Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Community Health ; 41(2): 359-67, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26499385

ABSTRACT

This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate adherence rates and identify barriers to receiving follow-up eye care in participants diagnosed with significant non-glaucomatous eye pathology in the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project. This community-based project aimed to improve detection, management, treatment, and follow-up eye care of individuals at high risk for glaucoma in community-based settings. Participants throughout Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA were enrolled. After a comprehensive eye examination, follow-up recommendations were given to each participant. A telephone survey was administered to individuals diagnosed with non-glaucomatous ocular pathology 3 months after initial eye examination to assess rates of follow-up and to evaluate potential barriers to follow-up. Of the 1649 participants enrolled in this project, 249 (15 %) were diagnosed with significant non-glaucomatous ocular pathology requiring follow-up care. There were 143 (57 %) who responded to the telephone survey. Respondents had a median age of 72 years, and were predominately female (69 %) and African-American (64 %). Of the respondents, 36 (25 %) attended a follow-up appointment. Participants who did not remember the results of their examinations, did not remember their recommendations, and had not seen an eye doctor within the past year were less likely to make a follow-up appointment (P = 0.04, 0.001 and 0.005, respectively). The Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Program was able to detect a significant amount of non-glaucomatous ocular pathology requiring follow-up care. Actual follow-up rates were sub-optimal. Further research is needed to determine interventions to overcome barriers and increase adherence with follow-up recommendations.


Subject(s)
Aftercare , Eye Diseases/diagnosis , Health Services Accessibility , Adult , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Philadelphia
2.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 56(1): 43-48, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32771327

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess ocular diagnoses and follow-up patterns of children referred for a comprehensive eye examination after a school-based vision screening program. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: Students in grades K-5 from the School District of Philadelphia public schools screened by The Wills Eye Vision Screening Program for Children between January 2014 and June 2015. METHODS: Children with subnormal best-corrected visual acuity or other ocular conditions were referred to the Wills Eye pediatric ophthalmology service. A social worker assisted parents/guardians of referred children in scheduling an appointment and navigating insurance/payment issues. Measured outcomes included demographic information, ocular diagnoses, treatments, and follow-up patterns. RESULTS: Of 10 726 children screened, 509 (5%) were referred for a follow-up eye examination. Of these 509 children, only 127 (25%) completed a referral eye examination with parental consent. Most children (58%) were diagnosed with more than one eye condition, including refractive error (76%), amblyopia (43%), strabismus (16%), and anisometropia (13%). Other conditions included macular hypoplasia, ptosis, and other congenital anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: This program discovered and addressed potentially vision-threatening conditions in underserved children susceptible to amblyopia by offering social worker services and financial support to enable referred children to complete an eye examination. Contact by the social worker required consent. Obtaining such consent proved to be a barrier to connecting children with the recommended consultation.


Subject(s)
Amblyopia , Refractive Errors , Vision Screening , Child , Humans , Referral and Consultation , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Refractive Errors/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Schools
3.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 55(1): 52-57, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31712026

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of eyeglass administration after a vision-screening program on standardized testing scores in school-aged children. DESIGN: Retrospective study of children who participated in a vision-screening program that provided free eyeglasses where indicated. PARTICIPANTS: Students in kindergarten through grade 5 in a large urban school district in North America. METHODS: Children in kindergarten through grade 3 were administered the Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA), and children in grades 3 through 5 were administered the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA). Classroom teachers completed eyeglass adherence questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 4523 children participated in the vision-screening program. Eyeglasses were worn most of the time (>75%) by 67.4% of the children and never or rarely worn (<25%) by 18.6% of children. DRA results were available for 2226 children. When eyeglasses were prescribed and worn, initially high reading performances (DRA level 3) were less likely to decline (odds ratio [OR] = 4.36, p < 0.001). Improvement was not observed for children who initially scored DRA level 1 or 2 (OR = 0.29, p < 0.001 and OR = 1.00, p = 0.986, respectively). PSSA reading results were available for 847 children. When eyeglasses were prescribed and worn, Asian children were more likely to score higher PSSA reading levels (OR = 2.53, p = 0.004). This trend was also observed in black and Hispanic children without reaching statistical significance (OR = 1.70, p = 0.061; OR = 2.67, p = 0.067, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In some children, wearing eyeglasses was associated with maintenance in standardized reading scores. High adherence to wearing eyeglasses suggests that children perceive a benefit, perhaps beyond that which these standardized test results were able to document.


