A Novel Mobile App-based Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Therapy for the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: Results From an Extension Study of a Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Multicenter Trial.

BACKGROUND: Mobile app-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a promising treatment of knee osteoarthritis as previously demonstrated in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter trial (parent study). METHODS: Sixty-four of the 253 patients with knee osteoarthrosis who completed the 12-week parent study were enrolled in a 14-week extension study during which they continued to receive double-blind, home-based NMES (two 20-minute daily sessions, 5 d/wk) with either the original device ("active NMES") or a low-voltage version ("sham NMES"). All subjects who enrolled in the extension study comprised the intent-to-treat population and subjects who applied NMES (compliance monitored through the mobile app and a remote portal) for at least 2,800 minutes (14-week device usage) comprised the per-protocol therapy compliant population. RESULTS: In the per-protocol therapy compliant population, the active NMES group (n = 21) had a higher reduction in Visual Analog Scale Nominated Activity (64.7% versus 24.3%, P = 0.020) and Visual Analog Scale Nominated Activity improvement ≥50% (76.2% versus 12.5%, P = 0.002) than the sham NMES group (n = 8). Outcomes were not markedly different between groups in the intent-to-treat population. DISCUSSION: Applying NMES therapy for an additional 14 weeks (totaling 26 weeks) resulted in notable and clinically meaningful pain relief when patients were fully compliant with NMES.

Novel drug OMS103HP reduces pain and improves joint motion and function for 90 days after arthroscopic meniscectomy.

PURPOSE: This phase 2 study compared OMS103HP (Omeros, Seattle, WA) with control (lactated Ringer's) irrigation solution in patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study. Safety and postoperative pain, range of motion, and self-reported function were evaluated for 90 days. Statistical results were based on univariate analysis of variance and repeated-measures analyses. RESULTS: Mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores within 24 hours after discharge from the recovery room showed more pain in the control group beginning at 2 hours and peaking at 8 hours. Univariate analysis of variance of mean VAS scores over the 24-hour period did not meet statistical significance. Repeated-measures analysis yielded a statistically significant difference (P = .004) for time-by-treatment interaction, showing a clear drug benefit over time based on VAS scores. There were statistically significant differences at day 7 between the groups in passive flexion without pain (P = .022). The proportion of patients achieving flexion of 95° or greater, 110°, and 125° was greater for the OMS103HP group. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) showed statistically significant differences (P ≤ .05) between the OMS103HP and control groups for 4 of 5 outcomes (symptoms, pain, sport and recreation, and knee-based quality of life but not activities of daily living). All scores showed a treatment effect through day 90. The overall incidence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory values for the OMS103HP and control groups was similar. Serious adverse events occurred in 1 control patient. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with meniscal tears who underwent simple debridement, the use of OMS103HP resulted in reduced acute postoperative pain (measured by VAS over the first 24 hours postoperatively), reduced pain during recovery (measured by the KOOS pain subscale, which measures both background levels of pain and exacerbations caused by movements or activities), improved postoperative knee motion, and improved functional outcomes as assessed with the KOOS Knee Survey. Clinical benefits of OMS103HP were consistent and sustained throughout 90 days of postoperative follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

The relationship between skeletal muscle serum markers and primary THA: a pilot study.

Various reports confirm elevations in serum markers associated with skeletal muscle injury after orthopaedic surgery in the absence of overt clinical manifestations of myocardial injury. We therefore measured the influence surgical approach has on these serum markers after primary THA. We nonrandomly enrolled 30 nonconsecutive patients undergoing THA in three groups of 10 based on current surgical approaches used at our facility: (1) minimally invasive (MIS) modified Watson Jones approach; (2) miniposterior transmuscular approach (MIS-I); and (3) MIS-II incision. Blood samples for hemoglobin, hematocrit, cardiac troponin I, total creatine kinase, creatine phosphokinase, and serum myoglobin were obtained the morning before surgery as a baseline, immediately postoperatively, and 72 hours thereafter. We found reproducible trends in serum enzyme levels consistent with skeletal muscle damage resulting from primary THA. Troponin I remained normal in all but one patient indicating no myocardial contribution to measured serum enzyme levels. All three procedures resulted in similar trends in serum enzyme markers relevant to primary THA. Our preliminary data suggest no surgical approach appears to affect the degree of muscle trauma more or less than another.

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma for chronic tennis elbow: a double-blind, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of 230 patients.

BACKGROUND: Elbow tenderness and pain with resisted wrist extension are common manifestations of lateral epicondylar tendinopathy, also known as tennis elbow. Previous studies have suggested platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to be a safe and effective therapy for tennis elbow. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical value of tendon needling with PRP in patients with chronic tennis elbow compared with an active control group. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 230 patients with chronic lateral epicondylar tendinopathy were treated at 12 centers over 5 years. All patients had at least 3 months of symptoms and had failed conventional therapy. There were no differences in patients randomized to receive PRP (n = 116) or active controls (n = 114). The PRP was prepared from venous whole blood at the point of care and contained both concentrated platelets and leukocytes. After receiving a local anesthetic, all patients had their extensor tendons needled with or without PRP. Patients and investigators remained blinded to the treatment group throughout the study. A successful outcome was defined as 25% or greater improvement on the visual analog scale for pain. RESULTS: Patient outcomes were followed for up to 24 weeks. At 12 weeks (n = 192), the PRP-treated patients reported an improvement of 55.1% in their pain scores compared with 47.4% in the active control group (P = .163). At 24 weeks (n = 119), the PRP-treated patients reported an improvement of 71.5% in their pain scores compared with 56.1% in the control group (P = .019). The percentage of patients reporting significant elbow tenderness at 12 weeks was 37.4% in the PRP group versus 48.4% in the control group (P = .143). Success rates for patients at 12 weeks were 75.2% in the PRP group versus 65.9% in the control group (P = .104). At 24 weeks, 29.1% of the PRP-treated patients reported significant elbow tenderness versus 54.0% in the control group (P = .009). Success rates for patients with 24 weeks of follow-up were 83.9% in the PRP group compared with 68.3% in the control group (P = .037). No significant complications occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found at 12 weeks in this study. At 24 weeks, however, clinically meaningful improvements were found in patients treated with leukocyte-enriched PRP compared with an active control group.