ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to identify pre- and intraoperative factors indicating the feasibility of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during breast-conserving surgery (BCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2019, a total of 128 women undergoing BCS due to early breast cancer were included in this prospective observational study, independent of whether IORT was planned or not. Patient and tumor characteristics as well as surgical parameters that could potentially influence the feasibility of IORT were recorded for the entire collective. In addition, a preoperative senological assessment was performed and analyzed to assess the feasibility of IORT. Logistic regression was then used to identify relevant preoperative parameters and to generate a formula predicting the feasibility of IORT. RESULTS: Of the 128 included women undergoing BCS, 46 were preoperatively rated to be feasible, 20 to be questionably feasible for IORT. Ultimately, IORT was realized in 30 patients. The most frequent reasons for omission of IORT were insufficient tumor-to-skin distance and/or an excessively large tumor cavity. Small clinical tumor size and large tumor-to-skin distance according to preoperative ultrasound were significantly related to accomplishment of IORT. CONCLUSION: We observed that preoperative ultrasound-based tumor-skin distance is a significant factor in addition to already known parameters to predict feasibility of IORT. Based on our findings we developed a formula to optimize IORT planning which might serve as an additional tool to improve patient selection for IORT in early breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mastectomy, Segmental , X-Rays , Prospective Studies , Feasibility Studies , Intraoperative CareABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To describe and analyze major local complications after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy xrays during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in early breast cancer. METHODS: Ten women out of 408 who were treated with IORT between 2002 and 2017 and subsequently developed a severe local complication requiring surgical intervention were retrospectively identified and analyzed. Demographic, clinical, and surgical parameters as well as complication characteristics and treatment methods were evaluated. RESULTS: At initial presentation, eight patients (80%) showed redness, six (60%) seroma, six (60%) wound infection, six (60%) suture dehiscence, and four (40%) induration of the former surgical area. Hematoma and necrosis were observed in one case (10%) each. Time interval until appearance of the first symptoms ranged from directly postoperative until 15 years postoperatively (median 3.1 months). Initial treatment modalities comprised antibiotic therapy (nâ¯= 8/80%) and transcutaneous aspiration of seroma (nâ¯= 3/30%). In the majority of patients, smaller surgical interventions (excision of a necrotic area/fistula [nâ¯= 6/60%] or secondary suture [nâ¯= 5/50%]) were sufficient to overcome the complication, yet larger interventions such as complex flap surgery and mastectomy were necessary in one patient each. CONCLUSION: IORT is an efficient and safe treatment method as <â¯2.5% of all IORT patients experienced major local complications. However, it seems to pose the risk of causing severe local complications that may require lengthy and burdensome treatment. Thorough preoperative counseling, implementation of recommended intraoperative precautions, and high vigilance for first symptoms of complications during follow-up appointments are necessary measures.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Mastectomy/methods , X-Rays , Seroma/etiology , Seroma/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Mastectomy, Segmental , Intraoperative Care/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Fatigue is common in breast-cancer survivors. Our study assessed fatigue longitudinally in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and aimed to identify risk factors associated with long-term fatigue and underlying fatigue trajectories. Fatigue was measured in a prospective multicenter cohort (REQUITE) using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) and analyzed using mixed models. Multivariable logistic models identified factors associated with fatigue dimensions at 2 years post-RT and latent class growth analysis identified individual fatigue trajectories. A total of 1443, 1302, 1203 and 1098 patients completed the MFI-20 at baseline, end of RT, after 1 and 2 years. Overall, levels of fatigue significantly increased from baseline to end of RT for all fatigue dimensions (P < .05) and returned to baseline levels after 2 years. A quarter of patients were assigned to latent trajectory high (23.7%) and moderate (24.8%) fatigue classes, while 46.3% and 5.2% to the low and decreasing fatigue classes, respectively. Factors associated with multiple fatigue dimensions at 2 years include age, BMI, global health status, insomnia, pain, dyspnea and depression. Fatigue present at baseline was consistently associated with all five MFI-20 fatigue dimensions (ORGeneralFatigue = 3.81, P < .001). From latent trajectory analysis, patients with a combination of factors such as pain, insomnia, depression, younger age and endocrine therapy had a particularly high risk of developing early and persistent high fatigue years after treatment. Our results confirmed the multidimensional nature of fatigue and will help clinicians identify breast cancer patients at higher risk of having persistent/late fatigue so that tailored interventions can be delivered.