ABSTRACT
Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes most cervical cancers and some cancers of the penis, vulva, vagina, oropharynx, and anus. Cervical precancers can be detected through screening. HPV vaccination with the 9-valent HPV vaccine (9vHPV) can prevent approximately 92% of HPV-attributable cancers (1).* Previous studies have shown lower incidence of HPV-associated cancers in non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations compared with other racial subgroups (2); however, these rates might have been underestimated as a result of racial misclassification. Previous studies have shown that cancer registry data corrected for racial misclassification resulted in more accurate cancer incidence estimates for AI/AN populations (3,4). In addition, regional variations in cancer incidence among AI/AN populations suggest that nationally aggregated data might not adequately describe cancer outcomes within these populations (5). These variations might, in part, result from geographic disparities in the use of health services, such as cancer screening or vaccination (6). CDC analyzed data for 2013-2017 from central cancer registries linked with the Indian Health Service (IHS) patient registration database to assess the incidence of HPV-associated cancers and to estimate the number of cancers caused by HPV among AI/AN populations overall and by region. During 2013-2017, an estimated 1,030 HPV-associated cancers were reported in AI/AN populations. Of these cancers, 740 (72%) were determined to be attributable to HPV types targeted by 9vHPV; the majority were cervical cancers in females and oropharyngeal cancers in males. These data can help identify regions where AI/AN populations have disproportionately high rates of HPV-associated cancers and inform targeted regional vaccination and screening programs in AI/AN communities.
Subject(s)
/statistics & numerical data , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/virology , Papillomaviridae/pathogenicity , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/ethnology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Registries , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx account for 3% of cancers diagnosed in the United States* each year. Cancers at these sites can differ anatomically and histologically and might have different causal factors, such as tobacco use, alcohol use, and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) (1). Incidence of combined oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers declined during the 1980s but began to increase around 1999 (2,3). Because tobacco use has declined in the United States, accompanied by a decrease in incidence of many tobacco-related cancers, researchers have suggested that the increase in oral cavity and pharynx cancers might be attributed to anatomic sites with specific cell types in which HPV DNA is often found (4,5). U.S. Cancer Statistics data were analyzed to examine trends in incidence of cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx by anatomic site, sex, race/ethnicity, and age group. During 2007-2016, incidence rates increased for cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx combined, base of tongue, anterior tongue, gum, tonsil, oropharynx, and other oral cavity and pharynx. Incidence rates declined for cancers of the lip, floor of mouth, soft palate and uvula, hard palate, hypopharynx, and nasopharynx, and were stable for cancers of the cheek and other mouth and salivary gland. Ongoing implementation of proven population-based strategies to prevent tobacco use initiation, promote smoking cessation, reduce excessive alcohol use, and increase HPV vaccination rates might help prevent cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx.
Subject(s)
Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/ethnology , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/ethnology , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
India's cervical cancer screening program was launched in 2016. We evaluated baseline facility readiness using nationally representative data from the 2012-13 District Level Household and Facility Survey on 4 tiers of the public health care system - 18,367 sub-health centres (SHCs), 8540 primary health centres (PHCs), 4810 community health centres and 1540 district/sub-divisional hospitals. To evaluate facility readiness we used the Improving Data for Decision Making in Global Cervical Cancer Programmes toolkit on six domains - potential staffing, infrastructure, equipment and supplies, infection prevention, medicines and laboratory testing, and data management. Composite scores were created by summing responses within domains, standardizing scores across domains at each facility level, and averaging across districts/states. Overall, readiness scores were low for cervical cancer screening. At SHCs, the lowest scores were observed in 'infrastructure' (0.55) and 'infection prevention' (0.44), while PHCs had low 'potential staffing' scores (0.50) due to limited manpower to diagnose and treat (cryotherapy) potential cases. Scores were higher for tiers conducting diagnostic work-up and treatment/referral. The highest scores were in 'potential staffing' except for PHCs, while the lowest scores were in 'infection & prevention' and 'medicines and laboratory'. Goa and Maharashtra were consistently among the top 5 ranking states for readiness. Substantial heterogeneity in facility readiness for cervical cancer screening spans states and tiers of India's public healthcare system. Infrastructure and staffing are large barriers to screening at PHCs, which are crucial for referral of high-risk patients. Our results suggest focus areas in cervical cancer screening at the district level for policy makers.
