Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 65
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Am Heart J ; 276: 110-114, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39182939

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to determine the number of major cardiovascular events (MACE, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death) and deaths from any cause that could be prevented across varying nationwide uptake of semaglutide 2.4 mg SC weekly for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Using a nationally representative cross-sectional study of participants in the 2017-2018 and 2019-March 2020 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the U.S. (NHANES), we estimated the number of MACE and deaths from any cause potentially prevented over a four-year period among participants meeting SELECT trial inclusion criteria. RESULTS: In a sample of n = 216 individuals (corresponding to 4,473,681 adults in the U.S. population) potentially eligible for this therapy, a total of 356,329 MACE and 232,808 all-cause mortality events were expected without semaglutide over 4 years and 35,633 MACE and 22,117 all-cause mortality events would be prevented with 50% uptake of semaglutide. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 4.5 million adults in the U.S. are forecasted to be eligible for semaglutide 2.4mg SC weekly therapy, with substantial impact on CVD and mortality if accessible and broadly used.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Glucagon-Like Peptides , Humans , Glucagon-Like Peptides/therapeutic use , Glucagon-Like Peptides/administration & dosage , Male , United States/epidemiology , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Aged , Secondary Prevention/methods , Nutrition Surveys , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Stroke/prevention & control , Stroke/epidemiology
2.
Eur Respir J ; 57(1)2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33154031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is prevalent among adolescents and young adults, but there has been limited knowledge about health consequences in human populations. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of results on respiratory disorders from studies of general-population samples and consider the mapping of these results to findings about biological processes linked to e-cigarettes in controlled laboratory studies. METHOD: We conducted a literature search and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies on the association of e-cigarette use with asthma and with COPD. We discuss findings from laboratory studies about effects of e-cigarettes on four biological processes: cytotoxicity, oxidative stress/inflammation, susceptibility to infection and genetic expression. RESULTS: Epidemiological studies, both cross-sectional and longitudinal, show a significant association of e-cigarette use with asthma and COPD, controlling for cigarette smoking and other covariates. For asthma (n=15 studies), the pooled adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 1.39 (95% CI 1.28-1.51); for COPD (n=9 studies) the aOR was 1.49 (95% CI 1.36-1.65). Laboratory studies consistently show an effect of e-cigarettes on biological processes related to respiratory harm and susceptibility to illness, with e-cigarette conditions differing significantly from clean-air controls, although sometimes less than for cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from epidemiological studies meets established criteria for consistency, strength of effect, temporality, and in some cases a dose-response gradient. Biological plausibility is indicated by evidence from multiple laboratory studies. We conclude that e-cigarette use has consequences for asthma and COPD, which is of concern for respirology and public health.


Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Tobacco Products , Vaping , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Laboratories , Vaping/adverse effects , Young Adult
3.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 22(6): 1030-1035, 2020 05 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31180120

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Exposure and receptivity to cigarette advertising are well-established predictors of cigarette use overall. However, less is known about whether exposure and receptivity to advertising for specific brands of cigarettes (ie, Marlboro, Camel, and Newport) are longitudinally associated with any subsequent cigarette use and subsequent use of those specific brands. METHODS: We analyzed data from a US sample of 7325 young adults aged 18-24 years who completed both Wave 1 and Wave 2 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study. Weighted logistic regression models were used to examine (1) among Wave 1 never-smokers, associations between Wave 1 exposure and receptivity to advertising for Marlboro, Camel, and Newport and subsequent overall and brand-specific smoking initiation at Wave 2, and (2) among Wave 1 ever-smokers, associations between Wave 1 exposure and receptivity to advertising for Marlboro, Camel, and Newport and subsequent preference of those brands at Wave 2. RESULTS: Among Wave 1 young-adult never-smokers, exposure to Camel advertising, but not Marlboro or Newport, was associated with smoking initiation with any brand of cigarettes at Wave 2. Among Wave 1 young-adult ever-smokers, receptivity to Marlboro, Camel, and Newport advertising was associated with subsequent preference for each brand, respectively, at Wave 2. CONCLUSIONS: This study found evidence for the association between receptivity to branded cigarette marketing and subsequent use of that brand. These findings provide evidence regarding the pathways through which cigarette marketing attracts young adults to use cigarettes and can inform tobacco prevention and counter-marketing efforts. IMPLICATIONS: This study extends prior work on the effects of cigarette advertising exposure and receptivity by illustrating the brand specificity of this advertising. These findings provide evidence that receptivity to branded cigarette advertising is longitudinally associated with preference for those specific cigarette brands.