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Prospective Studies , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/complications , Risk Factors , Fatigue/etiology , Fatigue/complications , Pain , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Most patients receive whole breast radiotherapy in a supine position. However, two randomised trials showed lower acute toxicity in prone position. Furthermore, in most patients, prone positioning reduced doses to the organs at risk. To confirm these findings, we compared toxicity outcomes, photographic assessment, and dosimetry between both positions using REQUITE data. METHODS: REQUITE is an international multi-centre prospective observational study that recruited 2069 breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Data on toxicity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and dosimetry were collected, as well as a photographic assessment. A matched case control analysis compared patients treated prone (n = 268) versus supine (n = 493). Exact matching was performed for the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, boost, lymph node irradiation, chemotherapy and fractionation, and the nearest neighbour for breast volume. Primary endpoints were dermatitis at the end of radiotherapy, and atrophy and cosmetic outcome by photographic assessment at two years. RESULTS: At the last treatment fraction, there was no significant difference in dermatitis (p = .28) or any HRQoL domain, but prone positioning increased the risk of breast oedema (p < .001). At 2 years, patients treated in prone position had less atrophy (p = .01), and higher body image (p < .001), and social functioning (p < .001) scores. The photographic assessment showed no difference in cosmesis at 2 years (p = .22). In prone position, mean heart dose (MHD) was significantly lower for left-sided patients (1.29 Gy vs 2.10 Gy, p < .001) and ipsilateral mean lung dose (MLD) was significantly lower for all patients (2.77 Gy vs 5.89 Gy, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Prone radiotherapy showed lower MLD and MHD compared to supine position, although the risk of developing breast oedema during radiotherapy was higher. At 2 years the photographic assessment showed no difference in the cosmetic outcome, but less atrophy was seen in prone-treated patients and this seems to have a positive influence on the HRQoL domain of body image.
ABSTRACT
Radiotherapy can induce various adverse effects including fibrosis in cancer patients. Radiation-induced aberrant expression of profibrotic genes has been associated with dysregulated epigenetic mechanisms. Pan-BET (bromodomain and extraterminal domain) inhibitors, such as JQ1 and I-BET151, have been reported to attenuate the profibrotic response after irradiation. Despite their profound preclinical efficacy, the clinical utility of pan-inhibitors is limited due to observed cytotoxicicities. Recently, inhibitors were developed that selectively target the first (BD1) and second (BD2) bromodomain of the BET proteins (iBET-BD1 [GSK778] and iBET-BD2 [GSK046]). Here, their potential to attenuate radiation-induced fibroblast activation with low-toxicity was investigated. Our results indicated that cell proliferation and cell cycle progression in fibroblasts from BJ cells and six donors were reduced when treated with I-BET151 and iBET-BD1, but not with iBET-BD2. After irradiation, induction of DGKA and profibrotic markers, especially COL1A1 and ACTA2, was attenuated with all BET inhibitors. H3K27ac enrichment was similar at the DGKA enhancer region after I-BET151 treatment and irradiation, but was reduced at the COL1A1 transcription start site and the ACTA2 enhancer site. iBET-BD2 did not change H3K27ac levels in these regions. BRD4 occupancy at these regions was not altered by any of the compounds. Cell migration activity was measured as a characteristic independent of extracellular matrix production and was unchanged in fibroblasts after irradiation and BET inhibitor-treatment. In conclusion, iBET-BD2 efficiently suppressed radiation-induced expression of DGKA and profibrotic markers without showing cytotoxicity. Thus BD2-selective targeting is a promising new therapeutic avenue for further investigations to prevent or attenuate radiotherapy-induced fibrosis.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Nuclear Proteins , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Fibrosis , Humans , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Protein Domains , Transcription Factors/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The TARGIT-A trial reported risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) during lumpectomy for breast cancer to be as effective as whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Here, we present further detailed analyses. METHODS: In total, 2298 women (≥45 years, invasive ductal carcinoma ≤3.5 cm, cN0-N1) were randomised. We investigated the impact of tumour size, grade, ER, PgR, HER2 and lymph node status on local recurrence-free survival, and of local recurrence on distant relapse and mortality. We analysed the predictive factors for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT as part of the risk-adapted approach, using regression modelling. Non-breast cancer mortality was compared between TARGIT-IORT plus EBRT vs. EBRT. RESULTS: Local recurrence-free survival was no different between TARGIT-IORT and EBRT, in every tumour subgroup. Unlike in the EBRT arm, local recurrence in the TARGIT-IORT arm was not a predictor of a higher risk of distant relapse or death. Our new predictive tool for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT is at https://targit.org.uk/addrt . Non-breast cancer mortality was significantly lower in the TARGIT-IORT arm, even when patients received supplemental EBRT, HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.17-0.88) P = 0.0091. CONCLUSION: TARGIT-IORT is as effective as EBRT in all subgroups. Local recurrence after TARGIT-IORT, unlike after EBRT, has a good prognosis. TARGIT-IORT might have a beneficial abscopal effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN34086741 (21/7/2004), NCT00983684 (24/9/2009).
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden , Whole-Body IrradiationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess acute cardiac toxicity caused by intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy xrays for early breast cancer. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed pre- and postoperative troponin I and NT-proBNP in 94 women who underwent breast-conserving surgery between 2013 and 2017â¯at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany. Thirty-nine women received IORT using low-energy xrays during breast-conserving surgery while 55 patients without IORT formed the control group. Demographic and surgical parameters as well as cardiac markers were evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences concerning age and side of breast cancer between the groups. Furthermore, no significant difference between the troponin I assays of the IORT and control groups could be found (preoperatively: 0.017⯱ 0.006â¯ng/ml vs. 0.018⯱ 0.008â¯ng/ml; pâ¯= 0.5105; postoperatively: 0.019⯱ 0.012â¯ng/ml vs. 0.018⯱ 0.010â¯ng/ml; pâ¯= 0.6225). Nterminal fragment of Btype natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was significantly higher in the control group 24â¯h after surgery (preoperatively: 158.154⯱ 169.427â¯pg/ml vs. 162.109⯱ 147.343â¯pg/ml; pâ¯= 0.56; postoperatively: 168.846⯱ 160.227â¯pg/ml vs. 232.527⯱ 188.957â¯pg/ml; pâ¯= 0.0279). CONCLUSION: Troponin I levels as a marker of acute cardiac toxicity did not show any significant differences in patients who received IORT during breast-conserving surgery compared to those who did not.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Cardiomyopathies/etiology , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Peptide Fragments/blood , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Troponin I/blood , Aged , Biomarkers , Breast Neoplasms/blood , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Cardiomyopathies/blood , Cardiotoxicity/blood , Cardiotoxicity/etiology , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Mastectomy, Segmental , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Scientific and clinical achievements in radiation, medical, and surgical oncology are changing the landscape of interdisciplinary oncology. The German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) working group of young clinicians and scientists (yDEGRO) and the DEGRO representation of associate and full professors (AKRO) are aware of the essential role of radiation oncology in multidisciplinary treatment approaches. Together, yDEGRO and AKRO endorsed developing a German radiotherapy & radiation oncology vision 2030 to address future challenges in patient care, research, and education. The vision 2030 aims to identify priorities and goals for the next decade in the field of radiation oncology. METHODS: The vision development comprised three phases. During the first phase, areas of interest, objectives, and the process of vision development were defined jointly by the yDEGRO, AKRO, and the DEGRO board. In the second phase, a one-day strategy retreat was held to develop AKRO and yDEGRO representatives' final vision from medicine, biology, and physics. The third phase was dedicated to vision interpretation and program development by yDEGRO representatives. RESULTS: The strategy retreat's development process resulted in conception of the final vision "Innovative radiation oncology Together - Precise, Personalized, Human." The first term "Innovative radiation oncology" comprises the promotion of preclinical research and clinical trials and highlights the development of a national committee for strategic development in radiation oncology research. The term "together" underpins collaborations within radiation oncology departments as well as with other partners in the clinical and scientific setting. "Precise" mainly covers technological precision in radiotherapy as well as targeted oncologic therapeutics. "Personalized" emphasizes biology-directed individualization of radiation treatment. Finally, "Human" underlines the patient-centered approach and points towards the need for individual longer-term career curricula for clinicians and researchers in the field. CONCLUSION: The vision 2030 balances the ambition of physical, technological, and biological innovation as well as a comprehensive, patient-centered, and collaborative approach towards radiotherapy & radiation oncology in Germany.
