ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pyroptosis has been implicated in the advancement of various cancers. Triggering pyroptosis within tumors amplifies the immune response, thereby fostering an antitumor immune environment. Nonetheless, few published studies have evaluated associations between functional variants in the pyroptosis-related genes and clinical outcomes of patients with non-oropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (NON-ORO HNSCC). METHODS: We conducted an association study of 985 NON-ORO HNSCC patients who were randomly divided into two groups: the discovery group of 492 patients and the replication group of 493 patients. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to examine associations between genetic variants of the pyroptosis-related genes and survival of patients with NON-ORO HNSCC. Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP) was used for multiple testing correction. Functional annotation was applied to the identified survival-associated genetic variants. RESULTS: There are 8254 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in 82 pyroptosis-related genes, of which 202 SNPs passed multiple testing correction with BFDP < 0.8 in the discovery and six SNPs retained statistically significant in the replication. In subsequent stepwise multivariable Cox regression analysis, two independent SNPs (CHMP4A rs1997996 G > A and PANX1 rs56175344 C > G) remained significant with an adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.57, p = 0.004) and 0.65 (95% CI = 0.51-0.83, p = 0.0005) for overall survival (OS), respectively. Further analysis of the combined genotypes revealed progressively worse OS associated with the number of unfavorable genotypes (ptrend < 0.0001 and 0.021 for OS and disease-specific survival, respectively). Moreover, both PANX1 rs56175344G and CHMP4A rs1997996A alleles were correlated with reduced mRNA expression levels. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variants in the pyroptosis pathway genes may predict the survival of NON-ORO HNSCC patients, likely by reducing the gene expression, but our findings need to be replicated by larger studies.
Subject(s)
Connexins , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Pyroptosis , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Humans , Pyroptosis/genetics , Male , Female , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/genetics , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/mortality , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Middle Aged , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Connexins/genetics , Prognosis , Aged , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with solid organ transplant (SOT) are at increased risk of developing aggressive cutaneous malignancies due to their immunosuppression, particularly cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). PURPOSE: There is limited data regarding SOT patients with locally advanced cSCC requiring radical surgery and microvascular free tissue transfer (MVFTT). Our objectives were to characterize outcomes in SOT patients and compare them with a non-SOT cohort. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing MVFTT for advanced cSCC of the head and neck between January 2016 and May 2020 at a tertiary referral center. Patients who underwent MVFTT as part of curative intent surgery for advanced cSCC during the study were considered for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included distant metastasis, palliative intent treatment, age less than 18 years, and lip primaries. PREDICTOR: The predictor variable was SOT status. A cohort of non-SOT patients was matched to the SOT cohort based on age, smoking status, tumor stage, and defect size. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary reconstructive outcome was the major surgical complications and secondary outcome measures included major medical complications and minor surgical complications. The primary oncologic outcome was overall survival and the secondary outcome was disease-specific survival. The primary predictor was transplant status. COVARIATES: Covariates included patient comorbidities, prior treatment, tumor stage, type of reconstruction, pathologic findings, and adjuvant therapy. ANALYSIS: Continuous and categorical variables were compared using Student's T test and Fisher's exact test. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences in survival between groups were calculated using the log-rank test. Statistical significance was set a priori at P ≤ .05. RESULTS: Fourteen SOT and 14 matched non-SOT patients met inclusion criteria. There was not a statistically significant difference in the rate of major surgical complications (7 vs 7%, P = .74) between the SOT and non-SOT cohorts. Rates of minor (21 vs 43%, P = .26) wound complications and medical complications (0 vs 14%, P = .24) were also similar between the SOT and non-SOT cohorts. Locoregional recurrences and distant metastasis were more common for SOT patients, though this was not statistically significant. Overall survival was significantly worse for SOT patients (21.7 vs 31.0 months, P = .04), though there was not a significant difference in disease-free survival (9.8 vs 31.0 months, P = .17). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: MVFTT in the management of SOT patients with locally advanced head and neck cSCC demonstrates similar complication rates with non-SOT patients. While survival and oncologic outcomes are worse in the SOT cohort, aggressive surgical intervention with MVFTT can be performed with comparable complication rates to patients without a history of SOT.