurement (ptiO2), cerebral microdialysis or both. Episodes of DCI (ptiO2 < 10 mmHg or lactate/pyruvate > 40) were treated via induced hypertension or in refractory cases by endovascular means. The primary outcome was defined as the extended Glasgow outcome scale after 12 months. In addition, we recorded the amount of imaging studies performed and the occurrence of silent and overall DCI-related infarction. RESULTS: Secondary deterioration, impeding neurological assessment, occurred in 54 (40.0%) of all good-grade SAH patients. In those patients, a comparable rate of favorable outcome at 12 months was observed before and after the introduction of INM (pre-INMSecD 14 (50.0%) vs. post-INMSecD 16, (61.6%); p = 0.253). A significant increase in good recovery (pre-INMSecD 6 (50.0%) vs. post-INMSecD 14, (61.6%); p = 0.014) was observed alongside a reduction in the incidence of silent infarctions (pre-INMSecD 8 (28.6%) vs. post-INMSecD 2 (7.7%); p = 0.048) and of overall DCI-related infarction (pre-INMSecD 12 (42.8%) vs. post-INMSecD 4 (23.1%); p = 0.027). The number of CT investigations performed during the DCI time frame decreased from 9.8 ± 5.2 scans in the pre-INMSecD group to 6.1 ± 4.0 (p = 0.003) in the post-INMSecD group. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable number of patients with good-grade SAH experiences secondary deterioration rendering them neurologically not assessable. In our cohort, the introduction of INM to guide DCI treatment in patients with secondary deterioration increased the rate of good recovery after 12 months. Additionally, a significant reduction of CT scans and infarction load was recorded, which may have an underestimated impact on quality of life and more subtle neuropsychological deficits common after SAH.

Ethics rounds: affecting ethics quality at all organisational levels.

Clinical ethics support (CES) services are experiencing a phase of flourishing and of growing recognition. At the same time, however, the expectations regarding the acceptance and the integration of traditional CES services into clinical processes are not met. Ethics rounds as an additional instrument or as an alternative to traditional clinical ethics support strategies might have the potential to address both deficits. By implementing ethics rounds, we were able to better address the needs of the clinical sections and to develop a more comprehensive account of ethics quality in our hospital, which covers the level of decisions and actions, and also the level of systems and processes and aspects of ethical leadership.

Intra-arterial nimodipine for the treatment of refractory delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is one of the main contributors to poor clinical outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Endovascular spasmolysis with intra-arterial nimodipine (IAN) may resolve angiographic vasospasm, but its effect on infarct prevention and clinical outcome is still unclear. We report the effect of IAN on infarction rates and functional outcome in a consecutive series of SAH patients. METHODS: To assess the effectiveness of IAN, we collected functional outcome data of all SAH patients referred to a single tertiary center since its availability (2011-2020). IAN was primarily reserved as a last tier option for DCI refractory to induced hypertension (iHTN). Functional outcome was assessed after 12 months according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS, favorable outcome = GOS4-5). RESULTS: Out of 376 consecutive SAH patients, 186 (49.5%) developed DCI. Thereof, a total of 96 (25.5%) patients remained unresponsive to iHTN and received IAN. DCI-related infarction was observed in 44 (45.8%) of IAN-treated patients with a median infarct volume of 111.6 mL (Q1: 51.6 to Q3: 245.7). Clinical outcome was available for 84 IAN-treated patients. Of those, a total of 40 (47.6%) patients reached a favorable outcome after 1 year. Interventional complications were observed in 9 (9.4%) of the IAN-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Intra-arterial spasmolysis using nimodipine infusion was associated with low treatment specific complications. Despite presenting a subgroup of severely affected SAH patients, almost half of IAN-treated patients were able to lead an independent life after 1 year of follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00030505.

