ABSTRACT
Gene expression is regulated by the rates of synthesis and degradation of mRNAs, but how these processes are coordinated is poorly understood. Here, we show that reduced transcription dynamics of specific genes leads to enhanced m6A deposition, preferential activity of the CCR4-Not complex, shortened poly(A) tails, and reduced stability of the respective mRNAs. These effects are also exerted by internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements, which we found to be transcriptional pause sites. However, when transcription dynamics, and subsequently poly(A) tails, are globally altered, cells buffer mRNA levels by adjusting the expression of mRNA degradation machinery. Stress-provoked global impediment of transcription elongation leads to a dramatic inhibition of the mRNA degradation machinery and massive mRNA stabilization. Accordingly, globally enhanced transcription, such as following B cell activation or glucose stimulation, has the opposite effects. This study uncovers two molecular pathways that maintain balanced gene expression in mammalian cells by linking transcription to mRNA stability.
Subject(s)
Poly A/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic , Adenosine/analogs & derivatives , Animals , B-Lymphocytes/physiology , Cells, Cultured , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Internal Ribosome Entry Sites , MCF-7 Cells , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 4, Group A, Member 2/genetics , Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 4, Group A, Member 2/metabolism , Poly A/metabolism , RNA Polymerase II/genetics , RNA Polymerase II/metabolism , RNA Stability , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Receptors, CCR4/genetics , Receptors, CCR4/metabolismABSTRACT
During translation initiation, eIF4G1 dynamically interacts with eIF4E and eIF1. While the role of eIF4E-eIF4G1 is well established, the regulatory functions of eIF4G1-eIF1 are poorly understood. Here, we report the identification of the eIF4G1-eIF1 inhibitors i14G1-10 and i14G1-12. i14G1s directly bind eIF4G1 and inhibit translation in vitro and in the cell, and their effects on translation are dependent on eIF4G1 levels. Translatome analyses revealed that i14G1s mimic eIF1 and eIF4G1 perturbations on the stringency of start codon selection and the opposing roles of eIF1-eIF4G1 in scanning-dependent and scanning-independent short 5' untranslated region (UTR) translation. Remarkably, i14G1s activate ER/unfolded protein response (UPR) stress-response genes via enhanced ribosome loading, elevated 5'UTR translation at near-cognate AUGs, and unexpected concomitant up-regulation of coding-region translation. These effects are, at least in part, independent of eIF2α-phosphorylation. Interestingly, eIF4G1-eIF1 interaction itself is negatively regulated by ER stress and mTOR inhibition. Thus, i14G1s uncover an unknown mechanism of ER/UPR translational stress response and are valuable research tools and potential drugs against diseases exhibiting dysregulated translation.
Subject(s)
Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-2 , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4G , Eukaryotic Initiation Factors , Neoplasm Proteins , Nerve Tissue Proteins , Unfolded Protein Response , Animals , Codon, Initiator , Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress/genetics , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-2/metabolism , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4G/antagonists & inhibitors , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4G/metabolism , Eukaryotic Initiation Factors/antagonists & inhibitors , Eukaryotic Initiation Factors/metabolism , Humans , Mice , Neoplasm Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Nerve Tissue Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Phosphorylation , Protein Biosynthesis , Unfolded Protein Response/geneticsABSTRACT
Translation of SARS-CoV-2-encoded mRNAs by the host ribosomes is essential for its propagation. Following infection, the early expressed viral protein NSP1 binds the ribosome, represses translation, and induces mRNA degradation, while the host elicits an anti-viral response. The mechanisms enabling viral mRNAs to escape this multifaceted repression remain obscure. Here we show that expression of NSP1 leads to destabilization of multi-exon cellular mRNAs, while intron-less transcripts, such as viral mRNAs and anti-viral interferon genes, remain relatively stable. We identified a conserved and precisely located cap-proximal RNA element devoid of guanosines that confers resistance to NSP1-mediated translation inhibition. Importantly, the primary sequence rather than the secondary structure is critical for protection. We further show that the genomic 5'UTR of SARS-CoV-2 drives cap-independent translation and promotes expression of NSP1 in an eIF4E-independent and Torin1-resistant manner. Upon expression, NSP1 further enhances cap-independent translation. However, the sub-genomic 5'UTRs are highly sensitive to eIF4E availability, rendering viral propagation partially sensitive to Torin1. We conclude that the combined NSP1-mediated degradation of spliced mRNAs and translation inhibition of single-exon genes, along with the unique features present in the viral 5'UTRs, ensure robust expression of viral mRNAs. These features can be exploited as potential therapeutic targets.
