Diagnostic Value of Adding Magnifying Chromoendoscopy to Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging Endoscopy for Colorectal Polyps.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study examined the additional value of magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) on magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy (M-NBI) in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps. METHODS: A multicenter prospective study was conducted at 9 facilities in Japan and Germany. Patients with colorectal polyps scheduled for resection were included. Optical diagnosis was performed by M-NBI first, followed by MCE. Both diagnoses were made in real time. MCE was performed on all type 2B lesions classified according to the Japan NBI Expert Team classification and other lesions at the discretion of endoscopists. The diagnostic accuracy and confidence of M-NBI and MCE for colorectal cancer (CRC) with deep invasion (≥T1b) were compared on the basis of histologic findings after resection. RESULTS: In total, 1173 lesions were included between February 2018 and December 2020, with 654 (5 hyperplastic polyp/sessile serrated lesion, 162 low-grade dysplasia, 403 high-grade dysplasia, 97 T1 CRCs, and 32 ≥T2 CRCs) examined using MCE after M-NBI. In the diagnostic accuracy for predicting CRC with deep invasion, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for M-NBI were 63.1%, 94.2%, 61.6%, 94.5%, and 90.2%, respectively, and for MCE they were 77.4%, 93.2%, 62.5%, 96.5%, and 91.1%, respectively. The sensitivity was significantly higher in MCE (P < .001). However, these additional values were limited to lesions with low confidence in M-NBI or the ones diagnosed as ≥T1b CRC by M-NBI. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter prospective study, we demonstrated the additional value of MCE on M-NBI. We suggest that additional MCE be recommended for lesions with low confidence or the ones diagnosed as ≥T1b CRC. Trials registry number: UMIN000031129.

Long-term Outcomes After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Trial From Japan.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To determine the long-term outcomes after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), we conducted a large, multicenter, prospective cohort trial with a 5-year observation period. METHODS: Between February 2013 and January 2015, we consecutively enrolled 1740 patients with 1814 colorectal epithelial neoplasms ≥20 mm who underwent ESD. Patients with noncurative resection (non-CR) lesions underwent additional radical surgery, as needed. After the initial treatment, intensive 5-year follow-up with planned multiple colonoscopies was conducted to identify metastatic and/or local recurrences. Primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-specific survival, and intestinal preservation rates. The rates of local recurrence and metachronous invasive cancer were evaluated as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, and intestinal preservation rates were 93.6%, 99.6%, and 88.6%, respectively. Patients with CR lesions had no metastatic occurrence, and patients with non-CR lesions had 4 metastatic occurrences. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that overall survival and disease-specific survival rates were significantly higher in patients with CR lesions than in those with non-CR lesions (P > .001 and P = .009, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in only 8 lesions (0.5%), which were successfully resected by subsequent endoscopic treatment. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that piecemeal resection (hazard ratio, 8.19; 95% CI, 1.47-45.7; P = .02) and margin-positive resection (hazard ratio, 8.06; 95% CI, 1.76-37.0; P = .007) were significant independent predictors of local recurrence after colorectal ESD. Fifteen metachronous invasive cancers (1.0%) were identified during surveillance colonoscopy, most of which required surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: A favorable long-term prognosis indicates that ESD can be the standard treatment for large colorectal epithelial neoplasms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000010136.

Short-term and long-term outcomes of submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal tumors after endoscopic resection: Analysis of a multicenter prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: We previously demonstrated that a favorable long-term prognosis indicated that endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) could be the standard treatment for large colorectal epithelial neoplasms, but the usefulness of ESD for local residual or recurrent tumors with submucosal fibrosis has not been fully demonstrated. The aim of the present study was to assess the usefulness of ESD for local residual or recurrent colorectal tumors. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide multicenter prospective study to evaluate the outcomes of ESD for colorectal tumors. In this post hoc analysis, a total of 54 local residual or recurrent colorectal tumors in 54 patients were included, and we analyzed the short-term and long-term outcomes of ESD for these lesions. RESULTS: The median size of the lesions was 16.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 11-25) mm. ESD was completed in 53 cases (98.1%) with a median procedure time of 65.0 min, but it was discontinued in one case because of submucosal cancer invasion. En bloc resection was achieved in 52 cases (96.3%), whereas R0 resection was achieved in 45 cases (83.3%). Intraoperative perforation was observed in four cases (7.4%) and delayed perforation in one (1.9%), but all cases could be managed conservatively. Delayed bleeding was not observed. There were no significant differences in short-term outcomes between the rectal and colonic lesions. There was no recurrence of the tumor during the median follow-up period of 60 (IQR 50-64) months. CONCLUSION: An analysis of our multicenter prospective study suggests that ESD is an effective salvage management for local residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.

