Systematic review and network meta-analysis of re-intervention rates of new surgical interventions for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the re-intervention rates of new surgical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) interventions, as the clinical durability of new surgical interventions for BPH is not widely known. METHODS: A critical review of new surgical BPH therapies namely 'UroLift®', 'Aquablation', 'Rezum', 'prostatic artery embolisation (PAE)' and 'temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND)' was performed on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases between May 2010 and December 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. All relevant articles were reviewed, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk assessment tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Of the 32 studies included, there were 10 randomised controlled trials and 22 prospective observational cohorts. A total of 2400 participants were studied with a median patient age of 66 years, a median prostate volume of 51.9 mL, and a median International Prostate Symptom Score of 22. The lowest re-intervention rate at 12 months was for Aquablation at 0.01%, followed by Rezum at 0.02%, iTIND at 0.03%, and PAE at 0.05%. Network meta-analysis (NMA) showed that the best-ranked treatment at 12 months was transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), followed by Aquablation, iTIND, Rezum, and UroLift. Re-intervention rates with these new BPH interventions are comparable, although some interventions reported better outcomes than TURP in the shorter term. CONCLUSIONS: While this systematic review and NMA showed that the re-intervention rate with these new surgical BPH interventions appears to be comparable to TURP in the short term, further studies are required to directly compare these various BPH procedures.

A review of the objective cognitive function measurements in males receiving hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PC) is more common in the older population and the use of hormonal therapy in PC can increase medical frailty and cognitive decline. This narrative review examines the impact of androgen deprivation therapies (ADTs) and next-generational hormonal therapies (NGHT) on cognitive function outcomes amongst patients with hormone-sensitive or castrate-resistant PC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six electronic databases were searched from January 2000 to June 2022 for quantitative studies to evaluate the impacts of hormonal therapies (ADT, combined androgen blockade, and NGHT) on cognitive functions in men with PC. RESULTS: Of the 36 studies identified, 20 studies reported no effect of hormonal therapies on any cognitive domain while 16 studies found possible declines in at least one domain. The domains assessed were highly variable and objective assessment measurements were not standardized or widely adopted. While the results have been inconsistent, a relationship between declining androgen levels and poorer performances in the visuospatial and visual memory domains has been highlighted. It was not possible to distinguish the degree of cognitive parameter changes between the populations of hormone-sensitive and castrate-resistant PC. CONCLUSIONS: While the exact impact of ADT and NGHT on cognitive function in men with PC remains controversial, appropriate care should be undertaken especially in older and frail individuals, specifically in those with progressive or established visuospatial or visual memory deficits.

Can malleable penile prosthesis implantation improve voiding dysfunction in men with concurrent erectile dysfunction and buried penis?

PURPOSE: A buried penis causes voiding dysfunction and limits penetrative sexual intercourse. This pilot study evaluates the urinary outcomes in men with buried penis following insertion of malleable penile implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with buried penis and co-existing urinary problems and erectile dysfunction underwent malleable penile prosthesis implantation were reviewed in a prospective ethics approved database. Patient demographics, flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score, Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) and overall satisfaction score (on a 5-point scale) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 12 men (age 55 to 72 years) were reviewed, and the average gain in penile length post-implant, as measured from the pubis to the tip of the glans penis, was 6.8 (3 to 8) cm. There was a significant improvement in IIEF-5 score (8.2 vs. 22.5; p=0.029) post-implant, and more than half of patients were able to resume normal sexual intercourse and positive SEP-2 and SEP-4 were reported in 9 (75%) and 8 (67%) patients. There were no significant intraoperative or postoperative complication. Significant improvement in Qmax (8.4 ml/s vs. 18.6 ml/s; p=0.042) and IPSS (24.5±5.5 vs 15.5±3.5; p=0.038) were observed. More than two-thirds (83%) reported PGI-I score at 1 or 2, while 9 (75%) patients scored a 5/5 in overall satisfaction rate. CONCLUSIONS: Malleable penile implants increases penile length and improves urinary function in a highly select group of men with a buried penis and erectile dysfunction.

Transanal total mesorectal excision the Gold Coast experience: learning curve and comparison to traditional technique.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic and open techniques in rectal cancer are well-published, however, technical challenges remain for mid to low rectal cancer resections in the narrow pelvis. Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has been pioneered to potentially circumvent these challenges. The aims of this study were to evaluate the learning curve associated with our first cases of taTME as well as compare outcomes to that of conventionally performed rectal resections. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study with data collated from all elective resections by the colorectal unit from 2015 to 2017. Primary outcome was completeness of total mesorectal excision and secondary outcomes were intra- and post-operative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were identified. Of which, 20 underwent taTME. Mesorectal completeness was obtained in only 47.4% in the taTME group compared to 78.3% in the anterior resection group (p = 0.115). 5.9% of patients in our taTME group had positive circumferential resection margin compared to nil in the anterior resection. Conversion rates were greater in the taTME group (15% versus 0%; 0.028). Operative time, length of stay and clavien IV and V complications were greater in the taTME group. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the difficulty in introducing a novel technique given the learning curve. Our results would expect to improve with increased caseload.