National geographical pattern of COVID-19 hospitalization, case fatalities, and associated factors in patients covered by Iran Health Insurance Organization.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the Spatio-temporal distribution and interpersonal comparisons are important tools in etiological studies. This study was conducted to investigate the temporal and geographical distribution of COVID-19 hospitalized patients in the Iran Health Insurance Organization (IHIO) insured population (the second largest social health insurance organization) and the factors affecting their case fatality rate (CFR). METHODS: In this descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study, the demographic and clinical data of all insured of the IHIO who were hospitalized with COVID-19 in hospitals across the country until March 2021 was extracted from the comprehensive system of handling the inpatient documents of this organization. The Excel 2019 and GeoDA software were used for descriptive reporting and geographical distribution of variables. A multiple logistic regression model was used to estimate the Odds Ratio (OR) of death in patients with COVID-19 using STATA 14 software. RESULTS: During the first 14 months of the COVID-19 outbreak in Iran, 0.72% of the IHIO insured (303,887 individuals) were hospitalized with COVID-19. Hospitalization per 100,000 people varied from 192.51 in East Azerbaijan to 1,277.49 in Yazd province. The overall CFR in hospitalized patients was 14%. Tehran and Kohgiluyeh & BoyerAhmad provinces had the highest and lowest CFR with 19.39% and 5.19%, respectively. The highest odds of death were in those over 80 years old people (OR = 9.65), ICU-admitted (OR = 7.49), Hospitalized in governmental hospitals (OR = 2.08), Being a foreign national (OR = 1.45), hospitalized in November (OR = 1.47) and Residence in provinces such as Sistan & Baluchestan (OR = 1.47) and Razavi Khorasan (OR = 1.66) respectively. Furthermore, the odds of death were lower in females (OR = 0.81) than in males. CONCLUSIONS: A sound understanding of the primary causes of COVID-19 death and severity in different groups can be the basis for developing programs focused on more vulnerable groups in order to manage the crisis more effectively and benefit from resources more efficiently.

Reducing head computed tomography after mild traumatic brain injury: Screening value of clinical findings and S100B protein levels.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The present prospective study was performed to investigate whether primary clinical findings and serum S100B concentrations at 3 and 6 hours post-trauma can contribute to the selection of patients for an initial computed tomography (CT) scanning. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: S100B was measured in serum samples obtained at 3 and 6 hours after the injury. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) associated with demographics and clinical predictors of positive CT scan were calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were also calculated for S100B levels. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: It was found that the presence of loss of consciousness (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.00-4.01; p = 0.008) and post-traumatic vomiting ≥ 2 episodes (OR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.08-3.29; p = 0.019) are factors associated with positive CT scan. In this study the best cut-off point of 0.115 µg L(-1) for 3-hour S100B has sensitivity of 94.9% (95% CI = 86.8-98.3) with specificity of 35.4% (95% CI = 25.2-47.0) to predict intracranial injury on CT scanning. The corresponding results for 6-hour S100B > 0.210 µg L(-1) were 98.7% (95% CI = 92.1-99.9) for sensitivity and 39.2% (95% CI = 28.6-50.8) for specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Serum S100B measurement along with clinical evaluation of patients with mild traumatic brain injury has promising screening value to support selection of patients for CT scanning.

Utilization Trend of Parenteral Antidiabetic Drugs in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Covered by Iran Health Insurance Organization from 2011 to 2030.

Background: Exploring and analyzing the cost of medicines is an important tool for their management and planning. This study aims to analyze the utilization and costs of parenteral anti-diabetic medications during the past decade and predict the future trend of these medications from 2021 to 2031 in people that are covered by Iran Health Insurance Organization (IHIO). Methods: This study was based on secondary analysis of data routinely reported to IHIO from 2011 to 2019. For each drug, the Defined Daily Dose (DDDs) and DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day were calculated for the last 9 years according to the WHO protocol. Then a regression analysis was used to predict the utilization trend of each drug for the following 10 years. Results: The overall utilization of injectable antidiabetic drugs has constantly increased during the last nine years. This increasing trend is estimated to continue during the next decade. Conclusion: In Iran, the increase in the diabetic population and better access in the future will be the main reasons for the increase in the utilization of various insulins. The increasing trend of utilizing injectable anti-diabetic drugs in Iran might be partly due to new patients and partly because of improvement in patient access to new treatments. This also suggests that, compared to the average in the commonwealth countries, Iranian diabetic patients has faced lack of drug utilization in the past decade that is gradually reducing.

