A 10-year analysis of application and match rates for pain medicine training in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed application and match rates for pain medicine training in the United States and hypothesized that there would be (1) greater growth in the number of training positions than applicants, (2) higher match rates among US allopathic graduates relative to non-US allopathic graduates, and (3) greater number of unfilled training positions over time. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study of all applicants for pain medicine training in the United States. METHOD: National Resident Matching Program data were obtained over a ten-year period (2014-2023). Match rates and applicant-to-position ratios were calculated and compared over time with linear regression. Comparisons were made with chi-square tests. RESULTS: Growth in the number of annual training positions (261-377, 44% increase) exceeded growth in the number of interested applicants (398-415, 4% increase) (P < .001). Annual applicant-to-training position ratios decreased (1.5-1.1, P < .001). The representation of US allopathic graduates among incoming pain medicine fellows decreased over the study period (73%-58%, P < .001) while US osteopathic graduates increased (9%-28%, P < .001).Match rates increased for both US allopathic graduates (71%-91%, P < .001) and non-US allopathic graduates (51%-81%, P < .001). From 2018 to 2023, US allopathic graduates (79%) had higher match rates than US osteopathic graduates (60%, P < .001) and international medical graduates (57%, P < .001). More available annual training positions went unfilled over the study period (2%-5%, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Stagnant annual applicant volume and increasing number of available training positions have led to increasing match rates for pain medicine fellowship training. Fewer US allopathic graduates are pursuing pain medicine training. The increasing percentage of unfilled training positions warrants ongoing surveillance.

Diversity of Backgrounds and Academic Accomplishments for Presidents Elected to Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Societies in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Academic accomplishments and demographics for presidents of hip and knee arthroplasty societies are poorly understood. This study compares the characteristics of presidents nominated to serve the Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of arthroplasty presidents in the United States (1990 to 2022). Curriculum vitae and academic websites were analyzed for demographic, training, bibliometric, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding data. Comparisons were made between organizations and time periods (1990 to 2005 versus 2006 to 2022). RESULTS: There were 97 appointments of 78 unique arthroplasty presidents (80%). Most presidents were male (99%) and Caucasian (95%). There was 1 woman (1%) and 5 non-Caucasian presidents (2% Asian, 3% Hispanic). There were no differences in demographics between the 3 arthroplasty organizations and the 2 time periods (P > .05). Presidents were appointed at 55 ± 10 years old, which was on average 24 years after completion of residency training. Most presidents had arthroplasty fellowship training (68%), and the most common were the Hospital for Special Surgery (21%) and Massachusetts General Hospital (8%). The median h-index was 53 resulting from 191 peer-reviewed publications, which was similar between the 3 organizations (P > .05). There were 2 presidents who had NIH funding (2%), and there were no differences in NIH funding between the 3 organizations (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroplasty society presidents have diverse training pedigrees, high levels of scholarly output, and similar demographics. There may be future opportunities to promote diversity and inclusion among the highest levels of leadership in total joint arthroplasty.

Correlation of Scholarly Activity and Departmental Clinical Productivity in a Surgical Subspecialty.

INTRODUCTION: Promotion within academic surgery involves demonstrated excellence in administrative, clinical, and scholarly activities. The present study analyzes the relationship between scholarly and clinical productivity in the field of reconstructive microsurgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of microsurgery fellowship directors (MFDs). Data on clinical productivity were obtained from the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery and scholarly productivity from Scopus. Outcomes were department annual free flap volume, number of publications, and h-index. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and nonparametric tests were used to compare continuous variables. RESULTS: Thirty-nine MFDs were included in this study. All were plastic surgery residency trained and 38% trained under the independent training pathway. Most underwent formal fellowship training in reconstructive microsurgery (89%). The top three microsurgery fellowships trained 37% of all MFDs. Twenty-five percent of MFDs trained at the institution where they ultimately became program director. Twenty percent of MFDs had an additional degree (4 MS, 2 PhD, and 1 MBA). The median number of annual free flaps performed per institution was 175 (interquartile range [IQR] 122). The median h-index was 17 (IQR 13) resulting from 48 (IQR 99) publications. There was a correlation between department annual free flap volume and h-index (r = 0.333, P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between academic productivity of MFDs and the clinical productivity of their department. This study provides a benchmark for aspiring reconstructive microsurgeons.

