Evaluation of Efficacy of Adding Aprepitant to Palonosetron and Dexamethasone in Carboplatin and Etoposide Therapy.

Although carboplatin (CBDCA) is classified as a moderately emetogenic agent, the majority of guidelines recommend the use of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist in addition to a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist with dexamethasone (DEX) for CBDCA-containing chemotherapy because of its higher emetogenic risk. However, the additional efficacy of aprepitant (APR) in CBDCA-containing treatment remains controversial, and data on multiple-day treatments are limited. Etoposide (ETP) was administered on days 1-3 in the CBDCA + ETP regimen, and it is important to evaluate suitable antiemetic therapy for the regimen. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of additional APR in CBDCA + ETP. Patients were divided into two groups and retrospectively evaluated. One was the control group, which was prophylactically administered palonosetron (PALO) and DEX, and the other was the APR group, which received APR orally with PALO and DEX. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) between the groups. The overall CR rates were 75.0 and 76.4% in the control and APR groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 1.00). In the acute phase, it was 88.9 and 97.2%, respectively, and 86.1 and 79.2% in the delayed phase, respectively, without significant differences (p = 0.10 and 0.38, respectively). The incidence and severity of nausea, vomiting, and anorexia were not significantly different between the two groups in the acute and delayed phases. Our findings suggest that combining APR with PALO and DEX does not improve the CR rate in CBDCA + ETP therapy.

Evaluation of the risk factors for the failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs for irinotecan-induced cholinergic symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: Irinotecan (IRI) is an anticancer drug that is frequently used to treat colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancers. Its side effects include cholinergic symptoms, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and hyperhidrosis. Anticholinergic medicines are frequently used for treatment or prophylaxis; however, the risk factors for the failure of a single prophylactic anticholinergic administration remain unclear. Moreover, an appropriate anticholinergic drug for prophylaxis remains unknown. Thus, we aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs for IRI-induced cholinergic symptoms and to evaluate the usefulness of multiple prophylactic doses of anticholinergic drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent IRI treatment for colorectal, gastric, or pancreatic cancer and received prophylactic anticholinergic drugs for IRI-induced cholinergic symptoms (n = 135) were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs. We also evaluated the efficacy of multiple prophylactic anticholinergic drug administration. RESULTS: Based on univariate and multivariate analyses, colorectal cancer, female sex, and prophylactic use of scopolamine butyl bromide were identified as risk factors for failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs. The efficacy of multiple prophylactic doses was confirmed to be 95% of the patients who had a single prophylactic failure due to temporary effect but symptom appearance after a certain period of time (wearing-off). CONCLUSION: We determined that colorectal cancer, female sex, and prophylactic use of scopolamine butyl bromide were risk factors associated with the failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs, and that multiple prophylactic doses for wearing-off can be a promising method.

Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer in elderly patients: analysis of the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan.

BACKGROUND: Whether concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy (CRT) is effective for elderly patients with head and neck cancer is a controversial topic. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of CRT vs. radiation therapy (RT) among elderly patients in Japan. METHODS: Data from the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan were extracted and analyzed. Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx who received definitive CRT or RT between 2011 and 2014 were included. RESULTS: CRT was administered to 78% of the 1057 patients aged ≥ 70 years and 67% of the 555 patients aged ≥ 75 years. For the patients aged ≥ 75 years, the overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in the CRT group than in the RT group (P < 0.05), while the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was not significantly different (P > 0.05). The add-on effect of CRT was significantly poor in elderly patients (P < 0.05), and it was not a significant factor in the multivariate analysis for patients aged ≥ 75 years. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the OS and PFS rates between the patients aged ≥ 70 years and those aged ≥ 75 years (all, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although aggressive CRT is administered to elderly patients in Japan, its effectiveness is uncertain. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to verify whether CRT is superior to RT alone for elderly patients.

EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant lung cancer cells perturbs innate immune signaling pathways in the tumor microenvironment.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) elicit potent cell cycle arrest in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. However, little is known about the mechanisms through which these drugs alter the tumor phenotype that contributes to the immune escape of EGFR-mutant cells. Using EGFR-mutant NSCLC cell lines and tissue samples from patients, we investigated the changes in immune checkpoints expressed in tumor cells following EGFR inhibition. Subsequently, we also analyzed the role of soluble factors from the dying tumor cells in the activation of immune signaling pathways involved in therapy resistance. Upon EGFR-TKI treatment, we found that EGFR-mutant cells upregulated the expression of innate immune checkpoint CD24 in vitro. We then analyzed biopsy samples from six patients who developed resistance to a first-generation EGFR-TKI without the acquired T790M mutation. Immunohistochemistry revealed that levels of tumor CD24 expression were increased upon treatment compared with those from pre-treatment samples. Monocyte-derived macrophages facilitated antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis when EGFR-TKI-treated EGFR-mutant cells were incubated with anti-CD24 antibodies in vitro, suggesting that CD24 may be a therapeutical target for EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Moreover, EGFR inhibition accelerated the release of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from dying tumor cells, which activated the type I interferon signaling pathways in human THP-1 monocytes in a stimulator of interferon genes-dependent manner. Our study indicates that EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells fosters a tumor microenvironment associated with immune escape. Thus, CD24 targeted therapy and cfDNA monitoring may contribute to improved treatment outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Efficacy of antacids for cisplatin-induced gastrointestinal symptoms in the treatment of lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and chemotherapy-associated dyspepsia syndrome (CADS) are frequently appearing adverse effects of cisplatin (CDDP)-containing chemotherapy. Antiemetic guidelines suggest that the administration of antacids such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine type-2 receptor antagonists be considered for CADS, although their efficacy for treating these symptoms remains unknown. This study aimed to reveal whether antacids attenuate gastrointestinal symptoms in CDDP-containing chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 138 patients with lung cancer who received ≥ 75 mg/m2 CDDP-containing regimens were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into an antacid group including patients administered PPIs or vonoprazan during all chemotherapy periods and controls without antacid administration. The primary endpoint was the comparison of anorexia incidence during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints were CINV evaluation and risk factor analysis for the incidence of anorexia using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of anorexia during the first cycle was 54.4% in the control group and 60.3% in the antacid group, without significant differences (p = 0.60). The incidence of nausea was also similar between the groups (p = 1.00). Multivariate analysis suggested that antacid administration was not associated with anorexia. CONCLUSION: Baseline antacid administration does not affect gastrointestinal symptoms associated with CDDP-containing treatment in lung cancer.

Expression of Karyopherin Alpha 2 and Karyopherin Beta 1 Correlate with Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Karyopherin alpha 2 (KPNA2) and karyopherin beta 1 (KPNB1) constitute nuclear transport protein complexes involved in nuclear import and are significant in tumor progression. Although high KPNA2 expression was associated with poor prognosis in solid tumors, the relationship between KPNA2 and KPNB1 expression and their prognostic role in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was used to correlate the expression of KPNA2 and KPNB1 with various features, including clinicopathological characteristics in 130 patients with GC and survival in 94 patients with invasive lesions extending to the submucosa or deeper. RESULTS: High expression of KPNA2 and KPNB1 was found in 25% and 36% of the patients, respectively. Both were significantly related to tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and Ki-67 expression. KPNA2 expression was significantly related to that of KPNB1 (p < 0.001). Patients with high KPNB1 expression had poorer prognosis than those with low expression (p = 0.027), as was also observed in case of KPNA2 (p < 0.001). Patients with high expression of both KPNA2 and KPNB1 accounted for 18% and had a poorer prognosis than those with high expression of either and those with low expression of both (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that high expression of both KPNA2 and KPNB1 was an independent prognostic factor in patients with GC (hazard ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-2.73, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: KPNA2 expression was correlated with KPNB1 expression, and high co-expression of KPNA2 and KPNB1 may represent a strong prognostic biomarker in GC.

First-line pembrolizumab ± chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer: Japanese subgroup of KEYNOTE-048.