Subject(s)
Radiation Oncology , Curriculum , Germany , Humans , Radiation Oncology/educationABSTRACT
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE: Randomized trials indicate that electronic or app-based assessment of patient-reported outcomes may improve outcomes in cancer patients. To analyze if an app-based follow-up would be accepted by elderly cancer patients, we conducted a single-center prospective feasibility study (NCT03196050). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cancer patients (≥60 years) without concurrent uncontrolled severe medical conditions and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70 were eligible if they were able to use the smartphone app. The primary endpoint was compliance over 1 year, calculated as patient-specific and study date-specific response rate to questions sent as push notifications; in this interim analysis, we report on 4month data. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of a subjective health status item (SPHS) with the physician-rated KPS. RESULTS: Out of 225 patients screened, 54 patients agreed to participate and 29 activated the app and participated in the study. The mean age was 66 years (61-78). The individual compliance rate averaged at 58.3% (standard deviation SDâ¯= 35%). Daily compliance was 53.3% on average (SDâ¯= 10.8%) and declined over time. The average percentage of patients who sent answers at least weekly was 75.0% (SDâ¯= 14.8%) and declined from 100% in week 1 to 53.8% in week 17 post-enrollment. Secondary outcomes indicated that questionnaires such as the EORTC-QLQ-C30 are accepted via app and that there is a significant moderate correlation between the SPHS and KPS scores (râ¯= 0.566; pâ¯< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that an app-based follow-up incorporating EORTC questionnaires might be possible in highly selected elderly cancer patients with modest compliance rates. Further trials should aim at an increased participation rate.
Subject(s)
Mobile Applications , Neoplasms/therapy , Smartphone , Telemedicine , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Patients , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telemedicine/instrumentationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate long-term oncological outcome and incidence of chronic side effects in patients with breast cancer and intraoperative radiotherapy given as an upfront boost (IORT boost). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 400 patients with an IORT boost with low-energy Xrays (20â¯Gy), subsequent whole-breast irradiation (46-50â¯Gy), and annual oncological follow-up. Side effects were prospectively evaluated (LENT-SOMA scales) over a period of up to 15 years. Side effects scored ≥grade 2â¯at least three times during follow-up were judged to be chronic. RESULTS: The median age was 63 years (30-85) and the median follow-up was 78 months (2-180) after IORT boost. In 15 patients a local recurrence occurred, resulting in a local recurrence rate at 5, 10, and 15 years of 2.0%, 6.6%, and 10.1%, respectively. The overall survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 92.1%, 81.8%, and 80.7%, respectively. The most common high-grade side effects were fibrosis (21%) and pain (8.6%). The majority of side effects occurred within the first 3 years. The actuarial rates of chronic fibrosis were 19.1% and 21.1% at 5 and ≥8 years, of chronic pain 8.6% at ≥4 years, of chronic edema of the breast 2.4% at ≥2 years, of chronic lymphedema 0.0% at 5 and 10 years, and of chronic hyperpigmentation 0.5% at ≥2 years. Side effects were similar or less than expected from an external beam boost. CONCLUSION: IORT boost appears to be a highly efficient and safe method for upfront delivery of the tumor bed boost in high-risk breast cancer patients.