Phthalate and phthalate replacement concentrations in relationship to adiposity in a multi-racial cohort of children.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Phthalates and phthalate replacements are used in multiple everyday products, making many of them bioavailable to children. Experimental studies suggest that phthalates and their replacements may be obesogenic, however, epidemiologic studies remain inconsistent. Therefore, our objective was to examine the association between phthalates, phthalate replacements and childhood adiposity/obesity markers in children. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 630 racial/ethnically diverse children ages 4-8 years. Urinary oxidative metabolites of DINCH and DEHTP, three low molecular weight (LMW) phthalates, and eleven high molecular weight (HMW) phthalates were measured. Weight, height, waist circumference and % body fat were measured. Composite molar sum groups (nmol/ml) were natural log-transformed. Linear regression models adjusted for urine specific gravity, sex, age, race-ethnicity, birthweight, breastfeeding, reported activity level, mother's education and pre-pregnancy BMI. RESULTS: All children had LMW and HMW phthalate metabolites and 88% had DINCH levels above the limit of detection. One unit higher in the log of DINCH was associated with 0.106 units lower BMI z-score [ß = -0.106 (95% CI: -0.181, -0.031)], 0.119 units lower waist circumference z-score [ß = -0.119 (95% CI: -0.189, -0.050)], and 0.012 units lower percent body fat [ß = -0.012 (95% CI: -0.019, -0.005)]. LMW and HMW group values were not associated with adiposity/obesity. CONCLUSIONS: We report an inverse association between child urinary DINCH levels, a non-phthalate plasticizer that has replaced DEHP in several applications, and BMI z-score, waist circumference z-score and % body fat in children. Few prior studies of phthalates and their replacements in children have been conducted in diverse populations. Moreover, DINCH has not received a great deal of attention or regulation, but it is a common exposure. In summary, understanding the ubiquitous nature of these chemical exposures and ultimately their sources will contribute to our understanding of their relationship with obesity.

Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety.

This review assessed the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic agents (prostaglandins, oxytocin, mifepristone, hyaluronidase, and nitric oxide donors) and mechanical methods (single- and double-balloon catheters, laminaria, membrane stripping, and amniotomy) and those generally considered under the rubric of complementary medicine (castor oil, nipple stimulation, sexual intercourse, herbal medicine, and acupuncture). A substantial body of published reports, including 2 large network meta-analyses, support the safety and efficacy of misoprostol (PGE1) when used for cervical ripening and labor induction. Misoprostol administered vaginally at doses of 50 µg has the highest probability of achieving vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Regardless of dosing, route, and schedule of administration, when used for cervical ripening and labor induction, prostaglandin E2 seems to have similar efficacy in decreasing cesarean delivery rates. Globally, although oxytocin represents the most widely used pharmacologic agent for labor induction, its effectiveness is highly dependent on parity and cervical status. Oxytocin is more effective than expectant management in inducing labor, and the efficacy of oxytocin is enhanced when combined with amniotomy. However, prostaglandins administered vaginally or intracervically are more effective in inducing labor than oxytocin. A single 200-mg oral tablet of mifepristone seems to represent the lowest effective dose for cervical ripening. The bulk of the literature assessing relaxin suggests this agent has limited benefit when used for this indication. Although intracervical injection of hyaluronidase may cause cervical ripening, the need for intracervical administration has limited the use of this agent. Concerning the vaginal administration of nitric oxide donors, including isosorbide mononitrate, isosorbide, nitroglycerin, and sodium nitroprusside, the higher incidence of side effects with these agents has limited their use. A synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator has been found to be effective for preinduction cervical ripening. Although a pharmacologic agent may be administered after the use of the synthetic hygroscopic dilator, in an attempt to reduce the interval to vaginal delivery, concomitant use of mechanical and pharmacologic methods is being explored. Combining the use of a single-balloon catheter with dinoprostone, misoprostol, or oxytocin enhances the efficacy of these pharmacologic agents in cervical ripening and labor induction. The efficacy of single- and double-balloon catheters in cervical ripening and labor induction seems similar. To date, the combination of misoprostol with an intracervical catheter seems to be the best approach when balancing delivery times with safety. Although complementary methods are occasionally used by patients, given the lack of data documenting their efficacy and safety, these methods are rarely used in hospital settings.