Subject(s)
Advertising/methods , Marketing of Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Smokers/psychology , Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Products/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Products/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Smoking/psychology , Young Adult
4.
J Cancer Educ ; 35(4): 678-681, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30852789

ABSTRACT

Computed tomography lung cancer screening reduces lung cancer mortality. However, screening is underutilized. This study assesses the extent to which providers discuss lung cancer screening with their patients, as a lack of discussion and counseling may serve as a potential cause of low utilization rates. Data from 1667 adults aged 55-80Ā years sampled in the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey was utilized. A weighted multivariable logistic regression model was fit with past-year discussion about lung cancer screening with a provider as the outcome. The adjusted odds of discussion were higher for current cigarette smokers compared to non-cigarette smokers (adjusted odds ratio = 3.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75 to 8.74). Despite higher odds, the absolute prevalence was low with only 18% (95% CI, 11.8 to 24.2%) of current adult smokers reporting a past-year discussion. Knowledge of screening from trusted sources of medical information, such as doctors, can increase screening rates and may ultimately reduce lung cancer mortality.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Health Communication , Health Personnel/psychology , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Patient Participation , Smokers/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Counseling , Decision Making , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
5.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 21(7): 918-925, 2019 06 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29741711

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in engagement with online tobacco and electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) marketing (online tobacco marketing) among adolescents in the United States between 2013 and 2015. METHODS: We assessed the prevalence of six forms of engagement with online tobacco marketing, both overall and by brand, among adolescents sampled in Wave 1 (2013-2014; n = 13651) and Wave 2 (2014-2015; n = 12172) of the nationally representative Population Assessment for Tobacco and Health Study. Engagement was analyzed by tobacco use status: non-susceptible never tobacco users; susceptible never tobacco users; ever tobacco users, but not within the past year; and past-year tobacco users. RESULTS: Among all adolescents, the estimated prevalence of engagement with at least one form of online tobacco marketing increased from 8.7% in 2013-2014 to 20.9% in 2014-2015. The estimated prevalence of engagement also increased over time across all tobacco use statuses (eg, from 10.5% to 26.6% among susceptible adolescents). Brand-specific engagement increased over time for cigarette, cigar, and e-cigarette brands. CONCLUSION: Engagement with online tobacco marketing, both for tobacco and e-cigarettes, increased almost twofold over time. This increase emphasizes the dynamic nature of online tobacco marketing and its ability to reach youth. The Food and Drug Administration, in cooperation with social networking sites, should consider new approaches to regulate this novel form of marketing. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first study to estimate the national prevalence of engagement with online tobacco marketing among adolescents over time. The estimated prevalence of this engagement approximately doubled between 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 among all adolescents and, notably, among adolescents at relatively low risk to initiate tobacco use. This increase in engagement could represent public health harm if it results in increased initiation and use of tobacco products. Stronger federal regulation of online tobacco marketing and tighter control of access to tobacco-related content by social media sites could reduce adolescents' exposure to and engagement with online tobacco marketing.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior/psychology , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/economics , Marketing/economics , Social Media/economics , Tobacco Products/economics , Tobacco Use/economics , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Marketing/methods , Marketing/trends , Social Media/trends , Tobacco Use/epidemiology , Tobacco Use/trends , United States/epidemiology
6.
Scand J Public Health ; 47(5): 528-537, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29360010

ABSTRACT

Aims: United States' (US) colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and treatment practices seek to reduce mortality. We examined the survival of US patients compared with patients in the virtually unscreened Norwegian population. Methods: We compared short-term survival after CRC between the US and Norway using relative survival (RS) and excess mortality (EMR) analyses. The CRC patients were aged 50 and older diagnosed in the US (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry, 2004, N=9511) and in Norway (Cancer Registry of Norway, 2003-2005, N=8256). Results: Death occurred within three years for 39% of the CRC patients. Stage distributions were more favorable for US patients. Stage-specific survival was similar for localized and regional cancers, but more favorable for US distant cancers. In multivariate models of patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, patients (especially below age 80) in the US experienced longer survival (EMR 0.9, CI 0.8-0.9). Stage-specific analyses showed, however, that survival for localized cancers was relatively shorter in the US than in Norway (EMR 1.4, CI 1.1-1.8), but longer for distant cancers (EMR 0.8, CI 0.7-0.8). Conclusions: The enhanced survival for US CRC patients likely reflects a screening-related earlier diagnostic stage distribution, as well as prioritized life extension for patients with metastatic cancers, reflecting vastly different health care systems in the two countries. CRC screening is currently under consideration in Norway. For survival outcomes, the current findings do not discourage such an implementation. Other screening-related aspects such as feasibility and cost-benefit are, however, also relevant and warrant further research within a socialized health system.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Registries , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology
7.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 167(1): 195-203, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28879558

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To estimate the potential near-term population impact of alternative second opinion breast biopsy pathology interpretation strategies. METHODS: Decision analysis examining 12-month outcomes of breast biopsy for nine breast pathology interpretation strategies in the U.S. health system. Diagnoses of 115 practicing pathologists in the Breast Pathology Study were compared to reference-standard-consensus diagnoses with and without second opinions. Interpretation strategies were defined by whether a second opinion was sought universally or selectively (e.g., 2nd opinion if invasive). Main outcomes were the expected proportion of concordant breast biopsy diagnoses, the proportion involving over- or under-interpretation, and cost of care in U.S. dollars within one-year of biopsy. RESULTS: Without a second opinion, 92.2% of biopsies received a concordant diagnosis. Concordance rates increased under all second opinion strategies, and the rate was highest (95.1%) and under-treatment lowest (2.6%) when all biopsies had second opinions. However, over-treatment was lowest when second opinions were sought selectively for initial diagnoses of invasive cancer, DCIS, or atypia (1.8 vs. 4.7% with no 2nd opinions). This strategy also had the lowest projected 12-month care costs ($5.907 billion vs. $6.049 billion with no 2nd opinions). CONCLUSIONS: Second opinion strategies could lower overall care costs while reducing both over- and under-treatment. The most accurate cost-saving strategy required second opinions for initial diagnoses of invasive cancer, DCIS, or atypia.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Reference Standards , Referral and Consultation/standards , Biopsy/economics , Biopsy/standards , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Decision Support Techniques , Diagnostic Errors/economics , Female , Humans , Medical Overuse/economics , Pathologists/standards , Referral and Consultation/economics , United States
8.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 20(9): 1095-1100, 2018 08 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30124987

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Direct-to-consumer tobacco marketing, including direct mail and email coupons, is a potentially influential marketing strategy. We examined the associations between receipt of tobacco direct mail/email coupons and trajectories of smoking behavior among US adults. Methods: Data were from the US Population Assessment on Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study adult sample (n = 32160) collected during 2013-2014. Participants self-reported their smoking status (every day, some days, not at all) 12 months prior to the survey (T0) and at the time of the survey (T1). Three smoking trajectories were identified: nonsmokers progressing to current smokers, current smokers continuing to smoke, and among current smokers at T0, progressing to or continuing with daily smoking. Participants also reported receipt of direct mail/email tobacco coupons in the 6 months preceding T1 (yes/no). Weighted multiple logistic regression models were used to test the associations between receiving direct mail/email tobacco coupons and different smoking trajectories adjusted for demographic characteristics. Results: One in eight (12.4%) US adult nonsmokers and 36.2% adult smokers at T0 reported receiving tobacco coupons. Receipt of tobacco coupons was negatively associated with poverty status. Receipt of tobacco coupons was associated with increased odds of progression to current smoking (AOR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.45 to 2.12), continuation of smoking (AOR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.65), and current smokers' progression to or continuation with daily smoking (AOR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.50 to 1.91). Conclusions: Direct-to-consumer tobacco coupons may promote progression of smoking among nonsmokers, and continuation of smoking and progression to daily smoking among smokers in US adults. Implications: Distributing direct mail coupons is a strategy employed by tobacco companies to promote their products. We found, in a US national study, that many adults received tobacco coupons, and receiving these coupons was associated with subsequent progression of smoking among nonsmokers, and continuation of smoking and daily smoking among smokers. Scrutiny over the use of direct mail coupons and its effects on population health is warranted. Future research is needed to evaluate the effect of different interventions to reduce the impact of these coupons on smoking behaviors.