Subject(s)
SARS-CoV-2 , Viral Nonstructural Proteins , 5' Untranslated Regions , Base Sequence , COVID-19/virology , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4E/genetics , Humans , Protein Biosynthesis , RNA Caps/genetics , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Viral/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/geneticsABSTRACT
Eukaryotic protein translation has slowly gained the scientific community's attention for its advanced and powerful therapeutic potential. However, recent technical developments in studying ribosomes and global translation have revolutionized our understanding of this complex multistep process. These developments have improved and deepened the current knowledge of mRNA translation, sparking excitement and new possibilities in this field. Translation factors are crucial for maintaining protein synthesis homeostasis. Since actively proliferating cancer cells depend on protein synthesis, dysregulated protein translation is central to tumorigenesis. Translation factors and their abnormal expressions directly affect multiple oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Recently, small molecules have been used to target translation factors, resulting in translation inhibition in a gene-specific manner, opening the door for developing translation inhibitors that can lead to novel chemotherapeutic drugs for treating multiple cancer types caused by dysregulated translation machinery. This review comprehensively summarizes the involvement of translation factors in tumor progression and oncogenesis. Also, it sheds light on the evolution of translation factors as novel drug targets for developing future therapeutic drugs for treating cancer.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Neoplasms , Protein Biosynthesis , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/genetics , Protein Biosynthesis/drug effects , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Ribosomes/metabolism , Ribosomes/drug effectsABSTRACT
TENT4A (PAPD7) is a non-canonical poly(A) polymerase, of which little is known. Here, we show that TENT4A regulates multiple biological pathways and focuses on its multilayer regulation of translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), in which error-prone DNA polymerases bypass unrepaired DNA lesions. We show that TENT4A regulates mRNA stability and/or translation of DNA polymerase η and RAD18 E3 ligase, which guides the polymerase to replication stalling sites and monoubiquitinates PCNA, thereby enabling recruitment of error-prone DNA polymerases to damaged DNA sites. Remarkably, in addition to the effect on RAD18 mRNA stability via controlling its poly(A) tail, TENT4A indirectly regulates RAD18 via the tumor suppressor CYLD and via the long non-coding antisense RNA PAXIP1-AS2, which had no known function. Knocking down the expression of TENT4A or CYLD, or overexpression of PAXIP1-AS2 led each to reduced amounts of the RAD18 protein and DNA polymerase η, leading to reduced TLS, highlighting PAXIP1-AS2 as a new TLS regulator. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that TLS error-prone DNA polymerase genes and their TENT4A-related regulators are frequently mutated in endometrial cancer genomes, suggesting that TLS is dysregulated in this cancer.
Subject(s)
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , DNA Repair/physiology , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/metabolism , Endometrial Neoplasms/metabolism , Mutation/genetics , Polynucleotide Adenylyltransferase/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Blotting, Western , Cell Line, Tumor , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Computational Biology , DNA Damage/genetics , DNA Damage/physiology , DNA Repair/genetics , DNA Replication/genetics , DNA Replication/physiology , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Endometrial Neoplasms/genetics , Female , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Immunoprecipitation , MCF-7 Cells , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polynucleotide Adenylyltransferase/genetics , RNA Stability/genetics , RNA Stability/physiology , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/genetics , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/metabolism , Ubiquitination/genetics , Ubiquitination/physiologyABSTRACT
Protein synthesis is linked to cell proliferation, and its deregulation contributes to cancer. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A (eIF1A) plays a key role in scanning and AUG selection and differentially affects the translation of distinct mRNAs. Its unstructured N-terminal tail (NTT) is frequently mutated in several malignancies. Here we report that eIF1A is essential for cell proliferation and cell cycle progression. Ribosome profiling of eIF1A knockdown cells revealed a substantial enrichment of cell cycle mRNAs among the downregulated genes, which are predominantly characterized by a lengthy 5' untranslated region (UTR). Conversely, eIF1A depletion caused a broad stimulation of 5' UTR initiation at a near cognate AUG, unveiling a prominent role of eIF1A in suppressing 5' UTR translation. In addition, the AUG context-dependent autoregulation of eIF1 was disrupted by eIF1A depletion, suggesting their cooperation in AUG context discrimination and scanning. Importantly, cancer-associated eIF1A NTT mutants augmented the eIF1A positive effect on a long 5' UTR, while they hardly affected AUG selection. Mechanistically, these mutations diminished the eIF1A interaction with Rps3 and Rps10 implicated in scanning arrest. Our findings suggest that the reduced binding of eIF1A NTT mutants to the ribosome retains its open state and facilitates scanning of long 5' UTR-containing cell cycle genes.