Multiethnic growth standards for fetal body composition and organ volumes derived from 3D ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND: A major goal of contemporary obstetrical practice is to optimize fetal growth and development throughout pregnancy. To date, fetal growth during prenatal care is assessed by performing ultrasonographic measurement of 2-dimensional fetal biometry to calculate an estimated fetal weight. Our group previously established 2-dimensional fetal growth standards using sonographic data from a large cohort with multiple sonograms. A separate objective of that investigation involved the collection of fetal volumes from the same cohort. OBJECTIVE: The Fetal 3D Study was designed to establish standards for fetal soft tissue and organ volume measurements by 3-dimensional ultrasonography and compare growth trajectories with conventional 2-dimensional measures where applicable. STUDY DESIGN: The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal 3D Study included research-quality images of singletons collected in a prospective, racially and ethnically diverse, low-risk cohort of pregnant individuals at 12 U.S. sites, with up to 5 scans per fetus (N=1730 fetuses). Abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness was measured from 2-dimensional images and fetal limb soft tissue parameters extracted from 3-dimensional multiplanar views. Cerebellar, lung, liver, and kidney volumes were measured using virtual organ computer aided analysis. Fractional arm and thigh total volumes, and fractional lean limb volumes were measured, with fractional limb fat volume calculated by subtracting lean from total. For each measure, weighted curves (fifth, 50th, 95th percentiles) were derived from 15 to 41 weeks' using linear mixed models for repeated measures with cubic splines. RESULTS: Subcutaneous thickness of the abdomen, arm, and thigh increased linearly, with slight acceleration around 27 to 29 weeks. Fractional volumes of the arm, thigh, and lean limb volumes increased along a quadratic curvature, with acceleration around 29 to 30 weeks. In contrast, growth patterns for 2-dimensional humerus and femur lengths demonstrated a logarithmic shape, with fastest growth in the second trimester. The mid-arm area curve was similar in shape to fractional arm volume, with an acceleration around 30 weeks, whereas the curve for the lean arm area was more gradual. The abdominal area curve was similar to the mid-arm area curve with an acceleration around 29 weeks. The mid-thigh and lean area curves differed from the arm areas by exhibiting a deceleration at 39 weeks. The growth curves for the mid-arm and thigh circumferences were more linear. Cerebellar 2-dimensional diameter increased linearly, whereas cerebellar 3-dimensional volume growth gradually accelerated until 32 weeks followed by a more linear growth. Lung, kidney, and liver volumes all demonstrated gradual early growth followed by a linear acceleration beginning at 25 weeks for lungs, 26 to 27 weeks for kidneys, and 29 weeks for liver. CONCLUSION: Growth patterns and timing of maximal growth for 3-dimensional lean and fat measures, limb and organ volumes differed from patterns revealed by traditional 2-dimensional growth measures, suggesting these parameters reflect unique facets of fetal growth. Growth in these three-dimensional measures may be altered by genetic, nutritional, metabolic, or environmental influences and pregnancy complications, in ways not identifiable using corresponding 2-dimensional measures. Further investigation into the relationships of these 3-dimensional standards to abnormal fetal growth, adverse perinatal outcomes, and health status in postnatal life is warranted.

Nutritional Intake in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies: A Descriptive Analysis of a Multisite United States Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Twin gestations have greater nutritional demands than singleton gestations, yet dietary intakes of women with twin gestations have not been well described. METHODS: In a prospective, multi-site US study of 148 women with dichorionic twin gestations (2012-2013), we examined longitudinal changes in diet across pregnancy. Women completed a food frequency questionnaire during each trimester of pregnancy. We examined changes in means of total energy and energy-adjusted dietary components using linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: Mean energy intake (95% CI) across the three trimesters was 2010 kcal/day (1846, 2175), 2177 kcal/day (2005, 2349), 2253 kcal/day (2056, 2450), respectively (P = 0.01), whereas the Healthy Eating Index-2010 was 63.9 (62.1, 65.6), 64.5 (62.6, 66.3), 63.2 (61.1, 65.3), respectively (P = 0.53). DISCUSSION: Women with twin gestations moderately increased total energy as pregnancy progressed, though dietary composition and quality remained unchanged. These findings highlight aspects of nutritional intake that may need to be improved among women carrying twins.

Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Combined with a Foley Catheter among Individuals with Obesity Undergoing Induction.