Subject(s)
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Community Health Centers , Delivery of Health Care , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , India , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since the mid-1980s, the burden of liver cancer in the United States has doubled, with 31,411 new cases and 24,698 deaths occurring in 2014. Foreign-born individuals may be more likely to die of liver cancer than individuals in the general US-born population because of higher rates of hepatitis B infection, a low socioeconomic position, and language barriers that limit the receipt of early cancer detection and effective treatment. METHODS: To determine whether liver cancer mortality rates were higher among foreign-born individuals versus US-born individuals in the United States, population-based cancer mortality data were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual population estimates were obtained from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey. Age-adjusted mortality rates and rate ratios (RRs) for liver cancer stratified by birth place were calculated, and the average annual percent change (AAPC) was used to evaluate trends. RESULTS: A total of 198,557 deaths from liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer were recorded during 2005-2014, and 16% occurred among foreign-born individuals. Overall, foreign-born individuals had a 24% higher risk of liver cancer mortality than US-born individuals (RR, 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.25). Foreign-born individuals did not have any significant changes in liver cancer mortality rates overall, but among US-born individuals, liver cancer mortality rates significantly increased (AAPC, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.1-3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Efforts that address the major risk factors for liver cancer are needed to help to alleviate the health disparities observed among foreign-born individuals and reverse the increasing trend observed in the US-born population.
Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Mortality/trends , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. , Residence Characteristics/classification , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) is the most common curable sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. Trichomonas vaginalis infection is associated with an increased risk of pelvic inflammatory disease, human immunodeficiency virus transmission, and preterm birth in women. Data on the prevalence and risk factors for TV infection in sub-Saharan African countries remain scarce. METHODS: A total of 350 Kenyan female sex workers, aged 18 to 50 years, participated in a 2-year longitudinal study of the acquisition of STIs, including TV infection. Every 3 months, cervical and vaginal brush samples were collected for STI testing. At baseline, a sociodemographic and behavior questionnaire was administered. Testing for TV, Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, and high-risk human papillomavirus was performed using APTIMA assays. RESULTS: The TV baseline prevalence was 9.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 6.3-12.7%) and 2-year cumulative TV incidence was 8.1 per 1000 person months (6.9-9.3). Risk factors for higher TV prevalence at baseline were CT infection (adjusted prevalence ratio [PR], 8.53; 95% CI, 3.35-21.71), human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity (PR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.45, 6.24) and greater than 4 years of sex work (PR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.07-6.60). Risk factors for elevated 2-year TV incidence were CT (hazard ratio [HR], 4.28; 95% CI, 1.36-13.50), high-risk human papillomavirus infection (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.06-3.45) and history of smoking (HR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.24-5.73). DISCUSSION: CT infection was positively associated with both prevalent and 2-year incident TV infections.
