Systemic therapy for advanced appendiceal adenocarcinoma: an analysis from the NCCN Oncology Outcomes Database for colorectal cancer.

Appendiceal malignancies are rare and represent 1% of intestinal tumors in the United States. The role and efficacy of modern systemic therapy in advanced appendiceal adenocarcinoma has not been established. This study analyzed patients with recurrent or metastatic appendiceal adenocarcinoma in the database for Colorectal Cancer (CRC; 2005-2012). This database tracks longitudinal care for patients treated at 8 specialty centers across the Unites States. Study objectives were to describe and evaluate the efficacy of systemic therapy and investigate relationships with clinicopathologic features. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Of 248 patients with advanced appendiceal carcinoma, 112 (45%) received systemic therapy for measurable disease and are the focus of this report. The most common chemotherapy regimens included FOLFOX with or without bevacizumab (n=39 and n=37, respectively), FOLFIRI (n=15), and single-agent fluoro-pyrimidine (n=10). Among 99 patients evaluable for best response, 39 experienced a response (response rate [RR], 39%) and 36 (36%) had stable disease. The median PFS was 1.2 years (95% CI, 1.0-1.8) and median OS was 2.1 years (95% CI, 1.6-2.3). Patients with non-mucinous histology or high-grade tumors and those who underwent nondebulking surgery had worse PFS and OS. Treatment of advanced appendiceal adenocarcinoma at NCCN Member Institutions commonly incorporates agents used for CRC. RR, PFS, and OS are comparable to those achieved in the treatment of metastatic CRC. Poor prognostic factors include nonmucinous histology or high-grade tumors and history of nondebulking surgery.

Panitumumab following disease progression on cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective review.

Despite advances in treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer over the past decade, the number of chemotherapy agents available remains limited. We report here a retrospective review of 11 patients who were treated with panitumumab following documented disease progression on cetuximab. Two patients demonstrated minor radiographic responses, albeit only for a short period of time. We conclude that the use of one epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor following failure on the other may be of benefit to patients who would otherwise have no other treatment options. However, studies to help identify the subset of patients who might benefit from this strategy are needed.

Neuroendocrine tumors.

Neuroendocrine tumors comprise a broad family of tumors, the most common of which are carcinoid and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The NCCN Neuroendocrine Tumors Guidelines discuss the diagnosis and management of both sporadic and hereditary neuroendocrine tumors. Most of the recommendations pertain to well-differentiated, low- to intermediate-grade tumors. This updated version of the NCCN Guidelines includes a new section on pathology for diagnosis and reporting and revised recommendations for the surgical management of neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas.

Oligometastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with High-Dose Chemotherapy and Targeted Radiation: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with oligometastatic breast cancer (oMBC) may benefit from aggressive local therapy. We sought to assess the effects of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) on outcomes in oMBC patients treated on a prospective phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). METHODS: Between 2005 and 2009, 12 patients with oMBC (≤3 metastatic sites) cancer were treated on protocol. Patients were to receive tandem HDCT supported by hematopoietic cell rescue (HCR). All radiographically identifiable oligometastatic sites received targeted radiation. RESULTS: HDCT was initiated at a median of 6.7 (3.5-12.7) months after diagnosis of oMBC. Hormone receptors (HR) were positive in 91.6% of patients, and HER2 was overexpressed in 25% of patients. Median radiation dose (EQD2) was 41.2 (37.9-48.7) Gy. Median follow-up was 13.1 (6.8-15.1) years for living patients. Ten-year PFS and OS were 33% (95%CI, 10-59%) and 55% (95%CI, 22-79%), respectively. Durable local control of treated lesions was 87.5%. At the last follow up, two patients remained progression free and two more were without evidence of disease following additional salvage treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although modern systemic therapies have obviated the use of HDC, aggressive local therapy warrants further evaluation and fractionated radiotherapy is a viable alternative if SBRT is not available.

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II colon cancer. METHODS: The authors used the State of California Cancer Surveillance Program (CSP) to assess patients ages 18 to 80 years with AJCC stage II colon cancer (ie, T3 or T4 and N0) who underwent surgical resection during 1991 and 2006. Patients who had rectal and rectosigmoid cancers were excluded. The cohort was stratified according to the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, and clinical and pathologic characteristics and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: From the CSP data, 3716 patients were identified who underwent curative-intent surgical resection for stage II colon cancer. When the 2 treatment groups (surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy [n = 916] and surgery alone [n = 2800]) were compared, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to be younger and to have left-sided lesions with ≥ 12 lymph nodes examined. There was no difference in sex or tumor differentiation between the 2 groups. According to a Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had improved overall survival compared with patients who underwent surgery alone (median survival, 12 years vs 9.2 years, respectively; P < .001). In multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was identified as an independent predictor of improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.99; P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first population-based analysis to identify a survival advantage for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with AJCC stage II colon cancer. On the basis of the current findings, the authors concluded that the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in select patients with stage II disease.

Improved outcomes in the management of esophageal cancer with the addition of surgical resection to chemoradiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: For patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, prospective randomized clinical trials have reported no added value of surgical resection to chemoradiation alone. Using a large regional cancer registry, our objective was to determine whether curative-intent esophageal resection provided a survival advantage in the multimodality management of esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program (CSP), we identified all patients with local and regional (i.e., AJCC Stages I-III) esophageal cancer during the years 1988-2006. Clinical and pathologic data included patient demographics, tumor information, indication for surgery, lymph node status, and timing of therapy. Overall survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox-regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: From CSP, 2233 patients with esophageal cancer were identified. Median survival (MS) of the entire cohort was 13.1 months. We stratified this cohort into patients who received chemoradiation alone (n = 645) and patients who received trimodality therapy (n = 286) (i.e., chemoradiation and surgery). Patients had significantly improved survival with trimodality therapy compared with chemoradiation alone (MS 25.2 vs. 12.3 months, respectively; P < 0.001). The survival advantage with trimodality therapy was observed for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (MS 24.5 vs. 12.8 months, respectively; P < 0.001) and adenocarcinoma (MS 25.9 vs. 10.6 months, respectively; P < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, trimodality therapy was a significant prognostic factor for improved survival in patients with esophageal cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.56-0.77, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that surgical resection remains an important component of the multimodality management of esophageal cancer.

A phase I study of a combination of yttrium-90-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) antibody and gemcitabine in patients with CEA-producing advanced malignancies.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose of combined therapy using an yttrium-90-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) antibody with gemcitabine in patients with advanced CEA-producing solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The chimeric human/murine cT84.66 is an anti-CEA intact IgG1, with high affinity and specificity to CEA. This was given at a fixed yttrium-90-labeled dose of 16.6 mCi/m(2) to subjects who had and an elevated CEA in serum or in tumor by immunohistochemistry. Also required was a tumor that imaged with an (111)In-labeled cT84.66 antibody. Patients were treated with escalating doses of gemcitabine given i.v. over 30 minutes on day 1 and 3 after the infusion of the yttrium-90-labeled antibody. Patients were treated in cohorts of 3. The maximum tolerated dose was determined as the highest level at which no >1 of 6 patients experienced a dose limiting toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were enrolled, and all but one had prior systemic therapy. The maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine in this combination was 150 mg/m(2). Dose limiting toxicities at a gemcitabine dose of 165 mg/m(2) included a grade 3 rash and grade 4 neutropenia. One partial response was seen in a patient with colorectal cancer, and 4 patients had a >50% decrease in baseline CEA levels associated with stable disease. Human antichimeric antibody responses were the primary reason for stopping treatment in 12 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility of combining gemcitabine with an yttrium-90-labeled anti-CEA antibody is shown with preliminary evidence of clinical response.

Human papillomavirus infection as a prognostic factor in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas treated in a prospective phase II clinical trial.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to determine the presence of high-risk HPV-16 in patients with HNSCC, assess the impact of HPV status on treatment response and survival in this select cohort treated with combined modality therapy and to identify the differences in HIF-1alpha and VEGF expression in HPV-positive and -negative tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had resectable, untreated stage III, IV HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hyopharynx or larynx, and stage II cancer of the base of tongue, hypopharynx and larynx. HPV status was determined by conventional PCR in fresh frozen biopsy samples and by Taqman PCR assay on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens. HIF-1alpha and VEGF expression were assessed by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on HPV status. RESULTS: HPV-16 was detected in 14 of 24 evaluable cases. There were no significant differences in response rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (86% vs. 90%) in HPV-positive and HPV-negative patients, respectively. There was a trend toward better progression-free (HR=0.15, 95% CI=0.002-12.54; p=0.06) and overall survival (HR=0.14, 95% CI=0.001-14.12; p=0.10) for HPV-positive patients. In a subset of 13 fresh frozen samples, RT-PCR revealed a significant increase in VEGF mRNA levels in HPV-positive tumors (p<0.01). No difference was seen for HIF-1alpha expression. CONCLUSION: HPV presence portended a better prognosis in patients with oropharyngeal SCC treated with a multimodality treatment in a prospective clinical trial. The level of VEGF mRNA was up-regulated in HPV-16-positive tumors possibly through an HIF-1 independent manner.

