Role of a Pharmacist in Postdischarge Care for Patients With Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to explore and describe the role of pharmacists in providing postdischarge care to patients with kidney disease. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (Ebscohost), Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus were searched on January 30, 2023. Publication date limits were not included. Search terms were identified based on 3 concepts: kidney disease, pharmacy services, and patient discharge. Experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, and qualitative studies, or study protocols, describing the pharmacist's role in providing postdischarge care for patients with kidney disease, excluding kidney transplant recipients, were eligible. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Six unique interventions were described in 10 studies meeting inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four interventions targeted patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization and 2 evaluated patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease. Pharmacists were a multidisciplinary care team (MDCT) member in 5 interventions and were the sole provider in 1. Roles commonly identified include medication review, medication reconciliation, medication action plan formation, kidney function assessment, drug dose adjustments, and disease education. Some studies showed improvements in diagnostic coding, laboratory monitoring, medication therapy problem (MTP) resolution, and patient education; prevention of hospital readmission was inconsistent. Limitations include lack of standardized reporting of kidney disease, transitions of care processes, and differences in outcomes evaluated. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review identifies potential roles of a pharmacist as part of a postdischarge MDCT for patients with varying degrees of kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacist's role in providing postdischarge care to patients with kidney disease is inconsistent. Multidisciplinary care teams including a pharmacist provided consistent identification and resolution of MTPs, improved patient education, and increased self-awareness of diagnosis.

Association of Primary Versus Rotating Nephrologist Model of Care in Hemodialysis Programs with Patient Outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Nephrologist staffing models for patients receiving hemodialysis vary widely. Patients may be cared for continuously by a single primary nephrologist or by a group of nephrologists on a rotating basis. It remains unclear whether these differing care models influence clinical outcomes. In this population-based cohort study of more than 14,000 incident patients on maintenance hemodialysis from Ontario, Canada, we found no difference in mortality, kidney transplantation, home dialysis initiation, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits when care was provided by a single primary nephrologist or a rotating group of nephrologists. These results suggest that primary nephrologist models do not necessarily improve objective clinical outcomes, providing reassurance to patients, providers, and administrators that both models are acceptable options.

Long-term Health Care Utilization and Associated Costs After Dialysis-Treated Acute Kidney Injury in Children.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common among hospitalized children and is associated with increased hospital length of stay and costs. However, there are limited data on postdischarge health care utilization after AKI hospitalization. Our objectives were to evaluate health care utilization and physician follow-up patterns after dialysis-treated AKI in a pediatric population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study, using provincial health administrative databases. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All children (0-18 years) hospitalized between 1996 and 2017 in Ontario, Canada. Excluded individuals comprised non-Ontario residents; those with metabolic disorders or poisoning; and those who received dialysis or kidney transplant before admission, a kidney transplant by 104 days after discharge, or were receiving dialysis 76-104 days from dialysis start date. EXPOSURE: Episodes of dialysis-treated AKI, identified using validated health administrative codes. AKI survivors were matched to 4 hospitalized controls without dialysis-treated AKI by age, sex, and admission year. OUTCOME: Our primary outcome was postdischarge hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient physician visits. Secondary outcomes included outpatient visits by physician type and composite health care costs. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Proportions with≥1 event and rates (per 1,000 person-years). Total and median composite health care costs. Adjusted rate ratios using negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: We included 1,688 pediatric dialysis-treated AKI survivors and 6,752 matched controls. Dialysis-treated AKI survivors had higher rehospitalization and emergency department visit rates during the analyzed follow-up periods (0-1, 0-5, and 0-10 years postdischarge, and throughout follow-up), and higher outpatient visit rates in the 0-1-year follow-up period. The overall adjusted rate ratio for rehospitalization was 1.46 (95% CI, 1.25-1.69; P<0.0001) and for outpatient visits was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09-1.23; P=0.01). Dialysis-treated AKI survivors also had higher health care costs. Nephrologist follow-up was infrequent among dialysis-treated AKI survivors (18.6% by 1 year postdischarge). LIMITATIONS: Potential miscoding of study exposures or outcomes. Residual uncontrolled confounding. Data for health care costs and emergency department visits was unavailable before 2006 and 2001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis-treated AKI survivors had greater postdischarge health care utilization and costs versus hospitalized controls. Strategies are needed to improve follow-up care for children after dialysis-treated AKI to prevent long-term complications.