Clinical outcome of the delineation-without-negative-biopsy strategy in magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy for identifying the extent of differentiated-type early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The histologic evaluation of biopsy samples collected from the surrounding mucosa has conventionally been used to determine the horizontal extent of early gastric cancer. Recently, optical delineation using magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) has been considered an alternative method to histologic evaluation. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome and efficacy of this method in identifying cancer margins. METHODS: Overall, 921 patients with 1018 differentiated-type early gastric tumors who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were examined. Before ESD, the lesions were classified based on whether they have clear or unclear margins on magnifying IEE. When the lesions had clear margins, the marking dots were placed outside the margins without a negative biopsy. Successful delineation was defined as lesions with clear margins and accurate delineation based on histopathological examination. The primary outcome was the accuracy of optical delineation without a negative biopsy compared with histopathological diagnosis. Moreover, the clinicopathological factors associated with an unsuccessful delineation were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1018 lesions, 820 had a clear margin and 198 an unclear margin. Of 820 lesions with a clear margin, 817 and 3 had an accurate and inaccurate delineation, respectively, according to the histological examination. Accordingly, the accuracy rate of optical delineation was 99.6% (817/820). The significant independent factors associated with an unsuccessful delineation were absence of Helicobacter pylori infection after eradication, tumor size > 20 mm, and moderate differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Optical delineation may be an alternative method to histological evaluation in lesions with a clear margin on magnifying IEE.

Computer-aided diagnosis system using only white-light endoscopy for the prediction of invasion depth in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic treatment is recommended for low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and colorectal cancer (CRC) with submucosal (SM) invasion <1000 µm. However, diagnosis of invasion depth requires experience and is often difficult. This study developed and evaluated a novel computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to determine whether endoscopic treatment is appropriate for colorectal lesions using only white-light endoscopy (WLE). METHODS: We extracted 3442 images from 1035 consecutive colorectal lesions (105 LGDs, 377 HGDs, 107 CRCs with SM <1000 µm, 146 CRCs with SM ≥1000 µm, and 300 advanced CRCs). All images were WLE, nonmagnified, and nonstained. We developed a novel CAD system using 2751 images; the remaining 691 images were evaluated by the CAD system as a test set. The capability of the CAD system to distinguish endoscopically treatable lesions and untreatable lesions was assessed and compared with the results from 2 trainees and 2 experts. RESULTS: The CAD system distinguished endoscopically treatable from untreatable lesions with 96.7% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity, and 90.3% accuracy. These values were significantly higher than those from trainees (92.1%, 67.6%, and 84.9%; P < .01, <.01, and <.01, respectively) and were comparable with those from experts (96.5%, 72.5%, and 89.4%, respectively). Trainees assisted by the CAD system demonstrated a diagnostic capability comparable with that of experts. CONCLUSIONS: The CAD system had good diagnostic capability for making treatment decisions for colorectal lesions. This system may enable a more convenient and accurate diagnosis using only WLE.

