Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Exp Dermatol ; 27(3): 295-298, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29283459

ABSTRACT

Previously, we determined that genetic and environmental factors contributed equally towards rosacea in twins. To assess an environmental factor, we characterized the malar cheek bacterial microbiome from twins discordant for rosacea. We found no significant difference in facial microbiome alpha and beta diversity between related twins discordant for rosacea. However, the relative percentage abundance of Gordonia and Geobacillus, low-abundant genera, was positively and negatively associated with rosacea severity, respectively. Our data demonstrate a significant correlation between facial microbiome and severity of rosacea in genetically matched twins and importantly that overall microbiome composition is largely unchanged.


Subject(s)
Cheek/microbiology , Dysbiosis/complications , Microbiota , Rosacea/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Firmicutes/isolation & purification , Geobacillus/isolation & purification , Gordonia Bacterium/isolation & purification , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Middle Aged , Proteobacteria/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
2.
Cancer Causes Control ; 27(6): 817-23, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27153844

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sun exposure is a major risk factor for skin cancer; however, the relative contribution of ultraviolet (UV) exposure during childhood versus adulthood on skin cancer risk remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine the impact of residential UV, measured by AVerage daily total GLObal solar radiation (AVGLO), exposure during childhood (birth, 15 years) versus adulthood (35, 50 years, and present) on incident non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and malignant melanoma (MM) in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Women were followed with yearly surveys throughout the duration of their participation in the Women's Health Initiative Observational study, a multicenter study from 1993 to 2005. A total of 56,557 women had data on all observations and were included in the baseline characteristics. The main exposure, residential UV (as measured by AVGLO), was measured by geographic residence during childhood and adulthood. Outcome was risk of incident NMSC and MM. RESULTS: Over 11.9 years (median follow-up), there were 9,195 (16.3 %) cases of NMSC and 518 (0.92 %) cases of MM. Compared with the reference group (women with low childhood and low adulthood UV), women with low childhood and high adulthood UV had a 21 % increased risk of NMSC (odds ratio 1.21, 95 % confidence interval 1.12, 1.31). Women with high childhood and high adulthood UV had a 19 % increased risk of NMSC (odds ratio 1.19, 95 % confidence interval 1.11, 1.27). Surprisingly, women with high childhood UV and low adulthood UV did not have a significant increase in NMSC risk compared with the reference group (odds ratio 1.08, 95 % confidence interval 0.91, 1.28) in multivariable models. Residential UV exposure in childhood or adulthood was not associated with increased melanoma risk. CONCLUSION: This study reveals an increase in NMSC risk associated with adulthood residential UV exposure, with no effect for childhood UV exposure.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Basal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Melanoma/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ultraviolet Rays , White People , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Postmenopause , Risk Factors , Women's Health
3.
Cancer ; 119(8): 1562-9, 2013 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23483536

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with decreased risk of gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer. However, the impact of NSAIDs on the risk of melanoma has been inconsistent. The authors evaluated the association between NSAID use and cutaneous melanoma risk in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Observational Study (OS). METHODS: At study entry, use of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) and nonaspirin NSAIDs was assessed among 59,806 postmenopausal Caucasian women ages 50 to 79 years. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed after adjusting for participant skin type, sun exposure history, and medical indications for NSAID use among other confounders. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 12 years, 548 incident melanomas were confirmed by medical review. Women who used ASA had a 21% lower risk of melanoma (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.98) relative to nonusers. Increased duration of ASA use (<1 year, 1-4 years, and ≥ 5 years) was associated with an 11% lower risk of melanoma for each categorical increase (Ptrend = .01), and women with ≥ 5 years of use had a 30% lower melanoma risk (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.94). In contrast, use of non-ASA NSAIDs and acetaminophen were not associated with melanoma risk. CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women who used ASA had a significantly lower risk of melanoma, and longer duration of ASA use was associated with greater protection. Although this study was limited by the observational design and self-report of NSAID use, the findings suggest that ASA may have a chemopreventive effect against the development of melanoma and warrant further clinical investigation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Melanoma/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Melanoma/ethnology , Melanoma/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Postmenopause , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/ethnology , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 32(8): 745-51, 2014 Mar 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24493717

