ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are currently no standard first-line treatment options for patients with higher grade 2-3, well-differentiated, advanced, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (177Lu-Dotatate) treatment. METHODS: NETTER-2 was an open-label, randomised, parallel-group, superiority, phase 3 trial. We enrolled patients (aged ≥15 years) with newly diagnosed higher grade 2 (Ki67 ≥10% and ≤20%) and grade 3 (Ki67 >20% and ≤55%), somatostatin receptor-positive (in all target lesions), advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours from 45 centres across nine countries in North America, Europe, and Asia. We used interactive response technologies to randomly assign (2:1) patients to receive four cycles (cycle interval was 8 weeks ± 1 week) of intravenous 177Lu-Dotatate plus intramuscular octreotide 30 mg long-acting repeatable (LAR) then octreotide 30 mg LAR every 4 weeks (177Lu-Dotatate group) or high-dose octreotide 60 mg LAR every 4 weeks (control group), stratified by neuroendocrine tumour grade (2 vs 3) and origin (pancreas vs other). Tumour assessments were done at baseline, week 16, and week 24, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded, independent, central radiology assessment. We did the primary analysis at 101 progression-free survival events as the final progression-free survival analysis. NETTER-2 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03972488, and is active and not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Jan 22, 2020, and Oct 13, 2022, we screened 261 patients, 35 (13%) of whom were excluded. We randomly assigned 226 (87%) patients (121 [54%] male and 105 [46%] female) to the 177Lu-Dotatate group (n=151 [67%]) and control group (n=75 [33%]). Median progression-free survival was 8·5 months (95% CI 7·7-13·8) in the control group and 22·8 months (19·4-not estimated) in the 177Lu-Dotatate group (stratified hazard ratio 0·276 [0·182-0·418]; p<0·0001). During the treatment period, adverse events (of any grade) occurred in 136 (93%) of 147 treated patients in the 177Lu-Dotatate group and 69 (95%) of 73 treated patients in the control group. There were no study drug-related deaths during the treatment period. INTERPRETATION: First-line 177Lu-Dotatate plus octreotide LAR significantly extended median progression-free survival (by 14 months) in patients with grade 2 or 3 advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. 177Lu-Dotatate should be considered a new standard of care in first-line therapy in this population. FUNDING: Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company.
Subject(s)
Intestinal Neoplasms , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Octreotide , Organometallic Compounds , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Octreotide/therapeutic use , Octreotide/administration & dosage , Octreotide/analogs & derivatives , Octreotide/adverse effects , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/radiotherapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/mortality , Female , Middle Aged , Organometallic Compounds/therapeutic use , Organometallic Compounds/administration & dosage , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Intestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Intestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Intestinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Intestinal Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Radiopharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Grading , Progression-Free SurvivalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a locally aggressive neoplasm for which few systemic treatment options exist. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vimseltinib, an oral, switch-control, CSF1R inhibitor, in patients with symptomatic TGCT not amenable to surgery. METHODS: MOTION is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 35 specialised hospitals in 13 countries. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of TGCT for which surgical resection could potentially worsen functional limitation or cause severe morbidity. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) with interactive response technology to vimseltinib (30 mg orally twice weekly) or placebo, administrated in 28-day cycles for 24 weeks. Patients and site personnel were masked to treatment assignment until week 25, unless progressive disease was confirmed earlier. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by independent radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST) at week 25 in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05059262, and enrolment is complete. FINDINGS: Between Jan 21, 2022, and Feb 21, 2023, 123 patients were randomly assigned (83 to vimseltinib and 40 to placebo). 73 (59%) patients were female and 50 (41%) were male. Nine (11%) of 83 patients assigned to vimseltinib and five (13%) of 40 patients assigned to placebo discontinued treatment before week 25; one patient in the placebo group did not receive any study drug. Objective response rate per RECIST was 40% (33 of 83 patients) in the vimseltinib group vs 0% (none of 40) in the placebo group (difference 40% [95% CI 29-51]; p<0·0001). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1 or 2; the only grade 3 or 4 TEAE that occurred in more than 5% of patients receiving vimseltinib was increased blood creatine phosphokinase (eight [10%] of 83). One patient in the vimseltinib group had a treatment-related serious TEAE of subcutaneous abscess. No evidence of cholestatic hepatotoxicity or drug-induced liver injury was noted. INTERPRETATION: Vimseltinib produced a significant objective response rate and clinically meaningful functional and symptomatic improvement in patients with TGCT, providing an effective treatment option for these patients. FUNDING: Deciphera Pharmaceuticals.