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Organ Transplantation , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Adolescent , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified at least 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) risk. Most of these SNPs are common variants with small to moderate effect sizes. Here we assessed the combined genetic effects of these variants on PTC risk by using summarized GWAS results to build polygenic risk score (PRS) models in three PTC study groups from Ohio (1,544 patients and 1,593 controls), Iceland (723 patients and 129,556 controls), and the United Kingdom (534 patients and 407,945 controls). A PRS based on the 10 established PTC SNPs showed a stronger predictive power compared with the clinical factors model, with a minimum increase of area under the receiver-operating curve of 5.4 percentage points (P ≤ 1.0 × 10-9). Adding an extended PRS based on 592,475 common variants did not significantly improve the prediction power compared with the 10-SNP model, suggesting that most of the remaining undiscovered genetic risk in thyroid cancer is due to rare, moderate- to high-penetrance variants rather than to common low-penetrance variants. Based on the 10-SNP PRS, individuals in the top decile group of PRSs have a close to sevenfold greater risk (95% CI, 5.4-8.8) compared with the bottom decile group. In conclusion, PRSs based on a small number of common germline variants emphasize the importance of heritable low-penetrance markers in PTC.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Multifactorial Inheritance , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/genetics , Thyroid Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Genome-Wide Association Study , Humans , Iceland/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Genetic , Penetrance , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/epidemiology , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/pathology , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/epidemiology , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , United Kingdom/epidemiology , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA) metabolism-related genes play an important role in the development of cancers. We assessed the associations of genetic variants in genes involved in the metabolism of PAHs and TSNA with risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in European populations using two published genome-wide association study datasets. In the single-locus analysis, we identified two SNPs (rs145533669 and rs35246205) in CYP2B6 to be associated with risk of SCCHN (P = 1.57 × 10-4 and .004, respectively), two SNPs (EPHX1 rs117522494 and CYP2B6 rs145533669) to be associated with risk of oropharyngeal cancer (P = .001 and .004, respectively), and one SNP (rs4359199 in HSD17B12) to be associated with risk of oral cancer (P = .006). A significant interaction effect was found between rs4359199 and drinking status on risks of SCCHN and oropharyngeal cancer (P < .05). eQTL and sQTL analyzes revealed that two SNPs (CYP2B6 rs35246205 and HSD17B12 rs4359199) were correlated with alternative splicing or mRNA expression levels of the corresponding genes in liver cells (P < .05 for both). In silico functional annotation suggested that these two SNPs may regulate mRNA expression by affecting the binding of transcription factors. Results from phenome-wide association studies presented significant associations between these genes and risks of other cancers, smoking behavior and alcohol dependence (P < .05). Thus, our study provided some insight into the underlying genetic mechanism of head and neck cancer, which warrants future functional validation.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , 17-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2B6/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genome-Wide Association Study , Genotype , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Humans , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , RNA, Messenger , Risk Factors , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Systemic treatments for angiosarcoma remains an area of unmet clinical need. The authors conducted this retrospective study to assess the clinical activity of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with angiosarcoma. The primary objective was to assess the objective response rate, and the secondary objective was to assess the progression-free and overall survival durations and disease control rate. METHODS: Patient data were obtained using The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Tumor Registry database. The final study population was refined to only include patients who had undergone pembrolizumab monotherapy. The objective response rate was evaluated using RECIST/irRECIST version 1.1. Progression-free survival and overall survival were defined as the time from the initiation of immunotherapy to disease progression or recurrence, death, or last follow-up and to death or last follow-up, respectively. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 25 patients. Most patients had metastatic disease (72%) and had undergone at least two lines of systemic therapy (80%) before starting pembrolizumab. The objective response rate was 18%, whereas the disease control rate was 59%. The median progression-free survival duration was 6.2 months and was not significantly different between the cutaneous (4.7 months) and visceral angiosarcoma (6.2 months) groups (p = .42). The median overall survival duration was 72.6 months. Toxicities were recorded for eight patients, with fatigue, anemia, constipation, and rash being the most common. CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab shows durable clinical activity in angiosarcoma. These findings suggest that checkpoint inhibition as monotherapy or combination therapy is likely to have a high probability of success.© 2022 American Cancer Society. LAY SUMMARY: This is the largest retrospective study to assess the clinical activity of checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in angiosarcomas. The study includes an adequate number of patients with visceral angiosarcoma that enabled to obtain meaningful clinical insights that were previously unavailable. Our findings indicate an improvement in progression-free survival with pembrolizumab that is comparable to other active agents in angiosarcoma. Pembrolizumab monotherapy in angiosarcomas also has a favorable tolerability profile. Our findings emphasize the need for prospective studies to evaluate the activity of pembrolizumab monotherapy and combination therapy.