Paradigm Shift in Vascular Surgery Training: Independent versus Integrated Match Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Currently, 2 predominant pathways exist for vascular surgery training: integrated and independent training pathways. We hypothesized that match rates would increase with time and be higher in the independent pathway than in the integrated pathway. METHODS: The National Resident Matching Program provided data from the Vascular Surgery Match (VSM) (2008-2021). Match rates were defined as the percentage of applicants who matched. Chi-squared tests were used to evaluate temporal trends and interpathway differences. RESULTS: Over the study period, the annual number of training positions increased for both the independent (119 to 129, 8% increase) and integrated (9 to 79, 778% increase) training pathways. From 2008 to 2021, the annual match rate was stable in the independent pathway (97% to 96%, P > 0.05). In the integrated pathway, the annual match rate increased from 29% to 44% (P < 0.001). During each year, match rates in the independent pathway exceeded those in the integrated pathway (P < 0.001). US allopathic graduates had higher match rates than non-US allopathic graduates in both the independent (92% vs. 82%, P < 0.001) and the integrated pathway (70% vs. 17%, P < 0.001). In the independent pathway, the percentage of applicants that matched at 1 of their top 3 choices decreased from 67% to 58% (P < 0.001). Over the study period, more training positions went unmatched in the Independent (n = 130, 8%) versus the Integrated (n = 17, 3%) pathway (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VSM match rates have increased for the integrated pathway and remains competitive especially for non-US allopathic graduates. More research is needed to understand applicant variables that modulate match rates.

Application and Match Rates in the Complex General Surgical Oncology Match.

BACKGROUND: The Society of Surgical Oncology collaborates with the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) to facilitate the Complex General Surgical Oncology (CGSO) Match. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to understand trends in CGSO Match outcomes. We hypothesized that (1) match rates would increase with time; (2) US allopathic graduates would have higher match rates than non-US allopathic graduates; and (3) most applicants would match at one of their top three ranked choices. METHODS: The NRMP provided applicant and program data from the CGSO Match (2014-2021). Chi-square tests elucidated temporal trends and match rates by applicant archetype. RESULTS: The annual number of applicants decreased from 103 to 90 (13% decrease), while the annual number of fellowship positions increased from 56 to 67 (20% increase) from 2014-2021. The annual percentage of applicants who did not match decreased from 46% to 26% (p < 0.05). Annual match rates increased from 54% to 74% (p < 0.05). US allopathic graduates had higher match rates than non-US allopathic graduates but this disparity narrowed over time (84% vs. 55% in 2021; p < 0.001). Approximately half of all applicants matched at one of their top three choices (first, 29%; second, 12%; third, 8%). Applicants matching at one of their top three choices increased from 36% to 50% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CGSO Match rates have increased over the past decade, thus primarily benefiting non-US allopathic graduates. Most applicants match at one of their top three choices. More research is needed to understand disparities in match rates by applicant and residency program characteristics.

Charting Outcomes in the Hand Surgery Fellowship Match.

PURPOSE: The hand surgery fellowship match attracts applicants from general, plastic, and orthopedic surgery residency training. The purpose of this study was to understand recent trends in applications and match rates in the hand surgery fellowship match. METHODS: The National Resident Matching Program provided program and applicant data from the hand surgery fellowship match (2012-2020). The primary outcomes of interest were match rates and number of unfilled fellowship positions by specialty. Trends over time and comparisons of the percentage of unfilled spots by specialty were observed. RESULTS: The total number of applicants decreased from 199 to 188 (5.5% decrease), while the number of available positions increased from 150 to 177 (18.0% increase) during the study period. The increase in available positions was driven primarily by orthopedic fellowships, which increased from 124 to 149 (20.2% increase). The percentage of applicants that did not match to a hand surgery fellowship decreased from 24.6% in 2012 to 5.9% in 2020. United States graduates had higher match rates than non-United States graduates during each year, but this disparity narrowed over time. Most applicants matched at one of their top 3 choices (first choice, 33.3%; second choice, 12.9%; third choice, 7.9%). Applicants matching at their first choice increased from 28.1% in 2012 to 39.4% in 2020. Plastic surgery hand surgery fellowships had a higher rate of unmatched positions relative to orthopedic surgery fellowships (6.1% vs 2.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Match rates in the hand surgery fellowship match have increased because of an overall increase in training positions and decrease in applicants. More research is needed to understand disparities in match rates by specialty. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The diverse training experiences of hand surgeons historically have been viewed as a strength for the specialty. Understanding recent trends in the hand surgery fellowship match by specialty can help future applicants and faculty anticipate likely match outcomes.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Total Joint Arthroplasty Fellowship Training.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 created unprecedented challenges in surgical training especially in specialties with high elective case volume. We hypothesized that case volume during total joint arthroplasty fellowship training would decrease by 25% given widespread economic shutdowns encountered during the fourth quarter of the 2019-2020 academic year. METHODS: Case logs from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education were obtained for accredited total joint arthroplasty fellowships (2017-2018 to 2020-2021). Case volumes were extracted and summarized as means ± SD. Student's t tests were used for inter-year comparisons. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty three arthroplasty fellows from 24 accredited fellowships were included. There was a 14% year-over-year decrease in total case volume during the 2019-2020 academic year (390 ± 108 vs 453 ± 128, P < .001). Case volume rebounded during the 2020-2021 academic year to 465 ± 93 (19% increase, P < .001). Case categories with the most significant percentage declines in 2019-2020 were primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA, -23%), revision total hip arthroplasty (THA, -19%), revision TKA (rTKA, -11%), and primary THA (-10%). CONCLUSION: There was a 14% overall decrease in arthroplasty case volume during the 2019-2020 academic year, which correlated with the widespread economic shutdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Certain elective case categories like primary TKA experienced the greatest negative impact. Results from this study may inform prospective trainees and faculty during future national emergencies.

