Urinary retention after AdVance™ Sling: A multi-institutional retrospective study.

AIMS: To identify risk factors for urinary retention following AdVance™ Sling placement using preoperative urodynamic studies to evaluate bladder contractility. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective review of patients who underwent an AdVance Sling for post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence from 2007 to 2019 was performed. Acute urinary retention (AUR) was defined as the complete inability to void or elevated post-void residual (PVR) leading to catheter placement or the initiation of intermittent catheterization at the first void trial postoperatively. Bladder contractility was evaluated based on preoperative urodynamics. RESULTS: Of the 391 patients in this study, 55 (14.1%) experienced AUR, and 6 patients (1.5%) had chronic urinary retention with a median follow-up of 18.1 months. In total, 303 patients (77.5%) underwent preoperative urodynamics, and there was no significant difference between average PdetQmax (26.4 vs. 27.4 cmH2 O), Qmax (16.6 vs. 16.2 ml/s), PVR (19.9 vs. 28.1 ml), bladder contractility index (108 vs. 103) for patients with or without AUR following AdVance Sling. Impaired bladder contractility preoperatively was not predictive of AUR. Time to postoperative urethral catheter removal was predictive of AUR (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.94; p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic urinary retention after AdVance Sling placement is uncommon and acute retention is generally self-limiting. No demographic or urodynamic factors were predictive of AUR. Patients who developed AUR were more likely to have their void trials within 2 days following AdVance Sling placement versus longer initial catheterization periods, suggesting that a longer duration of postoperative catheterization may reduce the occurrence of AUR.

Do urodynamics predict urinary retention after sling placement in the complex patient: the value of reproducing symptoms on urodynamics.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To examine urinary retention (UR) after female urethral sling placement in patients with or without detrusor underactivity (DU) or Valsalva voiding whose urodynamics (UDS) accurately reproduced voiding symptoms to determine whether the reproduction of voiding symptoms on UDS in those with DU is predictive of UR after sling placement. METHODS: We performed a review of patients undergoing urethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) looking specifically at the occurrence of short- and long-term urinary retention. Preoperative UDS data were obtained from a prospectively acquired UDS database in which patients were directly queried at the time of the UDS study about whether the filling and/or storage phase of the study reproduced their usual symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 141 women who had a urethral sling procedure, 124 (87.9%) had preoperative UDS. Of those who had UDS, 41 (33%) had de novo UR at some point postoperatively. Compared to those without DU, patients with DU and/or Valsalva voiding were more likely to have UR (75.6% vs. 56.6%, p = 0.04). There was no difference in association of UR in patients with DU/Valsalva voiding whose UDS reproduced voiding symptoms compared to those with DU/Valsalva voiding whose UDS did not reproduce symptoms (OR 1.01, CI 0.32-3.19, p 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients with DU/Valsalva voiding had an increased association with UR but did not find reproduction of symptoms on UDS to correlate with UR in either those with DU/Valsalva voiding or with normal bladder contractility.

A novel approach to bladder cycling for defunctionalized bladders prior to pediatric kidney transplantation: A case series.

Ensuring a safe reservoir for pediatric renal transplantation into a defunctionalized bladder is a challenge faced by urologists. We present three patients with defunctionalized bladders who initiated bladder cycling utilizing overnight continuous saline infusion via enteral feeding pump for bladder salvage and subsequent transplantation.

A Surprise During "Routine" Orchidopexy: An Extrarenal Wilms Tumor Case Report.

We present the case of a 12-month-old male diagnosed with an extrarenal Wilms tumor found incidentally at the time of inguinal orchiopexy. He was staged and treated according to Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocol, with no evidence for disease at the end of treatment. We review the patient's presentation and treatment course, followed by a review of current literature on extrarenal Wilms tumor and considerations for management.

Posterior urethral valves and kidney transplantation: Identifying opportunities for improvement.