Subject(s)
Hemangiosarcoma , Humans , Immunotherapy , Progression-Free Survival , Prospective Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), largely fueled by the human papillomavirus (HPV), has a complex biological and immunologic phenotype. Although HPV/p16 status can be used to stratify OPSCC patients as a function of survival, it remains unclear what drives an improved treatment response in HPV-associated OPSCC and whether targetable biomarkers exist that can inform a precision oncology approach. We analyzed OPSCC patients treated between 2000 and 2016 and correlated locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with conventional clinical parameters, risk parameters generated using deep-learning algorithms trained to quantify tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (OP-TIL) and multinucleated tumor cells (MuNI) and targeted transcriptomics. P16 was a dominant determinant of LRC, DFS and OS, but tobacco exposure, OP-TIL and MuNI risk features correlated with clinical outcomes independent of p16 status and the combination of p16, OP-TIL and MuNI generated a better stratification of OPSCC risk compared to individual parameters. Differential gene expression (DEG) analysis demonstrated overlap between MuNI and OP-TIL and identified genes involved in DNA repair, oxidative stress response and tumor immunity as the most prominent correlates with survival. Alteration of inflammatory/immune pathways correlated strongly with all risk features and oncologic outcomes. This suggests that development of OPSCC consists of an intersection between multiple required and permissive oncogenic and immunologic events which may be mechanistically linked. The strong relationship between tumor immunity and oncologic outcomes in OPSCC regardless of HPV status may provide opportunities for further biomarker development and precision oncology approaches incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors for maximal anti-tumor efficacy.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Papillomavirus Infections , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/analysis , Humans , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Precision Medicine , Prognosis , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Guidelines for follow-up after head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment recommend frequent clinical examinations and surveillance testing. Here, the authors describe real-world follow-up care for HNC survivors and variations in surveillance testing. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, this study examined a population-based cohort of HNC survivors between 2001 and 2011 Usage of cross-sectional head and neck imaging (CHNI), chest imaging (CI), positron emission tomography (PET), fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy (FNPL), and, in irradiated patients, thyroid function testing (TFT) was captured over 2 consecutive surveillance years. Multivariate modeling with logistic regression analyses was used to assess variations by clinical factors, nonclinical factors, number and types of providers seen and their evolution over time. RESULTS: Among 13,836 HNC survivors, the majority saw a medical, radiation, or surgical oncologist and a primary care provider (PCP; 81.7%) in their first year of surveillance. However, only 58.1% underwent either PET or CHNI, 47.8% underwent CHNI, 64.1% underwent CI, 32.5% underwent PET scans, 55.0% underwent FNPL, and 55.9% underwent TFT. In multivariate analyses, patients who followed up with more providers and those who followed up with both a PCP and an oncologist were more likely to undergo surveillance testing (P < .007). However, adjusting for providers seen did not explain the variations in surveillance testing rates based on age, race, education, income level, and place of residence. Over time, there was a gradual increase in the use of PET scans and TFT during surveillance years. CONCLUSIONS: In this large SEER-Medicare data study, only half of HNC survivors received the recommended testing, and greater compliance was seen in those who followed up with both an oncologist and a PCP. More attention is needed to minimize variations in surveillance testing across sociodemographic groups.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Health Personnel , Watchful Waiting , Aged , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Medicare , SEER Program , United States/epidemiology , Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to identify clinicodemographic risk factors for xerostomia among long-term oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 906 disease-free, adult OPC survivors with a median survival duration at the time of survey of 6 years (range, 1-16 years); self-reported xerostomia scores were available for 877 participants. Study participants had completed curative treatment between January 2000 and December 2013 and responded to a survey administered from September 2015 to July 2016. The primary outcome variable was cancer patient-reported xerostomia measured with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck Cancer Module. Clinicodemographic risk factors for moderate to severe xerostomia were identified via multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Moderate to severe xerostomia was reported by 343 of the respondents (39.1%). Female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% CI, 1.22-2.71; P = .003; Bayesian false-discovery probability [BFDP] = 0.568), high school or lower education (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.19-2.52; P = .004; BFDP = 0.636), and current cigarette smoking at the time of survey (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.19-5.47; P = .016; BFDP = 0.800) were risk factors for moderate to severe xerostomia, and bilateral intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with proton therapy and ipsilateral IMRT were protective. CONCLUSIONS: In this large xerostomia study, modern radiotherapy was a protective factor, and continued cigarette smoking at the time of survey, female sex, and high school or lower education were identified as other contributing risk factors associated with moderate to severe xerostomia. Importantly, these findings need to be confirmed in prospective studies. These results can inform future research and targeted patient-centered interventions to monitor and manage radiation therapy-associated xerostomia and preserve quality of life among patients with OPC.