BACKGROUND: Here, we report the results of the Japanese subgroup of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 study of pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil (pembrolizumab-chemotherapy), or cetuximab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil (EXTREME) in previously untreated recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Efficacy was evaluated in patients with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 20 and ≥ 1 and the total Japanese subgroup (n = 67). RESULTS: At data cutoff (25 February 2019), pembrolizumab led to longer OS versus EXTREME in the PD-L1 CPS ≥ 20 subgroup (median, 28.2 vs. 13.3 months; HR, 0.29 [95% CI 0.09-0.89]) and to similar OS in the total Japanese (23.4 vs. 13.6 months; HR, 0.51 [95% CI 0.25-1.05]) and CPS ≥ 1 subgroups (22.6 vs. 15.8 months; HR, 0.66 [95% CI 0.31-1.41]). Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy led to similar OS versus EXTREME in the PD-L1 CPS ≥ 20 (median, 18.1 vs. 15.8 months; HR, 0.72 [95% CI 0.23-2.19]), CPS ≥ 1 (12.6 vs. 15.8 months; HR, 1.19 [95% CI 0.55-2.58]), and total Japanese subgroups (12.6 vs. 13.3 months; unadjusted HR, 1.10 [95% CI 0.55-2.22]). Median PFS was similar for pembrolizumab and pembrolizumab-chemotherapy versus EXTREME in all subgroups. Grades 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 5 (22%), 19 (76%), and 17 (89%) patients receiving pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab-chemotherapy, and EXTREME, respectively. One patient receiving pembrolizumab-chemotherapy died because of treatment-related pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: These results support the use of first-line pembrolizumab and pembrolizumab-chemotherapy for Japanese patients with R/M HNSCC. Clinical trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02358031.

Outcomes of long-term nivolumab and subsequent chemotherapy in Japanese patients with head and neck cancer: 2-year follow-up from a multicenter real-world study.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in real-world clinical practice in Japan. Here, we report long-term outcomes from this study in the overall population and subgroups stratified by subsequent chemotherapy. METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective observational study, Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNC receiving nivolumab were followed up for 2 years. Effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS), OS rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and PFS rate. Safety endpoints included the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). RESULTS: Overall, 256 patients received a median of 6.0 doses (range: 1-52) of nivolumab over a median duration of 72.5 days (range: 1-736). Median OS was 9.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2-12.0] and median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI 1.8-2.7). A significant difference between 2-year survivors (n = 62) and non-2-year survivors was observed by median age (P = 0.0227) and ECOG PS (P = 0.0001). Of 95 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy, 54.7% received paclitaxel ± cetuximab. The median OS and PFS from the start of paclitaxel ± cetuximab were 6.9 months (95% CI 5.9-11.9) and 3.5 months (95% CI 2.3-5.5), respectively. IrAEs were reported in 17.2% of patients. Endocrine (7.0%) and lung (4.3%) disorders were the most common irAEs; kidney disorder (n = 1) was newly identified in this follow-up analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated the long-term effectiveness of nivolumab and potential effectiveness of subsequent chemotherapy in patients with R/M HNC in the real-world setting. Safety was consistent with that over the 1-year follow-up.

Impact of histamine type-2 receptor antagonists on the anticancer efficacy of gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Gefitinib is one of the standard treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. It has been reported that acid suppressants (AS) decrease the anti-tumor effect of gefitinib by reducing its solubility. AS is sometimes necessary in cancer patients; however, previous reports have not shown the most compatible AS with gefitinib administration in cancer patients. This study was conducted to determine if histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) can affect the anti-tumor efficacy of gefitinib. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients with NSCLC who were administered gefitinib were retrospectively investigated. Patients who were co-administered H2RA were compared with non-AS control patients. H2RA was administered once a day at about 3-5 or 8-12 h after gefitinib intake. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse effects. RESULTS: Median PFS in H2RA group and control group was 8.0 months and 9.0 months, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.82). The incidence of liver dysfunction was significantly less in patients administered H2RA, whereas there were no differences between the two groups with regard to skin toxicity and diarrhea. Multivariate analysis suggested that H2RA co-administration is not a risk factor for worse PFS and OS (hazard ratio of 0.95, 0.86; 95% confidence interval of 0.60-1.48, 0.52-1.43; p = 0.82 and 0.60, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that concomitant administration of H2RA with gefitinib does not affect the efficacy of gefitinib.