Second-generation narrow-band imaging to detect colorectal adenomas: A prospective study including community hospitals.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It is unclear whether second-generation narrow-band imaging (NBI) improves colorectal adenoma detection in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the ability of NBI to detect adenomas in academic and community hospitals. METHODS: This observational, multicenter study was conducted in four academic and four community hospitals between July 2018 and April 2019. We enrolled patients aged ≥ 20 years who underwent colonoscopy for screening, polyp surveillance, or diagnostic workup. The primary endpoint was the adenoma detection rate (ADR) between NBI (NBI group) and white-light imaging colonoscopies (WLI group) after propensity score (PS) matching. RESULTS: Of 1831 patients analyzed before PS matching, the NBI and WLI groups included 742 and 1089 patients, respectively. After PS matching, 711 pairs from both groups were analyzed. ADR and the mean number of adenomas per patient did not differ significantly between the NBI and WLI groups (43.5% vs 44.4%, P = 0.71; 0.90 ± 1.38 vs 0.91 ± 1.40, P = 0.95, respectively). Academic hospitals showed higher ADR in the NBI group (60.5% vs 53.8%), whereas community hospitals showed higher ADR in the WLI group (35.8% vs 40.5%). In the NBI group, ADR was significantly higher among NBI-screening-experienced endoscopists than among NBI-screening-inexperienced endoscopists (63.2% vs 39.2%, P < 0.001). The mean number of flat and depressed lesions detected per patient was significantly higher with NBI than with WLI (0.62 ± 1.34 vs 0.44 ± 1.01, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation NBI could not surpass WLI in terms of ADR based on patient recruitment from both academic and community hospitals but improved the detection of easily overlooked flat and depressed lesions.

Efficacy of Endoscopic Resection and Selective Chemoradiotherapy for Stage I Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophagectomy is the standard treatment for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We conducted a single-arm prospective study to confirm the efficacy and safety of selective chemoradiotherapy (CRT) based on findings from endoscopic resection (ER). METHODS: We performed a prospective study of patients with T1b (SM1-2) N0M0 thoracic ESCC from December 2006 through July 2012; 176 patients underwent ER. Based on the findings from ER, patients received the following: no additional treatment for patients with pT1a tumors with a negative resection margin and no lymphovascular invasion (group A); prophylactic CRT with 41.4 Gy delivered to locoregional lymph nodes for patients with pT1b tumors with a negative resection margin or pT1a tumors with lymphovascular invasion (group B); or definitive CRT (50.4 Gy) with a 9-Gy boost to the primary site for patients with a positive vertical resection margin (group C). Chemotherapy comprised 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. The primary end point was 3-year overall survival in group B, and the key secondary end point was 3-year overall survival for all patients. If lower limits of 90% confidence intervals for the primary and key secondary end points exceeded the 80% threshold, the efficacy of combined ER and selective CRT was confirmed. RESULTS: Based on the results from pathology analysis, 74, 87, and 15 patients were categorized into groups A, B, and C, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rates were 90.7% for group B (90% confidence interval, 84.0%-94.7%) and 92.6% in all patients (90% confidence interval, 88.5%-95.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study of patients with T1b (SM1-2) N0M0 thoracic ESCC, we confirmed the efficacy of the combination of ER and selective CRT. Efficacy is comparable to that of surgery, and the combination of ER and selective CRT should be considered as a minimally invasive treatment option. UMIN-Clinical Trials Registry no.: UMIN000000553.

Comparison of endoscopic visibility and miss rate for early gastric cancers after Helicobacter pylori eradication with white-light imaging versus linked color imaging.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We aimed to investigate whether linked color imaging (LCI) improves endoscopic visibility of early gastric cancers (EGC) after Helicobacter pylori eradication, which are often difficult to detect, and reduces the miss rate when compared with white-light imaging (WLI). METHODS: The visibility study used two images, one each with WLI and LCI, from 84 consecutive EGC after H. pylori eradication. Endoscopic visibility was evaluated using a visibility score and color difference (CD) value. To analyze miss rates, we studied a library of recorded videos using both WLI and LCI for 70 other consecutive patients after H. pylori eradication, among whom 19 had EGC. Endoscopic screening was done using the same protocol to map the entire stomach. Six endoscopists reviewed the videos in a randomized order. Miss rates of EGC were compared among the modalities. RESULTS: Mean [(±standard deviation) visibility scores with LCI were significantly higher than those with WLI (3.19 ± 0.84 vs 2.52 ± 0.98, P < 0.001), as were mean CD values (26.3 ± 9.1 vs 13.6 ± 6.3, P < 0.001). Miss rates of the six endoscopists were significantly lower with LCI than with WLI (30.7% vs 64.9%, P < 0.001). Both expert and trainee endoscopists had significantly better results with LCI than with WLI. CONCLUSIONS: Linked color imaging significantly improved the visibility of EGC after H. pylori eradication compared with WLI using both subjective and objective criteria. Furthermore, LCI significantly reduced miss rates of these lesions compared with WLI.