Blepharoptosis following oxaliplatin administration.

Oxaliplatin is a unique platinum derivative with anti-tumor activity in a number of malignancies, with neurotoxicity being a frequent side effect. Neurotoxicity can manifest in an acute phase and a chronic phase. The acute phase usually presents as dysesthesias of the hands and feet, jaw tightness, and pharyngolaryngo-dysesthesia, triggered and exacerbated by physical contact with cold temperatures. Although various other symptoms have been reported in the literature, little details are available. We report here, in detail, a case of blepharoptosis which appeared after repeated oxaliplatin infusions, and the disappearance of which seemed to be dependent on the infusion rate.

Phase I trial of intraperitoneal gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced malignancies primarily confined to the peritoneal cavity.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximally tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of i.p. gemcitabine. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients had peritoneal carcinomatosis. Gemcitabine (40, 80, 120, or 160 mg/m(2)) was administered into the peritoneal cavity in 2 L of warmed saline on days 1, 4, 8, and 12 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Thirty patients received 63 (median, 2; range, 0-6) courses. Tumors included ovary (14), uterus (2), colon (6), pancreas (3), and others (5). Dose-limiting toxicity included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatal respiratory failure, and grade 3 elevation of alanine aminotransferase in three patients. Hematologic toxicity and pain were

Male breast cancer 15 years after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation including total body irradiation for recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Over the years, the prognosis following treatment of a primary cancer has significantly improved. However, the growing population of these cancer survivors has led to the realization of multiple longterm complications secondary to their treatment. One of the most devastating long-term complications is the development of a second malignancy. CASE REPORTS: We report here the case of a 34-year-old man who developed stage IIB node-positive breast cancer almost 15 years following total body irradiation and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. To our knowledge, this is only the second report of a male breast cancer following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). CONCLUSION: Survivors of primary cancer need lifelong monitoring for complications from their initial therapy.

Setup variations in radiotherapy of esophageal cancer: evaluation by daily megavoltage computed tomographic localization.

PURPOSE: To use pretreatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) scans to evaluate setup variations in anterior-posterior (AP), lateral, and superior-inferior (SI) directions and rotational variations, including pitch, roll, and yaw, for esophageal cancer patients treated with helical tomotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated by combined chemoradiation using helical tomotherapy were selected. After patients were positioned using their skin tattoos/marks, MVCT scans were performed before every treatment and automatically registered to planning kilovoltage CT scans according to bony landmarks. Image registration data were used to adjust patient setups before treatment. A total of 250 MVCT scans were analyzed. Correlations between setup variations and body habitus, including height, weight, relative weight change, body surface area, and patient age, were evaluated. RESULTS: The standard deviations for systematic setup corrections in AP, lateral, and SI directions and pitch, roll, and yaw rotations were 1.5, 3.7, and 4.8 mm and 0.5 degrees, 1.2 degrees, and 0.8 degrees, respectively. The appropriate averages of random setup variations in AP, lateral, and SI directions and pitch, roll, and yaw rotations were 2.9, 5.2, and 4.4 mm, and 1.0 degrees, 1.2 degrees, and 1.1 degrees, respectively. Setup variations were stable throughout the entire course of radiotherapy in all three translational and three rotational displacements, with little change in magnitude. No significant correlations were found between setup variations and body habitus variables. CONCLUSIONS: Daily MVCT scans before each treatment can effectively detect setup errors and thereby reduce planning target volume (PTV) margins. This will reduce radiation dose to critical organs and may translate into lower treatment-related toxicities.

A phase I study of oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine: correlation of clinical outcome with gene expression.