Effect of the chronic medication use on outcome measures of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Evidence from big data.

Background: Concerns about the role of chronically used medications in the clinical outcomes of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have remarkable potential for the breakdown of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) management by imposing ambivalence toward medication continuation. This study aimed to investigate the association of single or combinations of chronically used medications in NCDs with clinical outcomes of COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on the intersection of two databases, the Iranian COVID-19 registry and Iran Health Insurance Organization. The primary outcome was death due to COVID-19 hospitalization, and secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, and ventilation therapy. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system was used for medication grouping. The frequent pattern growth algorithm was utilized to investigate the effect of medication combinations on COVID-19 outcomes. Findings: Aspirin with chronic use in 10.8% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients was the most frequently used medication, followed by Atorvastatin (9.2%) and Losartan (8.0%). Adrenergics in combination with corticosteroids inhalants (ACIs) with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.92) were the most associated medications with less chance of ventilation therapy. Oxicams had the least OR of 0.80 (0.73-0.87) for COVID-19 death, followed by ACIs [0.85 (0.77-0.95)] and Biguanides [0.86 (0.82-0.91)]. Conclusion: The chronic use of most frequently used medications for NCDs management was not associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes. Thus, when indicated, physicians need to discourage patients with NCDs from discontinuing their medications for fear of possible adverse effects on COVID-19 prognosis.

Effect of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm on systolic blood pressure in patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Elevated systolic BP (SBP) is a major contributor to cardiovascular disease. SBP control reduces the occurrence of stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular and total mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the magnitude of SBP reductions and the achievement of individual SBP targets in the original BENIFORCE study. METHODS: An olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled titration study in 276 patients with stage 1 (47.1%) or 2 (52.9%) hypertension. After placebo run-in, patients were randomized to placebo (12 weeks) or olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg/day (weeks 1-3). Olmesartan medoxomil was uptitrated to 40 mg/day (weeks 4-6), then olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 40/12.5 mg per day (weeks 7-9), and olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ 40/25 mg per day (weeks 10-12) if BP remained ≥120/80 mmHg at any time interval. SETTING: The BENIFORCE study was a multicenter (29 sites) study conducted between January and October 2007 in the US. RESULTS: In patients receiving olmesartan medoxomil-based therapy, 81.0%, 67.2%, and 46.6% of patients with stage 1 hypertension and 70.4%, 49.4%, and 23.5% of patients with stage 2 hypertension achieved SBP targets of <140, <130, and <120 mmHg, respectively (all p < 0.01 vs placebo). The proportions of patients achieving SBP targets increased with escalating doses of olmesartan medoxomil and HCTZ, administered alone or in combination, and was highest for combination therapy. Similarly, escalating doses of olmesartan medoxomil or olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ increased the proportion of patients achieving SBP reductions of >15 but ≤30, >30 but ≤45, and >45 mmHg compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: An olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm effectively reduced SBP and achieved SBP targets in patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension. This regimen resulted in >80% of patients achieving SBP reductions of ≥15 mmHg while 44% achieved SBP reductions of >30 mmHg.

Industry's Giant Leap Into Cellular Therapy: Catalyzing Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Immunotherapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We describe the significant technological leap from bench to bedside that was achieved through a strong academic-industry collaboration between dedicated clinicians and researchers at the University of Pennsylvania, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Novartis to commercialize the chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy tisagenlecleucel (CTL019; Kymriah®; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland). RECENT FINDINGS: Tisagenlecleucel was the first CAR-T therapy and the first gene therapy to receive US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2017, with an initial indication for pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) acute lymphoblastic leukemia, followed by approval in May 2018 for a second indication in adult patients with r/r diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Subsequent approvals in the European Union, Switzerland, and Canada soon followed. The tisagenlecleucel success story represents the development and commercialization of a first-of-its-kind personalized cellular therapy with a manufacturing process that supports commercial production and ongoing global clinical trials in a growing number of countries.