Subject(s)
Academic Performance , Eyeglasses , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Refractive Errors/therapy , Schools , Vision Screening/methods , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Refractive Errors/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
J AAPOS ; 22(4): 309.e1-309.e7, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30012459

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of decreased visual acuity and uncorrected refractive error in school-aged children participating in summer programs. METHODS: During the summers of 2014-2016, Wills Eye Hospital collaborated with summer programs in Philadelphia to provide vision screenings for underserved children. Parental consent was obtained prior to vision screening. Fail criteria included children in grades K-1 (ages 5-6) with visual acuity worse than 20/40 in either eye, children in grades 2-6 (ages 7-13) with visual acuity worse than 20/30 in either eye, or children with ≥2 lines of interocular difference. If decreased visual acuity was correctable to ≥20/30 by the onsite optometrist, two pairs of free eyeglasses were provided. Children with other ocular abnormalities were referred to pediatric ophthalmology. RESULTS: Of 1,627 children screened, 360 children (22.1%) did not pass vision screening, and 64 (3.9%) were referred. The prevalence of decreased distance visual was 34.1%. Younger children were more likely to have worse visual acuity than older children (OR = 0.943; P = 0.023; 95% CI, 0.896-0.992). Myopia (73%), astigmatism (56.8%), hyperopia (15.5%), spherical anisometropia (12.5%), and cylindrical anisometropia (11.9%) presented in the 303 children who underwent a manifest refraction. Myopia increased with age (OR = 0.818; P = 0.001; 95% CI, 0.724-0.922), whereas astigmatism decreased (OR = 0.817; P < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.728-0.913) with age. Two pairs of glasses were provided to 301 children. CONCLUSIONS: Partnership with summer programs and other community initiatives to provide vision screenings facilitates access to eye care ultimately aimed at improving social functioning and academic performance.


Subject(s)
Pediatrics/organization & administration , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Vision Screening/organization & administration , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Male , Philadelphia
5.
J AAPOS ; 22(3): 214-217.e2, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29660392

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and severity of uncorrected refractive errors in school-age children attending Philadelphia public schools. METHODS: The Wills Eye Vision Screening Program for Children is a community-based pediatric vision screening program designed to detect and correct refractive errors and refer those with nonrefractive eye diseases for examination by a pediatric ophthalmologist. Between January 2014 and June 2016 the program screened 18,974 children in grades K-5 in Philadelphia public schools. Children who failed the vision screening were further examined by an on-site ophthalmologist or optometrist; children whose decreased visual acuity was not amenable to spectacle correction were referred to a pediatric ophthalmologist. RESULTS: Of the 18,974 children screened, 2,492 (13.1%) exhibited uncorrected refractive errors: 1,776 (9.4%) children had myopia, 459 (2.4%) had hyperopia, 1,484 (7.8%) had astigmatism, and 846 (4.5%) had anisometropia. Of the 2,492 with uncorrected refractive error, 368 children (14.8%) had more than one refractive error diagnosis. In stratifying refractive error diagnoses by severity, mild myopia (spherical equivalent of -0.50 D to < -3.00 D) was the most common diagnosis, present in 1,573 (8.3%) children. CONCLUSIONS: In this urban population 13.1% of school-age children exhibited uncorrected refractive errors. Blurred vision may create challenges for students in the classroom; school-based vision screening programs can provide an avenue to identify and correct refractive errors.


Subject(s)
Refractive Errors/epidemiology , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Philadelphia/epidemiology , Prevalence , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Schools , Vision Screening/methods , Visual Acuity/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL