A randomized clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of rivipansel for sickle cell vaso-occlusive crisis.

The efficacy and safety of rivipansel, a predominantly E-selectin antagonist, were studied in a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial for vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) requiring hospitalization (RESET). A total of 345 subjects (204 adults and 141 children) were randomized and 320 were treated (162 with rivipansel, 158 with placebo) with an IV loading dose, followed by up to 14 additional 12-hourly maintenance doses of rivipansel or placebo, in addition to standard care. Rivipansel was similarly administered during subsequent VOCs in the Open-label Extension (OLE) study. In the full analysis population, the median time to readiness for discharge (TTRFD), the primary end point, was not different between rivipansel and placebo (-5.7 hours, P = .79; hazard ratio, 0.97), nor were differences seen in secondary end points of time to discharge (TTD), time to discontinuation of IV opioids (TTDIVO), and cumulative IV opioid use. Mean soluble E-selectin decreased 61% from baseline after the loading dose in the rivipansel group, while remaining unchanged in the placebo group. In a post hoc analysis, early rivipansel treatment within 26.4 hours of VOC pain onset (earliest quartile of time from VOC onset to treatment) reduced median TTRFD by 56.3 hours, reduced median TTD by 41.5 hours, and reduced median TTDIVO by 50.5 hours, compared with placebo (all P < .05). A similar subgroup analysis comparing OLE early-treatment with early-treatment RESET placebo showed a reduction in TTD of 23.1 hours (P = .062) and in TTDIVO of 30.1 hours (P = .087). Timing of rivipansel administration after pain onset may be critical to achieving accelerated resolution of acute VOC. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02187003 (RESET), NCT02433158 (OLE).

Pharmacokinetics and food-effect of fosdagrocorat (PF-04171327), a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor, in healthy adult Caucasian and Japanese subjects
.

OBJECTIVE: Fosdagrocorat (PF-04171327) is a pro-drug form of PF-00251802, a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor, under investigation for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. This study investigates the pharmacokinetics (PK) of single and multiple doses of fosdagrocorat in healthy Japanese and Western volunteers, the effect of food on fosdagrocorat PK, and the effect of fosdagrocorat on bone biomarkers. METHODS: This was a phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study. For single-escalating-dose evaluation, Japanese (n = 9) and Western (n = 9) subjects were randomized (1 : 1 : 1) to treatment sequences including 3 doses of fosdagrocorat (5, 10, or 30 mg) or placebo. For multiple-dose evaluation, Japanese subjects were randomized (3 : 1) to receive fosdagrocorat 20 mg or placebo once daily (QD) for 12 days. Subjects were aged 18 - 55 years; body mass index 17.5 - 30.5 kg/m2; total body weight > 45 kg. RESULTS: Following single doses of fosdagrocorat, the PK of PF-00251802 and its metabolite PF-04015475 were similar between Japanese (PF-00251802: mean area under the curve (AUC)inf (range across doses), 791 - 3,460 ng×h/mL; individual half-life (t1/2) 14.1 - 28.9 hours; PF-04015475: mean AUCinf, 395 - 1,740 ng×h/mL; individual t1/2 21.6 - 40.3 hours) and Western (PF-00251802: mean AUCinf, 750 - 4,150 ng×h/mL; individual t1/2 17.7 - 40.4 hours; PF-04015475: mean AUCinf, 394 - 2,160 ng×h/mL; individual t1/2 24.5 - 63.7 hours) subjects. Steady-state concentrations were reached within 9 days following multiple doses of fosdagrocorat. Food did not affect total exposure of PF-00251802 and PF-04015475. Multiple-dose administration of fosdagrocorat 20 mg QD resulted in suppression of bone formation markers and cortisol and increased bone resorption markers vs. placebo. Adverse events (AEs) were mild in severity and no serious AEs, deaths, or severe AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The PK profile of fosdagrocorat was similar between Japanese and Western subjects, with little effect of food on PK parameters. Fosdagrocorat was well tolerated in both Japanese and Western subjects.
.

Predicting the probability of successful efficacy of a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor from dose-response analysis.

