ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pregnancy for people with sickle cell disease (SCD) is high risk with persistently high rates of severe maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. Transfusion therapy is the best-studied treatment for SCD in pregnancy; hydroxyurea is not usually used because of teratogenicity concerns. In high-resource settings, red cell transfusions are likely underutilized, while in low-resource settings, they may be altogether unavailable. RECENT FINDINGS: A randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis, two of the strongest forms of clinical research, show transfusion significantly reduces maternal and fetal death, painful crisis, thrombosis, and acute respiratory failure. Downstream benefits of treatment are less well measured and may include improving maternal anemia, reducing opioid exposure, and avoiding hospitalization, which presents risk for additional complications. Alloimmunization is a particular transfusion risk in SCD. However, many strategies can mitigate this risk. Accordingly, the American Society of Hematology classifies chronic transfusion in pregnancy as low risk. SUMMARY: Given the low risk classification, lack of alternative therapies, dismal, stagnant pregnancy outcomes and the potential for profound treatment benefit, wider use of chronic transfusion therapy for SCD pregnancy is likely indicated. This review discusses the benefits and potential risks of prophylactic transfusions for SCD pregnancy. Use of chronic transfusions during pregnancy is indicated to help urgently transform outcomes.
ABSTRACT
The thrombotic risk with haemoglobin C trait (HbAC) or haemoglobin C disease (HbCC) is unclear. However, individuals with HbCC have demonstrated chronic haemolysis, higher blood viscosity and altered rheology when compared to individuals with wild-type haemoglobin (HbAA). These physiological alterations may theoretically translate to increased risk of thrombosis; therefore, a systematic literature review was performed to investigate the possible association between HbAC and/or HbCC and thrombosis. Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria representing 782 individuals with HbAC (n = 694) or HbCC (n = 88). Fifteen studies described the presence/absence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with HbAC (n = 685) or HbCC (n = 79), while seven studies described patients with HbAC (n = 9) or HbCC (n = 9) and arterial thrombosis. Most (n = 20) studies were case reports or case series; however, two studies suggested a potential increased VTE risk with HbAC compared to HbAA in (i) all patients (OR 2.2, 95% CI: 0.9-5.5) and in (ii) pregnant individuals (RR 3.7, 95% CI 0.9-16). This review is the largest assessment of patients with HbC trait or disease and thrombosis to date; despite its limitations, the findings suggest HbC may be a predisposing risk factor to thrombosis. Prospective cohort studies are warranted to definitively elucidate the risk of thrombosis in this population.
Subject(s)
Hemoglobin C Disease , Hemoglobinopathies , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Hemoglobin C , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Prospective Studies , Thrombosis/etiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Data to guide evidence-based management of pregnant people with sickle cell disease (SCD) are limited. This international Delphi panel aimed to identify consensus among multidisciplinary experts for SCD management during pregnancy. The 2-round Delphi process used questionnaires exploring 7 topics (antenatal care, hydroxyurea use, transfusion, prevention of complications, treatment of complications, delivery and follow-up, and bottlenecks and knowledge gaps) developed by a steering committee. Thirteen panelists (hematologists, physiologists, obstetricians, maternal fetal medicine, and transfusion medicine physicians) from the United States, the United Kingdom, Turkey, and France completed the first survey; 12 panelists completed the second round. Anonymized responses were collected and summarized by a contract research organization (Akkodis Belgium). Consensus and strong consensus were predefined as 75% to 90% (9-10 of 12) and >90% (≥11 of 12) of panelists, respectively, agreeing or disagreeing on a response to a predefined clinical scenario or statement. In several areas of SCD management, consensus was achieved: experts recommended performing at least monthly multidisciplinary antenatal follow-up, administering prophylactic aspirin for preeclampsia prevention between gestational weeks 12 and 36, initiating prophylactic transfusion therapy in certain cases, or choosing automated red blood cell exchange over other transfusion methods for patients with iron overload or severe acute chest syndrome. No consensus was reached on several topics including the prophylactic aspirin dose, indications for starting infection prophylaxis, routine use of prophylactic transfusions, or use of prophylactic transfusions for preventing fetal complications. These recommendations could inform clinical care for patients with SCD who are pregnant in the absence of large clinical trials involving this population; the identified knowledge gaps can orient future research.