PURPOSE: Oxaliplatin has in vitro activity similar to or higher than other platinum agents. Preclinically, gemcitabine has demonstrated synergy when combined with platinum compounds. These facts formed the rationale for determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin. METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced incurable solid tumors were given oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion on day 1 followed by escalating doses of gemcitabine given over 30 min on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were enrolled, including 30 patients at the MTD in an expanded cohort. At a gemcitabine dose of 800 mg/m2, 1/6 patients had a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 blurred vision and memory loss). At 1,000 mg/m2, 1/6 patients had a DLT (grade 3 increase in AST). At 1,200 mg/m2, 2/3 patients had a DLT (grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 confusion). The MTD of gemcitabine with 130 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin was therefore 1,000 mg/m2. The clearances of gemcitabine and ultrafilterable platinum are within the ranges previously reported for single agents. A patient with colon cancer had a partial response, and 21 patients had a best response of stable disease. In patients with tumor biopsies treated at the MTD, decreased ribonucleotide reductase M2 expression correlated with response. CONCLUSION: Treatment with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin was well tolerated with primarily hematologic toxicity at the MTD. Study of biochemical correlates of response remain of interest thought current results remain exploratory.

Helical tomotherapy for radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: a preferred plan with better conformal target coverage and more homogeneous dose distribution.

We compare different radiotherapy techniques-helical tomotherapy (tomotherapy), step-and-shoot IMRT (IMRT), and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT)-for patients with mid-distal esophageal carcinoma on the basis of dosimetric analysis. Six patients with locally advanced mid-distal esophageal carcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery. Radiotherapy included 50 Gy to gross planning target volume (PTV) and 45 Gy to elective PTV in 25 fractions. Tomotherapy, IMRT, and 3DCRT plans were generated. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs), homogeneity index (HI), volumes of lung receiving more than 10, 15, or 20 Gy (V(10), V(15), V(20)), and volumes of heart receiving more than 30 or 45 Gy (V(30), V(45)) were determined. Statistical analysis was performed by paired t-tests. By isodose distributions and DVHs, tomotherapy plans showed sharper dose gradients, more conformal coverage, and better HI for both gross and elective PTVs compared with IMRT or 3DCRT plans. Mean V(20) of lung was significantly reduced in tomotherapy plans. However, tomotherapy and IMRT plans resulted in larger V(10) of lung compared to 3DCRT plans. The heart was significantly spared in tomotherapy and IMRT plans compared to 3DCRT plans in terms of V(30) and V(45). We conclude that tomotherapy plans are superior in terms of target conformity, dose homogeneity, and V(20) of lung.

Phase I/II Trial of Anticarcinoembryonic Antigen Radioimmunotherapy, Gemcitabine, and Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Fluorodeoxyuridine Postresection of Liver Metastasis for Colorectal Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Report the feasibility, toxicities, and long-term results of a Phase I/II trial of 90Y-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen (anti-CEA) (cT84.66) radioimmunotherapy (RIT), gemcitabine, and hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) after maximal hepatic resection of metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver. METHODS: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver postresection or ablation to minimum disease were eligible. Each cohort received HAI of FUdR for 14 days on a dose escalation schedule. The maximum HAI FUdR dose level planned was 0.2 mg/kg/day, which is the standard dose for HAI FUdR alone. On day 9, 90Y-cT84.66 anti-CEA at 16.6 mCi/m2 as an i.v. bolus infusion and on days 9-11 i.v. gemcitabine at 105 mg/m2 were given. Patients could receive up to three cycles every 6 weeks of protocol therapy. Four additional cycles of HAI FUdR were allowed after RIT. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated on this study. A maximum tolerated dose of 0.20 mg/kg/day of HAI FUdR combined with RIT at 16.6 mCi/m2 and gemcitabine at 105 mg/m2 was achieved with only 1 patient experiencing grade 3 reversible toxicity (mucositis). After surgery, 10 patients had no evidence of visible disease and remained without evidence of disease after completion of protocol therapy. The remaining 6 patients demonstrated radiological visible disease after surgery and after protocol therapy 2 patients had a CR, 1 patient had PR, 2 had stable disease, and 1 had progression. With a median follow-up of 41.8 months (18.7-114.6), median progression free survival was 9.6 months. Two patients demonstrated long-term disease control out to 45+ and 113+ months. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the safety, feasibility, and potential utility of HAI FUdR, RIT, and systemic gemcitabine. The trimodality approach does not have higher hematologic toxicities than seen in prior RIT-alone studies. Future efforts evaluating RIT in colorectal cancer should integrate RIT with systemic and regional therapies in the minimal tumor burden setting.

