ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patients with ovarian cancer from smaller cities and rural communities face unique challenges in accessing comprehensive care. This study compares management strategies, outcomes, and access to care for patients in a small city and surrounding rural communities before and after establishing a full-time gynecologic oncology (GO) office. METHODS: A local tumor registry was used to identify patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer before and after a full-time GO office was established. Quantitative analyses were used to compare disease characteristics, management strategies, overall survival, and distance traveled for care between cohorts. RESULTS: Out of 381 patients, 171 women were diagnosed prior to establishing a full-time GO office (pre-GO) and 210 after (post-GO). Post-GO patients were more likely to undergo surgery by a GO specialist (97.1% versus 53.2%, p < 0.01), receive surgery locally (79.0% versus 43.3%, p < 0.01), and undergo complete lymph node dissection (63.3% versus 38.6%, p < 0.01). Patients treated with chemotherapy by GO increased from 10.3% pre-GO to 76.9% post-GO. 5-year survival rates were 33.8% versus 49.5% in the pre-GO and post-GO groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Median survival time increased from 30.8 months to 52.5 months from pre-GO to post-GO time periods. Distance patients traveled for surgery decreased from a mean of 47.9 miles pre-GO to 26.8 miles post-GO. CONCLUSION: After establishing a full-time GO office within a small city, local patients had significantly improved overall survival and access to care. These results highlight the benefit of expanding GO care into small cities with surrounding rural communities and may be used to address public health discrepancies for women across the country.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/surgery , Medically Underserved Area , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Rural Health Services , Aged , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Cities , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Michigan , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Compare the use of medical therapy alone (MTA) with surgical therapy (ST) for the empiric treatment of peritonsillar abscess (PTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients treated for PTA at our institution from May 2013 to February 2019 was analyzed. Demographics, disease characteristics, management strategies, and treatment outcomes were compared between treatment groups. Primary outcomes included treatment failure, defined as the need for follow-up surgical intervention, and complications within 2-weeks of empiric treatment. RESULTS: 306 patients (72.7%) received MTA while 115 (27.3%) underwent ST. There was no significant difference in the rate of treatment failure between the MTA (7.2%) and ST (6.1%) groups (p = 0.879). Complications were rare in both groups (1.6% with MTA versus 0.9% with ST; p = 0.898). Dysphagia (p = 0.011), trismus (p = 0.045), larger abscesses (p < 0.001), and hospital admission (p < 0.001) were more common in the ST group. Corticosteroid prescriptions were a common component of MTA (53.3%) and less often used with ST (33.9%; p = 0.001). After adjusting for abscess size, there remained no significant difference in the rate of treatment failure between groups. Univariate analyses demonstrated no significant independent predictors of treatment failure including age, sex, race, tonsillitis history, smoking history, presenting signs and symptoms, abscess size, hospital admission, and corticosteroid prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: MTA may be a safe and effective alternative to surgical drainage for the empiric treatment of PTA, warranting larger-scale prospective analyses. Abscess size did not appear to influence treatment failure; however, careful patient selection is likely to optimize treatment outcomes.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Drainage/methods , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Peritonsillar Abscess/drug therapy , Peritonsillar Abscess/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Rates of maternal syphilis have increased five-fold in Brazil in the past decade. While penicillin remains the only appropriate treatment for maternal syphilis, we hypothesized that low non-treponemal titers (<1:16) may lead to reduced penicillin treatment in Brazil. METHODS: Using Brazilian Ministry of Health data on women diagnosed with maternal syphilis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018, we conducted a random-effects logistic regression model with a cluster correction at the state level to evaluate predictive factors of penicillin treatment. RESULTS: We observed yearly increases in cases of pregnant women with syphilis from 2010 to 2018. There was significant variation by state: 52,451 cases were reported in São Paulo, followed by 26,838 in Rio de Janeiro. Among 215,937 cases of maternal syphilis, 91·3% received penicillin. In the random-effects model, a non-treponemal titer ≥1:16 was associated with 1·44 higher odds of receiving penicillin (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1·391·48), and prenatal care was associated with a 2·12 increased odds of receiving penicillin (95% CI: 2·022·21). Although there is an association between the absence of prenatal care and inadequate treatment for syphilis, 83·2% of women in this cohort who did not receive penicillin were engaged in prenatal care. CONCLUSIONS: Providers may inappropriately exclude low non-treponemal titers and thereby fail to use penicillin treatment in maternal syphilis. While the cause of the maternal syphilis epidemic in Brazil is multifactorial, we believe our findings can be used to develop targeted interventions throughout Brazil as well as shape public health initiatives globally.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Syphilis/drug therapy , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnant Women , Prenatal Care , Syphilis/diagnosis , Syphilis/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Porto Alegre, in south Brazil, has one of the highest hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection rates in the country (84.4 cases/100 000 in 2018). Prenatal screening of HCV, however, has not been routinely offered. METHODS: A longitudinal study of pregnant women with HCV and their infants was conducted between January 2014 and December 2018. Screening for HCV antibodies was offered to all women delivering at the study tertiary institution. HCV RT-PCR was performed if the woman was seropositive. Infants were followed prospectively. RESULTS: Among 18 953 pregnant women delivering infants during the study period, 17 810 were screened for HCV antibodies (93.9%) with 130 positive results (HCV seroprevalence 0.7%). HCV-RNA was detectable in 57/117 cases (48.7%). HCV viremia was associated with the use of injectable drugs (P = 0.03), inhaled/crack drug use (P = 0.02), having an HCV-seropositive partner, and ≥3 lifetime sexual partners (P < 0.01). Genotype 1 was most prevalent (68%) during pregnancy. Among 43 children with follow-up, six (13%) were HCV-infected (transmission rate 13.9%); 50% were infected with genotype 3. Two infants (33%) cleared their infection; the mothers had genetic polymorphisms associated with clearance. CONCLUSION: HCV vertical transmission was high in the study population, with HCV infection during pregnancy being vastly underdiagnosed. Public health efforts must focus on this vulnerable population for disease prevention and early treatment.