Subject(s)
Direct-to-Consumer Advertising/economics , Electronic Mail/economics , Postal Service/economics , Tobacco Industry/economics , Tobacco Products/economics , Tobacco Smoking/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Direct-to-Consumer Advertising/methods , Electronic Mail/trends , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Postal Service/trends , Self Report , Smoking/economics , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tobacco Industry/trends , Tobacco Smoking/psychology , Tobacco Use/economics , Tobacco Use/psychology , Tobacco Use/trends , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
Tob Control ; 27(6): 650-655, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29363609

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Flavour capsule cigarettes are a recent product worldwide, and little is known about the epidemiology of their use. We used data from a nationally representative survey to understand the sociodemographic characteristics of flavour capsule cigarette smokers and reasons for flavour capsule use. METHODS: Data were from the nationally representative, U.S. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health survey (2013-2014). Analyses included 7181 adults, aged 18-44 years, who were current or former established (≥100 lifetime cigarettes) cigarette smokers. Participants reported their usual brand of cigarettes which were classified as non-menthol, menthol or flavour capsule. Analyses assessed differences in participant demographics, smoking patterns and reasons for use by product type among those aged 18-24 years. Analyses were weighted to account for the survey design. RESULTS: Flavour capsule cigarettes were the usual cigarettes among 9.4% of smokers aged 18-24 years and 6.0%, 3.7% and <1% of smokers aged 25-34, 35-44 and ≥45 years, respectively. Among smokers aged 18-24 year, a significantly higher percentage of Hispanic smokers (17.3%) usually used flavour capsule cigarettes versus non-Hispanic white (8.4%, P<0.05) and non-Hispanic black (3.2%, P<0.05) smokers. Flavour capsule use was associated with later onset of smoking and lower levels of nicotine dependency and flavour capsule users placed more emphasis on taste, lower price and pack design than menthol or non-menthol users. CONCLUSIONS: Flavour capsule cigarettes use is highest in young adults, particularly Hispanics. Young adult predominance, lower level of addiction symptoms and emphasis on pack design by flavour capsule users suggest that these products may be positioned as starter products.


Subject(s)
Cigarette Smoking/epidemiology , Flavoring Agents , Menthol , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
10.
Tob Control ; 2018 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29921623

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We assessed whether receipt of coupons-via direct mail or e-mail-was prospectively related to trajectories of smoking behaviours. METHODS: Data were from a cohort of US adults (n=26 447) who participated in wave 1 (2013-2014) and wave 2 (2014-2015) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Participants reported receipt of tobacco direct mail/email coupons in the past 6 months in wave 1 and their smoking status in both waves. Weighted multiple logistic regressions were used to examine demographic correlates of receiving tobacco direct mail/email coupons at wave 1 and to examine the prospective effect of receiving tobacco coupons on trajectories of smoking behaviours. FINDINGS: At wave 1, 10.7% of never smokers, 13.9% of experimental smokers, 37.1% of current smokers and 16.5% of former smokers reported receiving tobacco direct mail/email coupons. Lower education and higher poverty adults and non-Hispanic white current smokers were more likely to have received these coupons (p<0.05). Receiving tobacco direct mail/email coupons at wave 1 was associated with increased odds of smoking initiation among never smokers (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=2.28, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.83), becoming established smokers among experimenters (AOR=1.62, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.04), becoming daily smokers among non-daily smokers (AOR=1.56, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.99) and smoking relapse among former smokers between waves (AOR=1.91, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.65). Receiving these coupons at wave 1 was associated with reduced odds of smoking cessation ≥6 months among current smokers (AOR=0.71, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco direct mail/email coupons encourage and sustain smoking and disproportionately affect lower socioeconomic populations.