BACKGROUND: Combining pharmacologic agents with mechanical ripening achieves the shortest labor duration, yet there is no clear evidence on route of drug administration in obese individuals. The use of buccal misoprostol has shown greater patient acceptance but remains understudied. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the difference in time to delivery of buccal compared with vaginal misoprostol in combination with a Foley catheter (FC) for induction of labor (IOL) in the obese population. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing identical dosages (25 µg) of buccal and vaginal misoprostol in combination with a FC. The parent trial was an institutional review board-approved, randomized clinical trial conducted from June 2019 through January 2020. Labor management was standardized among participants. Women undergoing IOL at ≥37 weeks with a singleton gestation and cervical dilation ≤2 cm were included. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was stratified. The primary outcome was time to delivery. RESULTS: A total of 215 participants were included. Demographic characteristics were similar between the three groups. Vaginal drug administration achieved a faster median time to delivery than the buccal route among patients with a body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 (vaginal misoprostol-FC: 21.3 hours vs. buccal misoprostol-FC: 25.2 hours, p = 0.006). There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the two groups. Furthermore, patients with a BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 receiving vaginal misoprostol delivered 1.2 times faster than women who received buccal misoprostol after censoring for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity (hazard ratio: 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.7). There were no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: We found that vaginal misoprostol was superior to buccal misoprostol when combined with a FC among individuals with a BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2. Vaginal misoprostol should be the preferred route of drug administration for term IOL in this population. KEY POINTS: · Vaginal misoprostol was superior to buccal route among patients with obesity.. · There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the two groups.. · Vaginal misoprostol should be the preferred route of administration among patients with obesity..

Fetal and Maternal Factors Predictive of Primary Cesarean Delivery at Term in a Low-Risk Population: NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine associations of fetal biometric and amniotic fluid measures with intrapartum primary cesarean delivery (PCD) and develop prediction models for PCD based on ultrasound parameters and maternal factors. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the National Institute of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Fetal Growth Studies-singleton cohort (2009-2013) including patients with uncomplicated pregnancies and intent to deliver vaginally at ≥370/7 weeks. The estimated fetal weight, individual biometric parameters, fetal asymmetry measurements, and amniotic fluid single deepest vertical pocket assessed at the final scan (mean 37.5 ± 1.9 weeks) were categorized as <10th, 10th to 90th (reference), and >90th percentiles. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between the ultrasound measures and PCD. Fetal and maternal SuperLearner prediction algorithms were constructed for the full and nulliparous cohorts. RESULTS: Of the 1,668 patients analyzed, 249 (14.9%) had PCD. The fetal head circumference, occipital-frontal diameter, and transverse abdominal diameter >90th percentile (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.50, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.39, 4.51; aOR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.02, 3.40; and aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.89, respectively) were associated with PCD. The fetal model demonstrated poor ability to predict PCD in the full cohort and in nulliparous patients (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.61; and AUC = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.60, respectively). Conversely, the maternal model had better predictive capability overall (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.82) and in the nulliparous subgroup (AUC = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.77). Models combining maternal/fetal factors performed similarly to the maternal model (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.82 in full cohort, and AUC = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.76 in nulliparas). CONCLUSION: Although a few fetal biometric parameters were associated with PCD, the fetal prediction model had low performance. In contrast, the maternal model had a fair-to-good ability to predict PCD. KEY POINTS: · Fetal HC >90th percentile was associated with cesarean delivery.. · Fetal parameters did not effectively predict PCD.. · Maternal factors were more predictive of PCD.. · Maternal/fetal and maternal models performed similarly.. · Prediction models had lower performance in nulliparas..

The "30-minute rule" for expedited delivery: fact or fiction?

Initially developed from hospital feasibility data from the 1980s, the "30-minute rule" has perpetuated the belief that the decision-to-incision time in an emergency cesarean delivery should be <30 minutes to preserve favorable neonatal outcomes. Through a review of the history, available data on delivery timing and associated outcomes, and consideration of feasibility across several hospital systems, the use and applicability of this "rule" are explored, and its reconsideration is called for. Moreover, we have advocated for balanced consideration of maternal safety with rapidity of delivery, encouraged process-based approaches, and proposed standardization of terminology regarding delivery urgency. Furthermore, a standardized 4-tier classification system for delivery urgency, from class I, for a perceived threat to maternal or fetal life, to class IV, a scheduled delivery, and a call for further research with a standardized structure to facilitate comparison have been proposed.

Combination Foley Catheter-Oxytocin versus Oxytocin Alone following Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes.