Magnified endoscopic observation of small depressed gastric lesions using linked color imaging with indigo carmine dye.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Magnifying linked color imaging with indigo carmine dye (M-Chromo-LCI) enables sterically enhanced and color image-magnified observation of the superficial gastric mucosa. This study investigated the usefulness of M-Chromo-LCI for the differential diagnosis of gastric lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 consecutive small depressed lesions were examined with conventional white-light imaging (C-WLI), magnifying blue-laser imaging (M-BLI), and M-Chromo-LCI. Endoscopic images were reviewed by three experts and three non-experts. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement were compared among the modalities. RESULTS: For experts, M-BLI showed a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than C-WLI (82.7 % vs. 67.0 %; P < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of M-Chromo-LCI was not different from M-BLI (87.7 % vs. 82.7 %; P = 0.31). For non-experts, M-BLI showed a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than C-WLI (69.3 % vs. 52.3 %; P < 0.001). M-Chromo-LCI additionally showed a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than M-BLI (79.7 % vs. 69.3 %; P = 0.005). M-Chromo-LCI had the highest interobserver agreement for each group. CONCLUSIONS: M-Chromo-LCI is expected to become a useful modality for the accurate diagnosis of gastric lesions.

Usefulness of close observation with non-magnified blue laser imaging for determining cold polypectomy indications.

PURPOSE: To examine the usefulness of non-magnified close observation with blue laser imaging (BLI) using a colonoscope with close observation capability in determining indications for cold polypectomy. METHODS: We conducted an image evaluation study on 100 consecutive colorectal lesions of 10 mm or less which were observed endoscopically without magnification using BLI mode prior to treatment. Two experts and two non-experts reviewed the images using the Japan NBI expert team (JNET) classification and the diagnostic accuracy was analyzed. RESULTS: The final pathological diagnoses of the 100 lesions were hyperplastic/sessile serrated polyp (HP/SSP), low grade dysplasia (LGD), high grade dysplasia (HGD) and deep submucosal invasive cancer (dSM), respectively, in 12, 79, 9 and 0 lesions. When JNET classification type 1 corresponds to HP/SSP; 2A to LGD; 2B to HGD; and 3 to dSM; the overall diagnostic accuracy was 84.3%. Accuracy was 90.5% for experts and 78.0% for non-experts. High confidence rate was 67.5% for experts and 48.0% for non-experts. In diagnostic accuracy for HGD, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were, respectively, 77.8%, 98.9%, 87.5% and 97.8% for experts; and 66.6%, 92.3%, 46.2% and 96.6% for non-experts. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of unmagnified close observation with BLI using a colonoscope with close observation capability is similar to that reported for magnifying endoscopy and is useful in predicting the histological diagnosis of colorectal polyps of 10 mm or less although the effectiveness may be limited for non-experts. This modality is a potentially useful tool in deciding indications for cold polypectomy.

Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for cecal lesions.

