Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Eur J Haematol ; 106(4): 546-554, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33471414

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Novel drugs and drug combinations have improved outcomes for multiple myeloma patients. However, subgroups of patients still have a poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In an attempt to identify how the novel drugs affect the outcome in standard-risk and high-risk patients, respectively, we have investigated 715 multiple myeloma (MM) patients who have undergone high dose treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation at our center during 1995 - 2020. Outcomes during three time periods, 1995-1999 (period I), 2000-2009 (period II), and 2010-2020 (period III), were compared separately for standard-risk and high-risk patients. Risk stratification was based on chromosome analysis for periods II and III. RESULTS: The whole cohort of patients showed significantly improved OS with time during the three periods being at a median of 5.8, 7.0, and 10.0 years, respectively. There is also a weak tendency for improved PFS, that is, a median of 2.4, 2.6, and 2.9 years, respectively, during the same periods. However, the separate analysis of standard-risk and high-risk patients showed that the overall improvement with time was due to improved standard-risk patients (median OS 8.4 years for the period I and not reached for period II and III). In contrast, no significant improvement was seen in high-risk patients. For patients with del17p, PFS was even worse during period III as compared to period II (median 1.6 vs 3.2 years respectively). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the dramatic improvement in outcome for MM patients during the last 20 years only applies for standard-risk patients, while high-risk MM patients still are doing poorly, indicating that the novel drugs developed during this time are preferentially effective in standard-risk patients. New treatment modalities like CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cells, and/or bispecific antibodies should be tried in clinical studies early in the course of the disease, especially in patients with high-risk cytogenetics.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Adult , Aged , Chromosome Aberrations , Combined Modality Therapy , Cytogenetic Analysis , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Prognosis , Retreatment , Survival Analysis , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eur J Haematol ; 105(6): 751-754, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32745304

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has emerged as a global pandemic. Cancer patients have been reported to be at higher risk for adverse outcome of COVID-19. Studies are ongoing to decipher the risk factors and risk groups among cancer patients as well as strategies to refine treatment approaches. Here, we report eight patients with multiple myeloma that underwent immunomodulatory therapies with daratumumab or lenalidomide-based combination treatments and one patient with smoldering multiple myeloma, all of which presented with symptomatic COVID-19. We report that patients that succumbed to COVID-19 presented with either progressive tumor disease under daratumumab treatment or were in remission under lenalidomide-dexamethasone treatment.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Lenalidomide/adverse effects , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Thalidomide/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Immunomodulation , Lenalidomide/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/immunology , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Prognosis , Remission Induction , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Analysis , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
3.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 194(11): 975-984, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29855667

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To ascertain the optimal radiation technique and radiation position for the neoadjuvant radiotherapy of patients with rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plans with similar dose objectives were generated for 20 selected patients. Dosimetric comparison was performed between prone and supine positions and between different radiation techniques. Dosimetric indices for the target volume and organs at risk (OAR) as well as normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of late small bowel toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: The helical tomotherapy (HT) in the prone position provided the optimal dose homogeneity in the target volume with the value of 0. Superior conformity values were obtained for Sliding Window (SW), Rapid Arc (RA) and HT compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) techniques. All of the techniques showed dose reduction to OAR in the high-dose area in prone position versus supine position. Pairwise comparison revealed significantly higher small bowel protection by RA in the prone position in the high-dose area (V75, V45Gy). Similarly, superior bladder sparing was found for 3D-CRT in the prone position at higher doses (V50, V75). More healthy tissue in the radiation volume was involved by application of 3D-CRT with no relevant difference between positions. The mean values of NTCP for the small bowel did not show clinically meaningful variation between the techniques. CONCLUSION: All techniques provided superior sparing of OAR in the prone position. At higher radiation doses, treatment in prone position resulted in significant OAR protection, especially concerning small bowel sparing by RA and bladder sparing by 3D CRT.