Phase II trial of combination treatment with S-1/cetuximab in patients with platinum-ineligible recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for first-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) in patients who cannot tolerate platinum-based regimens has not been clarified. We aimed to develop a new treatment regimen for patients with R/M SCCHN who are ineligible for platinum-based therapy, by evaluating the effects and safety of tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) and cetuximab. METHODS: Platinum-ineligibility was defined as: elderly (aged ≥ 75 years), poor PS, comorbidity, platinum resistance and refusal to undergo platinum-based therapy. Patients received S-1 (80 mg/m2/day for 14 days followed by a seven-day break) and cetuximab (initial dose, 400 mg/m2, followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Between September 2014 and September 2018, we enrolled 23 patients. Among the 21 patients who were evaluable, 20 were male [median age, 69 years (range 49-82)]. The ORR was 9 (43%) of 21 patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 22-66]. One and eight patients achieved complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.7 months (95% CI 9.0-18.3) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 months (95% CI 3.1-8.2). Grade 3/4 adverse events included acneiform rash and skin reactions (33%), hypomagnesemia (19%), hand-foot syndrome (14%), fatigue (14%), mucositis (10%), and anorexia (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Combination treatment with S-1 and cetuximab was effective and tolerated well by patients with platinum-ineligible R/M SCCHN. Registered clinical trial number: UMIN000015123.

Effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with head and neck cancer in Japanese real-world clinical practice: a multicenter retrospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: To fill the data gap between clinical trials and real-world settings, this study assessed the overall effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) during Japanese real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective study in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic HNC who received nivolumab for the first time between July and December 2017. Data on the clinical use, effectiveness, and safety of nivolumab were extracted from patient medical records. RESULTS: Overall, 256 patients were enrolled in this study. The median duration of nivolumab treatment was 72.5 days, with patients receiving a median of 6.0 (range 1-27) doses. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.2-12.0) months and the estimated 12-month OS rate was 43.2%. The objective response rate (ORR) was 15.7% overall and 21.1%, 7.1%, and 13.6% in patients with primary nasopharynx, maxillary sinus, and salivary gland tumors, respectively, who had been excluded from CheckMate 141. Grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 5.9% of patients. No new safety signals were identified compared with adverse events noted in CheckMate 141. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in real-world clinical practice are consistent with data from the CheckMate 141 clinical trial. Therapeutic response was also observed in the groups of patients excluded from CheckMate 141. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN-CTR (UMIN000032600), Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03569436).

Effectiveness of nivolumab affected by prior cetuximab use and neck dissection in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: results from a retrospective observational study in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: To examine the effect of prior use of cetuximab and neck dissection on the effectiveness of nivolumab, we conducted a large-scale subgroup analysis in Japanese patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. METHODS: Data on the effectiveness of nivolumab were extracted from patient medical records. All patients were analyzed for effectiveness by prior cetuximab use. In the analyses for prior neck dissection, only patients with locally advanced disease were included. RESULTS: Of 256 patients analyzed, 155 had received prior cetuximab. Nineteen of 50 patients with local recurrence underwent neck dissection. The objective response rate was 14.7 vs 17.2% (p = 0.6116), median progression-free survival was 2.0 vs 3.1 months (p = 0.0261), and median overall survival was 8.4 vs 12 months (p = 0.0548) with vs without prior cetuximab use, respectively. The objective response rate was 23.1 vs 25.9% (p = 0.8455), median progression-free survival was 1.8 vs 3.0 months (p = 0.6650), and median overall survival was 9.1 vs 9.9 months (p = 0.5289) with vs without neck dissection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of nivolumab for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer regardless of prior cetuximab use or neck dissection history. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN-CTR (UMIN000032600), Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03569436).

A review of head and neck cancer staging system in the TNM classification of malignant tumors (eighth edition).

A number of major modifications were made to the classification of head and neck carcinomas in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer, Cancer Staging Manual and Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification of Malignant Tumors. These modifications were aimed at improving the prognosis prediction accuracy of the system. In this article, we review the new edition of the TNM classification system. Among the several changes in the new system, a separate algorithm for p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma was included, as were new chapters on 'Head and Neck Skin Carcinoma' and 'Unknown Primary Carcinoma-Cervical Nodes.' Changes to Tumor (T) classification were made by introducing the depth of invasion of oral carcinoma, whereas changes to Node (N) classification were made by adding extra-nodal extension. It is believed that these changes will help improve the accuracy of the system in the prediction of prognosis. However, it is necessary to verify their validity through further clinical research.

Premedication with intravenous magnesium has a protective effect against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.