Association of an Acute Kidney Injury Follow-up Clinic With Patient Outcomes and Care Processes: A Cohort Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: To determine whether attendance at an acute kidney injury (AKI) follow-up clinic is associated with reduced major adverse kidney events. STUDY DESIGN: Propensity-matched cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients hospitalized with AKI in Ontario, Canada, from February 1, 2013, through September 30, 2017, at a single clinical center, who were not receiving dialysis when discharged. EXPOSURE: Standardized assessment by a nephrologist. OUTCOMES: Time to a major adverse kidney event, defined as death, initiation of maintenance dialysis, or incident/progressive chronic kidney disease. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Propensity scores were used to match each patient who attended an AKI follow-up clinic to 4 patients who received standard care. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess the association between the care within an AKI follow-up clinic and outcomes. To avoid immortal time bias, we randomly assigned index dates to the comparator group. RESULTS: We matched 164 patients from the AKI follow-up clinic to 656 patients who received standard care. During a mean follow-up of 2.2±1.3 (SD) years, care in the AKI follow-up clinic was not associated with a reduction in major adverse kidney events relative to standard care (22.1 vs 24.7 events per 100 patient-years; HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.75-1.11]). The AKI follow-up clinic was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.55-0.91]). Patients aged at least 66 years who attended the AKI follow-up clinic were more likely to receive ß-blockers (HR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.02-1.77]) and statins (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.05-1.74]), but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.94-1.56]). LIMITATIONS: Single-center study and residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Specialized postdischarge follow-up for AKI survivors was not associated with a lower risk of major adverse kidney events but was associated with a lower risk of death and increased prescriptions for some cardioprotective medications.

Informed consent practices in clinical research: present and future.

Clinical research must balance the need for ambitious recruitment with protecting participants' autonomy; a requirement of which is informed consent. Despite efforts to improve the informed consent process, participants are seldom provided sufficient information regarding research, hindering their ability to make informed decisions. These issues are particularly pervasive among patients experiencing acute illness or neurological impairment, both of which may impede their capacity to provide consent. There is a critical need to understand the components, requirements, and methods of obtaining true informed consent to achieve the vast numbers required for meaningful research. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the tenets underlying informed consent in research, including the assessment of capacity to consent, considerations for patients unable to consent, when to seek consent from substitute decision-makers, and consent under special circumstances. Various methods for obtaining informed consent are addressed, along with strategies for balancing recruitment and consent.

Recovery From Dialysis-Treated Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Population-Based Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The decision to initiate kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis remains controversial because it is unclear which patients will benefit. We sought to characterize factors associated with recovery from KRT-treated AKI in patients with cirrhosis to inform shared clinical decision-making. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients from Ontario, Canada, identified using administrative data to have cirrhosis at the time of hospital admission with AKI (based on serum creatinine level) who were treated with KRT (January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2016) and followed up until the end of 2017. EXPOSURES: Demographic characteristics and comorbidities before admission. OUTCOMES: Kidney recovery defined as the absence of KRT for at least 30 days. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: The cumulative incidences of kidney recovery, death, and liver transplant were calculated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and independent predictors of kidney recovery were evaluated using Fine and Gray competing risk regression models that generated subdistribution hazards ratios (sHRs). RESULTS: Overall, 722 patients were included (median age, 61 [interquartile range, 54-68] years; Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-Na score, 26 [interquartile range, 22-34]; 66% were male; 52% had viral hepatitis, 25% nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, 18% alcohol-associated liver disease). The cumulative incidences of kidney recovery at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 3%, 22%, 25%, and 26%, respectively. Higher MELD-Na score (sHR per 5 units greater, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.65-0.80]), acute-on-chronic liver failure (sHR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43-0.86]), and sepsis (sHR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.41-0.81]) were associated with a lower hazard of kidney recovery, whereas those on a liver transplant waitlist (sHR, 3.10 [95% CI, 1.96-4.88]) and who were admitted to a teaching hospital (sHR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.05-2.08]) were more likely to experience kidney recovery. LIMITATIONS: Observational design, AKI etiology not identified. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney recovery from KRT occurred in only one quarter of patients and was very unlikely after 3 months. These findings provide information regarding prognosis that may guide decisions regarding KRT initiation and continuation.