Prognostic indicators and survival in patients with stage IIIB inflammatory breast carcinoma after dose-intense chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To improve treatment outcome for patients presenting with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), we have sequentially developed and tested single and tandem dose-intense chemotherapy regimens (DICT). Tumor- and treatment-related factors were analyzed to generate a prognostic model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 1989 and April 2002, 120 patients received conventional-dose chemotherapy, surgery, and sequentially developed single- or tandem-cycle DICT. Disease- and treatment-specific features were subjected to univariate and multivariate analysis to correlate with outcome. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 61 months (range, 21 to 161 months), estimated 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 44% (95% CI, 34% to 53%) and 64% (95% CI, 55% to 73%), respectively. In an age-adjusted multivariate analysis, RFS was better in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive tumors (P =.002), for patients with fewer than four involved axillary nodes before DICT (P =.01), and in patients treated with radiation therapy (P =.001) and tandem DICT (P =.049). OS was improved in patients with ER/PR-positive tumors (P =.002), in those with fewer than four involved axillary nodes before DICT (P =.03), and in patients treated with radiation therapy (P =.002). CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis suggests that either single or tandem DICT can be administered safely and may benefit selected patients with stage IIIB IBC. Those with receptor-negative IBC and with four or more involved axillary nodes before DICT need improved neoadjuvant and postadjuvant intensification therapy. A prospective randomized trial of single versus tandem DICT would be required to confirm the potential benefit of tandem DICT in the setting of IBC.

Neurophysiological study of peripheral neuropathy after high-dose Paclitaxel: lack of neuroprotective effect of amifostine.

PURPOSE: To determine if there is a beneficial effect of amifostine in preventing or reducing the neuropathy induced by high-dose paclitaxel. METHODS: Breast cancer patients receiving high-dose infusional paclitaxel (725 mg/m(2)/24 h) in combination with doxorubicin (165 mg/m(2)/96 h) and cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg/2 h; ACT) were studied on two autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant protocols, one with and one without amifostine (740 mg/m(2) administered over 10 min before and 12 h after initiation of the paclitaxel infusion). Patients were evaluated before ACT and 20-40 days later with neurological examination, a composite peripheral neuropathy score, peroneal and sural nerve conduction studies, and quantitative sensory testing. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in paclitaxel maximum concentration, systemic clearance, or area under the curve determinations. Narcotic requirement as well as recovery of hematopoietic counts were also similar in subjects with or without amifostine. After ACT was administered, there was a decrease in peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude and sural nerve sensory action potential amplitude, as well as an increase in vibratory and cold detection thresholds. Clinical composite peripheral neuropathy scores were similar despite amifostine treatment; and logarithm to the base 2 ratios post/pre ACT showed no significant effect of amifostine on peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, sural nerve sensory action potential, vibratory detection thresholds, or cold detection thresholds. All subjects had acroparesthesias and lost their ankle deep-tendon reflexes after administration of ACT. CONCLUSIONS: Single high-dose paclitaxel produces predictable clinical and neurophysiological changes so that patients receiving high-dose therapy are ideal subjects to test the effectiveness of neuroprotective agents. Amifostine was ineffective in preventing or reducing the neurotoxicity of high-dose paclitaxel.