The accuracy of patient-reported weight prior to total joint arthroplasty and arthroscopy of the lower extremity.

PURPOSE: The accuracy of preoperative patient-reported weight was never evaluated in patients undergoing lower extremity procedures. The purpose of this study was to: (1) compare the disparity between patient-reported and measured weights in patients undergoing lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (LE-TJA) and arthroscopy; and (2) investigate the association between patient-specific factors (patient age, BMI, zip code, and psychiatric comorbidities) and the accuracy of patient-reported weight. METHODS: Preoperative self-reported weights were retrospectively compared to measured weights in 400 LE-TJA and 85 control arthroscopy patients. The difference between reported and measured weights was calculated. Additionally, the percent of accurate reporting within 0.5, 1, and 5 kg ranges of the measured weight was calculated. Outcomes were compared between surgical modalities as well as between patient-specific factors. RESULTS: There was low disparity (p = 0.838) between patient-reported and measured weights among LE-TJA (mean difference 0.18 ± 3.63 kg; p = 0.446) and that of arthroscopy (0.27 ± 4.08 kg; p = 0.129) patients. Additionally, LE-TJA patients were equally likely to report weights accurately within 0.5 kg of the measured weight (74% vs. 71.76%; p = 0.908). LE-TJA and arthroscopy patients had similar reporting accuracy within 1 and 5 kg of the measured weights (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Preoperative patient-reported weights demonstrated acceptable accuracy in both LE-TJA and lower extremity arthroscopic orthopaedic patient populations making it a potentially reliable parameter of preoperative assessment.

A Comparison of Case Volume in Craniofacial Surgery by Plastic Surgery Residency Training Model.

BACKGROUND: Plastic surgeons in the United States are trained under 2 residency training models: integrated and independent. This study analyzes the variability of craniofacial surgery cases performed both between and within training models. METHODS: Case volume data from national data reports of 5 plastic surgery resident cohorts were analyzed (2011-2015). Craniofacial surgery case volumes across 4 major categories and 23 subcategories were compared between training models via t tests. Differences in intramodel variability were compared with F tests. Fold differences were calculated between mean case volumes and minimum requirements in craniofacial surgery. RESULTS: A total of 526 independent/combined (64%) and 292 integrated (36%) plastic surgery residents were included. Integrated residents reported more cases classified as congenital defect (118.8 ± 49.3 vs 110.3 ± 42.9, P = 0.013), neoplasm (202.0 ± 79.7 vs 163.2 ± 60.8, P < 0.001), and trauma (149.0 ± 61.8 vs 127.0 ± 52.0, P < 0.001), but not aesthetic (122.3 ± 68.6 vs 116.5 ± 50.5, P = 0.201). Integrated residents reported more case volume in 12 case subcategories, whereas independent/combined residents reported more cases in 3 case subcategories. Integrated residents had greater intramodel variability in 12 case subcategories, whereas independent/combined residents had greater intramodel variability in 2 case subcategories. Fold differences between mean case volumes and minimum requirements ranged from 1.8 times to 6.0 times. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated residents tended to report significantly more craniofacial surgery cases and exhibit greater intrapathway variability. More research is needed to understand the impact of disparate case volume on core competency training in craniofacial surgery during plastic surgery residency.