Efficacy/safety of a fixed-dose amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment regimen in hypertensive blacks and non-blacks with uncontrolled BP on prior antihypertensive monotherapy.

In this secondary analysis of a dose-titration study of patients with hypertension uncontrolled on prior monotherapy, blacks (n=234) and non-blacks (n=765) were switched to amlodipine (AML)/olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 5/20 mg, with uptitration every 4 weeks to AML/OM 5/40 mg and then AML/OM 10/40 mg to achieve a seated cuff blood pressure (SeBP) of <120/70 mm Hg. Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 and 25 mg could be added if SeBP was ≥125/75 mm Hg. The cumulative proportions of patients achieving systolic SeBP <140 mm Hg (<130 mm Hg if diabetic) at 12 weeks were 71.6% for blacks and 77.2% for non-blacks. Mean SeBP change from baseline in blacks (mean baseline BP: 153.0/93.7 mm Hg) ranged from -11.7/-6.1 mm Hg for AML/OM 5/20 mg to -23.6/-12.9 mm Hg for AML/OM 10/40 mg +hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (all P<.0001). Antihypertensive efficacy was maintained throughout the 24-hour dosing interval. An AML/OM-based regimen was effective in blacks with hypertension uncontrolled on prior monotherapy.

Efficacy of amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil ± hydrochlorothiazide in patients aged ≥ 65 or < 65 years with uncontrolled hypertension on prior monotherapy.

Our subanalysis evaluated the efficacy of an amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil (AML/OM)-based titration regimen to achieve blood pressure (BP) goals among patients aged ≥ 65 years. In this dose-titration study, 999 patients (228 of whom were aged ≥ 65 years) with uncontrolled BP after ≥ 1 month of monotherapy were switched to fixed-dose AML/OM 5/20 mg and uptitrated every 4 weeks to AML/OM 5/40 and 10/40 mg to achieve BP < 120/70 mm Hg. Patients were subsequently uptitrated every 4 weeks to AML/OM 10/40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg and AML/OM 10/40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg to achieve BP < 125/75 mm Hg. The primary efficacy endpoint (ie, the cumulative percentage of patients achieving the seated cuff systolic BP goal of < 140 mm Hg [or < 130 mm Hg for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus] during first 12 weeks of treatment) was achieved by 76.7% and 75.6% of patients aged ≥ 65 (ie, 65-80) years and < 65 (ie, 18-64) years, respectively. For patients aged ≥ 65 and < 65 years, mean seated cuff BP changes from baseline during the titration periods ranged from -14.5/-7.8 mm Hg and -14.1/-7.7 mm Hg, respectively, for AML/OM 5/20 mg, to -28.5/-12.4 and -24.5/-14.0 mm Hg for AML/OM 10/40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg (all P < 0.0001). By week 20, the cumulative BP threshold of < 140/90 mm Hg was achieved by 86.8% and 84.2% of patients aged ≥ 65 and < 65 years, respectively. Among patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring, mean 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP all decreased from baseline at weeks 12 and 20 (all P < 0.0001). At weeks 12 and 20, the mean 24-hour American Heart Association-recommended ambulatory BP target of < 130/80 mm Hg was achieved in 80.4% and 97.4% of patients aged ≥ 65 years, respectively, and in 71.3% and 88.8% of patients aged < 65 years, respectively. The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events determined by clinical laboratory evaluation was low. The incidence of drug-related hypotension and orthostatic hypotension in patients aged ≥ 65 years was 2.2% and 0.0%, respectively, and in patients aged < 65 years, was 2.3% and 0.3%, respectively. Fixed-dose AML/OM ± HCTZ combination therapy effectively lowered BP and achieved BP goals in patients aged ≥ 65 and < 65 years with hypertension previously uncontrolled on monotherapy. The treatment regimen was well tolerated irrespective of patient age.

Efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil with or without hydrochlorothiazide in Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients whose blood pressure is uncontrolled on antihypertensive monotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: This is a prespecified subgroup analysis in Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients of a study that evaluated blood pressure (BP) control with fixed-dose amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil (AML/OM)-based therapy in patients whose condition was uncontrolled on prior monotherapy. METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, dose-titration study, patients with uncontrolled BP after at least 1 month of antihypertensive monotherapy were switched to fixed-dose AML/OM 5/20 mg. Patients were uptitrated to AML/OM 5/40 and 10/40 mg, with uptitration to AML/OM + hydrochlorothiazide 10/40 + 12.5 mg and 10/40 + 25 mg to achieve target BP. The primary efficacy endpoint was the cumulative proportion of patients achieving seated cuff systolic BP (SeSBP) less than 140 mmHg (<130 mmHg in patients with diabetes mellitus) at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included SeBP goal rates, ambulatory BP (ABP) target rates, and mean change from baseline in seated cuff BP (SeBP) and ABP at weeks 12 and 20. RESULTS: Mean baseline BP was similar in Hispanics (153.6/92.8 mmHg; n = 105) and non-Hispanics (153.7/91.8 mmHg; n = 894). At 12 weeks, 72.0% of Hispanics and 76.3% of non-Hispanics achieved the primary endpoint. At week 12, goal rates for cumulative SeBP (<140/90 mmHg or <130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes) were 69.0% and 71.5% in Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients, respectively. Mean change in SeBP in Hispanics ranged from -15.3/-7.3 mmHg for AML/OM 5/20 mg to -23.2/-13.8 mmHg for AML/OM 10/40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, and in non-Hispanics from -14.1/-7.8 mmHg to -25.4/-13.7 mmHg (all p < 0.0001 versus baseline). A majority of patients achieved mean 24 h, daytime, and nighttime ABP targets in both subgroups. Greater proportions of Hispanics achieved ABP targets versus non-Hispanics at week 12; however, this trend was reversed at week 20. Treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to a fixed-dose combination of AML/OM ± hydrochlorothiazide provided significant BP lowering and effectively controlled BP in a large proportion of Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients with hypertension uncontrolled on previous monotherapy.

Efficacy of amlodipine/olmesartan ± hydrochlorothiazide in patients uncontrolled on prior calcium channel blocker or angiotensin II receptor blocker monotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: While monotherapy is often recommended as initial treatment, most patients require dose escalation and add-on agents to achieve their blood pressure (BP) goal. This secondary analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of initiating patients on a regimen of fixed-dose amlodipine (AML)/olmesartan medoxomil (OM) ± hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) who were uncontrolled on prior monotherapy with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). METHODS: Patients uncontrolled on prior monotherapy with CCB or ARB therapy were initiated on AML/OM 5/20 mg and up-titrated every 4 weeks to AML/OM 5/40 mg, AML/OM 10/40 mg, AML/OM 10/40 + HCTZ 12.5 mg, and AML/OM 10/40 + HCTZ 25 mg. Patients were up-titrated to a higher AML/OM dose if mean seated cuff BP (SeBP) was ≥120/70 mmHg, and up-titrated to any HCTZ dose if mean SeBP was ≥125/75 mmHg. The primary efficacy endpoint was the cumulative proportion of patients achieving a seated cuff systolic BP (SeSBP) goal of <140 mmHg (<130 mmHg for patients with diabetes) after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included mean change from baseline in SeBP and ambulatory BP, ambulatory BP target achievement, and safety. RESULTS: For the prior CCB (n = 118; baseline SeBP: 153.4/91.5 mmHg) and ARB (n = 237; 154.6/92.6 mmHg) groups, SeSBP goal achievement after 12 weeks was 72.7% and 76.9%, respectively. Mean changes (± SE) from baseline in SeBP were dose proportional for prior CCB and ARB patients, ranging from -9.9 (± 1.25)/-5.8 (± 0.83) mmHg and -13.9 (± 0.79)/-7.6 (± 0.47) mmHg at the AML/OM 5/20 mg dose, respectively, to -21.8 (± 1.68)/-11.6 (±.12) mmHg and -26.2 (± 1.31)/-15.0 (± 0.86) mmHg at the AML/OM 10/40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg dose (P < 0.0001 for all). CONCLUSION: An AML/OM-based titration regimen was efficacious in achieving BP goal in patients uncontrolled on prior monotherapy with a CCB or ARB.

Efficacy of amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil ± HCTZ in obese patients uncontrolled on antihypertensive monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: BP-CRUSH (Blood Pressure Control in All Subgroups With Hypertension) was a phase IV, prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, dose-titration study (N = 999). The present subgroup analysis reports the efficacy/safety of up to 20 weeks of treatment with amlodipine (AML)/olmesartan medoxomil (OM) ± hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in obese and non-obese patients with hypertension uncontrolled on antihypertensive monotherapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eligible obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2); n = 505) and non-obese (<30 kg/m(2); n = 494) patients were switched to AML/OM 5/20 mg and uptitrated at 4-week intervals to AML/OM 5/40 mg, AML/OM 10/40 mg, AML/OM 10/40 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg, and AML/OM 10/40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg. Uptitration to higher doses of AML/OM was permitted if mean seated systolic BP (SeSBP) was ≥120 mmHg, or mean seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) was ≥70 mmHg. HCTZ was added if mean SeSBP was ≥125 mmHg, or mean SeDBP was ≥75 mmHg. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00791258 MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy endpoint was the cumulative proportion of patients achieving SeSBP <140 mmHg (<130 mmHg for patients with diabetes mellitus) at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included seated cuff BP (SeBP) goal rates, ambulatory BP target rates, and mean change from baseline in SeBP and ambulatory BP at weeks 12 and 20. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, 71.6% of obese patients (80.2% non-obese) achieved the primary endpoint of cumulative SeSBP <140 mmHg (<130 mmHg for patients with diabetes). The cumulative SeBP goal of <140/90 mmHg (<130/80 mmHg if diabetes) was achieved by 64.8% and 81.2% of obese patients by weeks 12 and 20, respectively (vs. 77.9% and 88.5% of non-obese patients, respectively). Treatment was well-tolerated, with 26.1% of obese patients (24.9% non-obese) experiencing drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). There were no serious drug-related TEAEs. CONCLUSION: An AML/OM ± HCTZ treatment regimen provided effective and safe BP control in obese patients with hypertension uncontrolled on monotherapy.

Efficacy of amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil in hypertensive patients with diabetes and obesity.

A subgroup analysis of a prospective, open-label, single-arm titration study in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes or obesity is reported. The primary end point was the change from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (BP) after 12 weeks. Patients received amlodipine 5 mg/d and were uptitrated (if seated [Se] BP was ≥ 120/80 mm Hg) at 3-week intervals to amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil 5/20 mg/d, 5/40 mg/d, and 10/40 mg/d. In patients with diabetes and obesity, baseline 24-hour ambulatory BP (± standard deviation) was 145.6 ± 10.4/83.1 ± 9.0 mm Hg and 143.7 ± 9.8/84.9 ± 8.2 mm Hg, respectively, and baseline SeBP was 159.1 ± 11.3/90.3 ± 9.2 mm Hg and 158.2 ± 12.5/94.2 ± 8.5mm Hg, respectively. Changes from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory BP (± standard error of the mean) were -21.5 ± 1.8/-12.6 ± 1.1 mm Hg and 21.6 ± 1.1/13.4 ± 0.8 mm Hg in patients with diabetes and obesity, respectively. Prespecified 24-hour ambulatory BP targets of < 130/80 mm Hg, < 125/75 mm Hg, and < 120/80 mm Hg were achieved by 79.1%, 53.5%, and 39.5% of patients with diabetes and 75.3%, 58.4%, and 43.8% of obese patients, respectively. The SeBP goal of < 130/80 mm Hg was achieved by 26.1% of patients with diabetes and <140/90 mm Hg was achieved by 78.1% of obese patients.

Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of an olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide-based treatment algorithm in elderly patients (age ≥65 years) stratified by age, sex and race: subgroup analysis of a 12-week, open-label, single-arm, dose-titration study.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension is a leading risk factor for development of heart failure, stroke and renal disease in the elderly. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate, by means of a prespecified secondary analysis of a 12-week, open-label, single-arm, dose-titration study, the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy and safety of an olmesartan medoxomil (OM)/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)-based titration regimen in patients aged ≥65 years with hypertension. Subgroups were stratified by age (≥65 to ≤75 or >75 years), sex (male or female) and race (Black or non-Black). METHODS: Following a 2- to 3-week placebo run-in phase, patients received OM 20 mg, uptitrated to OM 40 mg, followed by addition of HCTZ 12.5-25 mg step-wise at 3-week intervals if seated cuff BP (SeBP) was ≥120/70 mmHg. Patients below this target SeBP were maintained at their current dose but uptitrated to the next consecutive dose if mean seated cuff systolic BP (SBP) was ≥140 mmHg and/or mean seated cuff diastolic BP was ≥90 mmHg at follow-up visits. Efficacy was assessed by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and SeBP measurements. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP after 12 weeks. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the change from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP; change from baseline in ambulatory BP during the daytime (8:00 am-4:00 pm), nighttime (10:00 pm-6:00 am) and the last 6, 4 and 2 hours of the dosing interval; change from baseline in SeBP at each titration step and at study end; and the proportion of patients achieving mean 24-hour ambulatory BP targets and SeBP goals at week 12. The frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were also documented. RESULTS: Baseline and week 12 ABPM data were available for 150 out of 178patients who entered the active treatment phase. Changes from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory BP were -26.0/-12.5 mmHg and -24.9/-12.0 mmHg in patients aged ≥65 to ≤75 years (n = 128) and >75 years (n = 48), respectively (all p < 0.0001 vs baseline). Changes from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory BP were -26.0/-13.0 mmHg and -25.4/-11.5 mmHg in male (n = 92) and female (n = 84) patients, respectively (all p < 0.0001 vs baseline) and -26.7/-11.8 mmHg and -25.6/-12.4 mmHg in Black (n = 28) and non-Black (n = 148) patients, respectively (all p < 0.0001 vs baseline). Clinically significant ambulatory BP reductions were observed during the daytime, nighttime and the last 6, 4 and 2 hours of the dosing interval in all subgroups. Changes from baseline at week 12 in mean SeBP were similar to 24-hour ambulatory BP changes reported previously. At week 12, the proportion of patients achieving the 24-hour ambulatory BP target of <130/80 mmHg ranged from 67.5% to 77.4% and achieving the SeBP goal of <140/90 mmHg ranged from 60.7% to 68.8% across the subgroups. Most TEAEs and drug-related TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity, and there were no trends across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In a subgroup analysis based upon age, sex and race in patients aged ≥65 years with hypertension, an OM/HCTZ-based algorithm was efficacious and well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00412932.

Management of hypertension in patients with diabetes using an amlodipine-, olmesartan medoxomil-, and hydrochlorothiazide-based titration regimen.

The safety and efficacy of an amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil (OM)-based titration regimen was assessed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. After a 2- to 3-week placebo run-in period, 207 patients received amlodipine 5 mg and were uptitrated to amlodipine/OM 5/20, 5/40, and 10/40 mg and then amlodipine/OM 10/40 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 and 25 mg in a step-wise manner at 3-week intervals if the seated blood pressure (BP) remained ≥120/70 mm Hg. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP after 12 weeks of treatment. The baseline mean ± SD seated cuff systolic/diastolic BP was 158.8 ± 13.1/89.1 ± 10.1 mm Hg and the mean ± SD 24-hour ambulatory systolic/diastolic BP was 144.4 ± 11.7/81.6 ± 9.8 mm Hg. At week 12, the change from baseline in the mean ± SEM 24-hour ambulatory systolic/diastolic BP was -19.9 ± 0.8/-11.2 ± 0.5 mm Hg (p<0.0001 vs baseline), and 70% of patients had achieved a 24-hour ambulatory BP target of <130/80 mm Hg. At the end of 18 weeks of active treatment in patients uptitrated to amlodipine/OM 10/40 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, the change from baseline in the mean ± SEM seated BP was -28.0 ± 1.5/-13.7 ± 1.0 mm Hg (p<0.0001 vs baseline), with 62% of patients reaching the guideline-recommended seated BP goal of <130/80 mm Hg. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 19.3% of patients. The most frequent events were peripheral edema (6%), dizziness (3%), and hypotension (2%). In conclusion, this amlodipine/OM-based titration regimen was well tolerated and effectively lowered BP throughout the 24-hour dosing interval in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