BACKGROUND: Posterior urethral valves (PUV) represents a heterogenous spectrum in which guidelines for management are lacking particularly for those patients facing end-stage kidney disease and transplant. In this study we aim to 1) evaluate our long term PUV pediatric transplant outcomes compared to those without lower urinary tract dysfunction and 2) assess our PUV cohort for trends in bladder management and evaluate outcomes to inform development of institutional guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients with a diagnosis of PUV who underwent kidney transplant from 2000 to 2023 was completed. A matched cohort of patients without lower urinary tract dysfunction was identified for comparison of graft function. Charts of PUV patients were reviewed for both sociodemographic and clinical variables. Patients were classified by bladder management at the time of transplantation into three separate groups for analysis: voiding, clean intermittent catheterization, and incontinent diversion. Primary outcomes of interest were eGFR, graft failure, and UTIs post-transplant. RESULTS: 45 patients met inclusion criteria. 69% were on dialysis prior to transplant. 51% of grafts were from a deceased donor. Bladder management consisted of voiding (62%), CIC (4 via urethra, 10 via channel) (31%), and incontinent diversion (7%). 20% underwent augmentation cystoplasty (5 = ureter, 2 = gastric, 1 = colon, and 1 = ileum) prior to or at the time of transplant. Median follow up duration was 5.4 years (3.0, 10.8). Patients on CIC had higher rates of UTI; however, we found no significant difference in graft function outcomes (eGFR, graft failure) between bladder management groups or year of transplant. VUR in the transplant kidney was associated with vesicostomy (p = 0.028). 2 of 2 gastric augments developed malignancy, one of which was cause of death. Graft failure rate was 22% in both the PUV group and matched cohort, with median interval times to failure of 6.7 years and 3.7 years, respectively (p = 0.71). There were no differences in eGFR at follow-up time points between the PUV and matched cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PUV represent a spectrum of disease with heterogeneous management before and after kidney transplant. Overall, graft function outcomes were similar when compared to matched cohort without lower urinary tract dysfunction. Patients on CIC had higher rates of UTI but without impact on graft function. Gastric augmentation cystoplasty should be avoided given risk for malignancy. Guidelines to standardize evaluation and management would be helpful for patient care and outcomes.

Putting the coach in the game: Current and future state of surgical coaching in pediatric urology.

BACKGROUND: Surgical coaching has been proposed as a mechanism to fill gaps in proficiency and encourage continued growth following formal surgical training. Coaching benefits have been demonstrated in other surgical fields; however, have not been evaluated within pediatric urology. The aims of this study were to survey members of The Societies for Pediatric Urology (SPU) to assess the current understanding and utilization of surgical coaching while gauging interest, potential barriers and personal goals for participation in a coaching program. METHODS: Following IRB approval, members of the SPU were invited to electronically complete an anonymous survey which assessed 4 domains: 1) understanding of surgical coaching principles, 2) current utilization, 3) interest and potential barriers to participation, and 4) personal surgical goals. To evaluate understanding, questions with predefined correct answers on the key principles of coaching were posed either in multiple choice or True/False format to the SPU membership. RESULTS: Of the 674 pediatric urologists invited, 146 completed the survey (22%). Of those, 46% correctly responded the definition of surgical coaching. Coaching utilization was reported in 27% of respondents currently or having previously participated in a surgical coaching program. Despite current participation rates, only 6 surgeons (4%) have completed training in surgical coaching, despite 79% expressing interest to participate in a surgical coaching program. The most influential barrier to participating in a coaching program was time commitment. Respondents largely prioritized technical and cognitive skill improvement as their primary goals for coaching (see figure below). CONCLUSIONS: While interest in surgical coaching is high among pediatric urologists, the principles of surgical coaching were not universally understood. Furthermore, formal coach training is markedly deficient, representing a gap in our profession and an opportunity for significant avenues for improvement, especially for technical and cognitive skills. Development of a coaching model based on these results would best suit the needs of pediatric urologists providing that the time commitment barrier for these endeavors can be mitigated and/or reconciled.

Standardization and Implementation of a Surgical Coaching Model for Pediatric Urology.

To bridge gaps in proficiency and encourage life-long learning following training, coaching models have been utilized in multiple surgical fields; however, not within pediatric urology. In this review of our methodology, we describe the development of a coaching model at a single institution. In our initial experience, the perceived most beneficial aspect of the program was the goal setting process with logistics around debriefs being the most challenging. With our proposed coaching study, we aim to develop a model based upon prior coaching frameworks,1,2 that is feasible and universally adaptable to allow for further advancement of surgical coaching, particularly within the field of pediatric urology.