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Chronic Disease , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Partial breast irradiation using intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) after breast-conserving surgery could be sufficient for a selected group of breast cancer patients. We report the results of a cohort of patients from a single center treated as part of the randomized phase-3 TARGIT-A trial. METHODS: Patients (≥50â¯years) with cT1 cN0 cM0 and invasive ductal histology on biopsy were randomized between IORT with 20â¯Gy (arm-A) or postoperative whole-breast RT (WBRT) up to 56â¯Gy in 2â¯Gy fractions (arm-B). Postoperatively, patients in arm-A with multifocality, lymphovascular invasion, nodal invasion, extensive intraductal component, invasive lobular carcinoma, or resection margins <1â¯cm received additional postoperative WBRT. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2012, 184 patients were randomized, of whom 90 in arm-A and 90 in arm-B were evaluated. Median follow-up was 8.5 years. The 5year overall survival was 94.4% in arm-A and 93.3% in arm-B (pâ¯= 0.73). Two local recurrences were observed: one at 70.3 months in an arm-A patient who received IORTâ¯+ WBRT and another at 4.5 months in an arm-B patient who refused all forms of adjuvant treatment, thus resulting in a 5-year local recurrence of 0% in arm-A and 1.1% in arm-B. The 5year in-breast recurrence (outside of the index quadrant) was 0% in arm-A and 1.2% in arm-B. Salvage mastectomy was performed successfully in all patients with relapse. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up of this single-center cohort consolidates the earlier reports of low local recurrence rates after single-dose IORT. Our results are in line with non-inferiority of risk-adapted IORT for selected patients with early breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Mastectomy, Segmental , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The spine is the most frequent location of bone metastases. Local treatment aims at palliation of pain and, given the increased likelihood of long-term cancer survival, at local control. Kyphoplasty and intraoperative radiotherapy (Kypho-IORT) provided instantaneous pain relief in 70% of patients at the first day after the intervention and resulted in local control rates of > 93% at 1 year in a recently conducted phase I/II trial. To assess its clinical value, we designed a phase III trial which tests Kypho-IORT against the most widespread standard-of-care, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in patients with painful vertebral metastases. METHODS: This phase III study includes patients ≥50 years of age with up to 4 vertebral metastases and a pain score of at least 3/10 points on the visual/numeric analogy scale (VAS). Patients randomized into the experimental arm (A) will undergo Kypho-IORT (Kyphoplasty plus IORT with 8 Gy prescribed to 13 mm depth). Patients randomized into the control arm (B) will receive EBRT with either 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 8 Gy as a single dose. The primary end point is pain reduction defined as at least - 3 points on the VAS compared to baseline at day 1. Assuming that 40% of patients in the Kypho-IORT arm and 5% of patients in the control arm will achieve this reduction and 20% will drop out, a total of 54 patients will have to be included to reach a power of 0.817 with a two-sided alpha of 0.05. Secondary endpoints are evaluation of the percentage of patients with a pain reduction of at least 3 points at 2 and 6 weeks, local tumor control, frequency of re-intervention, secondary fractures/sintering, complication rates, skin toxicity/wound healing, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life. DISCUSSION: This trial will generate level 1 evidence on the clinical value of a one-stop procedure which may provide instantaneous pain relief, long-term control and shortened intervals to further adjuvant (systemic) therapies in patients with spinal metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT02773966 (Registration date: 05/16/2016).