OBJECTIVE: The benefit of mechanical ripening agents following preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) has not been established. We sought to compare the time to delivery in women who received transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin infusion versus oxytocin infusion alone in patients with unfavorable cervices and PPROM. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with PPROM of a live, singleton gestation between 240/7 and 366/7 weeks' gestation from January 2005 to October 2018 at a single, tertiary care institution. Patients with an unfavorable cervical examination (≤2-cm dilation), no contraindication to labor and undergoing labor induction were analyzed. Time to delivery was analyzed using multivariable linear regression adjusting for cervical dilation at induction and nulliparity. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 260 participants were included: 109 who received a Foley catheter and oxytocin (Foley/oxytocin) and 151 who had oxytocin alone. Demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. Unadjusted time to delivery was significantly shorter in the oxytocin only group (Foley/oxytocin: 20.35 hours vs. oxytocin alone: 14.7 hours, p < 0.001). No differences in length of labor were detected after adjusting for cervical dilation at induction and nulliparity (p = 0.5). The unadjusted rate of cesarean delivery was higher in the combination Foley/oxytocin group (Foley/oxytocin: 16.5% vs. oxytocin alone: 7.3%, p = 0.03), but no differences were found in the adjusted analysis (p = 0.06). There were no differences in clinical chorioamnionitis rates between the two groups (Foley/oxytocin: 8.3% vs. oxytocin alone: 9.3%, p = 0.83). Furthermore, no significant differences were found in maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with PROM, the use of a transcervical Foley catheter in addition to oxytocin is not associated with a shorter time to delivery compared with oxytocin alone. KEY POINTS: · Transcervical Foley catheter did not shorten length of labor in PPROM.. · Transcervical Foley catheter did not increase infection risk.. · Pitocin alone can be used in PPROM population..

Outcomes associated with antibiotic administration for isolated maternal fever in labor.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists currently recommends that antibiotic treatment should be considered for women with isolated maternal fevers during labor. However, there is little known about the maternal and neonatal impact of antibiotic treatment in this scenario. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the outcomes in women with a nonsustained, isolated maternal fever treated with antibiotics and compare it with expectant management. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of laboring women with a singleton gestation at term and a single temperature of between 38.0°C and 38.9°C without other evidence of infection (leukocytosis >15,000/mm3, fetal tachycardia, malodorous amniotic fluid, suspected alternate source of infection) at a tertiary teaching hospital. A contemporaneously maintained, validated obstetrical database was used to identify women for our cohort. Women with rheumatologic or renal disease, nongestational diabetes, preterm labor, placental abruption, vaginal bleeding, HIV, malpresentation, and fetal anomalies were excluded. The primary outcome was a postpartum fever above 38.0°C. Secondary maternal outcomes were treatment for postpartum endometritis, uterine atony, postpartum hemorrhage, admission to the intensive care unit, and postpartum length of stay. Secondary neonatal outcomes were neonatal intensive care unit admission, 5-minute Apgar score of <7, 5-minute Apgar score of <4, neonatal intensive care unit length of stay, and neonatal antibiotic administration. The results were compared using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018, 359 women were identified; 85 received antibiotics and 274 did not. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, except for gestational age at the time of delivery (39.2 weeks vs 39.5 weeks for the antibiotic and no antibiotic groups, respectively; P=.02). The incidence in postpartum fever showed a downward trend in the antibiotic group (10.59% for the antibiotic group vs 18.98% for the no antibiotic group; P=.07). Significantly fewer women in the antibiotic group were treated for postpartum endometritis (3.53% vs 11.31%; P=.03). Neonatal intensive care unit admission and neonatal antibiotic administration rates were higher in the antibiotic group (41.18% vs 17.88%; P<.001 and 36.47% vs 12.41%; P<.001, respectively). The incidence of 5-minute Apgar score of <7 was higher in the antibiotic group (8.25% vs 2.19%; P=.016). After controlling for age, gestational age, body mass index, group B streptococci status, delivery method, parity, administration of epidural, and receipt of acetaminophen, the odds for postpartum fever were reduced by a factor of 0.42 (95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.99) among women who received antibiotics when compared with those who did not receive antibiotics. Outcome results are presented in Table 2. CONCLUSION: Although there was a lower rate of treatment for endometritis among women who received antibiotics for a single isolated maternal fever, there was a higher rate of neonatal intensive care unit admissions and 5-minute Apgar score of <7. This indicates that there likely is maternal benefit associated with antibiotic use, however, there are concerns about the neonatal risk.