Subject(s)
Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath , Humans , Double-Blind Method , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Anilides , QuinolinesABSTRACT
Synovial sarcomas are soft tissue tumours of uncertain origin, most commonly found in the upper or lower extremities. They are characterised by distinctive chromosomal rearrangements involving the gene SS18. Synovial sarcomas can occasionally arise also in visceral sites, but retroperitoneal SSs are very unusual. Among them, a few primary renal synovial sarcomas have been described in the scientific literature. Primary renal synovial sarcomas tend to be monophasic and often show cystic changes. Histologically, they can closely resemble other primary kidney tumours, mainly paediatric tumours such as nephroblastoma and clear cell sarcoma of the kidney. In the current work, a primary synovial sarcoma of the kidney with unusual morphological features (extensively myxoid stroma and immunohistochemical positivity for BCOR) is described. Molecular analysis, through targeted RNA sequencing, was of invaluable help in reaching the correct diagnosis. Despite locally advanced disease at presentation, the patient showed an unexpectedly brilliant response to chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Kidney Neoplasms , Sarcoma, Synovial , Humans , Sarcoma, Synovial/genetics , Sarcoma, Synovial/diagnosis , Sarcoma, Synovial/metabolism , Sarcoma, Synovial/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/metabolism , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Male , Diagnosis, Differential , Cell Differentiation , Female , Proto-Oncogene Proteins , Repressor ProteinsABSTRACT
Plexiform fibromyxoma (PF), also referred to as plexiform angiomyxoid myofibroblast tumor, is an exceedingly rare mesenchymal neoplasm primarily affecting the stomach. Herein, we present a case of PF diagnosed in a 71-year-old male with a history of lung cancer, initially suspected to have a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the stomach, who subsequently underwent subtotal gastrectomy. The histopathological and molecular features of the tumor, including mutations in ABL1, CCND1, CSF1R, FGFR4, KDR, and MALAT1-GLI1 fusion, are elucidated and discussed in the context of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic considerations.
Subject(s)
Fibroma , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Aged , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Fibroma/genetics , Fibroma/pathology , Fibroma/metabolism , Immunohistochemistry , Mutation , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , GastrectomyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Breast angiosarcoma is a rare and aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. Two subtypes have been identified: primary angiosarcoma (PBA) and secondary breast angiosarcoma (SBA). In this retrospective analysis, we describe and compare our institute experience with the data existing in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included in our analysis 29 patients who received a diagnosis of PBA or SBA between 2006 and 2019. RESULTS: All patients received surgery as frontline treatment, but only 6 patients underwent to adjuvant treatment. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered 2 patients. The preferred chemotherapeutic regimen was taxanes with or without gemcitabine and associated with anthracyclines. A lower median RFS and OS were reported in patients with PBA compared to those with SBA, but the difference observed was not statistically significant. Patients with PBA had a lower median age at the diagnosis (38 vs. 75). CONCLUSION: In our analysis, we have shown a lower median RFS and OS in patients with PBA compared with those with SBA, and a significantly younger age at diagnosis in patients affected by PBA.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Hemangiosarcoma , Humans , Female , Hemangiosarcoma/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Antibiotics, AntineoplasticABSTRACT
The role of internal dosimetry is usually proposed for investigational purposes in patients treated by RLT, even if its application is not yet the standard method in clinical practice. This limited use is partially justified by several concomitant factors that make calculations a complex process. Therefore, simplified dosimetry protocols are required. METHODS: In our study, dosimetric evaluations were performed in thirty patients with NENs who underwent RLT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. The reference method (M0) calculated the cumulative absorbed dose performing dosimetry after each of the four cycles. Obtained data were employed to assess the feasibility of simplified protocols: defining the dosimetry only after the first cycle (M1) and after the first and last one (M2). RESULTS: The mean differences of the cumulative absorbed doses between M1 and M0 were - 10% for kidney, - 5% for spleen, + 34% for liver, + 13% for red marrow, and + 37% for tumor lesions. Conversely, differences lower than ± 10% were measured between M2 and M0. CONCLUSION: Cumulative absorbed doses obtained with the M2 protocol resembled the doses calculated by M0, while the M1 protocol overestimated the absorbed doses in all organs at risk, except for the spleen.