Subject(s)
Patient Care Planning , Prone Position , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Conformal , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Supine Position , Female , Humans , Intestine, Small/radiation effects , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiotherapy Dosage , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Factors , Urinary Bladder/radiation effects
4.
Methods Cell Biol ; 178: 43-61, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516528

ABSTRACT

Understanding the anti-tumor activity of immune cells and testing cancer immunotherapies requires conditions that are as life-like as possible. The tumor microenvironment (TME) describes a complex sum of cellular and acellular actors that influence both immune cells and tumor cells as well as their interplay. Yet in development phases of new immunotherapies, the screening of drugs and adoptive cell products benefits from reproducible and controlled conditions. Two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures cannot simultaneously meet these two challenges therefore lacking considerably predictive power owing to their artificial nature. Various 3D tumor models have therefore been implemented to mimic the architecture and intrinsic heterogeneity of a microtumor. This protocol provides an easy-to-follow, time-efficient, material-limited method for live cell killing and infiltration of single tumor spheroids. It uses multicellular tumor spheroids grown scaffold-free and allows co-culture with immune cells. This protocol is optimized for natural killer (NK) cell functionality assays. However, it can be transferred to other immune cells, in particular cytotoxic T cells. This assay can be analysed using life cell imaging (here with the IncuCyte S3 system) and/or flow cytometry.


Subject(s)
Microscopy , Neoplasms , Humans , Flow Cytometry , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Killer Cells, Natural/pathology , Coculture Techniques , Spheroids, Cellular , Tumor Microenvironment
5.
Front Immunol ; 9: 2159, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30319622

ABSTRACT

Chemokines govern leukocyte migration by attracting cells that express their cognate ligands. Many cancer types show altered chemokine secretion profiles, favoring the recruitment of pro-tumorigenic immune cells and preventing the accumulation of anti-tumorigenic effector cells. This can ultimately result in cancer immune evasion. The manipulation of chemokine and chemokine-receptor signaling can reshape the immunological phenotypes within the tumor microenvironment in order to increase the therapeutic efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Here we discuss the three chemokine-chemokine receptor axes, CXCR1/2-CXCL1-3/5-8, CXCR3-CXCL9/10/11, and CXCR4-CXCL12 and their role on pro-tumorigenic immune cells and anti-tumorigenic effector cells in solid tumors. In particular, we summarize current strategies to target these axes and discuss their potential use in treatment approaches.


Subject(s)
Chemokines, CXC/metabolism , Immunity, Cellular , Neoplasms/immunology , Receptors, CXCR/metabolism , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Carcinogenesis/immunology , Chemokines, CXC/immunology , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Lymphocytes/immunology , Lymphocytes/metabolism , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/metabolism , Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells/immunology , Neoplasm Invasiveness/immunology , Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms/therapy , Receptors, CXCR/immunology , Tumor Escape/immunology
6.
Matrix Biol ; 67: 47-62, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29360499

ABSTRACT

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) functions are regulated by a specialized microenvironment in the bone marrow - the hematopoietic stem cell niche - of which the extracellular matrix (ECM) is an integral component. We describe here the localization of ECM molecules, in particular the laminin α4, α3 and α5 containing isoforms in the bone marrow. Laminin 421 (composed of laminin α4, ß2, γ1 chains) is identified as a major component of the bone marrow ECM, occurring abundantly surrounding venous sinuses and in a specialized reticular fiber network of the intersinusoidal spaces of murine bone marrow (BM) in close association with HSPC. Bone marrow from Lama4-/- mice is significantly less efficient in reconstituting the hematopoietic system of irradiated wildtype (WT) recipients in competitive bone marrow transplantation assays and shows reduced colony formation in vitro. This is partially due to retention of Lin-c-kit+Sca-1+CD48- long-term and short-term hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSC/ST-HSC) in the G0 phase of the cell cycle in Lama4-/- bone marrow and hence a more quiescent phenotype. In addition, the extravasation of WT BM cells into Lama4-/- bone marrow is impaired, influencing the recirculation of HSPC. Our data suggest that these effects are mediated by a compensatory expression of laminin α5 containing isoforms (laminin 521/522) in Lama4-/- bone marrow. Collectively, these intrinsic and extrinsic effects lead to reduced HSPC numbers in Lama4-/- bone marrow and reduced hematopoietic potential.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow/metabolism , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Laminin/metabolism , Animals , Cell Cycle , Cell Movement , Extracellular Matrix/metabolism , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/metabolism , Laminin/genetics , Mice , Stem Cell Niche
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL