ABSTRACT
Three experiments show that the motivational effects of regulatory fit (consistency between regulatory state and strategic means) are context dependent. With no explicit decision rule about when to stop (Experiment 1) or an explicit enjoyment stop rule (Experiments 2 and 3), participants exerted more effort on tasks when experiencing regulatory fit than when experiencing regulatory nonfit. With an explicit sufficiency stop rule (Experiments 2 and 3), participants exerted less effort when experiencing regulatory fit than when experiencing regulatory nonfit. The interactive effect of regulatory fit and stop rules can be explained by misattribution of rightness feelings from regulatory fit; the effect was eliminated by drawing participants' attention to an earlier event as a source of rightness feelings (Experiments 1 and 3).
Subject(s)
Decision Making , Motivation , Adult , Affect , Attention , Female , Humans , Male , Psychology/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and QuestionnairesSubject(s)
Otolaryngology , Periodicals as Topic , Publishing , Humans , International Cooperation , Scholarly CommunicationABSTRACT
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVE: At the conclusion of this article, the readers should be able to 1) describe the laryngeal findings in patients who use combination therapy for asthma, 2) discuss the mechanism of laryngeal irritation from the use of inhalers, and 3) describe possible mechanisms for reducing laryngeal irritation and secondary dysphonia from the use of inhalers. OBJECTIVES: To describe voice changes and laryngeal findings in patients who are started on combination corticosteroid and bronchodilator therapy in the form of a dry powder inhaler (DPI). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, single-subject design. METHODS: Retrospective review of 10 consecutive patients meeting inclusion criteria, who presented at the voice center with more than 4 weeks of dysphonia after being started on a combination form of asthma medication for control and maintenance therapy. All patients were nonsmokers and without history of previous identification or excision of vocal pathology. All patients were treated previously with a proton pump inhibitor for gastroesophageal reflux. Laryngeal videostroboscopic evaluations were performed on all patients. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their perceived voice change and history of medical maintenance therapy for asthma. RESULTS: Dysphonia was present in the patients selected for greater than 4 weeks. Patients had been switched to combination therapy after previously using traditional two-drug asthma regimens. In eight of nine patients, the vocal folds demonstrated areas of hyperemia, with plaque-like changes on the surface mucosa. Reduced amplitude of vibration and a reduction in mucosal wave propagation were present on videostroboscopy. Questionnaires revealed that all patients were initiated on combination DPI treatment within the last 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Dysphonia caused by a change in the surface mucosa is a side effect from the use of DPI therapy for asthma. The high-impact force during inhalation of the medication and carrier leads to deposition of particles in the upper airway. We believe the extent of mucosal irritation can be minimized by patient education in the proper delivery of DPI. In some cases, however, return of the two medications delivered separately was necessary. The irritation of the laryngeal mucosa and return of normal vibratory parameters occurred in all patients.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/adverse effects , Albuterol/analogs & derivatives , Albuterol/adverse effects , Androstadienes/adverse effects , Asthma/drug therapy , Bronchodilator Agents/adverse effects , Laryngeal Diseases/chemically induced , Laryngoscopy , Larynx/drug effects , Voice Disorders/chemically induced , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Albuterol/administration & dosage , Androstadienes/administration & dosage , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Dilatation, Pathologic/chemically induced , Dilatation, Pathologic/diagnosis , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Fluticasone , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Humans , Laryngeal Diseases/diagnosis , Laryngeal Edema/chemically induced , Laryngeal Edema/diagnosis , Laryngeal Neoplasms/chemically induced , Laryngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Laryngitis/chemically induced , Laryngitis/diagnosis , Larynx/pathology , Leukoplakia/chemically induced , Leukoplakia/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Precancerous Conditions/chemically induced , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Salmeterol Xinafoate , Vocal Cords/drug effects , Vocal Cords/pathology , Voice Disorders/diagnosisABSTRACT
Acute complications from chemoradiation for head and neck cancers are relatively common. These can be minor or severe and can have a significant impact on the patient's quality of life. The incidence of late-onset (>5 years after cancer cure) complications is unknown, but the effect on quality of life is just as severe as with acute problems. What makes matters worse is that many of these patients lived years without dysphagia or other issues and were able to resume a normal lifestyle before developing complications. We present 4 cases involving patients with late-onset complications and discuss the need to remain vigilant in follow-up and caring for patients with head and neck cancer.