Subject(s)
Octreotide , Positron-Emission Tomography , Humans , Octreotide/therapeutic use , Radionuclide Imaging , Radiometry/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogeneous class of rare tumors with increasing incidence. They are characterized by the ability to secrete peptide hormones and biogenic amines but other reliable biomarkers are lacking, making diagnosis and identification of the primary site very challenging. While in some NENs, such as the pancreatic ones, next generation sequencing technologies allowed the identification of new molecular hallmarks, our knowledge of the molecular profile of NENs from other anatomical sites is still poor. METHODS: Starting from the concept that NENs from different organs may be clinically and genetically correlated, we applied a multi-omics approach by combining multigene panel testing, CGH-array, transcriptome and miRNome profiling and computational analyses, with the aim to highlight common molecular and functional signatures of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NENs and medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTCs) that could aid diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. RESULTS: By comparing genomic and transcriptional profiles, ATM-dependent signaling emerged among the most significant pathways at multiple levels, involving gene variations and miRNA-mediated regulation, thus representing a novel putative druggable pathway in these cancer types. Moreover, a set of circulating miRNAs was also selected as possible diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers useful for clinical management of NENs. CONCLUSIONS: These findings depict a complex molecular and functional landscape of NENs, shedding light on novel therapeutic targets and disease biomarkers to be exploited.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/genetics , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/genetics , Humans , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/genetics , Neuroendocrine Tumors/metabolism , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , PrognosisABSTRACT
In May 1982, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of streptozotocin to treat pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs). Thus, this year marks 40 years since that landmark date. This review of streptozotocin to treat panNETs is intended to commemorate this anniversary. A historical perspective of the chemical structure, pharmacokinetics, and mechanism of action of streptozotocin is followed by data from prospective and retrospective clinical studies. The last section of the review addresses the latest aspects and takes note of the prospects that lie ahead on the future horizon of the use of streptozotocin to treat panNETs, including ongoing clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Neuroendocrine Tumors , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Streptozocin/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
Sarcomas are rare, ubiquitous and heterogeneous tumors usually treated with surgery, chemotherapy, target therapy, and radiotherapy. However, 25-50% of patients experience local relapses and/or distant metastases after chemotherapy with an overall survival about 12-18 months. Recently, immuno-therapy has revolutionized the cancer treatments with initial indications for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma (immune-checkpoint inhibitors).Here, we provide a narrative review on the topic as well as a critical description of the currently available trials on immunotherapy treatments in patients with sarcoma. Given the promising results obtained with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (pembrolizumab and nivolumab) and CAR-T cells, we strongly believe that these new immunotherapeutic approaches, along with an innovative characterization of tumor genetics, will provide an exciting opportunity to ameliorate the therapeutic management of sarcomas.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Sarcoma , Humans , Immunotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Sarcoma/therapyABSTRACT
Rare cancers are identified as those with an annual incidence of fewer than 6 per 100,000 persons and includes both epithelial and stromal tumors from different anatomical areas. The advancement of analytical methods has produced an accurate molecular characterization of most human cancers, suggesting a "molecular classification" that has allowed the establishment of increasingly personalized therapeutic strategies. However, the limited availability of rare cancer samples has resulted in very few therapeutic options for these tumors, often leading to poor prognosis. Long non coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of non-coding RNAs mostly involved in tumor progression and drug response. In particular, the lncRNA HOX transcript antisense RNA (HOTAIR) represents an emergent diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker in many human cancers. The aim of this review is to highlight the role of HOTAIR in rare cancers, proposing it as a new biomarker usable in the management of these tumors.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/metabolism , RNA, Long Noncoding/metabolism , Animals , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Neoplasms/genetics , RNA, Long Noncoding/geneticsABSTRACT
Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are rare diseases occurring in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. They are characterized by the loss of epithelial tubular gland elements, and by the increased expression of neuroendocrine markers. GEP-NENs are subdivided into two histo-pathological types, gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs). According to WHO 2017 and 2019 classification criteria are graded and staged in four categories, NET-G1, NET-G2, NET-G3, and NEC-G3. The molecular characterization of these tumors can be fundamental for the identification of new diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the expression of the paralogous 13 HOX genes, normally involved in embryogenic development and frequently deregulated in human cancers, and of the HOX regulating lncRNA HOTAIR in GEP-NENs. The expression of HOX genes is gradually lost in the transition from GEP NET G1 to NET/NEC G3 tumors, while HOTAIR expression, inversely correlated with HOX genes expression and weakly expressed in low-grade GEP NENs, becomes aberrant in NET G3 and NEC G3 categories. Our data highlights their potential role in the molecular stratification of GEP-NENs by suggesting new prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets.