Atypical clinical presentation and management of urinary stone disease in non-verbal non-ambulatory children.

INTRODUCTION: Management of kidney stones primarily depends on various factors such as the presence of urinary tract obstruction, pain, stone size, location, impact on renal function, and the existence of infection. Renal colic is the classic presentation of an obstructive kidney stone. However, in this study, we present a cohort of non-verbal non-ambulatory (NVNA) patients who exhibit a distinct and uncommon presentation of kidney stones due to their medical conditions. Information about kidney stone disease in this gropup of complex pediatric patients is, scarce and their associated risk factors are not well understood. Therefore, we aim to summarize the clinical presentation, and management challenges in this unique group of NVNA patients to identify potential variables for prospective studies. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed for all NVNA patients seen at the pediatric multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic between July 2020 to August 2022. Demographic variables, clinical presentation data, metabolic evaluation, radiological imaging, and surgical management was included for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 224 pediatric patients were referred to the multidisciplinary stone clinic. Of those, 27 were identified to be NVNA. The most common primary diagnosis was Cerebral Palsy followed by Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Average age at first kidney stone presentation was 11.5 years ± 5.7 years. An obstructing stone was diagnosed in 18 (66%) patients, 4 (22.2%) of these presented with sepsis. Average stone burden was 9.2 mm ( ± 5.8 mm). Of the obstructing stones, 13 (72%) were in the kidney. All patients with an obstructing stone underwent surgical management with retrograde endoscopic approach. Metabolic 24-h-urine analysis was completed in 24 (89%) patients. 17 (62%) had an elevated urine density, 15 (55%) demonstrated calcium oxalate supersaturation, 12 (44%) met criteria for acidosis, and 7 (26%) had significant hypocitraturia. DISCUSSION: NVNA patients represent a unique cohort whose clinical presentation is atypical. Limited ability to express symptoms makes early detection difficult to recognize. Twenty two percent of patients present with sepsis as their first manifestation of an acutely obstructing kidney stone. Pain is subjectively interpreted by caregivers and is an uncommon symptom. Our cohort demonstrates common risk factors for stones including propensity for chronic dehydration, slow urinary tract transit, ineffective bladder emptying, G-tube feeding, and lithogenic medications. CONCLUSION: NVNA pediatric patients have atypical kidney stone clinical presentation. Awareness of this unique group of patients should support future collaborative studies to focus on understanding these atypical presentations and reflect on improving management.

Persistent Dysuria in a Young Male.

A Cowper's Duct syringocele is a rare diagnosis and currently there exists no clinical guidelines for evaluation and management. This clinical challenge illustrates the case presentation, evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment options for of a newly diagnosed Cowper's Duct syringocele.

Is it the Surgeon? A Re-examination of Mid-urethral Sling Complications.

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential technical factors during initial mid-urethral sling (MUS) placement that contribute to subsequent sling revision procedures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed examining synthetic MUS reoperations at a single institution from 2008-2020. The implanting surgeon's operative note, when available, was critically reviewed with respect to trocar placement, sling location, and tensioning technique. The reoperative report was reviewed for aberrant intraoperative findings relating to the index surgery. RESULTS: A total of 306 women underwent revision of their MUS. Operative reports from the implanting surgeon were available for 276 (90.2%) women. Review of index operative reports revealed 47 unambiguous descriptions of improper technique, including 19 cases of described excessive tensioning and 2 cases of MUS placement despite noted urethral injury during the index case. Indications for reoperation were clinical obstruction (63%), pain (40%), and mesh erosion/exposure (33%). In 186 (67.4%) women, there was an intraoperative finding during the revision that likely contributed to the need for reoperation. Among these 186 women, 110 (59.1%) slings were noted to have been placed too proximally, 78 (41.9%) were over-suspended, and 57 (30.6%) were placed too deep in the periurethral fascia. CONCLUSION: Review of the index operative note and findings at operative re-exploration of MUS surgeries, often reveals evidence that the initial MUS implantation was technically suboptimal. Such findings suggest that intraoperative surgical technique is a critically important factor contributing to postoperative complications in MUS surgery. This underscores the importance of surgical training and adherence to surgical principles during the placement of a synthetic MUS.