Subject(s)
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Xerostomia , Adult , Bayes Theorem , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Survivors , Xerostomia/epidemiology , Xerostomia/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Risk of recurrence among patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) who survive 5 years is low. The goal of this study was to assess long-term survival of patients with OPC alive without recurrence 5 years after diagnosis. METHODS: This study included newly diagnosed patients with OPC, who had been treated with radiation and were alive without recurrence 5 years after diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) probabilities beyond 5 years were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with OS were determined using Bayesian piecewise exponential survival regression. Standardized mortality ratios for all-cause death were estimated controlling for study year, age, and sex in the US general population. RESULTS: Among 1699 patients, the additional 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS probabilities were 94%, 83%, and 63%, respectively, and were lower than those in the general population. Patients who were older, were current or former smokers, had other than tonsil or base of tongue tumors, or had T4 tumors had a higher risk of death. Patients who had base of tongue tumors and had received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or lower-radiation doses had a lower risk of death. Standardized mortality ratios were higher among current and heavy smokers and lower among recipients of IMRT and lower radiation doses. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort, long-term survival among patients with OPC was good but lower than predicted for the general population. Patients treated with IMRT and those with less tobacco exposure had better outcomes.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Age Factors , Aged , Bayes Theorem , Cause of Death , Ex-Smokers , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Retrospective Studies , Smokers , Time Factors , Tongue Neoplasms/mortality , Tongue Neoplasms/radiotherapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite the significant societal burden of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers, clinical screening interventions for HPV-associated noncervical cancers are not available. Blood-based biomarkers may help close this gap in care. METHODS: Five databases were searched, 5687 articles were identified, and 3631 unique candidate titles and abstracts were independently reviewed by 2 authors; 702 articles underwent a full-text review. Eligibility criteria included the assessment of a blood-based biomarker within a cohort or case-control study. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven studies were included. Among all biomarkers assessed, HPV-16 E seropositivity and circulating HPV DNA were most significantly correlated with HPV-associated cancers in comparison with cancer-free controls. In most scenarios, HPV-16 E6 seropositivity varied nonsignificantly according to tumor type, specimen collection timing, and anatomic site (crude odds ratio [cOR] for p16+ or HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer [OPC], 133.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 59.40-298.21; cOR for HPV-unspecified OPC, 25.41; 95% CI, 8.71-74.06; cOR for prediagnostic HPV-unspecified OPC, 59.00; 95% CI, 15.39-226.25; cOR for HPV-unspecified cervical cancer, 12.05; 95% CI, 3.23-44.97; cOR for HPV-unspecified anal cancer, 73.60; 95% CI, 19.68-275.33; cOR for HPV-unspecified penile cancer, 16.25; 95% CI, 2.83-93.48). Circulating HPV-16 DNA was a valid biomarker for cervical cancer (cOR, 15.72; 95% CI, 3.41-72.57). In 3 cervical cancer case-control studies, cases exhibited unique microRNA expression profiles in comparison with controls. Other assessed biomarker candidates were not valid. CONCLUSIONS: HPV-16 E6 antibodies and circulating HPV-16 DNA are the most robustly analyzed and most promising blood-based biomarkers for HPV-associated cancers to date. Comparative validity analyses are warranted. Variations in tumor type-specific, high-risk HPV DNA prevalence according to anatomic site and world region highlight the need for biomarkers targeting more high-risk HPV types. Further investigation of blood-based microRNA expression profiling appears indicated.