Changes in endogenous daytime melatonin levels after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage - Preliminary findings from an observational cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with early and delayed brain injury due to several underlying and interrelated processes, which include inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial, and neuronal apoptosis. Treatment with melatonin, a cytoprotective neurohormone with anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and anti-apoptotic effects, has been shown to attenuate early brain injury (EBI) and to prevent delayed cerebral vasospasm in experimental aSAH models. Less is known about the role of endogenous melatonin for aSAH outcome and how its production is altered by the pathophysiological cascades initiated during EBI. In the present observational study, we analyzed changes in melatonin levels during the first three weeks after aSAH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Daytime (from 11:00 am to 05:00 pm) melatonin levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in serum samples obtained from 30 patients on the day of aSAH onset (d0) and in five pre-defined time intervals during the early (d1-4), critical (d5-8, d9-12, d13-15) and late (d16-21) phase. Perioperative daytime melatonin levels determined in 30 patients who underwent elective open aortic surgery served as a control for the acute effects of surgical treatment on melatonin homeostasis. RESULTS: There was no difference between serum melatonin levels measured in the control patients and on the day of aSAH onset (p = 0.664). However, aSAH was associated with a sustained up-regulation that started during the critical phase (d9-12) and progressed to the late phase (d16-21), during which almost 80% of the patients reached daytime melatonin levels above 5 pg/ml. In addition, subgroup analyses revealed higher melatonin levels on d5-8 in patients with a poor clinical status on admission (p = 0.031), patients with anterior communicating artery aneurysms (p = 0.040) and patients without an external ventricular drain (p = 0.018), possibly pointing to a role of hypothalamic dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our observations in a small cohort of patients provide first evidence for a delayed up-regulation of circulatory daytime melatonin levels after aSAH and a role of aneurysm location for higher levels during the critical phase. These findings are discussed in terms of previous results about stress-induced melatonin production and the role of hypothalamic and brainstem involvement for melatonin levels after aSAH.

Invasive neuromonitoring with an extended definition of delayed cerebral ischemia is associated with improved outcome after poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: The current definition of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is based on clinical characteristics precluding its use in patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Additional concepts to evaluate the unconscious patient are required. Invasive neuromonitoring (INM) may allow timely detection of metabolic and oxygenation crises before irreversible damage has occurred. METHODS: The authors present a cohort analysis of all consecutive SAH patients referred to a single tertiary care center between 2010 and 2018. The cohort (n = 190) was split into two groups: one before (n = 96) and one after (n = 94) the introduction of INM in 2014. A total of 55 poor-grade SAH patients were prospectively monitored using parenchymal oxygen saturation measurement and cerebral microdialysis. The primary outcome was the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) score after 12 months. RESULTS: With neuromonitoring, the first DCI event was detected earlier (mean 2.2 days, p = 0.002). The overall rate of DCI-related infarctions decreased significantly (from 44.8% to 22.3%; p = 0.001) after the introduction of invasive monitoring. After 12 months, a higher rate of favorable outcome was observed in the post-INM group, compared to the pre-INM group (53.8% vs 39.8%), with a significant difference in the GOSE score distribution (OR 4.86, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.07, p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort analysis of poor-grade SAH patients, the introduction of INM and the extension of the classic DCI definition toward a functional dimension resulted in an earlier detection and treatment of DCI events. This led to an overall decrease in DCI-related infarctions and an improvement in outcome.

Compliance with hand hygiene on surgical, medical, and neurologic intensive care units: direct observation versus calculated disinfectant usage.

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is considered the single most effective measure to prevent and control health care-associated infections (HAIs). Although there have been several reports on compliance rates (CRs) to HH recommendations, data for intensive care units (ICUs) in general and for shift- and indication-specific opportunities in particular are scarce. METHODS: The aim of this study was to collect data on ICU-, shift-, and indication-specific opportunities, activities and CRs at a surgical ICU (SICU), a medical ICU (MICU), and a neurologic ICU (NICU) at the University Hospital Aachen based on direct observation (DO) and calculated disinfectant usage (DU). RESULTS: Opportunities for HH recorded over a 24-hour period were significantly higher for the SICU (188 per patient day [PD]) and MICU (163 per PD) than for the NICU (124 per PD). Directly observed CRs were 39% (73/188) in the SICU, 72% (117/163) in the MICU, and 73% (90/124) in the NICU. However, CRs calculated as a measure of DU were considerably lower: 16% (29/188) in the SICU, 21% (34/163) in the MICU, and 25% (31/124) in the NICU. Notably, CRs calculated from DO were lowest before aseptic tasks and before patient contact. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first data picturing a complete day, including shift- and indication-specific analyses, and comparing directly observed CRs with those calculated based on DU, the latter of which revealed a 2.75-fold difference. Worrisomely, CRs were very low, especially concerning indications of greatest impact in preventing HAIs, such as before aseptic task. Thus, the gathering of additional data on CRs and the reasons for noncompliance is warranted.