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Itraconazole, a US Food and Drug Administration-approved antifungal drug, inhibits the Hedgehog (HH) signaling pathway, a crucial driver of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) tumorigenesis, and reduces BCC growth in mice. We assessed the effect of itraconazole on the HH pathway and on tumor size in human BCC tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ≥ one BCC tumor > 4 mm in diameter were enrolled onto two cohorts to receive oral itraconazole 200 mg twice per day for 1 month (cohort A) or 100 mg twice per day for an average of 2.3 months (cohort B). The primary end point was change in biomarkers: Ki67 tumor proliferation and HH activity (GLI1 mRNA). Secondary end points included change in tumor size in a subset of patients with multiple tumors. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were enrolled, of whom 19 were treated with itraconazole. Itraconazole treatment was associated with two adverse events (grade 2 fatigue and grade 4 congestive heart failure). Itraconazole reduced cell proliferation by 45% (P = .04), HH pathway activity by 65% (P = .03), and reduced tumor area by 24% (95% CI, 18.2% to 30.0%). Of eight patients with multiple nonbiopsied tumors, four achieved partial response, and four had stable disease. Tumors from untreated control patients and from those previously treated with vismodegib showed no significant changes in proliferation or tumor size. CONCLUSION: Itraconazole has anti-BCC activity in humans. These results provide the basis for larger trials of longer duration to measure the clinical efficacy of itraconazole, especially relative to other HH pathway inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/drug therapy , Itraconazole/administration & dosage , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , California , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/chemistry , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/pathology , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Chile , Disease Progression , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Itraconazole/adverse effects , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Messenger/analysis , Remission Induction , Skin Neoplasms/chemistry , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Time Factors , Transcription Factors/genetics , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden/drug effects , Zinc Finger Protein GLI1
5.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 103(19): 1469-75, 2011 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21878677

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Case-control studies have reported that exogenous estrogen use is associated with increased risk of skin cancer. The effects of menopausal hormone therapy on incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were evaluated in post hoc analyses of the Women's Health Initiative randomized placebo-controlled hormone therapy trials of combined estrogen plus progestin (E + P) and estrogen only (E-alone). METHODS: Postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years were randomly assigned to conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg/d) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg/d) or placebo in the E + P trial if they had an intact uterus (N = 16,608) or to conjugated equine estrogen alone or placebo in the E-alone trial if they had a hysterectomy (N = 10,739); the mean follow-up was 5.6 and 7.1 years, respectively. Incident nonmelanoma skin cancers (n = 980 [E + P trial]; n = 820 [E-alone trial]) and melanomas (n = 57 [E + P trial]; n =38 [E-alone trial]) were ascertained by self-report. Incident cases of cutaneous malignant melanoma were confirmed by physician review of medical records. Incidences of nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were compared between the two randomization groups within each trial using hazard ratios (HRs), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and Wald statistic P values from Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Rates of incident nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were similar between the active hormone (combined analysis of E + P and E-alone) and placebo groups (nonmelanoma skin cancer: HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.07; melanoma: HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.37). Results were similar for the E + P and E-alone trials when analyzed individually. CONCLUSIONS: Menopausal hormone therapy did not affect overall incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer or melanoma. These findings do not support a role of menopausal estrogen, with or without progestin, in the development of skin cancer in postmenopausal women.


Subject(s)
Estrogen Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)/adverse effects , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/adverse effects , Melanoma/epidemiology , Menopause , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Estrogen Replacement Therapy/methods , Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/administration & dosage , Melanoma/chemically induced , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Skin Neoplasms/chemically induced , Women's Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL