ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sterotactic radiosurgery is becoming an integral modality in the management of intracranial meningiomas, both as the primary treatment or as adjuvant therapy. This study analyzes the scholarly impact of the top 100 cited articles on the stereotactic radiosurgical management of intracranial meningiomas. METHODS: A ranked list of the 100 most-cited articles was generated using the Scopus database by searching the keywords 'intracranial meningioma' and 'stereotactic radiosurgery'. All articles were then evaluated on multiple criteria regarding both the publication of the articles (year of publication, journal, country of origin, and authors) as well as their methods and foci (type of study, location of studied meningiomas, and type of radiosurgical modality). Quantitaitve and qualitative analyses were then performed from the collected data. RESULTS: The most frequently cited articles on stereotactic radiosurgical management of intracranial meningiomas were published between 1990 and 2016. The average citation-per-year across all papers in the list was 6.1. The most studied anatomic area of intracranial meningiomas was the skull base, with the cavernous sinus being the most well-studied specific site. The most utilized stereotactic radiosurgical modality was Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The country with the highest number of publications was the United States. Twenty-six percent of the articles were published in the journal Neurosurgery; Lunsford, Kondziolka, Flickinger, Sheehan, and Pollock were respectively the most frequent listed authors among this list. The most active academic institute publishing on this topic was the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic radiosurgery is an integral modality in the management of intracranial meningiomas. This bibliometric analysis sheds the light on the ways in which intracranial meningiomas have been studied in the past two decades in order to identify trends among neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists and to reveal areas of rising and declining focus.
Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Radiosurgery , Humans , Meningioma/radiotherapy , Meningioma/surgery , Radiosurgery/methods , Meningeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures , Bibliometrics , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study evaluates the role and outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in the management of pituitary metastases. METHODS: The records of brain metastases patients who underwent GKRS at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center during the 10-year interval of 2010-2020 were systematically reviewed. Outcome measures included patient survival, tumor control rate, pituitary hormonal outcomes, visual outcomes, adverse radiation effects (AREs), and need for adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with pituitary metastases (eight male; median age of 65.5 years) had sufficient clinical follow-up for analysis. The most common primary cancers were non-small cell lung cancer (n = 6) and breast cancer (n = 4). Patients presented with headache (n = 9) and visual difficulties (n = 6). One patient underwent resection before GKRS. The median tumor volume was 0.78 cc (range 0.04-6.42 cc). The median overall survival after GKRS was 6.5 months (range 0.5-58 months). The overall survival after GKRS at 3-, 6-, and 12-months were 72.2%, 50.0% and 38.9%, respectively. The tumor control rate was 94.4%. One patient had further progression that required additional GKRS. None of the patients developed AREs after GKRS. CONCLUSION: GKRS is an effective treatment modality for the multidisciplinary management of patients with pituitary metastases. This minimally-invasive strategy is associated with optimal tumor control rate and low risk to adjacent optic nerves or neurovascular structures.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Pituitary Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Humans , Male , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/etiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Pituitary Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pituitary Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Follow-Up StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To review our institutional experience with the surgical management of prolactinomas through the endoscopic endonasal approach with specific focus on cavernous sinus invasion. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic data were collected retrospectively from the electronic medical record of 78 consecutive patients with prolactinomas undergoing endoscopic endonasal resection from 2002 to 2019. Immediate and late post-operative remission were defined as prolactin < 20 ng/mL within 14 days and 1-year of surgery without adjuvant therapy, respectively. Cavernous sinus invasion was quantified by Knosp score. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients with prolactinoma, 59% being male, underwent surgical resection with a mean age of 37 ± 13 years. Indications for surgery were medication resistance in 38 patients (48.7%), medication intolerance in 11 (14.1%), and patient preference in 29 (37.2%). Patients with Knosp 0-2 achieved higher immediate remission rates (83.8%) compared to patients with Knosp 3 (58.8%) and Knosp 4 (41.7%) patients (p = 0.003). Long-term remission rates were 48.7% and increased to 71.8% when combined with adjuvant treatments. Knosp 4 prolactinomas had significantly higher tumor volumes, higher preoperative prolactin levels, higher recurrence rates, higher rates of adjuvant therapy utilization, and were more likely to have failed dopamine agonist therapy compared to other tumor grades (p < 0.05). We encountered 18 complications in our series, and no cerebrospinal fluid leaks. CONCLUSION: The endoscopic endonasal approach is a safe and effective modality that can be employed in properly selected patients with invasive prolactinomas. It is associated with improved control and remission rates despite cavernous sinus invasion, though at a lower rate than without invasion.
Subject(s)
Cavernous Sinus , Pituitary Neoplasms , Prolactinoma , Adult , Cavernous Sinus/pathology , Cavernous Sinus/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pituitary Neoplasms/pathology , Pituitary Neoplasms/surgery , Prolactin , Prolactinoma/drug therapy , Prolactinoma/pathology , Prolactinoma/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Background Stereotactic radiosurgical rhizolysis of the trigeminal nerve is an established modality increasingly employed to alleviate the symptoms of refractory trigeminal neuralgia. This study analyzes the academic impact of the top 100 cited articles on the radiosurgical management of trigeminal neuralgia. Methods The Scopus database was searched for articles containing "radiosurgery" and one or more of "trigeminal neuralgia," "trigeminus neuralgia," and "tic douloureux." The top 100 articles written in English were arranged in descending order by citation count. Documents were evaluated for authors, publication year, journal and impact factor, total citations, nationality, study type, radiosurgical modality, and the affiliated institution. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on the data. Results The most cited articles were published between 1971 and 2019. The average citation per year was 4.3. The most targeted anatomic area was the "root entry zone" or proximal portion of the cisternal segment of the trigeminal nerve. The most utilized modality was Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The country with the highest number of publications was the United States. Thirty-six percent of the articles were published in the Journal of Neurosurgery . Lunsford, Kondziolka, Flickinger, and Régis, respectively, were the most frequently listed co-authors. The most prolific institute was the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Conclusion Stereotactic radiosurgery is an important modality in the management of medically or surgically refractory trigeminal neuralgia. This analysis assesses its contributions over the past five decades to identify trends in treatment practices for neurosurgeons and to highlight areas where further study is needed.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Technological advances have significantly fostered the use of robotics in neurosurgery. Due to their novelty, there is a need to develop training methods within neurosurgical residency programs that provide trainees the skills to utilize these systems in their future practices safely and effectively. METHODS: We describe a detailed curriculum for trainees with significant responsibilities in the operating room, as well as hands-on and theoretical didactics. The curriculum for robot-assisted stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implantation technique and assessment tool has been designed based on Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME's) milestone requirement for surgical treatment of epilepsy and movement disorders. Residents were surveyed to assess their use of robotics in their surgical training. RESULTS: Since 2019, more than 100 patients have undergone robot-assisted SEEG and DBS depth electrode implantations at our institution. Residents and fellows were involved in all aspects of surgical planning and execution and were encouraged to take an active role during procedures. Didactic sessions led by experienced faculty are emphasized as important learning tools prior to hands-on experience in the operating room. The results of the survey show that residents receive more training intraoperatively as compared to training sessions, yet trainees would benefit from more instruction on informative cadaveric simulation sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Our curriculum was developed to become a structured tool for assessment of robotic education in neurosurgical training. This curriculum based on ACGME milestone requirements serve as a template for resident and fellow education in robotics in neurosurgery.