Clinical Pharmacology of Tisagenlecleucel in B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

PURPOSE: Tisagenlecleucel is an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR19) T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of children and young adults with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the cellular kinetics of tisagenlecleucel, the effect of patient factors, humoral immunogenicity, and manufacturing attributes on its kinetics, and exposure-response analysis for efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamic endpoints in 79 patients across two studies in pediatric B-ALL (ELIANA and ENSIGN). RESULTS: Using quantitative polymerase chain reaction to quantify levels of tisagenlecleucel transgene, responders (N = 62) had ≈2-fold higher tisagenlecleucel expansion in peripheral blood than nonresponders (N = 8; 74% and 104% higher geometric mean Cmax and AUC0-28d, respectively) with persistence measurable beyond 2 years in responding patients. Cmax increased with occurrence and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Tisagenlecleucel continued to expand and persist following tocilizumab, used to manage CRS. Patients with B-cell recovery within 6 months had earlier loss of the transgene compared with patients with sustained clinical response. Clinical responses were seen across the entire dose range evaluated (patients ≤50 kg: 0.2 to 5.0 × 106/kg; patients >50 kg: 0.1 to 2.5 × 108 CAR-positive viable T cells) with no relationship between dose and safety. Neither preexisting nor treatment-induced antimurine CAR19 antibodies affected the persistence or clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: Response to tisagenlecleucel was associated with increased expansion across a wide dose range. These results highlight the importance of cellular kinetics in understanding determinants of response to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

Disparity in the availability of injectable epinephrine in a large, diverse US school district.

BACKGROUND: Food allergies affect 2.5% of the US population. Results of studies show that minorities have the highest prevalence of food allergies. The Houston Independent School District (HISD) has an urban, socioeconomically diverse population and the role of ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) with availability of epinephrine has not been explored in this population. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to understand the association of SES and the presence of epinephrine in urban schools. METHODS: A 6-item questionnaire about food allergy characteristics was sent by e-mail to one nurse per elementary school in the HISD to identify the number, characteristics and treatment of food allergic reactions, and the presence of epinephrine injectors. The reactions and presence of injectors were assessed for the previous school year. Schools were categorized by socioeconomic variables as "low" or "non-low" based on National School Lunch Program student participation. Poisson, logistic, and linear regression analyses were used for group comparisons. RESULTS: One or more children with food allergies were reported in 97% of responding schools, but only 43% of schools reported having epinephrine injectors. A larger number of injectors in schools were associated with students of higher SES (r(2) = 0.701; P < .001). There were 6 times more injectors in non-low SES schools than in low SES schools (P < .03). Low SES and limited English proficiency were associated with decreased epinephrine injectors in schools. CONCLUSION: In the HISD, epinephrine injectors were more likely to be found in non-low SES schools versus low SES schools. Because minority students are disproportionately highly represented in low SES schools, there appears to be a disparity in the availability of injectable epinephrine for minority students in HISD schools.

Improvement of teacher food allergy knowledge in socioeconomically diverse schools after educational intervention.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, teachers are the first respondents to food allergic reactions in schools. Studies of food allergy in school settings have identified deficiencies in teacher recognition and treatment of reactions. We sought to determine the effect of a didactic session on teacher knowledge of the causative foods, symptoms, and treatment of reactions in diverse elementary schools. METHODS: An educational intervention project using a pretest-posttest control group design was performed. Teacher knowledge about food allergy causes, symptoms, and treatment of food allergic reactions was assessed. RESULTS: The average percentage of correctly answered questions by teachers at baseline for each school ranged from 60% to 68%. After education, teachers at the intervention schools answered 24.6% to 34.6% (confidence interval = 21.5-74.1 and 32.1-103.9, respectively) more questions correctly compared with 4.0% to 4.3% (confidence interval = 2.5-21.6 and 0.9-31.0, respectively) in control schools. CONCLUSIONS: Education significantly increased teacher knowledge of food allergy causes, symptoms, and treatment of food allergic reactions in diverse schools.