Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Environ Manage ; 301: 113879, 2022 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34619593

ABSTRACT

A review of published literature was conducted to present the concentrations and composition profiles of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from significant sources to the environment. The major sources of PFAS to the environment are categorized under direct and indirect sources. The characteristic compounds and concentrations are summarized as found from direct sources such as manufacturing facilities, aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) applications, metal coating operations, and textile and paper coating operations; and from indirect sources such as landfills and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The major findings are: 1) among the aqueous matrices for which data were reviewed, groundwater impacted by AFFF contamination showed the highest median concentrations for both perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), while the second-highest median concentrations were associated with landfill leachates for PFOA and metal-plating sources for PFOS; 2) many of the unknown polyfluorinated precursors present in AFFF-impacted sites could potentially convert to persistent PFAS by abiotic or biotic transformation, and therefore could act as the long-term source of contamination to the environment; 3) part per billion (ppb) concentrations of PFAS were detected in water bodies surrounding fluorochemical manufacturing plants; 4) in consumer products such as textile, paper, and personal care products, PFOA concentrations were an order of magnitude higher compared to other PFAS; 5) biotransformation products such as fluorotelomer carboxylic acids (FTCAs) and perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) are detected in landfill leachates and WWTP effluents; and 6) many studies have shown increased PFAA concentrations in WWTP effluents compared to influents. This work provides a comprehensive review of the literature on the PFAS concentration and composition trends of select non-polymeric PFAS in different sources.


Subject(s)
Fluorocarbons , Groundwater , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Carboxylic Acids , Fluorocarbons/analysis , Waste Disposal Facilities , Water , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
2.
J Environ Manage ; 289: 112439, 2021 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33819657

ABSTRACT

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large class of chemicals widely used for many commercial and industrial applications and have resulted in contamination at sites across globally. Pump-and-treat systems, groundwater extraction, and ex situ treatment using granular activated carbon (GAC) are being implemented, either in full or pilot scale, to treat PFAS-impacted groundwater and drinking water. The only current method of regenerating spent GAC is to reactivate it at temperatures greater than 1000 °C, which requires large amounts of energy and is quite expensive. This research focused on development and demonstration of an effective GAC regeneration technology using a solvent-based method for PFAS-laden GAC used in water treatment. Two different organic solvents (ethanol and isopropyl alcohol) with 0.5% and 1.0% ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) as a base additive were tested to determine the most effective regenerant solution to remove PFAS from the contaminated GAC. Based on column tests using laboratory-contaminated GAC with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanoic sulfonate (PFOS), the solvent-base mix (SBM) of ethanol with 0.5% NH4OH was found to be the optimum performing regenerant solution. The GAC life span assessment showed that solvent-regenerated GAC performed similar to virgin GAC without losing its optimal performance of PFAS sorption. Further, the solvent-regenerated GAC showed optimal performance even after four cycles of solvent regenerations tested using the optimum SBM. Average percent removal in laboratory-contaminated GAC using the optimum SBM was 65% and 93% for PFOS and PFOA, respectively. Four field-spent GAC samples were also regenerated using the optimum SBM. Percent removal from these samples was found to be in range of 55%-68%. The type of GAC used, level of contamination and type of PFAS present, water type and quality, and the presence of co-contaminants may have influenced the removal capacity. Distillation experiments have shown that it is feasible to concentrate the spent solvent prior to disposal, which reduces the amount of PFAS-contaminated solvent waste produced in regeneration cycles.


Subject(s)
Fluorocarbons , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Water Purification , Charcoal , Fluorocarbons/analysis , Solvents , Technology , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL