An inferior vena cava-priority approach in laparoscopic isolated hepatic caudate lobectomy.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic isolated caudate lobectomy is still a challenging operation for surgeons. The access route of the operation plays a vital role during laparoscopic caudate lobectomy. There are few references regarding this technique. Here, we introduce a preferred inferior vena cava (IVC) approach in laparoscopic caudate lobectomy. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with caudate hepatic tumours between June 2016 and December 2021 were included in this study. All of them received laparoscopic caudate lobectomy involving an IVC priority approach. The IVC priority approach refers to prioritizing the dissection of the IVC from the liver parenchyma before proceeding with the conventional left or right approach. It emphasizes the importance of the IVC dissection during process. Clinical data, intraoperative parameters and postoperative results were evaluated. Sixteen patients were performed pure IVC priority approach, while 5 patients underwent a combined approach. We subsequently compared the intraoperative and postoperative between the two groups. RESULTS: All 21 patients were treated with laparoscopic technology. The operative time was 190.95 ± 92.65 min. The average estimated blood loss was 251.43 ± 247.45 ml, and four patients needed blood transfusions during the perioperative period. The average duration of hospital stay was 8.43 ± 2.64 (range from 6.0 to 16.0) days. Patients who underwent the pure inferior vena cava (IVC) approach required a shorter hepatic pedicle clamping time (26 vs. 55 min, respectively; P < 0.001) and operation time (150 vs. 380 min, respectively; P = 0.002) than those who underwent the combined approach. Hospitalization (7.0 vs. 9.0 days, respectively; P = 0.006) was shorter in the pure IVC group than in the combined group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic caudate lobectomy with an IVC priority approach is safe and feasible for patients with caudate hepatic tumours.

A new scoring system for predicting the outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma patients without microvascular invasion-a large-scale multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of HCC patients without MVI (so called M0) is highly heterogeneous and the need for adjuvant therapy is still controversial. METHODS: Patients with HCC with M0 who underwent liver resection (LR) or liver transplantation (LT) as an initial therapy were included. The Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH)-M0 score was developed from a retrospective cohort to form the training cohort. The classification which was developed using multivariate cox regression analysis was externally validated. RESULTS: The score was developed using the following factors: α-fetoprotein level, tumour diameter, liver cirrhosis, total bilirubin, albumin and aspartate aminotransferase. The score differentiated two groups of M0 patients (≤3, >3 points) with distinct long-term prognoses outcomes (median overall survival (OS), 98.0 vs. 46.0 months; p < 0.001). The predictive accuracy of the score was greater than the other commonly used staging systems for HCC. And for M0 patients with a higher score underwent LR. Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was effective to prolong OS. CONCLUSIONS: The EHBH M0 scoring system was more accurate in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients with M0 after LR or LT. Adjuvant therapy is recommended for HCC patients who have a higher score.

Impact of Bile Duct Tumor Thrombus on the Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatectomy with tumor thrombectomy is the preferred treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with bile duct tumor thrombus (BDTT); however, the impact of BDTT on their prognosis is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the long-term surgical outcomes of HCC patients with BDTT. METHODS: The data of HCC patients with and without BDTT who underwent hepatectomy were retrospectively reviewed and the long-term outcomes were compared. For propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. RESULTS: Before PSM, HCC patients with BDTT had more advanced tumor stages and adverse clinicopathological features. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly higher in the non-BDTT group before PSM (RFS, p < 0.001; OS, p < 0.001), while after PSM, the BDTT group had significantly poorer RFS (p = 0.025). There was no difference in OS between the groups (p = 0.588). Subgroup analysis showed that RFS and OS in AJCC stage I-II patients were significantly poorer in the BDTT group; no differences were found in the AJCC stage III group before or after PSM. When the presence of BDTT was recommended to increase the AJCC staging system by one stage in AJCC stage I-II patients, the predictive ability for RFS and OS was higher. CONCLUSIONS: BDTT was associated with significantly poorer long-term surgical outcomes in AJCC stage I-II patients. A modified AJCC staging system including BDTT status in stage I-II might have a better prognostic ability.

Postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization improves outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with bile duct tumor thrombus: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the primary treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct tumor thrombus (BDTT). This study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant TACE (PA-TACE) in patients with HCC and BDTT. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent surgery for HCC with BDTT at two medical centers were retrospectively analyzed. The survival outcomes of patients who were treated by hepatic resection followed by PA-TACE were compared with those of patients who underwent surgery alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed with a 1:1 ratio. RESULTS: Of the 308 consecutively enrolled HCC patients with BDTT who underwent surgical resection, 134 underwent PA-TACE whereas 174 underwent surgery alone. From the initial cohort, PSM matched 106 pairs of patients. The OS and DFS rates were significantly better for the PA-TACE group than the surgery alone group (for OS: before PSM, P = 0.026; after PSM, P = 0.039; for DFS: before PSM, P = 0.010; after PSM, P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: PA-TACE was associated with better survival outcomes than surgery alone for patients with HCC and BDTT. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to validate the beneficial effect of PA-TACE on HCC patients associated with BDTT.

Recurrence hazard rate in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and bile duct tumor thrombus: a multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) bile duct tumor thrombus (BDTT) have a high rate of postoperative recurrence. We aimed to describe the patterns and kinetics of recurrence in BDTT patients and provide management options accordingly. METHODS: This retrospective study included 311 HCC patients with BDTT who underwent surgery from 2009 to 2017 at five centers in China. The hazard rate of recurrence was calculated using the hazard function. RESULTS: The hazard rate of intrahepatic recurrence was higher than that of extrahepatic recurrence (0.0588 vs. 0.0301), and both showed a decreasing trend, and the intrahepatic recurrence and extrahepatic recurrence risk decreased to a lower level after 40 and 20 months, respectively. Patients who underwent anatomic resection had a consistently lower hazard rate of recurrence than patients who underwent nonanatomic resection, whereas patients who received postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) mainly had a lower hazard rate of recurrence in the first year than patients who did not. CONCLUSION: The follow-up of BDTT patients should be at least 40 months because of its high rate of recurrence, in parallel with the need for vigilance for extrahepatic recurrence within 20 months. Anatomic hepatectomy and adjuvant TACE are recommended to improve BDTT patient outcomes.

Long-Term Outcomes of Anatomic Versus Nonanatomic Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Bile Duct Tumor Thrombus: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic resection (AR) of the liver is generally recommended in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, the benefits of AR and nonanatomic resection (NAR) in HCC patients with bile duct tumor thrombus (BDTT) are unknown. This study aimed to compare long-term outcomes of AR and NAR in HCC patients with BDTT after curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 175 consecutive HCC patients with BDTT after curative resection between April 2009 and December 2017 were included. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the influence of potential confounders. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the cohorts. RESULTS: After PSM, 120 patients were analyzed. The AR group had better RFS than the NAR group (P = 0.010). Even though there was no statistically significant difference in OS (P = 0.140, power = 0.33), the 3- and 5-year OS rates in the AR group (52.4% and 44.2%, respectively) were obviously higher than those in the NAR group (35.4% and 30.4%, respectively). When patients were further stratified according to tumor size, better RFS and OS were observed in patients with small (≤ 5 cm) tumors after AR (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified AR (P = 0.024) as an independent favorable prognostic factor for RFS in HCC patients with BDTT. CONCLUSIONS: AR is recommended for HCC patients with BDTT, especially in patients with small (≤ 5 cm) tumors.

A nomogram based on combining systemic and hepatic inflammation markers for predicting microscopic bile duct tumour thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Bile duct invasion is a relatively rare event and is not well characterised in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It remains very difficult to diagnose HCC with bile duct tumour thrombus (BDTT) before surgery. Increasing evidence has revealed that inflammation plays a critical role in tumorigenesis. This study aimed to develop nomograms based on systemic and hepatic inflammation markers to predict microscopic BDTT (micro-BDTT) before surgery in HCC. METHODS: A total of 723 HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy as initial therapy between January 2012 and June 2020 were included in the study. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for micro-BDTT. The nomograms were constructed using significant predictors, including α-fetoprotein (AFP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), direct bilirubin (DB), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and γ-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The prediction accuracies of the nomograms were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: AFP, ALP, DB, PNI, and γ-GT/ALT were independent risk factors for predicting micro-BDTT (P = 0.036, P = 0.004, P = 0.013, P = 0.012, and P = 0.006, respectively), which were assembled into the nomograms. The area under the ROC curve of the nomograms combining PNI and γ-GT/ALT for predicting micro-BDTT was 0.804 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.730-0.878). The sensitivity and specificity values when used in predicting micro-BDTT before surgery were 0.739 (95% CI: 0.612-0.866) and 0.781 (95% CI: 0.750-0.813), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram based on combining systemic and hepatic inflammation markers is suitable for predicting micro-BDTT before surgery in HCC patients, leading to a rational therapeutic choice for HCC.