The Impact of Training Pathway on Breast Surgery Cases Performed during Plastic Surgery Residency.

BACKGROUND: Operative volume is a critical component of surgical resident education. This study compares reported breast surgery case volume between resident training pathways in plastic surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study reviewed case logs of plastic surgery residents in the independent/combined and integrated training pathways. Breast surgery case volume was compared via t tests across two major categories: reconstructive and aesthetic. Differences in intra-pathway variability were compared with F tests. Five consecutive cohorts of plastic surgery residents (n = 818): independent/combined (n = 526, 64%) and integrated (n = 292, 36%) at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited residency programs, were included (2011-2015). RESULTS: Independent/combined residents reported significantly more aesthetic cases than integrated residents, but similar reconstructive cases. Independent/combined residents reported more breast augmentations, mastopexy, cosmetic breast fat grafting, and other cosmetic breast cases. Within the reconstructive category, independent residents reported more breast reconstruction fat grafting cases while integrated residents reported more breast reconstruction with pedicle flap, other breast reconstruction, and breast reduction cases. Independent residents had greater intra-pathway variability in five case subcategories, while integrated residents had greater variability in one case subcategory. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in breast surgery case volume exist by plastic surgery residency training pathway. Given the importance of case volume to residents and faculty, these disparities may warrant greater attention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Academic productivity of faculty associated with microsurgery fellowships.

BACKGROUND: The Hirsch index (h-index) is widely recognized as a reliable measure of academic productivity. While previous studies have applied the h-index to surgical disciplines, none have analyzed microsurgery faculty. This manuscript aims to examine the h-index of microsurgery fellowship faculty to categorize its applicability to microsurgeons as a determinant of academic output. METHODS: Faculty demographics and institution characteristics were obtained from the American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery (ASRM) and official program websites. Faculty h-indices were calculated using the Scopus database (Elsevier, USA). Data was assessed using bivariate analysis and multiple linear regression models to determine the relationship between independent variables and total publications, career h-index and 5-year h-index (h5-index) of each faculty. RESULTS: A total of 139 faculties from 22 programs met inclusion criteria. The median faculty age was 44 (IQR 13) and 84.9% of faculty were male. Faculty size, number of years of fellowship existence, number of fellows, FACS memberships, number of free flaps annually, and academic appointment title were significantly associated with the total publications, h-index, and h5-index. Multivariable analysis based on the significant independent variables demonstrated that geographical region and faculty ranks were significantly associated with the h5-index. CONCLUSIONS: Variables associated with seniority (age, years of practice after fellowship, and academic appointment) were positively correlated with the h-index. Given the increased use of bibliometrics in academic medicine, these results show that h-index is a viable tool that can be used to assess research productivity among academic microsurgeons.

Academic Productivity of Faculty Associated With Craniofacial Surgery Fellowship Programs.

BACKGROUND: The H-index is increasingly being used as a measure of academic productivity and has been applied to various surgical disciplines. Here the authors calculate the H-index of craniofacial surgery fellowship faculty in North America in order to determine its utility for academic productivity among craniofacial surgeons. METHODS: A list of fellowship programs was obtained from the website of the American Society of Craniofacial Surgery. Faculty demographics and institution characteristics were obtained from official program websites and the H-index was calculated using Scopus (Elsevier, USA). Data were assessed using bivariate analysis tools (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests) to determine the relationship between independent variables and career publications, H-index and 5-year H-index (H5-index) of faculty. Dunn test for multiple comparisons was also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 102 faculty members from 29 craniofacial surgery fellowship programs were identified and included. Faculty demographics reflected a median age of 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 13), a predominantly male sample (88/102, 89.7%), and the rank of assistant professor being the most common among faculty members (41/102, 40.2%). Median of career publications per faculty was 37 (IQR 52.5) and medians of H-index and H5-index were 10.0 (IQR 13.75) and 3.5 (IQR 3.25), respectively. Greater age, male gender, Fellow of the American College of Surgeons membership, higher academic rank, and program affiliation with ranked research medical schools were significantly associated with higher H-indices. CONCLUSIONS: Variables associated with seniority were positively associated with the H-index. These results suggest that the H-index may be used as an adjunct in determining academic productivity for promotions among craniofacial surgeons.

Minority and Public Insurance Status: Is There a Delay to Alveolar Bone Grafting Surgery?

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the timing of alveolar bone grafting (ABG) surgery among children with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL±P) with regard to race and insurance status. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients receiving ABG surgery was conducted. A multivariate regression model was constructed using predetermined clinical and demographic variables. SETTING: A large, urban cleft referral center. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Nonsyndromic patients with CL±P were eligible for study inclusion. INTERVENTIONS: ABG surgery using autogenous bone harvested from the anterior iliac crest. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome of interest was age at ABG surgery. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients underwent ABG surgery at 8.1 ± 2.3 years of age. African American and Hispanic patients received delayed ABG surgery compared with Caucasian patients by approximately 1 year (P < .05). There was no difference in ABG surgery timing by insurance status (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The timing of ABG surgery varied by race but not by insurance status. Greater resources may be needed to ensure timely delivery of cleft care to African American and Hispanic children.

Disparities in Aesthetic Procedures Performed by Plastic Surgery Residents.

Background: Operative experience in aesthetic surgery is an important issue affecting plastic surgery residents. Objectives: This study addresses the variability of aesthetic surgery experience during plastic surgery residency. Methods: National operative case logs of chief residents in independent/combined and integrated plastic surgery residency programs were analyzed (2011-2015). Fold differences between the bottom and top 10th percentiles of residents were calculated for each aesthetic procedure category and training model. The number of residents not achieving case minimums was also calculated. Results: Case logs of 818 plastic surgery residents were analyzed. There was marked variability in craniofacial (range, 6.0-15.0), breast (range, 2.4-5.9), trunk/extremity (range, 3.0-16.0), and miscellaneous (range, 2.7-22.0) procedure categories. In 2015, the bottom 10th percentile of integrated and independent/combined residents did not achieve case minimums for botulinum toxin and dermal fillers. Case minimums were achieved for the other aesthetic procedure categories for all graduating years. Conclusions: Significant variability persists for many aesthetic procedure categories during plastic surgery residency training. Greater efforts may be needed to improve the aesthetic surgery experience of plastic surgery residents.

Craniofacial Surgery Fellowship Websites.

Applicants for craniofacial surgery fellowships utilize Internet-based resources like the San Francisco (SF) Match to manage applications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accessibility and content of craniofacial surgery fellowship websites (CSFWs). A list of available craniofacial surgery fellowships was compiled from directories of the American Society of Craniofacial Surgery (ACSFS) and SF Match. Accessibility of CSFWs was assessed via links from these directories and a Google search. Craniofacial surgery fellowship websites were evaluated on education and recruitment content and compared via program characteristics. Twenty-four of the 28 US-based craniofacial surgery fellowship programs had a CSFW (86%). The ACSFS and SF Match databases had limited CSFW accessibility, but a Google search revealed most CSFWs had the top search result (76%). In total, CSFWs provided an average of 39% of education and recruitment variables. While most programs provided fellowship program descriptions (96%), application links (96%), and faculty listings (83%), relatively few provided rotation schedules (13%), fellow selection process information (13%), or interview dates (8%). CSFW content did not vary by program location, faculty size, accreditation status, or institutional affiliations (P > 0.05). Craniofacial surgery fellowships often lack readily accessible websites from national program lists and have limited information for interested applicants. The consistent lack of online information across programs suggests future opportunities exist to improve these educational resources.

Accessibility of academic plastic surgeons as mentors to medical students.

BACKGROUND: Determining a field of specialty can be a difficult decision for medical students. Career plans are often fostered through exposure to the field and mentorship, but it is often hard to identify accessible mentors. The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of accessible mentors among academic plastic surgery faculty and to characterize predictors of accessibility. METHODS: An audit was conducted of academic plastic surgeon faculty affiliated with integrated and combined residency programs. A request for mentorship was sent from a medical student enrolled at the faculty member's affiliated medical school. Sources for e-mail addresses included residency program Web sites, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Web site, and a manual PubMed search. Independent predictors of accessible mentors were determined. RESULTS: There were 498 e-mails delivered and 363 responses received (response rate of 73%). In total, there were 283 positive responses, resulting in 56.8% of plastic surgeons contacted identifying themselves as accessible for mentorship. Younger age [odds ratio (OR), 1.72; P = 0.005], Fellow of the American College of Surgeons (OR, 1.49; P = 0.035), and faculty members of medical schools ranked in the top 20 (OR, 1.75; P = 0.003) were associated with an increased odds of accessibility. CONCLUSIONS: Most academic plastic surgeons are accessible as mentors (78%). Medical students enrolled at a highly ranked medical school seeking younger faculty mentors may have the greatest access to research opportunities and career advice. Encouraging faculty to participate in mentorship is important in developing the next generation of plastic surgeons.