Cancer Risk and Mortality in Patients With Kidney Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be at increased risk for cancer. CKD may also be associated with worse cancer outcomes. This study examined cancer incidence and mortality across the spectrum of CKD. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All adult Ontario residents with data on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or who were receiving maintenance dialysis or had received a kidney transplant (2007-2016). EXPOSURE: Patients were categorized as of the first date they had 2 eGFR assessments or were registered as receiving maintenance dialysis or having received a kidney transplant. eGFR levels were further categorized as ≥60, 45-59, 30-44, 15-29, and <15 mL/min/1.73 m2; the latter 4 groups are consistent with KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) CKD categories G3a, G3b, G4, and G5, respectively. OUTCOMES: Overall and site-specific cancer incidence and mortality. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models. RESULTS: Among 5,882,388 individuals with eGFR data, 29,809 receiving dialysis, and 4,951 having received a kidney transplant, there were 325,895 cancer diagnoses made during 29,993,847 person-years of follow-up. The cumulative incidence of cancer ranged between 10.8% and 15.3% in patients with kidney disease. Compared with patients with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) for a cancer diagnosis among patients with CKD G3a, G3b, G4, and G5 were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.07-1.10), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.01), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.90), respectively. The AHRs for patients receiving dialysis and who had received a transplant were 1.01 (95% CI, 0.96-1.07) and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.12-1.39), respectively. Patients with kidney disease had higher proportions of stage 4 cancers at diagnosis. Patients with CKD G3a, G3b, and G4 and transplant recipients had increased risks of cancer-specific mortality (AHRs of 1.27 [95% CI, 1.23-1.32], 1.29 [95% CI, 1.24-1.35], 1.25 [95% CI, 1.18-1.33], and 1.48 [95% CI, 1.18-1.87], respectively). The risks of bladder and kidney cancers and multiple myeloma were particularly increased in CKD, and mortality from these malignancies increased with worsening kidney function. LIMITATIONS: Possible unmeasured confounding and limited ability to infer causal associations. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer incidence in the setting of kidney disease is substantial. Cancer risk was increased in mild to moderate CKD and among transplant recipients, but not in advanced kidney disease. Cancer-related mortality was significantly higher among patients with kidney disease, particularly urologic cancers and myeloma. Strategies to detect and manage these cancers in the CKD population are needed.

Acute kidney injury is associated with subtle but quantifiable neurocognitive impairments.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with long-term morbidity and mortality. The effects of AKI on neurocognitive functioning remain unknown. Our objective was to quantify neurocognitive impairment after an episode of AKI. METHODS: Survivors of AKI were compared with age-matched controls, as well as a convenience sample of patients matched for cardiovascular risk factors with normal kidney function (active control group). Patients with AKI completed two assessments, while the active control group completed one assessment. The assessment included a standardized test: the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), and a robotic assessment: Kinarm. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 21 patients with AKI, 16 of whom completed both assessments, and 21 active control patients. The majority of patients with AKI had Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Stage 3 AKI (86%), 57% received dialysis and 43% recovered to ≤25% of their baseline serum creatinine by their first assessment. Compared with the RBANS, which detected little impairment, the Kinarm categorized patients as impaired in visuomotor (10/21, 48%), attention (10/20, 50%) and executive tasks (11/21, 52%) compared with healthy controls. Additionally, patients with AKI performed significantly worse in attention and visuomotor domains when compared with the active controls. Neurocognitive performance was generally not impacted by the need for dialysis or whether kidney function recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic technology identified quantifiable neurocognitive impairment in survivors of AKI. Deficits were noted particularly in attention, visuomotor and executive domains. Further investigation into the downstream health consequences of these neurocognitive impairments is warranted.

Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in chronic kidney disease and heart failure: ready for prime time in patients without diabetes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The benefits of sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors seem to extend beyond glycemic control. We review recent randomized trial evidence evaluating SGLT2 inhibition in nondiabetic settings, including in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF). RECENT FINDINGS: DAPA-CKD, DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced compared SGLT2 inhibitors to placebo, enrolling 5868 patients without diabetes. In DAPA-CKD, patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25-75 ml/min/1.73 m2 and macroalbuminuria irrespective of kidney disease aetiology had improved cardiovascular and kidney outcomes if randomized to receive SGLT2 inhibitors (primary composite endpoint: hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.72; absolute risk reduction [ARR] 5.3%). In DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced, participants with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) had improved cardiovascular outcomes when an SGLT2 inhibitor was added to guideline-directed medical therapy, mainly through a reduction in HF hospitalizations (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.83; ARR 3.7% and HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.81; ARR 5.1% with dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, respectively). In all 3 trials, the benefits were not modified by diabetes, baseline eGFR or proteinuria. SUMMARY: SGLT2 inhibitors improve kidney and HF outcomes in patients with high-risk CKD and HFrEF, irrespective of diabetes. Clinicians should become more comfortable prescribing these medications as we await studies that may further broaden their indications.

The Frequency of Routine Blood Sampling and Patient Outcomes Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Recipients.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Surveillance blood work is routinely performed in maintenance hemodialysis (HD) recipients. Although more frequent blood testing may confer better outcomes, there is little evidence to support any particular monitoring interval. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective population-based cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All prevalent HD recipients in Ontario, Canada, as of April 1, 2011, and a cohort of incident patients commencing maintenance HD in Ontario, Canada, between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016. EXPOSURE: Frequency of surveillance blood work, monthly versus every 6 weeks. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause hospitalization, and episodes of hyperkalemia. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cox proportional hazards with adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics was used to evaluate the association between blood testing frequency and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were evaluated using the Andersen-Gill extension of the Cox model to allow for potential recurrent events. RESULTS: 7,454 prevalent patients received care at 17 HD programs with monthly blood sampling protocols (n=5,335 patients) and at 8 programs with blood sampling every 6 weeks (n=2,119 patients). More frequent monitoring was not associated with a lower risk for all-cause mortality compared to blood sampling every 6 weeks (adjusted HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.99-1.38). Monthly monitoring was not associated with a lower risk for any of the secondary outcomes. Results were consistent among incident HD recipients. LIMITATIONS: Unmeasured confounding; limited data for center practices unrelated to blood sampling frequency; no information on frequency of unscheduled blood work performed outside the prescribed sampling interval. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly routine blood testing in HD recipients was not associated with a lower risk for death, cardiovascular events, or hospitalizations as compared with testing every 6 weeks. Given the health resource implications, the frequency of routine blood sampling in HD recipients deserves careful reassessment.

Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Acute Kidney Disease after an Episode of AKI: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Persistence of acute kidney disease (AKD) after an episode of acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with adverse outcomes. Multiple factors contribute to AKD after AKI, but the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) remains controversial. We examined if acute exposure to an ACEI/ARB associates with persistent AKD in survivors of AKI. METHODS: Multicenter prospective cohort study of patients whose hospitalization was complicated by AKI and who attended specialized AKI follow-up clinics between 2013 and 2018. Acute exposure was defined as ACEI/ARB exposure for ≥48 h before or during the AKI episode. The primary outcome was AKD (serum creatinine ≥1.5 times above pre-AKI baseline) at the first clinic visit. We used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: We included 345 survivors of AKI, 112 with persistent AKD at the first outpatient visit. Among 163 patients who were prescribed an ACEI/ARB before hospitalization, only 23% were discharged on an ACEI/ARB. There was no difference in the rate of AKD in patients discharged versus not discharged on an ACEI/ARB (12.5 vs. 15.0%, p = 0.530). Of the patients with AKD, 22 (19.6%) patients had acute ACEI/ARB exposure during the hospitalization. In fully adjusted models, acute exposure to an ACEI/ARB was not associated with AKD at the time of first clinic visit (median [interquartile range] 33 [18-54] days from hospital discharge). CONCLUSION: Acute exposure to an ACEI/ARB before or during an episode of AKI was not associated with persistent AKD at the time of first clinic visit suggesting that the receipt of such agents does not impede kidney recovery following AKI. Contrary to prevailing recommendations and current practice, the continued administration of an ACEI/ARB during an episode of AKI or initiation of these agents prior to discharge may be safe.

Determining the optimal time for liberation from renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (DOnE RRT).

INTRODUCTION: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is associated with high mortality and costs; however, no clinical guidelines currently provide specific recommendations for clinicians on when and how to stop RRT in recovering patients. Our objective was to systematically review the current evidence for clinical and biochemical parameters that can be used to predict successful discontinuation of RRT. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed with a peer-reviewed search strategy combining the themes of renal replacement therapy (IHD, CRRT, SLED), predictors of successful discontinuation or weaning (defined as an extended period of time free from further RRT), and patient outcomes. Major databases were searched and citations were screened using predefined criteria. Studied parameters were reported and, where possible, data was analyzed in the pooled analysis. RESULTS: Our search yielded 23 studies describing 16 variables for predicting the successful discontinuation of RRT. All studies were observational in nature. None were externally validated. Fourteen studies described conventional biochemical criteria used as surrogates of glomerular filtration rate (serum urea, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, urine urea excretion, urine creatinine excretion). Thirteen studies described physiologic parameters such as urine output before and after cessation of RRT, and 13 studies reported on newer kidney biomarkers, such as serum cystatin C and serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Six studies reported sensitivity and specificity characteristics of multivariate models. Urine output prior to discontinuation of RRT was the most-studied variable, with nine studies reporting. Pooled analysis found a sensitivity of 66.2% (95% CI, 53.6-76.9%) and specificity of 73.6% (95% CI, 67.5-79.0%) for urine output to predict successful RRT discontinuation. Due to heterogeneity in the thresholds of urine output used across the studies, an optimal threshold value could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous variables have been described to predict successful discontinuation of RRT; however, available studies are limited by study design, variable heterogeneity, and lack of prospective validation. Urine output prior to discontinuation of RRT was the most commonly described and robust predictor. Further research should focus on the determination and validation of urine output thresholds, and the evaluation of additional clinical and biochemical parameters in multivariate models to enhance predictive accuracy.

Routine Laboratory Testing Every 4 Versus Every 6 Weeks for Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Quality Improvement Project.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Few data exist revealing how the frequency of routine blood work for patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy affects patient outcomes and the costs of care. Our objective was to determine the effect of changing the frequency of blood work from 4- to 6-week intervals on the achievement of anemia and chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) targets. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective interrupted time series from June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2015. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Tertiary hospital in Ontario, Canada, that provides maintenance hemodialysis therapy to 350 to 400 adult patients. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES: Institution-wide switch of the interval for routine blood work from 4 to 6 weeks on March 24, 2014. OUTCOMES: Achievement of recommended hemoglobin and phosphate level targets. Cost savings attributable to a change in frequency of blood work for hemoglobin, ferritin, iron saturation, calcium, and phosphate comparing 252-day periods under each testing frequency condition. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Statistical process control to analyze variation in the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who achieved hemoglobin (10-12g/dL) and phosphate (2.5-4.6mg/dL) targets remained stable (average of 60% and 46%, respectively), with no measurements beyond 3 standard deviations from the mean. The hemodialysis unit mortality rate also remained stable (average of 2% per month). Reducing blood work frequency to every 6 weeks was associated with a saving of $85 per patient-year, corresponding to a program-wide savings of $35,000. LIMITATIONS: No case-mix adjustment due to use of aggregate hemodialysis unit data, and absence of data for hospitalizations and transfusions limiting assessment of the full cost of patient care. CONCLUSIONS: After switching the frequency of routine blood work from 4- to 6-week intervals, performance on anemia and CKD-MBD targets did not change and the reduction in blood work was associated with laboratory cost savings. Reducing the frequency of blood work may represent an opportunity for hemodialysis providers to devote greater efforts toward other care elements that better improve patient outcomes.