PF-04171327 is a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor (DAGR) being developed to retain anti-inflammatory efficacy while reducing unwanted effects. Our aim was to conduct a longitudinal dose-response analysis to identify the DAGR doses with efficacy similar to or greater than prednisone 10 mg once daily (QD). The data included were from a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in 323 subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis on a background of methotrexate. Subjects received DAGR 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg, prednisone 5 or 10 mg, or placebo QD for 8 weeks. The Disease Activity Score 28-4 calculated using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4 CRP) was the efficacy endpoint utilized in this dose-response model. For DAGR, the maximum effect (Emax) on DAS28-4 CRP was estimated to be -1.2 points (95 % CI -1.7, -0.84), and the evaluated dose range provided 31-87 % of the Emax; for prednisone 5 and 10 mg, the estimated effects were -0.27 (95 % CI -0.55, 0.006) and -0.94 point (95 % CI -1.3, -0.59), respectively. Stochastic simulations indicated that the DAGR 1, 5, 10 and 15 mg have probabilities of 0.9, 29, 54 and 62 %, respectively, to achieve efficacy greater than prednisone 10 mg at week 8. DAGR 9 mg estimated probability was 50 % suggesting that DAGR ≥9 mg QD has an effect on DAS28-4 CRP comparable to or greater than prednisone 10 mg QD. This work informs dose selection for late-stage confirmatory trials.

Clinical Pharmacology Applications of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence in Drug Development and Approval-An Industry Perspective.

Since the 21st Century Cures Act was signed into law in 2016, real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) have attracted great interest from the healthcare ecosystem globally. The potential and capability of RWD/RWE to inform regulatory decisions and clinical drug development have been extensively reviewed and discussed in the literature. However, a comprehensive review of current applications of RWD/RWE in clinical pharmacology, particularly from an industry perspective, is needed to inspire new insights and identify potential future opportunities for clinical pharmacologists to utilize RWD/RWE to address key drug development questions. In this paper, we review the RWD/RWE applications relevant to clinical pharmacology based on recent publications from member companies in the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) RWD Working Group, and discuss the future direction of RWE utilization from a clinical pharmacology perspective. A comprehensive review of RWD/RWE use cases is provided and discussed in the following categories of application: drug-drug interaction assessments, dose recommendation for patients with organ impairment, pediatric plan development and study design, model-informed drug development (e.g., disease progression modeling), prognostic and predictive biomarkers/factors identification, regulatory decisions support (e.g., label expansion), and synthetic/external control generation for rare diseases. Additionally, we describe and discuss common sources of RWD to help guide appropriate data selection to address questions pertaining to clinical pharmacology in drug development and regulatory decision making.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Rivipansel in Healthy Subjects and Subjects with Sickle Cell Disease.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease is an inherited blood disorder with reduced blood-carrying capacity. It is associated with a tendency to form microclots in blood vessels, leading to painful episodes known as a vaso-occlusive crisis. Rivipansel is a pan-selectin inhibitor being studied for the treatment of a vaso-occlusive crisis in patients with sickle cell disease. METHODS: A population pharmacokinetic model of rivipansel plasma and urine concentrations was constructed using a two-compartment model and data from nine different clinical studies. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Schwartz formula for children and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula for adults. Urine volume and concentration of the study drug in urine from subjects in five clinical studies were used to estimate renal and nonrenal clearance. RESULTS: Rivipansel drug concentrations were well described by the model. The post hoc estimates of average steady-state concentrations were predicted to be similar for the adult and pediatric cohorts of the pivotal phase III study. Parameter estimates showed almost exclusively renal excretion of rivipansel, which is consistent with the known properties of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of rivipansel was well characterized by a two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model. Our results illustrate the important role of simulations in optimizing a potential drug dosing regimen for patients with sickle cell disease and progressive renal impairment.