Postoperative Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Improves Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Hepatic Vein Invasion: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vascular invasion is a major determinant of survival outcomes after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) in patients with HCC with hepatic vein tumor thrombus (HVTT). METHODS: Data from patients who underwent LR for HCC with HVTT at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The survival outcomes for patients who underwent PA-TACE after LR were compared with those who underwent LR alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to match patients in a ratio of 1:1. RESULTS: All included 319 patients who underwent LR for HCC with HVTT, 134 underwent LR alone (the LR group), and 185 patients underwent in adjuvant TACE (the PA-TACE group). PSM matched 107 patients in two groups. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly better for patients in the PA-TACE group than the LR group (for OS: before PSM, P < 0.001; after PSM, P = 0.004; for RFS: before PSM, P < 0.001; after PSM, P = 0.013), respectively. On subgroup analysis, equivalent acceptable results were obtained in patients with peripheral HVTT (pHVTT) and major HVTT (mHVTT). However, PA-TACE resulted in no survival benefits for patients when the HVTT had extended to the inferior vena cava (IVCTT). CONCLUSIONS: PA-TACE was associated with significantly better survival outcomes than LR alone for patients with HCC and HVTT (pHVTT and mHVTT). There was no survival benefits in patients whose HVTT had extended to form IVCTT.

Liver resection versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic vein or inferior vena cava tumor thrombus: A propensity score matching analysis.

AIM: Because of the rarity of hepatic vein tumor thrombus (HVTT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), little is known about HVTT. Thus, the survival benefit of liver resection (LR) versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for HCC patients with HVTT or inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVCTT) remains controversial. We aimed to explore the survival benefits of LR versus TACE for the treatment of these patients. METHODS: From 2012 to 2016, a total of 276 patients with HVTT or IVCTT who underwent liver resection or TACE were enrolled in this study. Patients in the LR group were matched at a 1:1 ratio with patients treated with TACE as an initial treatment (TACE group). Clinical characteristics, overall survival, and disease-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The median survival time in the LR group was 4.7 months longer than that in the TACE group before PSM (19.4 vs. 14.7 months, P = 0.006) and 6.9 months longer than that in the TACE group after PSM (20.9 vs. 14.0 months, P = 0.019). The median disease-free survival time in the LR group was 3.2 months longer than that in the TACE group before PSM (12.3 vs. 9.1 months, P = 0.038) and 5.8 months longer than that in the TACE group after PSM (13.0 vs. 7.2 months, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Liver resection provides a good prognosis for HCC patients with HVTT or IVCTT compared with patients undergoing TACE, and coexistence with portal vein tumor thrombus is the most important factor related to survival.

Effect of microvascular invasion on the postoperative long-term prognosis of solitary small HCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of microvascular invasion (MVI) on the postoperative long-term prognosis of solitary small hepatocellular carcinoma remains controversial. We compared the long-term outcomes of MVI-positive and MVI-negative groups of patients with solitary small hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, VIP, Wan Fang, and Sino Med databases were systematically searched to compare the long-term outcomes of MVI-positive and MVI-negative groups of patients with solitary small hepatocellular carcinoma from inception to November 1, 2018. The study outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), were extracted independently by two authors. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 3033 patients were evaluated. A meta-analysis of all 14 studies suggested that the OS of the MVI-positive group was significantly worse than that of the MVI-negative group (HR = 2.39, 95% CI = 2.02-2.84, I2 = 22.8%; P < 0.001). Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis of DFS, and MVI showed a worse prognosis (HR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.59-2.02, I2 = 25.3%; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that MVI still showed a negative effect on the long-term OS and DFS of patients with solitary small HCC measuring up to 2 cm, 3 cm, or 5 cm. CONCLUSION: Microvascular invasion was a risk factor for poorer prognosis for solitary small hepatocellular carcinoma.