WITHDRAWN: Death and Recovery of Kidney Function Among Patients Continued on Dialysis After Discharge From Hospital Stays Complicated by Acute Kidney Injury: A Cohort Study.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the authors and editors because after publication of the Article in Press, the authors discovered that there had been an error in the programming of the statistical analysis. Once the error was corrected, the conclusions of the article were no longer supported. The Publisher and authors apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Kidney Disease Awareness and Knowledge among Survivors ofAcute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors are at risk for chronic kidney disease, recurrent AKI, and cardiovascular disease. The transition from hospital to ambulatory care is an opportunity to reduce these sequelae by launching self-care plans through effective patient education. How well AKI survivors are informationally prepared to apply kidney-specific self-care is unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify awareness and disease-specific knowledge among AKI survivors. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey of AKI-related awareness and knowledge in 137 patients with Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Stage II or III AKI near the time of hospital discharge. Patients were asked (1) "Did you experience AKI while in the hospital?" and (2) "Do you have a problem with your kidney health?" Objective knowledge of AKI was evaluated with a 15-item adapted version of the validated Kidney Knowledge Survey that included topics such as common causes, risk factors, and how AKI is diagnosed. RESULTS: Median age was 54 (interquartile range 43-63) and 81% were white. Eighty percent of patients were unaware that they had experienced AKI and 53% were both unaware they had experienced AKI or had a "problem with their kidneys." Multivariable logistic regression identified being male and lack of nephrology consult as predictors of unawareness with ORs of 3.92 (95% CI 1.48-10.33) and 5.10 (95% CI 1.98-13.13), respectively. Less than 50% recognized nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, contrast, or phosphate-based cathartics as risk factors for AKI. Two-thirds of patients did not agree that they knew a lot about AKI and more than 80% desired more information. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with moderate to severe AKI are unaware of their condition, lack understanding of risk factors for recurrent AKI, and desire more information. Patient-centered communication to optimize awareness, understanding, and care will require coordinated educational strategies throughout the continuum of AKI care.

Causes of Death after a Hospitalization with AKI.

Mortality after AKI is high, but the causes of death are not well described. To better understand causes of death in patients after a hospitalization with AKI and to determine patient and hospital factors associated with mortality, we conducted a population-based study of residents in Ontario, Canada, who survived a hospitalization with AKI from 2003 to 2013. Using linked administrative databases, we categorized cause of death in the year after hospital discharge as cardiovascular, cancer, infection-related, or other. We calculated standardized mortality ratios to compare the causes of death in survivors of AKI with those in the general adult population and used Cox proportional hazards modeling to estimate determinants of death. Of the 156,690 patients included, 43,422 (28%) died in the subsequent year. The most common causes of death were cardiovascular disease (28%) and cancer (28%), with respective standardized mortality ratios nearly six-fold (5.81; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.70 to 5.92) and eight-fold (7.87; 95% CI, 7.72 to 8.02) higher than those in the general population. The highest standardized mortality ratios were for bladder cancer (18.24; 95% CI, 17.10 to 19.41), gynecologic cancer (16.83; 95% CI, 15.63 to 18.07), and leukemia (14.99; 95% CI, 14.16 to 15.85). Along with older age and nursing home residence, cancer and chemotherapy strongly associated with 1-year mortality. In conclusion, cancer-related death was as common as cardiovascular death in these patients; moreover, cancer-related deaths occurred at substantially higher rates than in the general population. Strategies are needed to care for and counsel patients with cancer who experience AKI.