Subject(s)
Cancer Pain/therapy , Intraoperative Care/methods , Kyphoplasty/methods , Pain Management/methods , Spinal Neoplasms/therapy , Cancer Pain/diagnosis , Cancer Pain/etiology , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Progression-Free Survival , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Spinal Neoplasms/complications , Spinal Neoplasms/mortality , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Spine/radiation effects , Spine/surgerySubject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Risk , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The TARGIT-A trial compared risk-adapted radiotherapy using single-dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT) versus fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for breast cancer. We report 5-year results for local recurrence and the first analysis of overall survival. METHODS: TARGIT-A was a randomised, non-inferiority trial. Women aged 45 years and older with invasive ductal carcinoma were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive TARGIT or whole-breast EBRT, with blocks stratified by centre and by timing of delivery of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy: randomisation occurred either before lumpectomy (prepathology stratum, TARGIT concurrent with lumpectomy) or after lumpectomy (postpathology stratum, TARGIT given subsequently by reopening the wound). Patients in the TARGIT group received supplemental EBRT (excluding a boost) if unforeseen adverse features were detected on final pathology, thus radiotherapy was risk-adapted. The primary outcome was absolute difference in local recurrence in the conserved breast, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 2·5% at 5 years; prespecified analyses included outcomes as per timing of randomisation in relation to lumpectomy. Secondary outcomes included complications and mortality. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00983684. FINDINGS: Patients were enrolled at 33 centres in 11 countries, between March 24, 2000, and June 25, 2012. 1721 patients were randomised to TARGIT and 1730 to EBRT. Supplemental EBRT after TARGIT was necessary in 15·2% [239 of 1571] of patients who received TARGIT (21·6% prepathology, 3·6% postpathology). 3451 patients had a median follow-up of 2 years and 5 months (IQR 12-52 months), 2020 of 4 years, and 1222 of 5 years. The 5-year risk for local recurrence in the conserved breast was 3·3% (95% CI 2·1-5·1) for TARGIT versus 1·3% (0·7-2·5) for EBRT (p=0·042). TARGIT concurrently with lumpectomy (prepathology, n=2298) had much the same results as EBRT: 2·1% (1·1-4·2) versus 1·1% (0·5-2·5; p=0·31). With delayed TARGIT (postpathology, n=1153) the between-group difference was larger than 2·5% (TARGIT 5·4% [3·0-9·7] vs EBRT 1·7% [0·6-4·9]; p=0·069). Overall, breast cancer mortality was much the same between groups (2·6% [1·5-4·3] for TARGIT vs 1·9% [1·1-3·2] for EBRT; p=0·56) but there were significantly fewer non-breast-cancer deaths with TARGIT (1·4% [0·8-2·5] vs 3·5% [2·3-5·2]; p=0·0086), attributable to fewer deaths from cardiovascular causes and other cancers. Overall mortality was 3·9% (2·7-5·8) for TARGIT versus 5·3% (3·9-7·3) for EBRT (p=0·099). Wound-related complications were much the same between groups but grade 3 or 4 skin complications were significantly reduced with TARGIT (four of 1720 vs 13 of 1731, p=0·029). INTERPRETATION: TARGIT concurrent with lumpectomy within a risk-adapted approach should be considered as an option for eligible patients with breast cancer carefully selected as per the TARGIT-A trial protocol, as an alternative to postoperative EBRT. FUNDING: University College London Hospitals (UCLH)/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, UCLH Charities, National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme, Ninewells Cancer Campaign, National Health and Medical Research Council, and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care/methods , Intraoperative Care/mortality , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Mastectomy, Segmental/mortality , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy/mortality , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Since the last recommendations from the Breast Cancer Expert Panel of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) in 2008, evidence for the effectiveness of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has grown. This growth is based on updates of the national S3 and international guidelines, as well as on new data and meta-analyses. New aspects were considered when updating the DEGRO recommendations. METHODS: The authors performed a comprehensive survey of the literature. Data from recently published (meta-)analyses, randomized clinical trials and international cancer societies' guidelines yielding new aspects compared to 2008 were reviewed and discussed. New aspects were included in the current guidelines. Specific issues relating to particular PMRT constellations, such as the presence of risk factors (lymphovascular