Early vs expectant artificial rupture of membranes following Foley catheter ripening: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Early amniotomy shortens the duration of spontaneous labor, yet there is no clear evidence on the optimal timing of amniotomy following cervical ripening. There are limited high-quality studies on the use of early amniotomy intervention following labor induction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter expulsion reduces the duration of labor among individuals undergoing combined misoprostol and Foley catheter labor induction at term. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2020 to May 2021 comparing amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter expulsion (early artificial rupture of membranes) with expectant management. Randomization was stratified by parity. Labor management was standardized among participants. Individuals undergoing induction at ≥37 weeks with a singleton gestation and needing cervical ripening were eligible. Our primary outcome was time to delivery. Wilcoxon rank sum, Pearson chi-square, and Cox survival analyses with intent-to-treat principles were performed adjusting for age, body mass index, parity, mode of delivery, Bishop score, and the interaction between randomization group and parity. A sample size of 160 was planned to detect a 4-hour reduction in delivery time. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients (79 early artificial rupture of membranes, 81 expectant management) were randomized. Early artificial rupture of membranes achieved a faster median time to delivery than expectant management (early artificial rupture of membranes: 11.1 hours; interquartile range, 6.25-17.1 vs expectant management: 19.8 hours; interquartile range, 13.2-26.2; P<.001). A greater percentage of individuals in the early artificial rupture of membranes group delivered within 24 hours (86% vs 70%; P=.03). There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the 2 groups (22% vs 31%; P=.25). Individuals delivered 2.3 times faster following early artificial rupture of membranes (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.4; P<.001). There were no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter expulsion resulted in 2.3 times faster delivery than expectant management. Therefore, early artificial rupture of membranes should be considered in individuals undergoing mechanical cervical ripening at term.

Activity restriction and preterm birth prevention.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since the 1900s, activity restriction (AR) has been widely prescribed as a strategy for preventing preterm birth (PTB). Over the past decade, the practice has been called into question as numerous studies have demonstrated that AR does not improve obstetrical and perinatal outcomes but does confer significant physical and psychological risks. The purpose of this review is to offer clinicians a summary of the latest data on the risks, benefits, and efficacy of AR for the prevention of PTB. RECENT FINDINGS: Both retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated that AR does not significantly prolong pregnancy including those with multiple gestations, short cervices, ruptured membranes, and increased body mass indexes. Several studies have also shown that physical activity during pregnancy is associated with a higher incidence of vaginal delivery, a lower incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, and a lower incidence of hypertensive disorders without increasing the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. SUMMARY: The culmination of these data led to the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicines' release of an updated committee recommendation in August of 2020; AR should not be routinely prescribed as a treatment to prevent PTB.

The Compliance of Prescribed Activity Restriction in Women at High Risk for Preterm Birth.

OBJECTIVE: Despite lack of evidence to support efficacy, activity restriction is one of the most commonly prescribed interventions used for the prevention of preterm birth. We have a departmental policy against the use of activity restriction but many practitioners still prescribe it in an effort to prevent preterm birth. We sought to evaluate the rate and compliance of women who are prescribed activity restriction during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-site retrospective questionnaire study at a tertiary care, academic affiliated medical center. Women with a history of preterm delivery or short cervix were included. Once patients were identified, each patient was contacted and administered a questionnaire. We assessed the rates of activity restriction prescription and compliance. Secondary outcomes included details regarding activity restriction and treatment in pregnancy. Continuous variables were compared with t-test and categorical variables with Chi-square test. The value p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Among the 52 women who responded to the questionnaire, 18 reported being placed on activity restriction by a physician, with 1 self-prescribing activity restriction, giving a rate of our primary outcome of 19 of 52 (36.5%). All women reported compliance with prescribed activity restriction (100%). Gestational age at delivery was not different in women placed on activity restriction. CONCLUSION: This questionnaire suggests that approximately one in three high-risk women were placed on activity restriction during their pregnancy despite a departmental policy against its use. The 100% compliance rate in patients placed on activity restriction is a strong reminder of the impact prescribing patterns of physicians can have on patients. KEY POINTS: · One in three women are placed on activity restriction in pregnancy.. · Women are compliant with prescribed activity restriction.. · Activity restriction does not reduce rates of preterm birth..

