Can neurodevelopmental disorders influence the course of neurodegenerative diseases? A scoping review.

This scoping review aims at giving an overview of the possible influence of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) on cognitive-behavioral neurodegenerative diseases (CBNDs). Based on the PRISMA-ScR checklist, it details the methods of NDDs screening, the identified NDDs-CBNDs associations, as well as the criteria and types of association. The last literature search was performed in June 2023. In the final study, 32 articles were included. Analysis first showed that NDDs were mainly detected through medical records screening. Second, the association of specific learning disorders and major or mild neurocognitive disorder due to Alzheimer's disease was the most investigated. Third, associations were mostly based on prevalence comparisons. Finally, 66 % of studies reported a positive association between NDDs and CBNDs. Notably, up to 67 % of positive associations were observed with atypical forms of certain CBNDs. Authors' interpretations suggest that NDDs could constitute a risk factor for CBNDs. However, the influence of NDDs on CBNDs still lacks evidence and biological support, possibly due to the heterogeneity of methods and criteria employed. Developing validated assessment tools for all NDDs and conducting cohort studies could be beneficial for research, and clinical practice. Indeed, this review also underlines the importance of adopting a life-span approach regarding CBNDs.

To start or stop an action depends on which movement we perform: An appraisal of the horse-race model.

In order to gauge the executive processes underlying adaptive behavior, a central criterion in psychology is the extent to which experimental findings generalize across response types. The latency of two major acts of control, action initiation and inhibition, was evaluated using a stop-signal paradigm with two response types, involving either a finger key-pressing or a wrist pen-swiping response. In both conditions, 40 participants were instructed to respond quickly to a GO stimulus but to cancel their responses when a STOP signal was presented, which occurred randomly in 25% of the trials. Taken together, analyses of reaction times and of inhibition probability functions indicated that action initiation generalized across the two response types. In contrast, the finger key-pressing and the wrist pen-swiping responses involved independent inhibition processes. These results challenge a strictly top-down view for some acts of control by showing an interaction between the executive and motor levels in terms of response modality specificity.