Primary healthcare needs and service utilisation of people with disability: a data linkage protocol.

INTRODUCTION: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in the early management and treatment of the comorbidities and complications experienced by people with disability. However, GPs experience multiple constraints, including limited time and disability-related expertise. Knowledge gaps around the health needs of people with disability as well as the frequency and extent of their engagement with GPs mean evidence to inform practice is limited. Using a linked dataset, this project aims to enhance the knowledge of the GP workforce by describing the health needs of people with disability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This project is a retrospective cohort study using general practice health records from the eastern Melbourne region in Victoria, Australia. The research uses Eastern Melbourne Primary Health Network (EMPHN)-owned de-identified primary care data from Outcome Health's POpulation Level Analysis and Reporting Tool (POLAR). The EMPHN POLAR GP health records have been linked with National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) data. Data analysis will involve comparisons across disability groups and the rest of the population to explore utilisation (eg, frequency of visits), clinical and preventative care (eg, cancer screening, blood pressure readings) and health needs (eg, health conditions, medications). Initial analyses will focus on NDIS participants as a whole and NDIS participants whose condition is either an acquired brain injury, stroke, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis or cerebral palsy, as classified by the NDIS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Eastern Health Human Research Ethics Committee (E20/001/58261), and approval for the general collection, storage and transfer of data was from the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners National Research Ethics and Evaluation Committee (protocol ID: 17-088). Dissemination mechanisms will include the engagement of stakeholders through reference groups and steering committees, as well as the production of research translation resources in parallel with peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Responding to COVID-19 with real-time general practice data in Australia.

INTRODUCTION: As SARS-CoV-2 spread around the world, Australia was no exception. Part of the Australian response was a robust primary care approach, involving changes to care models (including telehealth) and the widespread use of data to inform the changes. This paper outlines how a large primary care database responded to provide real-time data to inform policy and practice. Simply extracting the data is not sufficient. Understanding the data is. The POpulation Level Analysis and Reporting (POLAR) program is designed to use GP data for multiple objectives and is built on a pre-existing engagement framework established over a fifteen-year period. Initially developed to provide QA activities for general practices and population level data for General Practice support organisations, the POLAR platform has demonstrated the critical ability to design and deploy real-time data analytics solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic for a variety of stakeholders including state and federal government agencies. METHODS: The system extracts and processes data from over 1,300 general practices daily. Data is de-identified at the point of collection and encrypted before transfer. Data cleaning for analysis uses a variety of techniques, including Natural Language Processing and coding of free text information. The curated dataset is then distilled into several analytic solutions designed to address specific areas of investigation of interest to various stakeholders. One such analytic solution was a model we created that used multiple data inputs to rank patient geographic areas by the likelihood of a COVID-19 outbreak. The model utilised pathology ordering, COVID-19 related diagnoses, indication of COVID-19 related concern (via progress notes) and also incorporated state based actual confirmed case figures. RESULTS: Using the methods described, we were able to deliver real-time data feeds to practices, Primary Health Networks (PHN) and other agencies. In addition, we developed a COVID-19 geographic risk stratification based on local government areas (LGAs) to pro-actively inform the primary care response. Providing PHNs with a list of geographic priority hotspots allowed for better targeting and response of Personal Protective Equipment allocation and pop-up clinic placement. CONCLUSIONS: The program summarised here demonstrates the ability of a well-designed system underpinned by accurate and reliable data, to respond in real-time to a rapidly evolving public health emergency in a way which supports and enhances the health system response.