Subject(s)
Genes, Homeobox , Intestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease Progression , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Intestinal Neoplasms/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Neuroendocrine Tumors/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Up-RegulationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and morphological features related to nodal involvement in appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), to identify patients who should be referred for oncological radicalization with hemicolectomy. BACKGROUND: Appendiceal NETs are usually diagnosed accidentally after appendectomy; the indications for right hemicolectomy are currently based on several parameters (ie, tumor size, grading, proliferative index, localization, mesoappendiceal invasion, lymphovascular infiltration). Available guidelines are based on scarce evidence inferred by small, retrospective, single-institution studies, resulting in discordant recommendations. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. Patients who underwent surgical resection of appendiceal NETs at 11 tertiary Italian centers, from January 1990 to December 2015, were included. Clinical and morphological data were analyzed to identify factors related to nodal involvement. RESULTS: Four-hundred fifty-seven patients were evaluated, and 435 were finally included and analyzed. Of them, 21 had nodal involvement. Grading G2 [odds ratio (OR) 6.04], lymphovascular infiltration (OR 10.17), size (OR 18.50), and mesoappendiceal invasion (OR 3.63) were related to nodal disease. Receiver operating characteristic curve identified >15.5âmm as the best size cutoff value (area under the curve 0.747). On multivariate analysis, grading G2 (OR 6.98), lymphovascular infiltration (OR 8.63), and size >15.5âmm (OR 35.28) were independently related to nodal involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size >15.5âmm, grading G2, and presence of lymphovascular infiltration are factors independently related to nodal metastases in appendiceal NETs. Presence of ≥1 of these features should be considered an indication for oncological radicalization. Although these results represent the largest study currently available, prospective validation is needed.
Subject(s)
Appendiceal Neoplasms/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Adult , Appendectomy , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Metformin seems to have anticancer effects. However, it is not clear whether use of glycemia and metformin affect outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). We investigated the association between glycemia and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with pNETs treated with everolimus and/or somatostatin analogues, as well as the association between metformin use and PFS time. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 445 patients with advanced pNET treated at 24 medical centers in Italy from 1999 through 2015. Data on levels of glycemia were collected at time of diagnosis of pNET, before treatment initiation, and during treatment with everolimus (with or without somatostatin analogues), octreotide, or lanreotide. Diabetes was defined as prior or current use of glycemia control medication and/or fasting plasma glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1c ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/L), or a random sample of plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L), with reported classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis. Patients were assigned to groups based on diagnosis of diabetes before or during antitumor therapy. PFS was compared between patients with vs without diabetes. Among patients with diabetes, the association between metformin use and PFS was assessed. We performed sensitivity and landmark analyses to exclude patients who developed diabetes while receiving cancer treatment and to exclude a potential immortal time bias related to metformin intake. RESULTS: PFS was significantly longer in patients with diabetes (median, 32.0 months) than without diabetes (median, 15.1 months) (hazard ratio for patients with vs without diabetes, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.80; P = .0002). PFS of patients treated with metformin was significantly longer (median PFS, 44.2 months) than for patients without diabetes (hazard ratio for survival of patients with diabetes receiving metformin vs without diabetes, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.62; P < .00001) and longer than for patients with diabetes receiving other treatments (median PFS, 20.