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Anus Neoplasms/virology , Biomarkers/blood , DNA, Viral/blood , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Female , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of pre-treatment NLR in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS: Patients who completed definitive radiotherapy (RT) for oropharyngeal cancer and had blood counts taken pre-RT from 2002 to 2013 were included. NLR was calculated as total neutrophil/lymphocytes. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted with linear and Cox regression methods. NLR was analysed posteriori and dichotomised on the discovered median. RESULTS: Eight hundred and forty-eight patients were analysed. The median pre-RT NLR was 3. Patients with NLR of <3 had improved overall survival (OS) than those with NLR ≥ 3 (5-year OS 85 vs 74%, p < 0.0001). OS differences remained significant when stratified according to HPV status (HPV-positive p = 0.011; HPV-negative p = 0.003). Freedom from any recurrence (FFR), locoregional control (LRC) and freedom of distant recurrence (FDR) were better in those with NLR < 3. The negative impact of elevated pre-RT NLR on OS (HR = 1.64, p = 0.001), FFR (HR = 1.6, p = 0.006) and LRC (HR = 1.8, p = 0.005) remained significant on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-RT NLR is an independent prognostic factor in patients with oropharyngeal cancer regardless of HPV status. Patients with lower NLR had more favourable OS and disease control.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/blood , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Lymphocytes , Neutrophils , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/blood , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Leukocyte Count , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Prognosis , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Optimal hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening strategies for cancer patients have not been established. We compared the performance of selective HCV screening strategies. METHODS: We surveyed patients presenting for first systemic anticancer therapy during 2013-2014 for HCV risk factors. We estimated the prevalence of positivity for HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and examined factors associated with anti-HCV status using Fisher's exact test or Student's t test. Sensitivity was calculated for screening patients born during 1945-1965, patients with ≥ 1 other risk factor, or both cohorts ("combined screening"). RESULTS: We enrolled 2122 participants. Median age was 59 years (range, 18-91); 1138 participants were women. Race/ethnicity distribution was white non-Hispanic, 76% (n = 1616); Hispanic, 11% (n = 233); black non-Hispanic, 8% (n = 160); Asian, 4% (n = 78); and other, 2% (n = 35). Primary cancer distribution was non-liver solid tumor, 78% (n = 1664); hematologic cancer, 20% (n = 422); and liver cancer, 1% (n = 28). Prevalence of anti-HCV was 1.93% (95% CI, 1.39%-2.61%). Over 28% of patients with detectable HCV RNA were unaware of infection. Factors significantly associated with anti-HCV positivity included less than a bachelor's degree, birth in 1945-1965, chronic liver disease, injection drug use, and blood transfusion or organ transplant before 1992. A total of 1315 participants (62%), including 39 of 41 with anti-HCV, reported ≥ 1 risk factor. Sensitivity was 80% (95% CI, 65-91%) for birth-cohort-based, 68% (95% CI, 52-82%) for other-risk-factor-based, and 95% (95% 83-99%) for combined screening. CONCLUSION: Combined screening still missed 5% of patients with anti-HCV. These findings favor universal HCV screening to identify all HCV-infected cancer patients.