Subject(s)
Sex Workers/statistics & numerical data , Trichomonas Vaginitis/epidemiology , Trichomonas vaginalis/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Cervix Uteri/parasitology , Demography , Female , Humans , Incidence , Kenya/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Work , Sexual Behavior , Surveys and Questionnaires , Trichomonas Vaginitis/parasitology , Vagina/parasitology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes nearly all cervical cancers and some cancers of the vagina, vulva, penis, anus, and oropharynx (1).* Most HPV infections are asymptomatic and clear spontaneously within 1 to 2 years; however, persistent infection with oncogenic HPV types can lead to development of precancer or cancer (2). In the United States, the 9-valent HPV vaccine (9vHPV) is available to protect against oncogenic HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 as well as nononcogenic types 6 and 11 that cause genital warts. CDC analyzed data from the U.S. Cancer Statistics (USCS) to assess the incidence of HPV-associated cancers and to estimate the annual number of cancers caused by HPV, overall and by state, during 2012-2016 (3,4). An average of 43,999 HPV-associated cancers were reported annually, and an estimated 34,800 (79%) of those cancers were attributable to HPV. Of these 34,800 cancers, an estimated 32,100 (92%) were attributable to the types targeted by 9vHPV, with 19,000 occurring among females and 13,100 among males. The most common were cervical (9,700) and oropharyngeal cancers (12,600). The number of cancers estimated to be attributable to the types targeted by 9vHPV ranged by state from 40 to 3,270 per year. HPV vaccination is an important strategy that could prevent these cancers, but during 2018, only half of adolescents were up to date on HPV vaccination (5). These surveillance data from population-based cancer registries can be used to inform the planning for, and monitor the long-term impact of, HPV vaccination and cancer screening efforts nationally and within states.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Population Surveillance , Anus Neoplasms/epidemiology , Anus Neoplasms/virology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Penile Neoplasms/epidemiology , Penile Neoplasms/virology , Registries , United States/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaginal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vaginal Neoplasms/virology , Vulvar Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vulvar Neoplasms/virologyABSTRACT
Cervical cancer is the second leading cause of new cancer cases and cancer-related deaths among women in India, with an estimated 96,922 new cases and 60,078 deaths each year.* Despite the availability of effective low-cost screening options in India, limited access to screening and treatment services, diagnosis at a later stage, and low investment in health care infrastructure all contribute to the high number of deaths (1). In 2016 the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of India recommended cervical cancer screening using visual inspection with acetic acid every 5 years for women aged 30-65 years (per World Health Organization [WHO] guidelines) (2,3). To establish a baseline for cervical cancer screening coverage, survey data were analyzed to estimate the percentage of women aged 30-49 years who had ever been screened for cervical cancer (defined as ever having had a cervix examination). Cervical cancer screening was estimated using data from the Fourth National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), a nationally representative survey conducted at the district level during 2015-2016, which included 699,686 Indian women aged 15-49 years. Lifetime cervical cancer screening prevalence was low (29.8%) and varied by geographic region, ranging from 10.0% in the Northeast Region to 45.2% in the Western Region. Prevalence of screening was higher among women with higher levels of education and household wealth, those who had ever been married, and urban residents. This screening prevalence can be used as a baseline indicator for cervical cancer screening in India in accordance with the WHO Noncommunicable Diseases Global Monitoring Framework during state-based programmatic rollout and program evaluation (4).
Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Female , Humans , India , Middle Aged , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
From 1970 to 2010 the foreign-born population in the United States has rapidly increased from 9.6 to 40.0 million individuals. Historically, differences in cancer rates have been observed between US-born and foreign-born individuals. However, comprehensive and up-to-date data on US cancer rates by birth place is lacking. To compare cancer mortality rates among foreign and US-born individuals, population-based cancer mortality data were obtained from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics. Utilizing data recorded on death certificates, individuals were categorized as US-born or foreign-born. Annual population estimates were obtained from the American Community Survey. Age-adjusted mortality rates and rate ratios (RRs) for all cancer sites were calculated using SEER*Stat. A total of 5,670,535 deaths from malignant cancers were recorded in the US from 2005 to 2014 and 9% of deaths occurred among foreign-born individuals. Overall, foreign-born individuals had a 31% lower cancer mortality rate when compared to US-born individuals (Rate Ratio (RR): 0.69 (95% CI: 0.68-0.69)), and similar results were observed when stratifying by sex, race/ethnicity, age, and geographic region. However, foreign-born individuals did have significantly elevated cancer mortality rates for seven cancers sites, of which five were infection-related, including: nasopharynx (RR: 2.01), Kaposi Sarcoma (RR: 1.94), stomach (RR: 1.82), gallbladder (RR: 1.47), acute lymphocytic leukemia (RR: 1.27), liver and intrahepatic bile duct (RR: 1.24), and thyroid (RR: 1.22) cancers. Many of these deaths could be avoided through improved access to prevention, screening, and treatment services for immigrant populations in the US or in their country of origin.
Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Death Certificates , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/ethnology , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , SEER Program , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Historically, foreign-born individuals in the US have had an elevated risk of dying from gastric cancer when compared to US-born individuals. This is primarily due to factors that occur prior to their immigration to the US, including diet and underlying risk of H. pylori infection. METHODS: National mortality data from 2005 to 2014 were obtained from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics. Annual population estimates were obtained from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey for foreign-born and US-born persons. Age-adjusted gastric cancer mortality rates and rate ratios (RR) were calculated stratified by birth place, age, race/ethnicity, and geographic location. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2014, 111,718 deaths from malignant gastric cancer occurred in the US, of which 24,583 (22%) occurred among foreign-born individuals. Overall, foreign-born individuals had higher mortality rates compared with US-born individuals (RR 1.82; 95% CI 1.80, 1.85) and this difference remained after stratifying by sex, age, and geographic location. However, this finding was primarily driven by the low rate of gastric cancer mortality among US-born whites, with similar mortality rates observed among all other foreign-born and US-born groups. Gastric cancer mortality rates significantly decreased during the study period overall (AAPC - 2.50; 95% CI - 3.21, - 1.79) with significant declines observed among US-born (AAPC - 2.81; 95% CI - 3.55, - 2.07) and the foreign-born (AAPC - 2.53; 95% CI - 3.20, - 1.86) population. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts directed at reducing the prevalence of gastric cancer risk factors could help reduce the elevated burden observed among foreign-born individuals and US-born minority groups.
Subject(s)
Emigration and Immigration/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Mortality/trends , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Residence Characteristics , Risk Factors , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate , Time Factors , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The World Health Organization revised its human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination recommendations to include a two (2-) dose schedule for girls aged ≤ 15 years. We investigated acceptability of 2- versus 3-dose schedule among adolescent vaccination providers and mothers of adolescent girls in five countries. METHODS: Adolescent vaccination providers (N = 151) and mothers of adolescent girls aged 9-14 years (N = 118) were recruited from Argentina, Malaysia, South Africa, South Korea, and Spain. We assessed providers' preference for a 2- versus 3-dose HPV vaccination schedule via quantitative surveys. Mothers' attitudes towards a 2-dose schedule were assessed through focus group discussions. RESULTS: Most adolescent providers preferred a 2- over a 3-dose HPV vaccination schedule (overall: 74%), with preference ranging from 45.2% (South Africa) to 90.0% (South Korea). Lower cost, fewer clinic visits, and higher series completion were commonly cited reasons for 2-dose preference among providers and mothers. Safety and efficacy concerns were commonly cited barriers to accepting a 2-dose HPV vaccination schedule among providers and mothers. Mothers generally accepted the reduced schedule, however requested further information from a trusted source. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent vaccination providers and mothers preferred the 2-dose over 3-dose HPV vaccination schedule. Acceptability of a 2-dose HPV vaccination could be improved with additional information to providers and mothers on HPV vaccination safety and efficacy.
Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Immunization Schedule , Mothers/psychology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adolescent , Argentina , Child , Female , Humans , Malaysia , Papillomavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Republic of Korea , South Africa , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , VaccinationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to provide national estimates of Pap test receipt, by birthplace, and percent of lifetime in the United States (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooled nationally representative data (2005, 2008, 2013, 2015) from the National Health Interview Survey were used to examine differences in Pap test receipt among adult US women by birthplace and percent of lifetime in the US. Descriptive estimates were age-adjusted. Regression models were adjusted for selected sociodemographic and healthcare access and utilization factors and presented as predicted margins. RESULTS: Foreign-born women 18 years and older were more than twice as likely to have never received a Pap test compared with US-born women (18.6% vs 6.8%). Regression models showed that foreign-born women from Mexico (9.8%), South America (12.6%), Caribbean (14.6%), Southeast Asia (13.7%), Central Asia (20.4%), South Asia (22.9%), Middle East (25.0%), Africa (27.8%), Europe (16.4%), and Former Soviet Union (28.2%) were more likely to be unscreened compared with US-born women (7.6%). Foreign-born women who spent less than 25% of their life in the US had higher prevalence of never having a Pap test (20%) compared with foreign-born who spent more than 25% of their life in the US (12.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Using national survey, we found that where a woman is born and the percent of her lifetime spent residing in the US do impact whether she gets screened at least once in her lifetime. IMPACT: These findings may inform cervical cancer screening efforts targeting foreign-born women.
Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Papanicolaou Test , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Residence Characteristics , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates are high, particularly in developing countries. Most cervical cancers can be prevented by human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, screening, and timely treatment. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides global technical assistance for implementation and evaluation of HPV vaccination pilot projects and programs and laboratory-related HPV activities to assess HPV vaccines. CDC collaborates with global partners to develop global cervical cancer screening recommendations and manuals, implement screening, create standardized evaluation tools, and provide expertise to monitor outcomes. CDC also trains epidemiologists in cancer prevention through its Field Epidemiology Training Program and is working to improve cancer surveillance by supporting efforts of the World Health Organization in developing cancer registry hubs and assisting countries in estimating costs for developing population-based cancer registries. These activities contribute to the Global Health Security Agenda action packages to improve immunization, surveillance, and the public health workforce globally.
Subject(s)
Health Plan Implementation , Immunization Programs , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Public Health Surveillance , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Female , Global Health , Humans , Immunization Programs/methods , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Mass Screening , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Quality Improvement , United States , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/etiology , WorkforceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Whether higher penile human papillomavirus (HPV) viral load is associated with a lower rate of HPV clearance remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: We examined the association between penile HPV16 and HPV18 viral load and subsequent HPV clearance in uncircumcised Kenyan men. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seronegative, sexually active, 18- to 24-year-old men randomized to the control arm of a male circumcision trial in Kisumu, Kenya. Men provided exfoliated penile cells from two anatomical sites (glans/coronal sulcus and shaft) every 6 months for 2 years. GP5+/6+ polymerase chain reaction was used to identify 44 HPV-DNA types. Human papillomavirus viral load testing was conducted using a LightCyler real-time polymerase chain reaction assay; viral load was classified as high (>250 copies/scrape) or low (≤250 copies/scrape), for nonquantifiable values. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression modeling were used to examine the association between HPV viral load and HPV clearance. RESULTS: A total of 1097 men, with 291 HPV16 and 131 HPV18 cumulative infections over 24 months were analyzed. Human papillomavirus clearance at 6 months after first HPV detection was lower for high versus low viral load HPV16 infections in the glans (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.92)] and shaft (aHR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.16-0.90), and HPV18 infections in the glans (aHR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.17). DISCUSSION: High versus low HPV viral load was associated with a reduced HPV clearance for HPV16 infections in the glans and shaft, and for HPV18 infections in the glans, among young uncircumcised men. Reduced clearance of high viral load HPV16 and HPV18 infections in men may increase HPV transmission to their female partners as well as enhance the development of penile lesions in comparison to men with low viral load HPV infections.
Subject(s)
Human papillomavirus 16 , Human papillomavirus 18 , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Penile Diseases/virology , Penis/virology , Adult , Circumcision, Male , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kenya , Male , Proportional Hazards Models , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Regression Analysis , Viral Load , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Circumcision and lower human papillomavirus (HPV) viral loads in men are possibly associated with a reduced risk of HPV transmission to women. However, the association between male circumcision and HPV viral load remains unclear. METHODS: Swab specimens from the glans and shaft of the penis were collected from men enrolled in a circumcision trial in Kisumu, Kenya. GP5+/6+ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to identify HPV DNA types. HPV-16 and HPV-18 loads were measured with a LightCycler real-time PCR and classified as high (>250 copies/scrape) or low (≤250 copies/scrape). RESULTS: A total of 1159 men were randomly assigned to undergo immediate circumcision, and 1140 men were randomly assigned to the control arm (these individuals were asked to remain uncircumcised until the study ended). The hazard of acquisition of high-viral load infections in the glans was lower in the circumcision arm, compared with the control arm, for HPV-16 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .20-.49]) and HPV-18 (HR, 0.34 [95% CI, .21-.54]). The 6-month risk of HPV persistence among men with high-viral load infections in the glans at baseline was lower in the circumcision arm, compared with the control arm, for HPV-16 (risk ratio [RR], 0.36 [95% CI, .18-.72]) and HPV-18 (RR 0.34 [95% CI, .13-.86]). Weaker and less precise results were obtained for shaft samples. CONCLUSIONS: Male circumcision could potentially reduce the risk of HPV transmission to women by reducing the hazard of acquisition, and the risk of persistence of high-HPV viral load infections in the glans in men.