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.69; P < .0001). In multivariable analysis, adjusted for other factors associated with outcomes, metformin was associated with longer PFS but level of glycemia was not. Metformin was associated with increased PFS of patients receiving somatostatin analogues and in those receiving everolimus, with or without somatostatin analogues. Sensitivity and landmark analyses produced similar results. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective study of patients with pNETs, we found a significant association between metformin use and longer PFS.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Everolimus/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Italy/epidemiology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroendocrine Tumors/mortality , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Combination of chemotherapies (fluoropirimidines, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) with biologic drugs (bevacizumab, panitumumab, cetuximab) have improved clinical responses and survival of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, patients' selection thorough the identification of predictive factors still represent a challange. Cetuximab (Erbitux®), a chimeric monoclonal antibody binding to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), belongs to the Immunoglobulins (Ig) grade 1 subclass able to elicite both in vitro and in vivo the Antibody-Dependent Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity (ADCC). ADCC is the cytotoxic killing of antibody-coated target cells by immunologic effectors. The effector cells express a receptor for the Fc portion of these antibodies (FcγR); genetic polymorphisms of FcγR modify the binding affinity with the Fc of IgG1. Interestingly, the high-affinity FcγRIIIa V/V is associated with increased ADCC in vitro and in vivo. Thus, ADCC could partially account for cetuximab activity. METHODS/DESIGN: CIFRA is a single arm, open-label, phase II study assessing the activity of cetuximab in combination with irinotecan and fluorouracile in FcγRIIIa V/V patients with KRAS, NRAS, BRAF wild type mCRC. The study is designed with a two-stage Simon model based on a hypothetical higher response rate (+ 10%) of FcγRIIIa V/V patients as compared to previous trials (about 60%) assuming ADCC as one of the possible mechanisms of cetuximab action. The test power is 95%, the alpha value of the I-type error is 5%. With these assumptions the sample for passing the first stage is 14 patients with > 6 responses and the final sample is 34 patients with > 18 responses to draw positive conclusions. Secondary objectives include toxicity, responses' duration, progression-free and overall survival. Furthermore, an associated translational study will assess the patients' cetuximab-mediated ADCC and characterize the tumor microenvironment. DISCUSSION: The CIFRA study will determine whether ADCC contributes to cetuximab activity in mCRC patients selected on an innovative immunological screening. Data from the translational study will support results' interpretation as well as provide new insights in host-tumor interactions and cetuximab activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The CIFRA trial (version 0.0, June 21, 2018) has been registered into the NIH-US National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov database with the identifier number ( NCT03874062 ).
Subject(s)
Cetuximab/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Irinotecan/therapeutic use , Receptors, IgG/genetics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Humans , Polymorphism, Genetic , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although prognosis of NENs is affected by several features including tumour burden, the specific role of this factor in pancreatic NENs (PanNENs) and gastrointestinal NENs (GI NENs) is not well established. AIM: To compare the prognostic role of tumour burden in PanNENs and GI NENs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of stage IV PanNENs and GI NENs. Tumours were classified based on liver tumour volume (<25% or >25%). Overall survival as assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards method was used to perform risk factor analysis. RESULTS: The analysis included 300 patients, including 166 panNENs (55.3%) and 134 GI NENs (44.7%). A total of 158 patients (52.7%) had G2 tumours, 107 had G1 tumours (35.7%), and 35 had G3 tumours (11.6%). Tumour liver involvement >25% was observed in 187 patients (62.3%): 106 PanNENs (56.7%), and 81 GI NENs (43.3%) (pâ¯=â¯0.551). Bone metastases were present in 45 patients (15%): 22 PanNENs (13.2%) and 23 GI NENs (17.1%) (pâ¯=â¯0.416). Characteristics of the PanNENs, including: grading (G2 vs G1, HRâ¯=â¯3.7; G3 vs G1, HRâ¯=â¯16.40), liver involvementâ¯>â¯25% (HRâ¯=â¯3.09), and bone metastases (HRâ¯=â¯2.27) were independent predictors for poor survival, whereas the only significant risk factor in GI NENs was grading (G2 vs G1, HRâ¯=â¯4.36; G3 vs G1, HRâ¯=â¯8.60). CONCLUSIONS: PanNENs and GI NENs have different risk profiles. Liver tumour volume and the presence of bone metastases significantly affect survival in patients with PanNENs but has no impact on the clinical outcomes of GI NENs.