Single-dose, multiple-dose, and population pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in neonates and preterm infants with a clinical diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetic profile of pantoprazole granules was assessed in neonates and preterm infants with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either the pantoprazole 1.25 mg (approx. 0.6 mg/kg) or 2.5 mg (approx. 1.2-mg/kg) group and treated for > or =5 consecutive days. Blood was sampled either at 0, 2, 8, and 18 h postdose or at 0, 1, 4, and 12 h postdose on day 1 and at 3 and 6 h postdose after > or =5 consecutive doses. Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) and CYP3A4 genotypes were determined. Safety was monitored. Population pharmacokinetics (popPK) analyses were conducted using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: The popPK modeling of the pantoprazole 1.25 mg and 2.5 mg groups obtained mean (+/-standard deviation) estimates for the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of 3.54 (+/-2.82) and 7.27 (+/-5.30) microg h/mL, respectively, and mean estimates for half-life of 3.1 (+/-1.5) and 2.7 (+/-1.1) h, respectively. Pantoprazole did not accumulate following multiple-dose administration. The two patients with the CYP2C19 poor metabolizer genotype had a substantially higher AUC than extensive metabolizers. No safety-related discontinuations occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In preterm infants and neonates, pantoprazole granules were generally well tolerated, mean exposures with pantoprazole 2.5 mg were slightly higher than that in adults who received 40 mg. While the half-life was longer, accumulation did not occur.

Effect of Renal or Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravenous Rivipansel.

Two studies evaluated the effects of renal and hepatic impairment on pharmacokinetics and safety of rivipansel (NCT02813798, NCT02871570). A single intravenous 840-mg rivipansel dose was administered to subjects with renal impairment or normal renal function in study 1005 and subjects with moderate hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function in study 1006. Plasma (both studies) and urine (study 1005) samples were collected for 96 hours postdose. All subjects in studies 1005 (n = 28) and 1006 (n = 16) completed all study procedures. Rivipansel exposure (AUCinf ) was 47%, 124%, and 437% higher and total clearance 30%, 57%, and 82% lower in the mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment groups, respectively, than in the normal renal function group. Overall rivipansel exposure was 20% lower and total clearance 31% higher in the moderate hepatic impairment group than in the normal hepatic function group. Ten treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in studies 1005 and 1006; no event was considered treatment related. As expected, clearance of rivipansel decreased with increasing renal impairment. The difference observed between rivipansel pharmacokinetics in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and subjects with normal hepatic function was not considered clinically significant. Single doses of rivipansel were well tolerated in subjects with either renal or hepatic impairment.

Fosdagrocorat (PF-04171327) versus prednisone or placebo in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase IIb study.

Objectives: Glucocorticoids have anti-inflammatory, transrepression-mediated effects, although adverse events (AEs; transactivation-mediated effects) limit long-term use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of fosdagrocorat (PF-04171327), a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor, versus prednisone or placebo. Methods: In this 12-week, phase II, randomised controlled trial, 323 patients with moderate to severe RA were randomised 1:1:1:1:1:1:1 to fosdagrocorat (1 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg or 15 mg), prednisone (5 mg or 10 mg) or placebo, once daily. The primary endpoints (week 8) were American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) responses, and percentage changes from baseline in biomarkers of bone formation (procollagen type 1 N-terminal peptide [P1NP]) and resorption (urinary N-telopeptide to urinary creatinine ratio [uNTx:uCr]). Safety was assessed. Results: ACR20 responses with fosdagrocorat 10 mg and 15 mg were superior to placebo, and fosdagrocorat 15 mg was non-inferior to prednisone 10 mg (week 8 model-predicted ACR20 responses: 47%, 61%, 69% and 73% vs 51%, 71% and 37% with fosdagrocorat 1 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg vs prednisone 5 mg, 10 mg and placebo, respectively). Percentage changes from baseline in P1NP with fosdagrocorat 1 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg met non-inferiority criteria to prednisone 5 mg. Corresponding changes in uNTx:uCr varied considerably. All fosdagrocorat doses reduced glycosylated haemoglobin levels. AEs were similar between groups; 63 (19.5%) patients reported treatment-related AEs; 9 (2.8%) patients reported serious AEs. No patients had adrenal insufficiency, treatment-related significant infections or laboratory abnormalities. No deaths were reported. Conclusion: In patients with RA, fosdagrocorat 10 mg and 15 mg demonstrated efficacy similar to prednisone 10 mg and safety similar to prednisone 5 mg. Trial registration number: NCT01393639.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Fosdagrocorat (PF-04171327), a Dissociated Glucocorticoid Receptor Agonist, in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Dissociated agonists of the glucocorticoid receptor (DAGRs) show similar antiinflammatory effects but improved tolerability compared with standard glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonists. The prodrug fosdagrocorat (PF-04171327), with active DAGR metabolite PF-00251802 (Metabolite-1), is postulated to show superior efficacy over placebo and prednisone in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated the population pharmacokinetics of active Metabolite-1 and its active metabolite PF-04015475 (Metabolite-2) in patients with moderate to severe RA enrolled in a 12-week, phase II, randomized, double-blind study (NCT01393639). A simultaneous fit of a two-compartment model for Metabolite-1 and a one-compartment model for Metabolite-2 provided an adequate fit to the data. Significant covariates included weight, with an additional female effect on clearance of Metabolite-1 (∼26%) and Metabolite-2 (∼33%) compared with males. Age influenced clearance of Metabolite-1. In combination, age, weight, and sex predicted >twofold differences in area under the concentration-time curve of Metabolite-1 at the extremes.