Subject(s)
Circumcision, Male , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Human papillomavirus 18/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Penis/virology , Viral Load , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Kenya , Male , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prevalence , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Adolescents exposed to domestic violence are at high risk for dating abuse. This randomized controlled trial evaluated a dating abuse prevention program designed specifically for this risk group. Moms and Teens for Safe Dates consisted of six mailed booklets of dating abuse prevention information and interactive activities. Mothers who had been victims of domestic violence but no longer lived with the abuser delivered the program to their adolescents who had been exposed to the abuse. Mother and adolescent pairs (N = 409) were recruited through community advertising; the adolescents ranged from 12 to 16 years old and 64 % were female. Mothers and adolescents completed baseline and 6-month follow-up telephone interviews. Booklet completion in the treatment group ranged from 80 % for the first to 62 % for the last booklet. The analyses first tested whether program effects on dating abuse varied by four a priori identified moderators (mother's psychological health, the amount of adolescent exposure to domestic violence, and adolescent sex and race/ethnicity). Main effects of the program were examined when there were no differential program effects. Program effects on psychological and physical victimization and psychological and cyber perpetration were moderated by the amount of adolescent exposure to domestic violence; there were significant favorable program effects for adolescents with higher, but not lower levels of exposure to domestic violence. There were no moderated or main effects on sexual violence victimization and perpetration or cyber victimization. The findings suggest that a dating abuse prevention program designed for adolescents exposed to domestic violence can have important positive effects.
Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior/psychology , Domestic Violence/psychology , Intimate Partner Violence/prevention & control , Mothers/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Crime Victims/psychology , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Psychology, AdolescentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma is increasing, but vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) and removal of precancerous anal lesions could prevent new cases. The overall HPV-associated cancer incidence is reported to be higher in rural populations and in counties with lower economic status. We assessed these differences specifically for HPV-associated anal squamous cell carcinoma and described the geographic, county-level economic, and sociodemographic variations in incidence rates and trends. METHODS: We analyzed data from the US Cancer Statistics to assess age-standardized incidence rates of HPV-associated squamous cell carcinomas among adults aged 18 years and older from 2001 to 2019. We calculated rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals to examine differences in incidence rates. We also quantified changes in incidence rates over time using joinpoint regression. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2019, 72â421 new cases of HPV-associated anal squamous cell carcinoma were diagnosed among women (2.8 per 100â000) and 37â147 among men (1.7 per 100â000). Age-standardized incidence rates were higher in the South compared with other census regions and in counties ranked in the bottom 25% and 25%-75% economically than in the top 25%. The overall incidence rate increased in women but remained stable in men during 2009-2019. Incidence rates increased in adults aged 50 years and older but decreased among those aged 40-44 years from 2001 to 2019 in women and from 2007 to 2019 in men. CONCLUSIONS: There were inequities in HPV-associated anal squamous cell carcinoma incidence by geographic and county-level economic characteristics. Failure to improve vaccine and treatment equity may widen existing disparities.
Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Papillomavirus Infections , Adult , Male , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Incidence , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Anus Neoplasms/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed among women globally and in the United States (US); however, its incidence in the six US-Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) remains less characterized. METHODS: We analyzed data from a population-based cancer registry using different population estimates to calculate incidence rates for breast cancer among women aged >20 years in the USAPI. Rate ratios and 95â¯% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare incidence rates between the USAPI and the US (50 states and the District of Columbia). RESULTS: From 2007-2020, 1118 new cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in the USAPI, with 66.3â¯% (n = 741) of cases reported in Guam. Age-standardized incidence rates ranged from 66.4 to 68.7 per 100,000 women in USAPI and 101.1-110.5 per 100,000 women in Guam. Compared to the US, incidence rates were lower in USAPI, with rate ratios ranging from 0.38 (95â¯% CI: 0.36, 0.40) to 0.39 (95â¯% CI: 0.37, 0.42). The proportion of late-stage cancer was significantly higher in the USAPI (48.7â¯%) than in the US (34.0â¯%), particularly in the Federated States of Micronesia (78.7â¯%) and Palau (73.1â¯%). CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer incidence rates were lower in the USAPI than in the US; however, late-stage diagnoses were disproportionately higher. Low incidence and late-stage cancers may signal challenges in screening, cancer surveillance, and health care access and resources. Expanding access to timely breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment could reduce the proportion of late-stage cancers and improve survival in the USAPI.