A titrate-to-goal study of switching patients uncontrolled on antihypertensive monotherapy to fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil ± hydrochlorothiazide.

In the prospective, open-label, titrate-to-goal Blood Pressure Control in All Subgroups With Hypertension (BP-CRUSH) study, 999 patients with hypertension uncontrolled on monotherapy (mean age, 55.6 ± 11.4 years; baseline blood pressure [BP], 153.7 ± 9.2/91.9 ± 8.6 mm Hg) were switched to fixed-dose amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil (AML/OM) 5/20 mg. Patients were uptitrated every 4 weeks to AML/OM 5/40 mg and 10/40 mg to achieve BP < 120/70 mm Hg. Patients were subsequently uptitrated every 4 weeks to AML/OM+hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 10/40+12.5 mg and 10/40+25 mg to achieve BP <125/75 mm Hg. The primary end point, the cumulative percentage of patients achieving seated systolic BP < 140 mm Hg (< 130 mm Hg for patients with diabetes) by week 12, was 75.8%. The mean (± standard error) BP changes from baseline during the titration periods ranged from -14.2±0.4 mm Hg/-7.7 ± 0.3 mm Hg for AML/OM 5/20 mg to -25.1 ± 0.7 mm Hg/-13.7 ± 0.4 mm Hg for AML/OM+HCTZ 10/40+25 mg. By week 20, the cumulative BP threshold of <140/90 mm Hg was achieved by 90.3% of patients. An ambulatory BP monitoring substudy (n=243) showed that 24-hour efficacy was maintained. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), mostly mild to moderate in severity, occurred in 529 patients (53.0%). Drug-related TEAEs occurred in 255 patients (25.5%). This well-tolerated, treat-to-goal algorithm enabled a large proportion of patients with uncontrolled hypertension on monotherapy to safely achieve BP control on single-pill AML/OM combination therapy or triple therapy with the addition of HCTZ. .

Efficacy of amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil in patients with hypertension: the AZOR Trial Evaluating Blood Pressure Reductions and Control (AZTEC) study.

The aim of the present study was to use ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) to determine the efficacy of a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine (AML) and olmesartan medoxomil (OM) over the 24-hour dosing interval. This 12-week, titrate-to-goal study was conducted in 185 patients with hypertension. Patients were initially treated with AML 5 mg/ day and uptitrated to AML/OM 5/20, 5/40, and 10/40 mg/day every 3 weeks if mean seated BP (SeBP) was ≥ 120/80 mmHg. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in mean 24-hour systolic BP at week 12 as assessed by ABPM. At baseline, the mean 24-hour ambulatory BP (± standard deviation [SD]) was 144.8 ± 11.1/85.7 ± 7.9 mmHg. At week 12, the change from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory BP (± standard error of the mean [SEM]) was -21.4 ± 0.8/-12.7 ± 0.5 mmHg (p < 0.0001 versus baseline). At baseline, the mean SeBP (± SD) was 158.2 ± 12.6/92.8 ± 8.6 mmHg and at week 12, the mean SeBP change (± SEM) from baseline (last observation carried forward) was -24.1 ± 1.1/-12.1 ± 0.7 mmHg (p < 0.0001 versus baseline). Proportions of patients achieving mean 24-hour ambulatory BP prespecified study targets were 70.9% (<130/80 mmHg), 48.3% (<125/75 mmHg), and 40.7% (<120/80 mmHg). Cumulatively, 76.8% of patients uptitrated to AML/OM 10/40 mg/day attained an SeBP goal of <140/90 mmHg. The study drug was well tolerated with few adverse events (peripheral edema, 2.2%; dizziness, 1.1%). An AML/OM-based titration regimen effectively reduces BP in patients with hypertension.