PURPOSE: Magnesium supplementation is an effective protective method against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN); however, there are few reports regarding the mechanism of its nephroprotective effect. The aim of this study was to determine whether premedication with intravenous magnesium prevents CIN and to determine the relationship between its nephroprotective effect and serum magnesium level. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with head and neck cancer who received cisplatin, docetaxel, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) were retrospectively investigated. Grade 2 or more serum creatinine elevation was defined as CIN. The incidence of CIN was compared between a magnesium sulfate (20 mEq, 2.46 g) premedication group and a non-magnesium group during the first cycle and in all cycles. RESULTS: CIN did not occur in any patients receiving magnesium premedication but did occur in 5 of 29 patients during the first cycle and in 6 patients during all subsequent cycles in patients who did not receive magnesium premedication. Furthermore, the variation of creatinine clearance was significantly worse in the non-magnesium group than in the magnesium premedication group from baseline. There was no difference in adverse effects or response rate between the two groups. Univariate analysis suggested that magnesium premedication significantly reduced the risk of CIN. On the other hand, serum magnesium depletion was seen in both groups to equal degrees despite supplementation. CONCLUSION: Intravenous magnesium premedication has a protective effect on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity without the influence on the serum magnesium level. Magnesium premedication is a simple nephroprotective method that does not influence other adverse effects or rate of response to chemotherapy.

Combined inhibition of EZH2 and histone deacetylases as a potential epigenetic therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer cells.

Recent discoveries have revealed that human cancer involves aberrant epigenetic alterations. We and others have previously shown that the histone methyltransferase EZH2, the catalytic subunit of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), is frequently overexpressed in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and that an EZH2 inhibitor, 3-deazaneplanocin A, inhibits the proliferation of NSCLC cells. Transcriptional silencing by EZH2 was recently shown to be required for the activity of histone deacetylases (HDACs) that interact with another PRC2 protein, EED. To develop a more effective epigenetic therapy for NSCLC, we determined the effects of co-treatment with 3-deazaneplanocin A and the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat (SAHA) in NSCLC cells. The co-treatment synergistically suppressed the proliferation of all tested NSCLC cell lines, regardless of their epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status. The synergistic effect was associated with slightly decreased histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation, modestly increased histone acetylation, and the depletion of EZH2 and other PRC2 proteins. The co-treatment resulted in an accumulation of p27Kip1, decrease in cyclin A, and increased apoptotic fraction in an additive/synergistic manner. Interestingly, the co-treatment strongly suppressed EGFR signaling, not only in EGFR-wild-type NSCLC cells, but also in EGFR-mutant cells, mainly through dephosphorylation of EGFR. Furthermore, the co-treatment suppressed the in vivo tumor growth of EGFR-mutant, EGFR-tyrosine kinase-resistant H1975 cells more effectively than did each agent alone, without visible toxicity. These results suggest that the combined pharmacological targeting of EZH2 and HDACs may provide more effective epigenetic therapeutics for NSCLC.

Expression of fucosyltransferase 8 is associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome in non-small cell lung cancers.

UNLABELLED: Objecitive: Fucosyltransferase 8 (FUT8), the only enzyme responsible for the core α1,6-fucosylation of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides of glycoproteins, is a vital enzyme in cancer development and progression. We examined FUT8 expression in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) to analyze its clinical significance. We also examined the expression of guanosine diphosphate-mannose-4,6-dehydratase (GMD), which is imperative for the synthesis of fucosylated oligosaccharides. METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry, we evaluated the expression of FUT8 and GMD in relation to patient survival and prognosis in potentially curatively resected NSCLCs. RESULTS: High expression of FUT8 was found in 67 of 129 NSCLCs (51.9%) and was significantly found in non-squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.008). High expression of FUT8 was associated with poor survival (p = 0.03) and was also a significant and independent unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with potentially curatively resected NSCLCs (p = 0.047). High expression of GMD was significantly associated with high FUT8 expression (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: High expression of FUT8 is associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with potentially curatively resected NSCLCs, suggesting that FUT8 can be a prognostic factor. The analysis of FUT8 expression and its core fucosylated products may provide new insights for the therapeutic targets of NSCLCs.