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/secondary , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Tumor Burden , Aged , Female , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroendocrine Tumors/therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis , Risk Factors , SurvivalABSTRACT
Glioblastoma multiforme is the most common and aggressive primary brain cancer with only â¼3% of patients surviving more than 3 years from diagnosis. Several mechanisms are involved in drug and radiation resistance to anticancer treatments and among them one of the most important factors is the tumor microenvironment status, characterized by cancer cell hypersecretion of interleukins and cytokines. The aim of our research was the synthesis of a nanocarrier of quercetin combined with temozolomide, to enhance the specificity and efficacy of this anticancer drug commonly used in glioblastoma treatment. The nanohydrogel increased the internalization and cytotoxicity of quercetin in human glioblastoma cells and, when co-delivered with temozolomide, contribute to an improved anticancer effect. The nanohydrogel loaded with quercetin had the ability to recognize CD44 receptor, a brain cancer cell marker, through an energy and caveolae dependent mechanism of internalization. Moreover, nanohydrogel of quercetin was able to reduce significantly IL-8, IL-6, and VEGF production in pro-inflammatory conditions with interesting implications on the mechanism of glioblastoma cells drug resistance. In summary, novel CD44 targeted polymeric based nanocarriers appear to be proficient in mediating site-specific delivery of quercetin via CD44 receptor in glioblastoma cells. This targeted therapy lead to an improved therapeutic efficacy of temozolomide by modulating the brain tumor microenvironment.
Subject(s)
Drug Carriers/pharmacology , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Hyaluronan Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Hydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate/pharmacology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Drug Carriers/chemistry , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Glioblastoma/genetics , Glioblastoma/pathology , Humans , Hyaluronan Receptors/genetics , Hyaluronic Acid/chemistry , Hyaluronic Acid/pharmacology , Hydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate/chemistry , Interleukin-6/genetics , Interleukin-8/genetics , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Nanoparticles/therapeutic use , Polymers/chemistry , Polymers/pharmacology , Quercetin/chemistry , Quercetin/pharmacology , Temozolomide/chemistry , Temozolomide/pharmacology , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer is dismal and the novel targeted therapies, albeit successfully used to treat many advanced tumors, have shown modest results. We performed a meta-analysis in order to quantify the effect size on survival of adding targeted therapy to single agent gemcitabine. METHODS: Randomized phase III trials comparing gemcitabine mono-therapy versus gemcitabine plus a targeted agent in first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer designed on survival as primary outcome were selected. Search was done through Medline and the registry of the NIH. Keywords used for searching were 'pancreas', 'pancreatic', 'gemcitabine'. Study quality was assessed with MERGE criteria. Findings were depicted in classical Forest plots. Publication bias was evaluated by the construction of funnel plot. RESULTS: Nine studies met the meta-analysis inclusion criteria including 4564 patients. The target therapies were: erlotinib, cetuximab, rigosertib, elpamotide, bevacizumab, aflibercept, axitinib, masitinib and ganitumab. There was no statistically significant heterogeneity among the nine trials (p = 0.77). The hazard ratio (HR) of the pooled analysis was 0.998 (CI 95%: 0.932-1.068). Subgroup meta-analysis was also performed in anti-EGFR and anti-angiogenesis trials: the pooled HR were 0.94 (CI 95%: 0.705-1.175) and 1.055 (CI 95%: 0.913-1.197), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis does not show significant improvements in survival for targeted drugs in advanced pancreatic cancer. The possible reason of these results could be linked to the biology of pancreatic cancer as well as to the absence of predictive factors.
Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Benzamides , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Humans , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Piperidines , Pyridines , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Survival Analysis , Thiazoles/administration & dosage , Thiazoles/adverse effects , GemcitabineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are few background data on the impact of clinical factors on neurotoxicity and prognosis in patients treated with adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) chemotherapy. METHODS: 102 stage II high-risk and stage III colorectal cancer patients were treated for 6 months with adjuvant CAPOX, then they were followed up. Associations between clinical variables, metabolic syndrome components, smoking and neurotoxicity were evaluated by the x03C7;2 test. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was applied to graph disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate analysis was done with the log-rank test. Cox's proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the effect of several risk factors on DFS. RESULTS: Significant associations were found between diabetes (p < 0.001), BMI (p = 0.01) and the occurrence of chronic neurotoxicity. After a median follow-up of 46 months, 14 patients (13.7%) had suffered recurrence. An analysis of the prognostic factors for DFS showed that prognosis is unfavorable for patients with high lymph-nodal involvement (HR: 5.23, p = 0.0007), diabetes (HR: 4.86; p = 0.03) and a BMI ≥25 (HR: 3.69, p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: Common mediators in diabetes and obesity could be involved in peripheral neuropathy and in stimulating micro-metastases. Further studies are necessary to explain this interesting connection between diabetes, obesity and colon cancer.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Body Mass Index , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Diabetes Complications/etiology , Obesity/complications , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Adult , Aged , Capecitabine/administration & dosage , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Chronic Disease , Diabetes Complications/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Oxaliplatin , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , PrognosisABSTRACT
Background: The optimal treatment sequencing for advanced, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is unknown. We performed a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the best treatment sequence in terms of progression-free survival to first-line (PFS1) and to second-line (PFS2), and overall survival among patients with advanced, well-differentiated pNETs. Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively analyzed the prospectively collected data of patients with sporadic well-differentiated pNETs who received at least two consecutive therapeutic lines, with evidence of radiological disease progression before change of treatment lines. Results: Among 201 patients, 40 (19.9%) had a grade 1 and 149 (74.1%) a grade 2 pNET. Primary tumor resection was performed in 98 patients (48.8%). First-line therapy was performed in 128 patients with somatostatin analogs (SSA), 35 received SSA + radioligand therapy (RLT), 21 temozolomide-based chemotherapy, and 17 SSA + targeted therapy. PFS was significantly longer in patients with grade 1 pNETs compared to those with grade 2, in patients who received primary tumor surgery, and in patients treated with RLT compared to other treatments. At multivariate analysis, the use of upfront RLT was independently associated with improved PFS compared to SSA. Second-line therapy was performed in 94 patients with SSA + targeted therapy, 35 received chemotherapy, 45 SSA + RLT, and 27 nonconventional-dose SSA or SSA switch. PFS was significantly longer in patients treated with RLT compared to other treatments. At multivariate analysis, the type of second-line therapy was independently associated with the risk for progression. OS was significantly longer in patients who received primary tumor surgery, with Ki67 < 10%, without extrahepatic disease, and in patients who received SSA-RLT sequence compared to other sequences. Conclusions: In this large, multicenter study, RLT was associated with better PFS compared to other treatments, and the SSA-RLT sequence was associated with the best survival outcomes in patients with pNETs with Ki67 < 10%. Primary tumor surgery was also associated with improved survival.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Metabolic profiling is a valuable tool to characterize tumor biology but remains largely unexplored in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Our aim was to comprehensively assess the metabolomic profile of NETs and identify novel prognostic biomarkers and dysregulated molecular pathways. DESIGN AND METHODS: Multiplatform untargeted metabolomic profiling (GC-MS, CE-MS, and LC-MS) was performed in plasma from 77 patients with G1-2 extra-pancreatic NETs enrolled in the AXINET trial (NCT01744249) (study cohort) and from 68 non-cancer individuals (control). The prognostic value of each differential metabolite (n = 155) in NET patients (P < .05) was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for multiple testing and other confounding factors. Related pathways were explored by Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA) and Metabolite Pathway Analysis (MPA). RESULTS: Thirty-four metabolites were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) (n = 16) and/or overall survival (OS) (n = 27). Thirteen metabolites remained significant independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis, 3 of them with a significant impact on both PFS and OS. Unsupervised clustering of these 3 metabolites stratified patients in 3 distinct prognostic groups (1-year PFS of 71.1%, 47.7%, and 15.4% (P = .012); 5-year OS of 69.7%, 32.5%, and 27.7% (P = .003), respectively). The MSEA and MPA of the 13-metablolite signature identified methionine, porphyrin, and tryptophan metabolisms as the 3 most relevant dysregulated pathways associated with the prognosis of NETs. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a metabolomic signature that improves prognostic stratification of NET patients beyond classical prognostic factors for clinical decisions. The enriched metabolic pathways identified reveal novel tumor vulnerabilities that may foster the development of new therapeutic strategies for these patients.