Acute Kidney Injury Due to Diarrheal Illness Requiring Hospitalization: Data from the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Diarrheal illness is a major reason for hospitalization, but data on consequent acute kidney injury (AKI) are sparse. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of AKI in infectious and non-infectious diarrheal illness requiring hospitalization and to identify correlates and outcomes of diarrhea-associated AKI. DESIGN: Using data from the 2012 National Inpatient Sample (NIS), we created a cohort of patients with a primary diagnosis of diarrheal illness. Diarrheal illness, disease correlates, and AKI were defined by ICD-9 diagnosis codes. We used logistic regression with backward variable selection to determine factors independently associated with AKI in infectious and non-infectious diarrheal illness, as well as to determine the association of AKI with in-hospital mortality. We used generalized linear models to assess differences in length of stay and costs of hospitalization. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was AKI in hospitalized diarrheal illness. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalization associated with AKI. KEY RESULTS: One in ten adults hospitalized with diarrheal illness experienced AKI, with higher incidence rates in older adults. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension were associated with increased odds of AKI (all diarrhea OR 4.81, 95% CI 4.52 to 5.12 and OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.40, respectively). AKI in diarrheal illness was associated with substantial increase in mortality (OR 5.05, 95% CI 4.47 to 5.72), length of stay (mean increase 1.7 days [95% CI 1.6 to 1.8]), and cost of hospitalization (mean increase $4411 [95% CI 4023 to 4800]). CONCLUSION: Acute kidney injury is common and consequential among patients hospitalized for diarrheal illness. Persons with CKD and hypertension are the most susceptible, possibly due to diminished renal reserve and exacerbating effects of treatment with diuretics and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers. Proactive management of these unique pharmacologic and physiologic factors is necessary to prevent AKI in this vulnerable population.

Interventions to prevent hemodynamic instability during renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic instability related to renal replacement therapy (HIRRT) may increase the risk of death and limit renal recovery. Studies in end-stage renal disease populations on maintenance hemodialysis suggest that some renal replacement therapy (RRT)-related interventions (e.g., cool dialysate) may reduce the occurrence of HIRRT, but less is known about interventions to prevent HIRRT in critically ill patients receiving RRT for acute kidney injury (AKI). We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of RRT-related interventions for reducing HIRRT in such patients across RRT modalities. METHODS: A systematic review of publications was undertaken using MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE, and Cochrane's Central Registry for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). Studies that assessed any intervention's effect on HIRRT (the primary outcome) in critically ill patients with AKI were included. HIRRT was variably defined according to each study's definition. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, identified articles for inclusion, extracted data, and evaluated study quality using validated assessment tools. RESULTS: Five RCTs and four observational studies were included (n = 9; 623 patients in total). Studies were small, and the quality was mostly low. Interventions included dialysate sodium modeling (n = 3), ultrafiltration profiling (n = 2), blood volume (n = 2) and temperature control (n = 3), duration of RRT (n = 1), and slow blood flow rate at initiation (n = 1). Some studies applied more than one strategy simultaneously (n = 5). Interventions shown to reduce HIRRT from three studies (two RCTs and one observational study) included higher dialysate sodium concentration, lower dialysate temperature, variable ultrafiltration rates, or a combination of strategies. Interventions not found to have an effect included blood volume and temperature control, extended duration of intermittent RRT, and slower blood flow rates during continuous RRT initiation. How HIRRT was defined and its frequency of occurrence varied widely across studies, including those involving the same RRT modality. Pooled analysis was not possible due to study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Small clinical studies suggest that higher dialysate sodium, lower temperature, individualized ultrafiltration rates, or a combination of these strategies may reduce the risk of HIRRT. Overall, for all RRT modalities, there is a paucity of high-quality data regarding interventions to reduce the occurrence of HIRRT in critically ill patients.