A Phase I trial of 90Y-anti-carcinoembryonic antigen chimeric T84.66 radioimmunotherapy with 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Targeted systemic radiation therapy using radiolabeled antibodies results in tumor doses sufficient to produce significant objective responses in the radiosensitive hematological malignancies. Although comparable doses to tumor are achieved with radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in solid tumors, results have been modest primarily because of their relative lack of radiosensitivity. For solid tumors, as with external beam radiotherapy, RIT should have a more important clinical role if combined with other systemic, potentially radiation-enhancing chemotherapy agents and if used as consolidative therapy in the minimal tumor burden setting. The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the feasibility and toxicities of systemic 90Y-chimeric T84.66 (cT84.66) anti-carcinoembryonic antigen RIT in combination with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer were entered. The study was designed for each patient to receive 90Y-cT84.66 anti-carcinoembryonic antigen at 16.6 mCi/m2 as an i.v. bolus infusion combined with 5-FU delivered as a 5-day continuous infusion initiated 4 h before antibody infusion. Cohorts of patients were entered at 5-FU dose levels of 700, 800, 900, and 1000 mg/m2/day. Upon reaching the highest planned dose level of 5-FU, a final cohort received 90Y-cT84.66 at 20.6 mCi/m2 and 5-FU at 1000 mg/m2/day. For all patients, Ca-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid at 125 mg/m2 every 12 h was administered for the first 72 h after 90Y-cT84.66. Patients were eligible to receive up to three cycles of 90Y-cT84.66/5-FU every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated on this study. All had been heavily pretreated with 19 having previously received 5-FU and 16 having failed two to four chemotherapy regimens. A maximum-tolerated dose of 16.6 mCi/m2 90Y-cT84.66 combined with 1000 mg/m2/day 5-FU was reached. These dose levels are comparable with maximum-tolerated dose levels of each agent alone. Thirteen patients received one cycle and 8 patients two cycles of therapy. Hematopoietic toxicity was dose-limiting and reversible. RIT did not appear to increase nonhematopoietic toxicities associated with 5-FU. Two of 19 patients assayed developed a human anti-chimeric antibody immune response after the first cycle of therapy, which is significantly less than that observed in a previous trial evaluating 90Y-cT84.66 alone. No objective responses were observed. However, 11 patients with progressive disease entering the study demonstrated radiological stable disease of 3-8 months duration and 1 patient demonstrated a mixed response. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this trial are encouraging and demonstrate the feasibility and possible advantages of combining continuous infusion 5-FU with 90Y-cT84.66 RIT. The addition of 5-FU does not appear to significantly enhance hematological toxicities of the radiolabeled antibody. In addition, 5-FU reduces the development of human anti-chimeric antibody response, permitting multicycle therapy in a larger number of patients. Future efforts should continue to focus on integrating radiation therapy delivered by radiolabeled antibodies into established 5-FU regimens.

Phase I trial of intraperitoneal docetaxel in the treatment of advanced malignancies primarily confined to the peritoneal cavity: dose-limiting toxicity and pharmacokinetics.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of i.p. docetaxel and to determine the peritoneal pharmacokinetics and pharmacological advantage of this agent. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-one patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis received docetaxel administered via an implanted i.p. catheter at doses of 40, 80, 100, 125, or 156 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. DLTs on course 1 were used to define the maximum tolerated dose. RESULTS: Tumor types included gastric adenocarcinoma (n=7), ovarian cancer (n=4), other gastrointestinal primaries (n=3), and other cancers (n=7). Sixty cycles of i.p. docetaxel (median, 2; range, 1-11) were delivered. DLTs occurred in two patients at the 156 mg/m2 dose level; both developed an ileus, and one patient died of neutropenic sepsis. One of five evaluable patients treated with 125 mg/m2 docetaxel i.p. developed grade 4 neutropenic sepsis and stomatitis; another patient developed renal failure attributable to glomerulonephritis and grade 3 thrombocytopenia that was not judged to be dose-limiting. One of six patients receiving 100 mg/m2 D, the recommended Phase II dose, developed grade 4 neutropenia lasting <5 days. Other non-DLT treatment-related toxicities included dehydration requiring i.v. fluids, emesis, stomatitis, constipation, and abdominal pain. Best response on protocol therapy included 7 of 18 patients with stable disease for a median of 5 cycles (range, 2-11); 11 patients progressed by the first evaluation after a median of 2 cycles (range, 1-3). There were three patients inevaluable for response who received only one cycle of i.p. docetaxel (two because of patient preference and one because of adhesion formation). Pharmacokinetic evaluation revealed mean plasma areas under the curves (AUC) at 100 and 125 mg/m2 i.p. docetaxel of 3.14 and 6.33 microM.h (ranges, 1.02-5.88 and 3.97-12.70 microM. h), respectively; the mean peritoneal AUCs were 315 and 1063 microM.h (ranges, 250-373 and 239-2222 microM.h), respectively. The mean peak plasma concentrations at 100 and 125 mg/m2 i.p. docetaxel were 0.46 and 0.66 microM, and the mean peak peritoneal concentrations at those doses were 59 and 81 microM, respectively. The median and mean pharmacological advantage calculations (AUCperitoneal/AUCplasma) across all dose levels were 152 and 181, respectively (range, 18.8-367.4). The mean peritoneal 24- and 96-h concentrations were 0.9 microM (range, 0.2-1.6 microM) and <0.1 nM, respectively. The mean time that the concentration was >0.1 microM was 31.2 h (range, 27-36.5 h). CONCLUSIONS: i.p. docetaxel can be safely delivered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 i.p. every 3 weeks. This route of administration provides a significant peritoneal pharmacological advantage while delivering systemic concentrations consistent with the administration of standard i.v. doses.