Subject(s)
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-1/genetics , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-1/metabolism , Ribosomal Proteins/metabolism , 5' Untranslated Regions , Animals , Cell Cycle Checkpoints/physiology , Cell Proliferation/physiology , Codon, Initiator , Fibroblasts , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Mice , Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , Mutation , Neoplasms/genetics , Protein Binding , Protein Biosynthesis , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Ribosomal Proteins/genetics , Ribosomes/metabolismABSTRACT
Translation initiation of most mRNAs involves m7G-cap binding, ribosomal scanning, and AUG selection. Initiation from an m7G-cap-proximal AUG can be bypassed resulting in leaky scanning, except for mRNAs bearing the translation initiator of short 5' untranslated region (TISU) element. m7G-cap binding is mediated by the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E)-eIF4G1 complex. eIF4G1 also associates with eIF1, and both promote scanning and AUG selection. Understanding of the dynamics and significance of these interactions is lacking. We report that eIF4G1 exists in two complexes, either with eIF4E or with eIF1. Using an eIF1 mutant impaired in eIF4G1 binding, we demonstrate that eIF1-eIF4G1 interaction is important for leaky scanning and for avoiding m7G-cap-proximal initiation. Intriguingly, eIF4E-eIF4G1 antagonizes the scanning promoted by eIF1-eIF4G1 and is required for TISU. In mapping the eIF1-binding site on eIF4G1, we unexpectedly found that eIF4E also binds it indirectly. These findings uncover the RNA features underlying regulation by eIF4E-eIF4G1 and eIF1-eIF4G1 and suggest that 43S ribosome transition from the m7G-cap to scanning involves relocation of eIF4G1 from eIF4E to eIF1.
Subject(s)
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4E/metabolism , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4G/metabolism , Eukaryotic Initiation Factors/metabolism , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , 5' Untranslated Regions , Amino Acid Sequence , Binding Sites , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-1/chemistry , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-1/genetics , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-1/metabolism , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4E/chemistry , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4E/genetics , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4G/chemistry , Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4G/genetics , Eukaryotic Initiation Factors/chemistry , Eukaryotic Initiation Factors/genetics , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Models, Biological , Models, Molecular , Neoplasm Proteins/chemistry , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins/chemistry , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , Peptide Chain Initiation, Translational , Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs , RNA Caps/genetics , RNA Caps/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Ribosomes/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/chemistry , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
Conventional treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is an initial debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Despite initial high response, three-fourths of these women experience disease recurrence with a dismal prognosis. Patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer who underwent cytoreductive surgery were enrolled and tissue samples were collected. Post surgery, these patients were started on chemotherapy and followed up till the end of the cycle. Fluorescence-based differential in-gel expression coupled with mass spectrometric analysis was used for discovery phase of experiments, and real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and pathway analysis were performed for expression and functional validation of differentially expressed proteins. While aldehyde reductase, hnRNP, cyclophilin A, heat shock protein-27, and actin are upregulated in responders, prohibitin, enoyl-coA hydratase, peroxiredoxin, and fibrin-ß are upregulated in the nonresponders. The expressions of some of these proteins correlated with increased apoptotic activity in responders and decreased apoptotic activity in nonresponders. Therefore, the proteins qualify as potential biomarkers to predict chemotherapy response.