invasion, blood vessel invasion, positive lymph node ratio >20 %, resection margins <3 mm, G3 grading, young age/premenopausal status, extracapsular invasion, negative hormone receptor status, invasive lobular cancer, size >2 cm or a combination of ≥ 2 risk factors) and 1-3 positive lymph nodes are emphasized. RESULTS: The evidence for improved overall survival and local control following PMRT for T4 tumors, positive resection margins, >3 positive lymph nodes and in T3 N0 patients with risk factors such as lymphovascular invasion, G3 grading, close margins, and young age has increased. Recently identified risk factors such as invasive lobular subtype and negative hormone receptor status were included. For patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes, the recommendation for PMRT has reached the 1a level of evidence. CONCLUSION: PMRT is mandatory in patients with T4 tumors and/or positive lymph nodes and/or positive resection margins. PMRT should be strongly considered in patients with T3 N0 tumors and risk factors, particularly when two or more risk factors are present.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Mastectomy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Germany , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm, Residual/mortality , Neoplasm, Residual/pathology , Neoplasm, Residual/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Despite multimodal therapies, almost all GBM recur within a narrow margin around the initial resected lesion. Thus, novel therapeutic intensification strategies must target both, the population of dispersed tumor cells around the cavity and the postoperative microenvironment. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a pragmatic and effective approach to sterilize the margins from persistent tumor cells, abrogate post-injury proliferative stimuli and to bridge the therapeutic gap between surgery and radiochemotherapy. Therefore, we have set up INTRAGO, a phase I/II dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IORT added to standard therapy in newly diagnosed GBM. In contrast to previous approaches, the study involves the application of isotropic low-energy (kV) x-rays delivered by spherical applicators, providing optimal irradiation properties to the resection cavity. METHODS/DESIGN: INTRAGO includes patients aged 50 years or older with a Karnofsky performance status of at least 50% and a histologically confirmed (frozen sections) supratentorial GBM. Safety and tolerability (i.e., the maximum tolerated dose, MTD) will be assessed using a classical 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are wound healing deficits or infections requiring surgical intervention, IORT-related cerebral bleeding or ischemia, symptomatic brain necrosis requiring surgical intervention and early termination of external beam radiotherapy (before the envisaged dose of 60 Gy) due to radiotoxicity. Secondary end points are progression-free and overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, number: NCT02104882 (Registration Date: 03/26/2014).
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Clinical Protocols , Glioblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Glioblastoma/surgery , Intraoperative Care , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Radiography , Radiotherapy DosageABSTRACT
The chemokine CXCL12 promotes glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence after radiotherapy (RT) by facilitating vasculogenesis. Here we report outcomes of the dose-escalation part of GLORIA (NCT04121455), a phase I/II trial combining RT and the CXCL12-neutralizing aptamer olaptesed pegol (NOX-A12; 200/400/600 mg per week) in patients with incompletely resected, newly-diagnosed GBM lacking MGMT methylation. The primary endpoint was safety, secondary endpoints included maximum tolerable dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), NOX-A12 plasma levels, topography of recurrence, tumor vascularization, neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO), quality of life (QOL), median progression-free survival (PFS), 6-months PFS and overall survival (OS). Treatment was safe with no dose-limiting toxicities or treatment-related deaths. The MTD has not been reached and, thus, 600 mg per week of NOX-A12 was established as RP2D for the ongoing expansion part of the trial. With increasing NOX-A12 dose levels, a corresponding increase of NOX-A12 plasma levels was observed. Of ten patients enrolled, nine showed radiographic responses, four reached partial remission. All but one patient (90%) showed at best response reduced perfusion values in terms of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV). The median PFS was 174 (range 58-260) days, 6-month PFS was 40.0% and the median OS 389 (144-562) days. In a post-hoc exploratory analysis of tumor tissue, higher frequency of CXCL12+ endothelial and glioma cells was significantly associated with longer PFS under NOX-A12. Our data imply safety of NOX-A12 and its efficacy signal warrants further investigation.