Feasibility and efficacy of induction docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy combined with concurrent weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of induction docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy followed by concurrent weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Between 2010 and 2013, 30 patients with Stage IV HNSCC were treated in Hokkaido University Hospital with three cycles of induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), day 1; and 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2)/day 120 h continuous infusion, every 3 weeks) followed by concurrent weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2), on weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7) chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Three courses of induction chemotherapy were performed in 25 patients (83%) with grade 3-4 toxicities during induction chemotherapy observed in 22 patients (73%). The major toxicities were hematologic, with 22 cases (73%) showing grade 3-4 neutropenia. Radiotherapy was completed (70 Gy) in 29 patients (97%), while a total of 19 patients (63%) completed five (13 patients) or six (6 patients) courses of chemotherapy. During concurrent chemoradiotherapy, no grade 4 hematological toxicities were observed. Grade 4 dermatitis was observed in one patient, and grade 3 mucositis was observed in 12 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths during the induction chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates and the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 86%, 72%, and 89%, 81%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sequential therapy composed of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy is feasible, showing encouraging results in patients with locally advanced HNSCC. Concurrent weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy following induction chemotherapy appears to be a suitable alternative to three-weekly high-dose cisplatin therapy.

Evaluation of Prediabetes in Cisplatin-induced Nephrotoxicity in the Short Hydration Method: A Subgroup Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) is one of the most attention-requiring adverse effects. We have reported that diabetes mellitus significantly increases the incidence of CIN in a short hydration method in real-world lung cancer treatment. However, the effect of prediabetes on CIN development remains unclear. This study investigated whether patients with prediabetes exhibit CIN at a greater rate during real-world cisplatin-including treatments as a subgroup analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study enrolled patients with lung cancer receiving cisplatin treatment (≥75 mg/m2) from May 2014 to January 2021 (n=169). Patients were divided into a prediabetes group (baseline HbA1c 5.7-6.4%) and a control group (baseline HbA1c <5.7%). The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of CIN in all treatment cycles between the two groups. We also assessed variations in serum creatinine (SCr) levels and creatinine clearance (CCr). RESULTS: CIN occurred in 4.7% of controls and 8.3% of patients with prediabetes in all cycles, with no significant difference (p=0.37). In contrast, variation of SCr levels and CCr was significantly worse in the prediabetes group [median variation level (range) 0.11 mg/dl (-0.11-0.46 mg/dl) and 0.12 mg/dl (-0.02-1.08 mg/d) in controls and prediabetes, p=0.04 for SCr; -12.9 ml/min (-54.1-4.9 ml/min) and -16.3 ml/min (-49.4-3.0 ml/min), p=0.02 for CCr, respectively]. These results were also confirmed during the first cycle of treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with prediabetes did not develop problematic CIN, although they exhibited significant increases in SCr and decreases in CCr.

A Phase 2 Study of Encorafenib in Combination with Binimetinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAF-Mutated Thyroid Cancer in Japan.

Background: Driver mutations at BRAF V600 are frequently identified in papillary thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), in which BRAF inhibitors have shown clinical effectiveness. This Japanese phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a BRAF inhibitor, encorafenib, combined with an MEK inhibitor, binimetinib, in patients with BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, uncontrolled study was conducted at 10 institutions targeted patients with BRAF V600-mutated locally advanced or distant metastatic thyroid cancer not amenable to curative treatment who became refractory/intolerant to ≥1 previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted regimen(s) or were considered ineligible for those. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We enrolled 22 patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer: 17 had differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and 5 had ATC. At data cutoff (October 26, 2022), the median follow-up was 11.5 (range = 3.4-19.0) months. The primary endpoint of centrally assessed ORR was 54.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.2-75.6; partial response in 12 patients and stable disease in 10). The ORRs in patients with DTC and ATC were 47.1% (8 of 17) and 80.0% (4 of 5), respectively. The medians for DOR and PFS by central assessment and for OS were not reached in the overall population, the DTC subgroup, or the ATC subgroup. At 12 months, the rate of ongoing response was 90.9%, and the PFS and OS rates were 78.8% and 81.8%, respectively. All patients developed ≥1 adverse events (AEs): grade 3 AEs in 6 patients (27.3%). No patients developed grade 4-5 AEs. The most common grade 3 AE was lipase increased (4 patients [18.2%]). Those toxicities were mostly manageable with appropriate monitoring and dose adjustment. Conclusions: Treatment with encorafenib plus binimetinib met the primary endpoint criteria and demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer regardless of its histological type, such as DTC or ATC, with no new safety concerns identified. Encorafenib plus binimetinib could thus be a new treatment option for BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Clinical Trial Registration number: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT2011200018.