BACKGROUND: The treatment results of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal lesions have improved markedly, but some lesions remain difficult to treat. Hence the cecum is considered a technically challenging site for ESD. We examined the feasibility of ESD for cecal lesions. METHODS: Among a total of 708 colorectal ESD performed in our hospital between March 2006 and December 2016, 549 procedures performed after April 2012 were studied, at a time when the techniques of ESD had stabilized and the procedure was covered by health insurance in Japan. Among 549 cases, 61 were cecal lesions and 488 were noncecal lesions. The treatment outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: For cecal lesions, the en bloc resection rate was 95.1%, R0 resection rate was 91.8%, perforation rate was 0%, delayed bleeding rate was 6.6%, median diameter of resected specimen was 32 mm (16-65 mm), median time of the procedure was 44 minutes (8-140 min). The corresponding results for noncecal lesions were 97.3%, 95.5%, 0.4%, 2.7%, 30 mm (10-109 mm), and 37 min (7-225 min). No significant differences were observed and the good treatment results were seen. When the outcomes were analyzed for cecal sites considered to be particularly challenging; proximity to appendiceal orifice, the ileocecal valve, and the bottom of cecum, the treatment results were not inferior to other sites. CONCLUSIONS: ESD is safe and effective even for cecal lesions considered challenging to treat. ESD is feasible for cecal lesions.

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection using IT knife nano with clip traction method for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an accepted and established treatment for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC), it is technically difficult, time consuming, and less safe than endoscopic mucosal resection. To perform ESD safely and more efficiently, we proposed a new technique of esophageal ESD using an IT knife nano with the clip traction method. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD using this new technique. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive cases of esophageal ESD performed using an IT knife nano with the clip traction method at our hospital between March 2013 and January 2017. Therapeutic efficacy and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients underwent esophageal ESD using the IT knife nano with the clip traction method. In all cases, we performed en bloc resection. Complete resection was achieved in 100 cases (97.1%). The median operating time was 40 (range 13-230) min. No cases of perforation or delayed bleeding occurred. Although two cases (2.0%) of mediastinal emphysema occurred without visible perforation at endoscopy, all were successfully managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: The new technique of esophageal ESD using the IT knife nano with the clip traction method appears to be feasible, effective, and safe for EESCC treatment.

Linked-color imaging improves endoscopic visibility of colorectal nongranular flat lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As a newly developed image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) technique, linked-color imaging (LCI) provides very bright images with enhanced color tones. With the objective of improving the detection rate of colorectal flat tumor lesions, which are difficult to detect, we examined the usefulness of LCI from the viewpoint of visibility. METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive nongranular flat tumors were used in this study. Endoscopic images were acquired by white-light imaging (WLI), blue-laser imaging (BLI)-bright, and LCI modes. For each lesion, we selected 1 image each acquired by WLI, BLI-bright, and LCI modes. Six endoscopists interpreted the images. By using a previously reported visibility scale, we scored the visibility level on a scale of 1 to 4. RESULTS: The mean (± standard deviation) visibility scores were 2.74 ± 1.08 for WLI, 2.94 ± 0.97 for BLI-bright, and 3.36 ± 0.72 for LCI. The score was significantly higher for BLI-bright compared with WLI (P < .001) and again higher for LCI compared with BLI-bright (P < .001). When we compared between experts and trainees, the corresponding scores of experts were 2.83 ± 1.06, 3.17 ± 0.88, and 3.40 ± 0.74, with a tendency similar to the scores of all endoscopists. For the trainees, there was no difference between the scores for WLI (2.65 ± 1.10) and BLI-bright (2.71 ± 1.00), but the score for LCI (3.31 ± 0.69) was significantly higher than that for WLI or BLI-bright (P < .001). When only sessile serrated adenoma/polyp lesions were analyzed, LCI remained significantly higher than the other 2. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that LCI increases the visibility of colorectal flat lesions and contributes to improvement of the detection rate for these lesions.

