ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mucin-1 is known to be over-expressed by various human carcinomas and is shed into the circulation where it can be detected in patient's serum by specific anti-Mucin-1 antibodies, such as the tumour marker assays CA 15-3 and CA 27.29. The prognostic value of Mucin-1 expression in ovarian carcinoma remains uncertain. One aim of this study was to compare the concentrations of Mucin-1 in a cohort of patients with either benign or malignant ovarian tumours detected by CA 15-3 and CA 27.29. Another aim of this study was to evaluate Mucin-1 expression by immunohistochemistry in a different cohort of ovarian carcinoma patients with respect to grade, stage and survival. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with and treated for ovarian tumours were included in the study. Patient characteristics, histology including histological subtype, tumour stage, grading and follow-up data were available from patient records. Serum Mucin-1 concentrations were measured with ELISA technology detecting CA 15-3 and CA 27.29, Mucin-1 tissue expression was determined by immunohistochemistry using the VU4H5 and VU3C6 anti-Mucin-1 antibodies. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS 18.0. RESULTS: Serum samples of 118 patients with ovarian tumours were obtained to determine levels of Mucin-1. Median CA 15-3 and CA 27.29 concentrations were significantly higher in patients with malignant disease (p< 0.001) than in patients with benign disease.Paraffin-embedded tissue of 154 patients with ovarian carcinoma was available to determine Mucin-1 expression. The majority of patients presented with advanced stage disease at primary diagnosis. Median follow-up time was 11.39 years. Immunohistochemistry results for VU4H5 showed significant differences with respect to tumour grade, FIGO stage and overall survival. Patients with negative expression had a mean overall survival of 9.33 years compared to 6.27 years for patients with positive Mucin-1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: This study found significantly elevated Mucin-1 serum concentrations in ovarian carcinoma patients as compared to those women suffering from benign ovarian diseases. However, it needs to be noted that Mucin-1 concentrations in carcinoma patients showed a rather high variability. Results from immunohistochemistry indicate that Mucin-1 has a prognostic relevance in ovarian carcinomas when evaluating the expression by VU4H5 antibody.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Neoplasm/metabolism , Carcinoma/metabolism , Mucin-1/metabolism , Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , CA-125 Antigen/metabolism , Carcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma/pathology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Analysis , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIM: Mucin 1 (MUC1) is a high molecular weight transmembrane glycoprotein with unique properties which is used as a tumour marker in sera of ovarian cancer patients. The common test kit for the cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) is not sufficient for the discrimination between sera from healthy individuals and sera from patients with benign changes of the ovaries. In this study, the newly developed anti-MUC1 antibody PankoMab was tested in normal and patient sera with an ELISA, and the obtained data were compared against data from experiments using the commercial kits for CA15-3 and CA27.29. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sera of 123 patients diagnosed with benign or malignant changes of the ovaries were obtained before surgery. CA15-3 was analysed with an automated ELISA system (Immulite 2000). CA27.29 was measured with the ST AIA-PACK CA27.29 for the AIA-600II-Analyzer (Tosoh Bioscience, Belgium). The release of MUC1 fragments carrying the TA-MUC1 epitope was analysed with an ELISA using the PankoMab antibody. RESULTS: Using the already established markers CA15-3 and CA27.29, significant differences between benign and malignant changes of the ovaries were found. The same result was obtained with the newly developed TA-MUC1 test. In contrast to CA15-3 and CA27.29, however, the median of TA-MUC1 was lower in sera from patients with ovarian cancer compared to sera from patients with benign diseases of the ovary. However, sera of patients with benign ovarian diseases had significantly higher TA-MUC1 values compared to sera of healthy individuals. The risk score of TA-MUC1 achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 78.4% in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and a sensitivity of 37% for the prediction of ovarian disease, at 95% specificity. CONCLUSION: In this study we employed an additional marker for MUC1 which recognizes a more tumour-specific MUC1 epitope (TA-MUC1). We obtained results showing significant differences between detection in benign and malignant ovarian diseases. Although the mean MUC1 values were elevated in sera of patients with ovarian cancer compared to values of patients with benign cysts, by using all three test systems, a different result was found by analysing the median TA-MUC1 values. PankoMab could be a useful, additional tool for obtaining conclusive information on the transformation process from benign to malignant state in ovarian tissues.