ABSTRACT
The U.S.-affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) have higher cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates and lower screening coverage compared with the United States. This is likely because of economic, geographical, health care delivery, and cultural barriers for women living in these resource-constrained, isolated regions. The most recent U.S. and World Health Organization cervical cancer screening guidelines recommended primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as one screening option or the preferred screening modality. Primary HPV screening-based strategies offer several advantages over current screening methods in the USAPI. However, adoption of this newer screening modality has been slow in the United States and not yet incorporated into USAPI screening programs. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and partners initiated the Pacific Against Cervical Cancer (PACe) project in 2019 to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness of primary HPV testing-based strategies in Guam and in Yap, Federated States of Micronesia. This report provides an overview of the PACe project and outlines the approaches we took in implementing primary HPV testing as a new cervical cancer screening strategy (including the option of self-sampling in Yap), encompassing four core components: (1) community engagement and education, (2) medical and laboratory capacity building, (3) health information and system improvement, and (4) modeling and cost-effectiveness analysis. The PACe project provides examples of systematic implementation and resource appropriate technologies to the USAPI, with broader implications for never screened and under-screened populations in the United States and Pacific as they face similar barriers to accessing cervical cancer screening services.
Subject(s)
Capacity Building , Early Detection of Cancer , Mass Screening , Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pacific Islands , United States , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Guam , Vaginal SmearsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine population-level scrotal cancer incidence rates and trends among adult men in the United States. METHODS: Data from the United States Cancer Statistics, covering approximately 96% of the United States population, were analyzed to calculate age-standardized incidence rates of scrotal cancer among men aged 18 years and older from 1999 to 2020. Trends in incidence rates were evaluated by age, race and ethnicity, Census region, and histology using joinpoint regression. RESULTS: Overall, 4669 men were diagnosed with scrotal cancer (0.20 per 100,000). Incidence rates were highest among men aged 70 years and older (0.82 per 100,000). Rates were higher among non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander men (0.31 per 100,000) compared to other race and ethnicity groups. The most common histologic subtypes were squamous cell carcinoma (35.9%), extramammary Paget disease (20.8%), and sarcoma (20.5%). Incidence rates decreased by 2.9% per year from 1999 to 2019 for non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander men, decreased by 8.1% per year from 1999 to 2006 for basal cell carcinomas, and increased by 1.8% per year from 1999 to 2019 for extramammary Paget disease; otherwise, rates remained stable for all other variables examined. CONCLUSION: While scrotal cancer incidence rates were higher than previously reported, rates were still low and stable over time.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cancer survival has improved for the most common cancers. However, less improvement and lower survival has been observed in some groups perhaps due to differential access to cancer care including prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. METHODS: To further understand contemporary relative cancer survival (one- and five- year), we used survival data from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) for cancers diagnosed during 2007-2016. We examined overall relative cancer survival by sex, race and ethnicity, age, and county-level metropolitan and non-metropolitan status. Relative cancer survival by metropolitan and non-metropolitan status was further examined by sex, race and ethnicity, age, and cancer type. RESULTS: Among persons with cancer diagnosed during 2007-2016 the overall one-year and five-year relative survival was 80.6% and 67.4%, respectively. One-year relative survival for persons living in metropolitan counties was 81.1% and 77.8% among persons living in non-metropolitan counties. We found that persons who lived in non-metropolitan counties had lower survival than those who lived in metropolitan counties, and this difference persisted across sex, race and ethnicity, age, and most cancer types. CONCLUSION: Further examination of the differences in cancer survival by cancer type or other characteristics might be helpful for identifying potential interventions, such as programs that target screening and early detection or strategies to improve access to high quality cancer treatment and follow-up care, that could improve long-term outcomes. IMPACT: This analysis provided a high-level overview of contemporary cancer survival in the United States.