A case report of prostate cancer metastasis to the stomach resembling undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Occurrence of metastatic cancer to the stomach is rare, particularly in patients with prostate cancer. Gastric metastasis generally presents as a solitary and submucosal lesion with a central depression. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a case of gastric metastasis arising from prostate cancer, which is almost indistinguishable from the undifferentiated-type gastric cancer. A definitive diagnosis was not made until endoscopic resection. On performing both conventional and magnifying endoscopies, the lesion appeared to be slightly depressed and discolored area and it could not be distinguished from undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Biopsy from the lesion was negative for immunohistochemical staining of prostate-specific antigen, a sensitive and specific marker for prostate cancer. Thus, false initial diagnosis of an early primary gastric cancer was made and endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed. Pathological findings from the resected specimen aroused suspicion of a metastatic lesion. Consequently, immunostaining was performed. The lesion was positive for prostate-specific acid phosphatase and negative for prostate-specific antigen, cytokeratin 7, and cytokeratin 20. Accordingly, the final diagnosis was a metastatic gastric lesion originating from prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: In this patient, the definitive diagnosis as a metastatic lesion was difficult due to its unusual endoscopic appearance and the negative stain for prostate-specific antigen. We postulate that both of these are consequences of hormonal therapy against prostate cancer.

Frequent Presence of Lymphovascular Invasion in Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors on Immunohistochemical Analysis.

Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (RNETs) have become common in recent years and are good candidates for endoscopic resection (ER). To achieve clear resection margins, more advanced techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device, and cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection are available for ER. After ER, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is regarded as an important predictor of nodal metastasis. Previous studies have shown that small RNETs with LVI were uncommon (0-8.3%). However, using immunohistochemical analysis, a recent study revealed the frequent occurrence of LVI in small RNETs in a systematic manner (46.7%). There is a possibility that the actual detection rate of LVI in small RNETs is not always evaluated accurately because of the limited detection sensitivity of conventional hematoxylin-eosin staining. In addition, the correlation between LVI detected using immunohistochemical analysis and the development of metastasis remains unclear. Further prospective studies are required to clarify the role of LVI detected using immunohistochemical analysis.

Magnified endoscopic observation of early colorectal cancer by linked color imaging with crystal violet staining (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many reports have shown the usefulness of magnification endoscopy with crystal violet (CV) staining for delineating the pit pattern in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma. However, the diagnostic accuracy of this method is not adequate for assessing the depth of invasion of early stage cancers. The novel technology of linked color imaging (LCI) combined with CV staining is expected to improve the accuracy of determining the depth of invasion. METHODS: We studied 3 patients with early stage colorectal cancer who were referred to our hospital. After CV spraying, high-magnification endoscopy was conducted by using the LCI mode. Efficacy of this modality was evaluated by comparing the preoperative diagnostic endoscopic images with posttreatment histopathologic findings. RESULTS: In 2 cases of rectal cancer, although conventional endoscopic examination could not exclude the possibility of submucosal cancer, use of the LCI mode with CV staining confirmed mucosal cancer. Eventually, EMR was conducted and achieved curative resection. In 1 case of sigmoid colon cancer, both conventional and CV magnification endoscopy suggested submucosal cancer. However, mucosal cancer was diagnosed by the novel method, and EMR achieved curative resection. CONCLUSIONS: LCI high-magnification endoscopy combined with CV staining provides images close to histopathologic findings and is expected to improve the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis of the depth of invasion for early stage colorectal cancer.

[The Present Status of Surgical and Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Cancer Patients Aged 85 Years or Older].

This study aimed to survey treatment ofgastric cancer via gastrectomy or endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)in patients aged 85 years or older and to clarify the risks and benefits of gastrectomy in terms of postoperative complications and prognosis. The analysis included 40 patients who were treated via gastrectomy and 41 who were treated via ESD. All patients were aged 85 years or older. Although most ofthe patients who had gastrectomy had good performance status(PS), comorbidities were found in 72.5%, and limited operation was often performed. In the gastrectomy group, R0 tumor-free resection margins were achieved in 75%, and postoperative complications occurred in 45%. Despite R0 surgery, the 2-year overall survival rate was 61.7% and the 3-year overall survival was 42.9%. Seven patients(17.1%)in the ESD group were diagnosed with T1b tumors, and no patients were shifted to surgery. Treatment decisions for super-elderly gastric cancer patients are made with regard to age, PS, and comorbidities. There is a limit to survival time after radical gastrectomy. It is necessary to examine the negative effect of gastrectomy on survival time. Selected patients aged 85 years or older with T1b gastric cancer should be given the option of ESD.