Immunohistochemical expression of Ki67, c-erbB-2, and c-kit antigens in benign and malignant pheochromocytoma.

In this study, we evaluated the immunohistochemical expression and the possible advantages of Ki67 antigen, c-erbB-2, and c-kit proto-oncogenes in the differentiation between benign and malignant pheochromocytomas. Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from 44 benign (35 adrenal and 9 extra-adrenal) and 11 malignant (9 adrenal and 2 extra-adrenal) cases of pheochromocytoma were selected for immunohistochemical staining using antibodies against Ki67, c-erbB-2, and c-kit antigens. We investigated the relationship between the expression of these antigens and age, gender, tumor size, histologic patterns and necrosis, as well as tumor behavior. The risk of malignancy was higher when tumor size was increased. We found out that more uncommon tissue patterns, such as small cell and spindle cell patterns, are mostly indicators of malignancy. There was a statistically significant relationship between Ki67- and c-erbB-2-positive staining of the tumor cells and the malignant behavior of the pheochromocytomas (p-value=0.000), while cytoplasmic c-kit staining did not show any correlation with tumor malignancy (p-value=0.087). We concluded that tumor size and the histomorphologic patterns (spindle cell and small round cell) are significantly associated with tumor behavior. In addition, Ki67 positivity and c-erbB-2 expression can be used as immunohistochemical markers for predicting the malignant behavior of pheochromocytoma.

Effects of an olmesartan medoxomil based treatment algorithm on 24-hour blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The BENIFICIARY (BENIcar safety and efFICacy evaluatIon: An open-label, single-ARm, titration study in patients with hypertension and tYpe 2 diabetes) study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After a placebo run-in period, 192 patients received OM 20 mg/day for 3 weeks. If blood pressure (BP) remained > or =120/70 mm Hg, patients were up-titrated to OM 40 mg/day for 3 weeks and subsequently (in 3-week intervals) to OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg/day, then OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg/day as necessary. Blood pressure was evaluated by mean 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) from baseline to Week 12. Secondary endpoints included: change in ambulatory diastolic BP (DBP) from baseline to Week 12; changes in ambulatory SBP and DBP during daytime, nighttime, and the last 2, 4, and 6 hours of the dosing interval; and achievement of prespecified ambulatory BP targets. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT00403481. RESULTS: Mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP and DBP decreased by 20.4 mm Hg and 11.1 mm Hg, respectively (both P < 0.0001 to baseline), and 61.6%, 47.1%, and 39.0% of patients reached the ambulatory BP targets of <130/80 mm Hg, <125/75 mm Hg, and <120/80 mm Hg, respectively. The study medication was well tolerated with few adverse events: 67/192 patients (34.9%) experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) while 15/192 (7.8%) experienced a drug-related TEAE. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label ABPM study, an OM +/- HCTZ based treatment regimen safely and significantly reduced BP in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes when assessed by 24-hour ABPM.

The effects of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm on 24-hour blood pressure levels in elderly patients aged 65 and older.

This study examined the effect of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) +/- hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, mean seated cuff (Se) blood pressure (BP), and SeBP goal achievement in elderly (65 years and older) patients with hypertension. After a 2- to 3-week placebo run-in period, patients received OM 20 mg, up-titrated to OM 40 mg, and then added HCTZ 12.5 mg to 25 mg in a stepwise manner at 3-week intervals if SeBP remained >or=120/70 mm Hg. The primary end point was change from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP. At study end, mean 24-hour ambulatory BP had decreased by 25.7/12.3 mm Hg (n=150) and mean SeBP by 25.4/10.5 mm Hg (n=176; all P<.00001 vs baseline). Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events, most commonly dizziness (3.4%), hypotension (2.2%), and headache (1.1%), were observed in 11.8% of patients. An OM-based treatment algorithm effectively lowers BP in an elderly patient population throughout the 24-hour dosing interval without compromising tolerability.