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Prenatal Supplement and Medication Use in Low-Risk Pregnant Women.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the overall quantity and type of supplements and medications used during pregnancy in a low-risk cohort and to examine any racial/ethnic differences in intake. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from 2,164 racially/ethnically diverse, nonobese, and low-risk pregnant women participating without pre-pregnancy chronic conditions in a prospective cohort study at 12 sites across the United States. Medication data were self-reported as free text in enrollment, follow-up visit questionnaires, and abstracted from medical records at delivery. Supplements and medications data were mapped to their active ingredients and categorized into corresponding classes using the Slone Drug Dictionary. The total number and classes of supplements and medications consumed during pregnancy were calculated. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate the racial/ethnic differences in supplements and medications intake. All models were adjusted for maternal sociodemographic factors and study site. RESULTS: 98% of women took at least one supplement during pregnancy, with prenatal vitamins/multivitamins being most common. While only 31% reported taking no medications during pregnancy, 23% took one, 18% took two, and 28% took three or more. The percentage of women taking at least one medication during pregnancy was highest among non-Hispanic white women and lowest among Asians (84 vs. 55%, p < 0.001). All racial/ethnic groups reported taking the same top four medication classes including central nervous system agents, gastrointestinal drugs, anti-infective agents, and antihistamines. Compared with non-Hispanic white women, Hispanic (adjusted relative risk [aRR]: 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.98), and Asian women (aRR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.98) were less likely to take central nervous system agents, as well as gastrointestinal drugs (Hispanics aRR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66-0.94; Asians aRR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.90), and antihistamines (Hispanics aRR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.47-0.92). CONCLUSION: Supplement intake was nearly universal. Medication use was also common among this low-risk pregnancy cohort and differed by race/ethnicity. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00912132. KEY POINTS: · In women without chronic conditions, medication use is common.. · Racial/ethnic differences exist in prenatal medications use.. · Almost all women use supplements during pregnancy..

Fetal Growth Biometry as Predictors of Shoulder Dystocia in a Low-Risk Obstetrical Population.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate fetal biometrics as predictors of shoulder dystocia (SD) in a low-risk obstetrical population. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were enrolled as part of a U.S.-based prospective cohort study of fetal growth in low-risk singleton gestations (n = 2,802). Eligible women had liveborn singletons ≥2,500 g delivered vaginally. Sociodemographic, anthropometric, and pregnancy outcome data were abstracted by research staff. The diagnosis of SD was based on the recorded clinical impression of the delivering physician. Simple logistic regression models were used to examine associations between fetal biometrics and SD. Fetal biometric cut points, selected by Youden's J and clinical determination, were identified to optimize predictive capability. A final model for SD prediction was constructed using backward selection. Our dataset was randomly divided into training (60%) and test (40%) datasets for model building and internal validation. RESULTS: A total of 1,691 women (98.7%) had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery, while 23 (1.3%) experienced SD. There were no differences in sociodemographic or maternal anthropometrics between groups. Epidural anesthesia use was significantly more common (100 vs. 82.4%; p = 0.03) among women who experienced SD compared with those who did not. Amniotic fluid maximal vertical pocket was also significantly greater among SD cases (5.8 ± 1.7 vs. 5.1 ± 1.5 cm; odds ratio = 1.32 [95% confidence interval: 1.03,1.69]). Several fetal biometric measures were significantly associated with SD when dichotomized based on clinically selected cut-off points. A final prediction model was internally valid with an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.99). At a model probability of 1%, sensitivity (71.4%), specificity (77.5%), positive (3.5%), and negative predictive values (99.6%) did not indicate the ability of the model to predict SD in a clinically meaningful way. CONCLUSION: Other than epidural anesthesia use, neither sociodemographic nor maternal anthropometrics were significantly associated with SD in this low-risk population. Both individually and in combination, fetal biometrics had limited ability to predict SD and lack clinical usefulness. KEY POINTS: · SD unpredictable in low-risk women.. · Fetal biometry does not reliably predict SD.. · Epidural use associated with increased SD risk.. · SD prediction models clinically inefficient..

Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Combining pharmacologic agents with mechanical ripening achieves the shortest time to labor; however, there is no clear evidence on route of drug administration. Buccal administration of misoprostol has shown greater patient acceptance but remains understudied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the difference in time to delivery between buccal and vaginal administration of misoprostol along with a Foley catheter for induction of labor. STUDY DESIGN: The BEGIN trial (buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term) was an institutional review board-approved, randomized clinical trial conducted from June 2019 to January 2020 comparing identical doses (25 µg) of buccal misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol along with a Foley catheter for induction of labor. Randomization was stratified by parity. Labor management was standardized among participants. Individuals undergoing induction of labor at ≥37 weeks with a singleton gestation and needing cervical ripening were included. Our primary outcome was time to delivery. Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson chi-squared, and Cox survival analyses with intent-to-treat principles were performed. A sample size of 216 was planned to detect a 4-hour reduction in delivery time. RESULTS: A total of 215 women (108 in the buccal drug administration group and 107 in the vaginal drug administration group) were randomized. The vaginal route of drug administration achieved a faster median time to delivery than the buccal route of drug administration (19.7 hours in the vaginal route vs 24.1 hours in the buccal route; P<.001). A greater percentage of women in the vaginal drug administration group delivered within 24 hours compared with the buccal drug administration group (65% vs 49%; P=.02). There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the 2 groups (17% in the vaginal drug administration group vs 21% in the buccal drug administration group; P=.6). Individuals who received vaginal misoprostol with Foley catheter delivered 2 times faster than women who received buccal misoprostol with Foley catheter after censoring for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity (hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-3.17). There was no significant difference in maternal and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: We found that vaginal administration of misoprostol was superior to buccal administration of misoprostol along with a Foley catheter for induction of labor. Furthermore, vaginal administration of misoprostol resulted in twice the chance of delivering earlier compared with buccal administration of misoprostol with no difference in cesarean delivery rates. Therefore, the vaginal route of administration of misoprostol should be preferred among individuals undergoing a combined pharmacologic and mechanical induction.

Acute ambient air pollution exposure and placental Doppler results in the NICHD fetal growth studies - Singleton cohort.

BACKGROUND: Increased placental vascular resistance is a proposed mechanism by which air pollution exposure during pregnancy lowers birth weight and increases pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of acute air pollution exposure during pregnancy on uterine and umbilical artery Doppler indicators of placental vascular resistance. METHODS: After a first ultrasound to confirm gestational age, 2562 pregnant women recruited in 12 clinics throughout the United States underwent up to five standardized ultrasounds with Doppler measurements. Exposures to 11 air pollutants were estimated for the hour of ultrasound and each of the 2 h prior to ultrasound at the clinics using the National Air Quality Forecast Capability reanalysis products. We used mixed logistic regression to study the longitudinal odds ratio (OR) of any, uni- or bi-lateral systolic and diastolic uterine artery notching compared to no notching and the longitudinal OR of abnormal end diastolic flow of the umbilical artery compared to forward flow. Uterine and umbilical artery resistance indexes were studied using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Each inter-quartile range (IQR) increase of particulate matter < 2.5 µm, nitrate, ammonium, primary organic matter (POM) and nitrogen dioxide during the hour of ultrasound was associated with a decreased risk of unilateral systolic notch and with increased resistance index of the left uterine artery. For the umbilical artery, each IQR increase in ozone was associated with decreased resistance index (b: -0.26, 95 % CI: -0.52, -0.01) and with a decreased risk of abnormal end diastolic flow (OR: 0.36, 95 % CI: 0.14, 0.94); while each IQR increase of elemental carbon and POM was associated with increased risk of abnormal end diastolic flow (OR: 1.47, 95 % CI: 1.02, 2.13 and OR: 1.67, 95 % CI: 1.17, 2.39, respectively). DISCUSSION: Our results suggest acute air pollution exposure may influence placental vascular resistance.