11.
N Engl J Med ; 371(19): 1793-802, 2014 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25372087

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) showed that screening with low-dose computed tomography (CT) as compared with chest radiography reduced lung-cancer mortality. We examined the cost-effectiveness of screening with low-dose CT in the NLST. METHODS: We estimated mean life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs per person, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for three alternative strategies: screening with low-dose CT, screening with radiography, and no screening. Estimations of life-years were based on the number of observed deaths that occurred during the trial and the projected survival of persons who were alive at the end of the trial. Quality adjustments were derived from a subgroup of participants who were selected to complete quality-of-life surveys. Costs were based on utilization rates and Medicare reimbursements. We also performed analyses of subgroups defined according to age, sex, smoking history, and risk of lung cancer and performed sensitivity analyses based on several assumptions. RESULTS: As compared with no screening, screening with low-dose CT cost an additional $1,631 per person (95% confidence interval [CI], 1,557 to 1,709) and provided an additional 0.0316 life-years per person (95% CI, 0.0154 to 0.0478) and 0.0201 QALYs per person (95% CI, 0.0088 to 0.0314). The corresponding ICERs were $52,000 per life-year gained (95% CI, 34,000 to 106,000) and $81,000 per QALY gained (95% CI, 52,000 to 186,000). However, the ICERs varied widely in subgroup and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We estimated that screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT would cost $81,000 per QALY gained, but we also determined that modest changes in our assumptions would greatly alter this figure. The determination of whether screening outside the trial will be cost-effective will depend on how screening is implemented. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; NLST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00047385.).


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Life Expectancy , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Radiography, Thoracic/economics , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/economics , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Smoking , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
12.
13.
Tob Control ; 25(2): 174-80, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25361744

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which multiple tobacco product use among adolescents and young adults falls outside current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory authority. METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey of 1596 16-26-year-olds to assess use of 11 types of tobacco products. We ascertained current (past 30 days) tobacco product use among 927 respondents who ever used tobacco. Combustible tobacco products included cigarettes, cigars (little filtered, cigarillos, premium) and hookah; non-combustible tobacco products included chew, dip, dissolvables, e-cigarettes, snuff and snus. We then fitted an ordinal logistic regression model to assess demographic and behavioural associations with higher levels of current tobacco product use (single, dual and multiple product use). RESULTS: Among 448 current tobacco users, 54% were single product users, 25% dual users and 21% multiple users. The largest single use category was cigarettes (49%), followed by hookah (23%), little filtered cigars (17%) and e-cigarettes (5%). Most dual and multiple product users smoked cigarettes, along with little filtered cigars, hookah and e-cigarettes. Forty-six per cent of current single, 84% of dual and 85% of multiple tobacco product users consumed a tobacco product outside FDA regulatory authority. In multivariable analysis, the adjusted risk of multiple tobacco use was higher for males, first use of a non-combustible tobacco product, high sensation seeking respondents and declined for each additional year of age that tobacco initiation was delayed. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of current adolescent and young adult tobacco users in this study engaged in dual and multiple tobacco product use; the majority of them used products that fall outside current FDA regulatory authority. This study supports FDA deeming of these products and their incorporation into the national media campaign to address youth tobacco use.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior , Health Behavior , Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Products , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Female , Government Regulation , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Policy , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Prevention , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tobacco Products/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco, Smokeless , United States/epidemiology , United States Food and Drug Administration , Young Adult
18.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 33(3): 174-82, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23698136

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of health care access and socioeconomic determinants on Pap smear screening in Latin America. METHODS: Individual-level data was collected from the Demographic and Health Surveys in Bolivia, Brazil, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Peru, and Trinidad and Tobago between 1987 and 2008. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify socioeconomic and health care determinants of two outcomes: knowledge of Pap smears and recent Pap smear screening. RESULTS: In all countries, the proportion of women with a recent Pap smear screening remained below 55%. Key determinants of knowledge of Pap smears were age, education, and recent doctor's visit. For recent Pap smear screening, key determinants were wealth and recent doctor's visit. Women were between 1.47 and 3.44 times more likely to have received a recent Pap smear if they had a recent doctor's visit. Even the poorest women with a recent doctor's visit were more likely to screen than the richest women without a recent visit. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that visiting a doctor is an important determinant of cervical cancer screening in Latin America. Because screening may coincide with other medical visits, physicians could effectively encourage screening.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Papanicolaou Test/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vaginal Smears/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Latin America , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL