ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer to become the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. There has been a dramatic increase in the use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. However, struggle in making decisions regarding breast reconstruction has existed. Thus, decision aid (DA) is necessary to be conducted, and further studies are needed to promote better decision aid. This review discussed how DAs can be used to help women make decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Additionally, the review was the first to compare different DA formats to determine which one is most effective. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies published before October 2022 in PubMed and Embase using the medical subject headings "breast reconstruction" and "decision aid." Demographic data as well as decision, outcomes and instruments used for assessment were also collected. Risk of bias was measured by the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. RESULTS: A network meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with a total of 1401 patients wereincluded. 90.9% participants presented usable results for evaluation of decisional conflict, and web-based DA (-0.3, 95% CI -0.56 to -0.05) showed significant improvement. 50.3% participants provided results of decisional regret, and no subgroups showed significant reduction. 60.3% participants contributed to results for knowledge, and web-based DA (0.61, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.21) showed the most positive effect. 44.5% participants were included for evaluation of satisfaction, and web-based DA (0.44, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.72) revealed significant increase. CONCLUSION: The review concluded that web-based decision aids are the favorable format of decision aid.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patients often experience pain and psychological distress when undergoing elective surgeries. Mindfulness-based interventions have been proposed as potential strategies to address these challenges. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative mindfulness-based interventions on several outcomes for patients undergoing elective surgery, including preoperative anxiety/depression, postoperative anxiety/depression, postoperative pain, and quality of life (QOL). METHODS: This meta-analysis encompassed randomized controlled trials published in the database PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase to August 2023. Mindfulness-based interventions were compared to control groups, who received treatment as usual (TAU). The RevMan software was employed to assess each outcome by using standardized mean difference based on patient-reported data. Subgroup analyses were further performed according to different categories of surgical types. RESULTS: Eight RCTs with a total of 685 patients were identified. This meta-analysis demonstrated significant difference in preoperative anxiety (SMD:-0.36, 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.11, p = .006) and postoperative pain immediately (SMD:-0.65,95% CI: -1.09 to -0.20, p = .004), 2-3 days (SMD:-0.40, 95% CI:-0.78 to -0.02, p = .04),at 14 days (SMD:-0.48,95% CI: -0.85 to -0.12, p = .009) and 28 days (SMD:-0.89,95% CI: -1.55 to -0.23, p = .008) postoperatively. However, there were no differences between postoperative anxiety, preoperative/postoperative depression, and QOL. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest preoperative mindfulness-based interventions can effectively manage preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in patients scheduled for elective surgery. Further research is warranted to explore the different timing and types of mindfulness-based intervention.