Fetal Tachycardia in the Setting of Maternal Intrapartum Fever and Perinatal Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: The fetal consequences of intrapartum fetal tachycardia with maternal fever or clinical chorioamnionitis are not well studied. We evaluated the association between perinatal morbidity and fetal tachycardia in the setting of intrapartum fever. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized control trial that enrolled 5,341 healthy laboring nulliparous women ≥36 weeks' gestation. Women with intrapartum fever ≥ 38.0°C (including those meeting criteria for clinical chorioamnionitis) after randomization were included in this analysis. Isolated fetal tachycardia was defined as fetal heart rate (FHR) ≥160 beats per minute for at least 10 minutes in the absence of other FHR abnormalities. FHR abnormalities other than tachycardia were excluded from the analysis. The primary outcome was a perinatal composite (5-minute Apgar's score ≤3, intubation, chest compressions, or mortality). Secondary outcomes included low arterial cord pH (pH < 7.20), base deficit ≥12, and cesarean delivery. RESULTS: A total of 986 (18.5%) of women in the trial developed intrapartum fever, and 728 (13.7%) met criteria to be analyzed; of these, 728 women 336 (46.2%) had maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) reviewer-defined fetal tachycardia, and 349 of the 550 (63.5%) women during the final hour of labor had validated software (PeriCALM) defined fetal tachycardia. After adjusting for confounders, isolated fetal tachycardia was not associated with a significant difference in the composite perinatal outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.15 [0.82-12.03]) compared with absence of tachycardia. Fetal tachycardia was associated with higher odds of arterial cord pH <7.2, aOR = 1.48 (1.01-2.17) and of infants with a base deficit ≥ 12, aOR = 2.42 (1.02-5.77), but no significant difference in the odds of cesarean delivery, aOR = 1.33 (0.97-1.82). CONCLUSION: Fetal tachycardia in the setting of intrapartum fever or chorioamnionitis is associated with significantly increased fetal acidemia defined as a pH <7.2 and base excess ≥12 but not with a composite perinatal morbidity. KEY POINTS: · The perinatal outcomes associated with fetal tachycardia in the setting of maternal fever are undefined.. · Fetal tachycardia was not significantly associated with perinatal morbidity although the sample size was limited.. · Fetal tachycardia was associated with an arterial cord pH <7.2 and base deficit of 12 or greater..

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #50: The role of activity restriction in obstetric management: (Replaces Consult Number 33, August 2014).

Despite current recommendations against its use, activity restriction remains a common intervention used to prevent preterm birth in multiple clinical settings. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm premature rupture of membranes, multiple gestations, vaginal bleeding, short cervical length, placenta previa, and fetal growth restriction are also common reasons for antepartum hospital admission and frequently lead to a recommendation for activity restriction. However, numerous reports have shown that activity restriction does not prevent adverse obstetrical outcomes but does confer significant physical and psychosocial risks. This consult reviews the current literature on activity restriction and examines the evidence regarding its use in obstetrical management. The recommendations by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine are as follows: (1) we recommend against the routine use of any type of activity restriction in pregnant women at risk of preterm birth based on preterm labor symptoms, arrested preterm labor, or shortened cervix (GRADE 1B); (2) we recommend against the use of routine inpatient hospitalization and activity restriction for the prevention of preterm birth in women with multiple gestations (GRADE 1A); and (3) given the lack of data definitively demonstrating that activity restriction improves perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction, preterm premature rupture of membranes, or hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, coupled with evidence of adverse effects of activity restriction, we suggest that activity restriction not be prescribed for the treatment of pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction, preterm premature rupture of membranes, or hypertensive disease (GRADE 2B).

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's conflict of interest policy.

A vital mission of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine is to provide independent, objective, scientifically based information and recommendations for providers, patients, and payors of high-risk pregnancy care. To ensure that these recommendations are free from bias, special interest, or the perception of either, a publicly transparent process for disclosing relevant financial and nonfinancial interests (disclosures of interest) and management of potential conflicts of interest are essential. Educational and research presentations also require proper disclosure to allow attendees to properly assess information presented at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine events. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine established a task force to review the current Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine policies and procedures as they pertain to disclosure of interest and conflict of interest. To establish current best practices in disclosure of interest and conflict of interest definitions, reporting, and conflict of interest mitigation, members of the task force reviewed external literature, including policies of other medical organizations. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine is committed to a continuous process of improvement in the approach to these issues and will revise this policy as indicated.

Prior authorization and its impact on access to obstetric ultrasound.

Prior authorization is a process requiring health care providers to obtain advance approval from a payer before a patient undergoes a procedure for the study to be covered. Prior authorization was introduced to decrease overutilization of ultrasound procedures. However, it has led to unanticipated consequences such as impeding access to obstetric imaging, increased administrative overhead without reimbursement, and contribution to physician frustration and burnout. Payers often use intermediary radiology benefit management companies without providing specialty-specific review in a timely manner as is requisite when practicing high-risk obstetrics. This article proposes a number of potential solutions to this problem: (1) consider alternative means to monitor overutilization; (2) create and evaluate data regarding providers in the highest utilization; (3) continue to support and grow the educational efforts of speciality societies to publish clinical guidelines; and (4) emphasize the importance of practicing evidence-based medicine. Understanding that not all health plans may be willing or able to collaborate with health care providers, we encourage physicians to advocate for policies and legislation to limit the implementation of prior authorization within their own states.