ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The present study examined the feasibility and effects of integrating a multidisciplinary team (MDT) model of care for women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) into a large Australian cancer center. The challenges encountered and lessons learned are described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the present prospective, longitudinal, mixed-methods implementation study, the MDT model included face-to-face consultations with a breast care nurse and social worker, followed by a MDT case discussion and face-to-face delivery of a personalized management plan. Data were collected to describe the cohort of women living with MBC who had attended a specialist breast cancer service and their supportive care needs. RESULTS: A total of 62 women with median age of 60 years (interquartile range [IQR], 37-82 years) participated. The median interval from the first breast cancer diagnosis was 5.7 years (IQR, 2.0-11.6 years), and the median interval from the diagnosis of MBC was 2.0 years (IQR, 0.9-3.6 years). The MDT care model required new resources and cross-sector participation. However, the participants indicated a preference for personalized needs assessment and care planning at the diagnosis of MBC. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the challenges of implementing and evaluating an MDT care model for women with MBC. The model coordinated MDT collaboration to strengthen the delivery of complex care plans. Investment in cross-sector partnerships to optimize care coordination for women with MBC was needed.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/nursing , Breast Neoplasms/secondary , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Models, Nursing , Patient Care Team , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cancer Care Facilities , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Research , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/standards , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Hot flashes are frequent and bothersome in menopausal women and breast cancer survivors. Most pharmacological interventions or herbal therapies for hot flashes have limitations because of contraindications in breast cancer survivors, side effects, or lack of proven efficacy. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of psychoeducational interventions, including relaxation, on hot flashes in menopausal women and women previously diagnosed with breast cancer. DESIGN: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library, and reference lists of articles were searched for relevant articles published between January 1980 and December 2006. Data extraction and quality assessment were carried out by two of the authors. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 475 patients were included. Five studies evaluated psychoeducational interventions, including education, counseling, cognitive-behavioral strategies, and mindfulness-based stress reduction. All showed an improvement in vasomotor symptoms, although the experimental group in the two studies containing the largest numbers of participants also received pharmacological therapies. Nine trials evaluated the efficacy of relaxation techniques to improve hot flashes. Five of these studies showed a significant improvement in hot flashes. Only three of the 14 studies evaluated a psychoeducational intervention in breast cancer survivors. Two of these showed a significant improvement in hot flashes. CONCLUSIONS: Psychoeducational interventions, including relaxation, seem to alleviate hot flashes in menopausal women and breast cancer survivors; however, the methodological quality of published research is either fair or poor. More studies are required, especially in the breast cancer population where only a few studies are available, before psychoeducational interventions are offered as a treatment option.
Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy/methods , Hot Flashes/therapy , Menopause , Patient Education as Topic , Quality of Life , Relaxation , Breast Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Research Design , Women's HealthABSTRACT
A major challenge in value-based health care is the lack of standardized health outcomes measurements, hindering optimal monitoring and comparison of the quality of health care across different settings globally. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) assembled a multidisciplinary international working group, comprised of 26 health care providers and patient advocates, to develop a standard set of value-based patient-centered outcomes for breast cancer (BC). The working group convened via 8 teleconferences and completed a follow-up survey after each meeting. A modified 2-round Delphi method was used to achieve consensus on the outcomes and case-mix variables to be included. Patient focus group meetings (8 early or metastatic BC patients) and online anonymized surveys of 1225 multinational BC patients and survivors were also conducted to obtain patients' input. The standard set encompasses survival and cancer control, and disutility of care (eg, acute treatment complications) outcomes, to be collected through administrative data and/or clinical records. A combination of multiple patient-reported outcomes measurement (PROM) tools is recommended to capture long-term degree of health outcomes. Selected case-mix factors were recommended to be collected at baseline. The ICHOM will endeavor to achieve wide buy-in of this set and facilitate its implementation in routine clinical practice in various settings and institutions worldwide.