Subject(s)
Hepacivirus/immunology , Hepatitis C Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Mass Screening/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hepatitis C/ethnology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , RNA, Viral/blood , Risk Factors , White People/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
Head and neck cancer (HNC) risk prediction models based on risk factor profiles have not yet been developed. We took advantage of the large database of the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) Consortium, including 14 US studies from 1981-2010, to develop HNC risk prediction models. Seventy percent of the data were used to develop the risk prediction models; the remaining 30% were used to validate the models. We used competing-risk models to calculate absolute risks. The predictors included age, sex, education, race/ethnicity, alcohol drinking intensity, cigarette smoking duration and intensity, and/or family history of HNC. The 20-year absolute risk of HNC was 7.61% for a 60-year-old woman who smoked more than 20 cigarettes per day for over 20 years, consumed 3 or more alcoholic drinks per day, was a high school graduate, had a family history of HNC, and was non-Hispanic white. The 20-year risk for men with a similar profile was 6.85%. The absolute risks of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers were generally lower than those of oral cavity and laryngeal cancers. Statistics for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were 0.70 or higher, except for oropharyngeal cancer in men. This HNC risk prediction model may be useful in promoting healthier behaviors such as smoking cessation or in aiding persons with a family history of HNC to evaluate their risks.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Models, Theoretical , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A possible surveillance model for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) who received definitive radiotherapy was created using a partially observed Markov decision process. The goal of this model is to guide surveillance imaging policies after definitive radiotherapy. METHODS: The partially observed Markov decision process model was formulated to determine the optimal times to scan patients. Transition probabilities were computed using a data set of 1508 patients with HNC who received definitive radiotherapy between the years 2000 and 2010. Kernel density estimation was used to smooth the sample distributions. The reward function was derived using cost estimates from the literature. Additional model parameters were estimated using either data from the literature or clinical expertise. RESULTS: When considering all forms of relapse, the model showed that the optimal time between scans was longer than the time intervals used in the institutional guidelines. The optimal policy dictates that there should be less time between surveillance scans immediately after treatment compared with years after treatment. Comparable results also held when only locoregional relapses were considered as relapse events in the model. Simulation results for the inclusive relapse cases showed that <15% of patients experienced a relapse over a simulated 36-month surveillance program. CONCLUSIONS: This model suggests that less frequent surveillance scan policies can maintain adequate information on relapse status for patients with HNC treated with radiotherapy. This model could potentially translate into a more cost-effective surveillance program for this group of patients.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Markov Chains , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Algorithms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnostic imaging , Cohort Studies , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Alcohol is a well-established risk factor for head and neck cancer (HNC). This study aims to explore the effect of alcohol intensity and duration, as joint continuous exposures, on HNC risk. METHODS: Data from 26 case-control studies in the INHANCE Consortium were used, including never and current drinkers who drunk ≤10 drinks/day for ≤54 years (24234 controls, 4085 oral cavity, 3359 oropharyngeal, 983 hypopharyngeal and 3340 laryngeal cancers). The dose-response relationship between the risk and the joint exposure to drinking intensity and duration was investigated through bivariate regression spline models, adjusting for potential confounders, including tobacco smoking. RESULTS: For all subsites, cancer risk steeply increased with increasing drinks/day, with no appreciable threshold effect at lower intensities. For each intensity level, the risk of oral cavity, hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancers did not vary according to years of drinking, suggesting no effect of duration. For oropharyngeal cancer, the risk increased with durations up to 28 years, flattening thereafter. The risk peaked at the higher levels of intensity and duration for all subsites (odds ratio = 7.95 for oral cavity, 12.86 for oropharynx, 24.96 for hypopharynx and 6.60 for larynx). CONCLUSIONS: Present results further encourage the reduction of alcohol intensity to mitigate HNC risk.
Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcohol Drinking/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Laryngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Laryngeal Neoplasms/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mouth Neoplasms/etiology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/etiology , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/pathology , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have high survival when treated with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Whether replacement of cisplatin with cetuximab-an antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor-can preserve high survival and reduce treatment toxicity is unknown. We investigated whether cetuximab would maintain a high proportion of patient survival and reduce acute and late toxicity. METHODS: RTOG 1016 was a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial at 182 health-care centres in the USA and Canada. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma; American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition clinical categories T1-T2, N2a-N3 M0 or T3-T4, N0-N3 M0; Zubrod performance status 0 or 1; age at least 18 years; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive either radiotherapy plus cetuximab or radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks, and patients were stratified by T category (T1-T2 vs T3-T4), N category (N0-N2a vs N2b-N3), Zubrod performance status (0 vs 1), and tobacco smoking history (≤10 pack-years vs >10 pack-years). Patients were assigned to receive either intravenous cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 5-7 days before radiotherapy initiation, followed by cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly for seven doses (total 2150 mg/m2), or cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22 of radiotherapy (total 200 mg/m2). All patients received accelerated intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivered at 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 6 weeks at six fractions per week (with two fractions given on one day, at least 6 h apart). The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation to death from any cause, with non-inferiority margin 1·45. Primary analysis was based on the modified intention-to-treat approach, whereby all patients meeting eligibility criteria are included. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01302834. FINDINGS: Between June 9, 2011, and July 31, 2014, 987 patients were enrolled, of whom 849 were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy plus cetuximab (n=425) or radiotherapy plus cisplatin (n=424). 399 patients assigned to receive cetuximab and 406 patients assigned to receive cisplatin were subsequently eligible. After median follow-up duration of 4·5 years, radiotherapy plus cetuximab did not meet the non-inferiority criteria for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1·45, one-sided 95% upper CI 1·94; p=0·5056 for non-inferiority; one-sided log-rank p=0·0163). Estimated 5-year overall survival was 77·9% (95% CI 73·4-82·5) in the cetuximab group versus 84·6% (80·6-88·6) in the cisplatin group. Progression-free survival was significantly lower in the cetuximab group compared with the cisplatin group (HR 1·72, 95% CI 1·29-2·29; p=0·0002; 5-year progression-free survival 67·3%, 95% CI 62·4-72·2 vs 78·4%, 73·8-83·0), and locoregional failure was significantly higher in the cetuximab group compared with the cisplatin group (HR 2·05, 95% CI 1·35-3·10; 5-year proportions 17·3%, 95% CI 13·7-21·4 vs 9·9%, 6·9-13·6). Proportions of acute moderate to severe toxicity (77·4%, 95% CI 73·0-81·5 vs 81·7%, 77·5-85·3; p=0·1586) and late moderate to severe toxicity (16·5%, 95% CI 12·9-20·7 vs 20·4%, 16·4-24·8; p=0·1904) were similar between the cetuximab and cisplatin groups. INTERPRETATION: For patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma, radiotherapy plus cetuximab showed inferior overall survival and progression-free survival compared with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Radiotherapy plus cisplatin is the standard of care for eligible patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute USA, Eli Lilly, and The Oral Cancer Foundation.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cetuximab/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , Cetuximab/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/virology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To describe knowledge about human papillomavirus (HPV), HPV-related care behavior, and advocacy intent (e.g., vaccine recommendation and willingness to become an advocate for vaccination) and to investigate associations between knowledge, HPV-related care behavior, and advocacy intent among HPV-related cancer survivors. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was offered through Qualtrics to HPV-related cancer survivors who were either volunteers at a cancer center or patients of survivorship clinics. RESULTS: A total of 200 survivors responded. Only 33.2% of respondents reported knowing their cancer was HPV-related and 56.8% reported HPV vaccine is safe. Participants who knew that their cancer was caused by HPV were more likely to have vaccinated their children (p < .001). Also, participants who knew that the vaccine is safe were more willing to recommend the vaccine (p < .001), to be a peer mentor for others with HPV-related cancers (43.2% vs. 14.0%, p < .001), and to act as an advocate for increasing vaccination rates (44.1% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.01). Finally, survivors who were aware of the vaccine's effectiveness in decreasing precancerous lesions were more likely to recommend the vaccine (45.7% vs. 12.0%, p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Raising survivor awareness of the link between HPV and cancer and HPV vaccine safety may increase their willingness to serve as powerful opinion leaders and peer mentors to promote HPV vaccination. Providers may take the simple step of informing patients that their cancer is HPV-related and HPV vaccine is safe to increase the number of informed and empowered survivors.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Vaccination/psychology , Adult , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/immunology , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hypoparathyroidism occurs relatively frequently after thyroid surgery in children. However, few studies have reported risk factors. We aimed to identify risk factors for hypoparathyroidism that occurred after total thyroidectomy for proven or suspected malignancy in children. METHODS: Children (aged ≤ 18 years) who underwent total thyroidectomy for neoplasm or RET germline mutation at our institution between 1997 and 2018 were included. We retrospectively reviewed demographics, surgical indications, perioperative and follow-up laboratory results, pathologic results, and duration of calcium/calcitriol supplementation. Risk factors for hypoparathyroidism were identified by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 184 consecutive patients, 111 had undergone surgery for neoplasm; these diseases were primarily malignancies (106, 95.5%), predominantly papillary carcinoma (103, 92.8%). The remaining 73 patients had undergone early thyroidectomy for RET germline mutation. Among all patients, 67 (36.4%) had hypoparathyroidism: 61 transient and 6 permanent. In a multivariate analysis, central neck dissection (odds ratio 4.3, 95% confidence interval 2.0-9.1) and gross extrathyroidal extension (odds ratio 4.9, 95% confidence interval 2.0-12.1) predicted overall hypoparathyroidism; however, no significant factors were associated with permanent hypoparathyroidism. Most patients with permanent hypoparathyroidism (5 of 6) had undergone therapeutic central neck dissection. When central neck dissection was performed, younger children had a higher risk of overall hypoparathyroidism. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric total thyroidectomies, central neck dissection and gross extrathyroidal extension were major predictors for overall hypoparathyroidism. Surgeons performing thyroidectomy in such patients should be aware of the relatively high risk, preserve parathyroid tissue to the extent possible, and be conscientious regarding postoperative calcium monitoring and replacement.
Subject(s)
Hypoparathyroidism/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Thyroidectomy/adverse effects , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neck Dissection/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
Because lymphocyte telomere length (LTL) plays critical roles in the maintenance of genomic stability and integrity, LTL thus may influence the etiology and prognosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (SCCOP). However, given the association between LTL and risk of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated SCCOP and between LTL and tumor HPV status of SCCOP, we hypothesized that LTL is associated with SCCOP prognosis, particularly in HPV-positive patients after definitive radiotherapy. LTL and tumor HPV type 16 (HPV16) status were determined in 564 incident SCCOP patients before radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Both univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to estimate the association between LTL and prognosis. Eighty-five percent patients had HPV16-positive tumors. Patients with shorter telomeres had significantly better overall, disease-specific and disease-free survival than did those with longer telomeres (log-rank P < 0.001). Moreover, patients with shorter telomeres had significantly lower risk of death overall [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.1-0.4], death due to SCCOP (HR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.1-0.4) and SCCOP recurrence (HR = 0.3; 95% CI = 0.2-0.5) after adjusting for other important prognostic confounders. Finally, we found more pronounced effects of LTL on survival in HPV16-positive SCCOP patients after stratified analysis according to tumor HPV status. These findings indicate that LTL plays a significant role in the survival of patients with SCCOP, especially HPV16-positive patients who undergo definitive radiotherapy. Therefore, pretreatment LTL may be an independent prognostic biomarker for HPV16-positive SCCOP. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.
Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Lymphocytes/ultrastructure , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/radiotherapy , Telomere , Tumor Virus Infections/radiotherapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/genetics , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/genetics , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/virology , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Virus Infections/virologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to characterize the incidence, pattern, and impact on oncologic outcomes of retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) involvement in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS: Data regarding patients with HPV-associated OPC who were treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center with intensity-modulated radiotherapy from 2004 through 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. RPLN status was determined by reviewing pretreatment imaging and/or reports. Outcomes analysis was restricted to patients with lymph node-positive (+) disease. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Bayesian information criterion assessed model performance changes with the addition of RPLN status to current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging. Competing risk analysis compared modes of disease recurrence. RESULTS: The incidence of radiographic RPLN involvement was 9% (73 of 796 patients) and was found to vary by primary tumor site. The 5-year rates of freedom from distant metastases (FDM) and overall survival were lower in patients with RPLN(+) status compared with those with RPLN-negative (-) status (84% vs 93% [P = .0327] and 74% vs 87% [P = .0078], respectively). RPLN(+) status was not found to be associated with outcomes on multivariate analysis. Bayesian information criterion analysis demonstrated that current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging was not improved with the inclusion of RPLN. Locoregional and distant disease recurrence probabilities for those patients with RPLN(+) status were 8% and 13%, respectively, compared with 10% and 6%, respectively, for those with RPLN(-) status. RPLN(+) status portended worse 5-year FDM in the low-risk subgroup (smoking history of <10 pack-years) and among patients who received concurrent chemotherapy but not induction chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: RPLN(+) status was associated with worse overall survival and FDM on univariate but not multivariate analysis. In subgroup analyses, RPLN(+) status was associated with poorer FDM in both patients with a smoking history of <10 pack-years and those who received concurrent chemotherapy, suggesting that RPLN(+) status could be considered an exclusion criteria in treatment deintensification efforts seeking to omit chemotherapy.