Delay to Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Hypertensive Stroke Patients: An Analysis of Delay Duration Across Agents.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A subset of ischemic stroke patients present with blood pressures above that considered safe for thrombolytic administration, requiring antihypertensive therapy. Guideline statements are ambivalent regarding which antihypertensive agent should be used to obtain a satisfactory blood pressure < 185/110 mm Hg prior to alteplase. METHODS: We reviewed data from consecutive patients at a single institution treated with alteplase from January 2014 to January 2019, collecting door-to-needle times, antihypertensive agent (if used), and antihypertensive-to-needle times. Patients were grouped by initial agent administered. We assessed for differences in door-to-needle times between those needing antihypertensive(s) and those who did not. Antihypertensive-to-needle times were compared across 3 antihypertensive groups (labetalol, nicardipine, and hydralazine). RESULTS: Analysis included 239 patients: 177 receiving no antihypertensive, 44 labetalol, 13 nicardipine, and 5 hydralazine. Those not administered an antihypertensive prior to alteplase had shorter door-to-needle times (52.6 minutes versus 62.1 minutes, P = .016). We found no statistical differences when comparing door-to-needle times across all groups (no med 52.6 minutes, labetalol 64.3 minutes, nicardipine 53.0 minutes, hydralazine 67.4 minutes, P = .052). No differences were found in antihypertensive-to-needle amongst the 3 antihypertensive groups (labetalol 18.75 minutes, nicardipine 12.15 minutes, hydralazine 25.40 minutes, P = .239). CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring antihypertensives experienced slower door-to-needle times. No statistically significant changes were observed in door-to-needle times by antihypertensive used, however these results may have clinical importance. This study is limited by relatively small sample size. Pooling data from multiple institutions could provide more robust assessment and inform clinical practice.

A Stroke Care Model at an Academic, Comprehensive Stroke Center During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has required the adaptation of hyperacute stroke care (including stroke code pathways) and hospital stroke management. There remains a need to provide rapid and comprehensive assessment to acute stroke patients while reducing the risk of COVID-19 exposure, protecting healthcare providers, and preserving personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies. While the COVID infection is typically not a primary cerebrovascular condition, the downstream effects of this pandemic force adjustments to stroke care pathways to maintain optimal stroke patient outcomes. METHODS: The University of California San Diego (UCSD) Health System encompasses two academic, Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs). The UCSD Stroke Center reviewed the national COVID-19 crisis and implications on stroke care. All current resources for stroke care were identified and adapted to include COVID-19 screening. The adjusted model focused on comprehensive and rapid acute stroke treatment, reduction of exposure to the healthcare team, and preservation of PPE. AIMS: The adjusted pathways implement telestroke assessments as a specific option for all inpatient and outpatient encounters and accounts for when telemedicine systems are not available or functional. COVID screening is done on all stroke patients. We outline a model of hyperacute stroke evaluation in an adapted stroke code protocol and novel methods of stroke patient management. CONCLUSIONS: The overall goal of the model is to preserve patient access and outcomes while decreasing potential COVID-19 exposure to patients and healthcare providers. This model also serves to reduce the use of vital PPE. It is critical that stroke providers share best practices via academic and vetted social media platforms for rapid dissemination of tools and care models during the COVID-19 crisis.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor induced rapidly progressive vasculopathy after intracranial stent placement.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been associated with progressive peripheral arterial disease and, more recently, rare cases of intracranial vascular stenosis have been reported. We report the fourth case of TKI treatment associated intracranial vasculopathy and rapid progression of intracranial vascular stenosis following intracranial stent placement. This was a 49-year-old woman who developed right-sided weakness, paresthesias, numbness, and speech difficulties 7 years following TKI treatment for CML. Cerebral catheter angiography demonstrated 90% stenosis of the left supraclinoid internal carotid artery, for which the patient underwent intracranial stent placement with no residual stenosis and improved distal blood flow. Approximately 1 month following the procedure, the patient returned with similar symptoms. Catheter angiography demonstrated 70% and 50% stenosis just distal and proximal to the stent construct, respectively. Rapid disease progression and non-atherosclerotic vasculopathy may argue against endovascular therapy.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor induced rapidly progressive vasculopathy after intracranial stent placement.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been associated with progressive peripheral arterial disease and, more recently, rare cases of intracranial vascular stenosis have been reported. We report the fourth case of TKI treatment associated intracranial vasculopathy and rapid progression of intracranial vascular stenosis following intracranial stent placement. This was a 49-year-old woman who developed right-sided weakness, paresthesias, numbness, and speech difficulties 7 years following TKI treatment for CML. Cerebral catheter angiography demonstrated 90% stenosis of the left supraclinoid internal carotid artery, for which the patient underwent intracranial stent placement with no residual stenosis and improved distal blood flow. Approximately 1 month following the procedure, the patient returned with similar symptoms. Catheter angiography demonstrated 70% and 50% stenosis just distal and proximal to the stent construct, respectively. Rapid disease progression and non-atherosclerotic vasculopathy may argue against endovascular therapy.

Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to Healthcare Worker Gowns and Gloves During Care of Nursing Home Residents.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the frequency of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission to gowns and gloves worn by healthcare workers (HCWs) interacting with nursing home residents to better inform infection prevention policies in this setting DESIGN: Observational study SETTING: Participants were recruited from 13 community-based nursing homes in Maryland and Michigan PARTICIPANTS: Residents and HCWs from these nursing homes METHODS: Residents were cultured for MRSA at the anterior nares and perianal or perineal skin. HCWs wore gowns and gloves during usual care activities. At the end of each activity, a research coordinator swabbed the HCW's gown and gloves. RESULTS: A total of 403 residents were enrolled; 113 were MRSA colonized. Glove contamination was higher than gown contamination (24% vs 14% of 954 interactions; P1.0; P<.05). We also identified low-risk care activities: giving medications and performing glucose monitoring (OR<1.0; P<.05). Residents with chronic skin breakdown had significantly higher rates of gown and glove contamination. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA transmission from MRSA-positive residents to HCW gown and gloves is substantial; high-contact activities of daily living confer the highest risk. These activities do not involve overt contact with body fluids, skin breakdown, or mucous membranes, which suggests the need to modify current standards of care involving the use of gowns and gloves in the nursing home setting.