In Vitro and In Vivo Investigation of Potential for Complex CYP3A Interaction for PF-00251802 (Dagrocorat), a Novel Dissociated Agonist of the Glucocorticoid Receptor.

The dissociated agonists of the glucocorticoid receptor are a novel class of agents in clinical development for rheumatoid arthritis. PF-04171327 (fosdagrocorat) is a phosphate ester prodrug of PF-00251802 (dagrocorat), a selective high-affinity partial agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor, which is further metabolized to PF-04015475. This study evaluated the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of PF-00251802 and PF-04015475 in vitro and used model-based prediction approaches to estimate clinical impact. PF-00251802 is a reversible inhibitor of several CYPs, but modeling has suggested no clinically relevant interaction. PF-00251802 and PF-04015475 are time-dependent inhibitors and inducers of CYP3A in vitro; PF-00251802 is also a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP2D6. Model-based prediction suggested the potential for weak inhibition of CYP3A in vivo. A clinical DDI study was conducted with midazolam, a sensitive CYP3A substrate. A phase 1 open-label, multiple-dose study evaluated the effect of PF-04171327 on midazolam pharmacokinetics and safety in 12 healthy volunteers. Administration of midazolam alone or concomitantly with PF-04171327 resulted in equivalent pharmacokinetic profiles (AUCinf , 21.17 vs 20.28 ng·h/mL, respectively), indicating that PF-04171327 had no net effect on CYP3A activity in vivo. These findings support the further development of PF-00251802 and PF-04171327 as potential treatments for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (NCT00987038).

Dose Selection Based on Modeling and Simulation for Rivipansel in Pediatric Patients Aged 6 to 11 Years With Sickle Cell Disease.

This modeling and simulation exercise aimed to provide dosing recommendations for rivipansel phase III studies in children aged 6-11 years with sickle cell disease (SCD). Pharmacokinetic data from 109 patients aged 12-51 years who received rivipansel (2-40 mg/kg) in previous studies (three phase I and one phase II) were integrated to build a three-compartmental simulation model. Renal clearance simulations across the age range accounted for renal function development and postulated hyperfiltration in SCD. Simulated demographic distributions for the pediatric SCD population were used to predict concentration-time profiles from three dosing regimens, which were then compared against efficacious average steady-state concentrations observed in phase II. A dosing regimen comprising a 40-mg/kg loading dose followed by a 20-mg/kg maintenance dose every 12 hours was selected, as it will likely provide an efficacious concentration range. Its validity will be confirmed in the ongoing phase III study.

Lack of Effect of Rivipansel on QTc Interval in Healthy Adult African American Male Subjects.

Rivipansel is a pan-selectin inhibitor in phase 3 development for the treatment of vaso-occlusive crises in patients with sickle cell disease. This single-dose, randomized, 3-period, 3-treatment (400 mg moxifloxacin open-label, 4 g rivipansel-blinded, and placebo-blinded) crossover study evaluated the effect of rivipansel on the QT/QTc interval in 48 healthy male African American subjects (age, 21-53 years; weight, 60-115 kg). Time-matched, placebo-adjusted change from baseline QT interval using Fridericia's correction method (QTcF) was determined using a repeated-measures mixed-effects model. The highest upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for QTcF change was 3.22 milliseconds 3 hours postdose. Moxifloxacin showed the anticipated QTcF effect, indicating that the study had adequate sensitivity to detect changes in the QTcF interval. The study concluded that no QTcF effect was demonstrated with rivipansel compared with placebo, as the upper bound of the 2-sided 90%CI was less than 10 milliseconds at all times. Exposure-response modeling for rivipansel concentrations and change from baseline in QTcF data corroborated a lack of effect with rivipansel compared with placebo. Single doses of rivipansel 4 g by intravenous infusion over 20 minutes were well tolerated in this study.

The effects of concomitant administration of theophylline and toborinone on the pharmacokinetics of both compounds in poor and extensive metabolizers via CYP2D6.

This study investigated the effects of the concomitant administration of theophylline and toborinone on the pharmacokinetics of both compounds in poor and extensive metabolizers via CYP2D6. In period 1, a single dose of 3.5 mg/kg theophylline was administered orally. In period 2, a single dose of 1.0 microg/kg/min toborinone was infused over 6 hours. In period 3, 3.5 mg/kg theophylline was coadministered with 1.0 microg/kg/min toborinone. Serial blood and pooled urine samples were collected before and after toborinone administration for the quantification of toborinone and its metabolites in plasma and urine. Serial blood samples were collected before and after theophylline administration for the quantification of theophylline and its metabolites in plasma. No significant differences were observed in toborinone pharmacokinetics between poor and extensive metabolizers via CYP2D6. Toborinone coadministration with theophylline did not result in a substantive effect on the disposition of theophylline and vice versa.

The pharmacokinetics of toborinone in subjects with congestive heart failure and concomitant renal impairment and/or concomitant hepatic impairment.

The pharmacokinetics of toborinone was studied in subjects with congestive heart failure (CHF) and concomitant renal and/or hepatic disease. At the time of admission, subjects were grouped based on estimated creatinine clearance and serum bilirubin. Glomerular filtration rate was assessed using iothalamate clearance. Hepatic function was assessed using the caffeine metabolism test and indocyanine green clearance. No significant differences were observed in mean toborinone pharmacokinetic parameters among the four study groups. Positive correlations were observed between toborinone clearance and the measured indices of renal and hepatic function: creatinine clearance, iothalamate renal clearance, paraxanthine/caffeine ratio, and indocyanine green clearance. Toborinone clearance decreased with decreasing creatinine clearance, decreasing glomerular filtration rate, decreasing demethylation metabolic activity, and decreasing hepatic bloodflow, although no significant differences were observed in any mean toborinone pharmacokinetic parameters evaluated among the four study groups.

Randomized, open-label, multicentre pharmacokinetic studies of two dose levels of pantoprazole granules in infants and children aged 1 month through <6 years with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of pantoprazole delayed-release granules in infants and children aged 1 month to <6 years with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). The studies described in this manuscript were conducted to fulfil the requirements of the paediatric written request for pantoprazole by the US FDA. METHODS: Two randomized, open-label, multicentre studies were conducted in infants aged 1 month to <12 months (study 1) and children aged 1 year through <6 years (study 2) with GORD. Patients were randomly assigned to either the low-dose pantoprazole group (0.6 mg/kg equivalent) or the high-dose pantoprazole group (1.2 mg/kg equivalent) in a 1 : 1 fashion. Pantoprazole granules were administered approximately 30 minutes before breakfast for at least five consecutive doses. Blood samples were obtained at prespecified intervals. Plasma pantoprazole concentration-time data were analysed by non-compartmental methods. Descriptive statistics were calculated for pharmacokinetic parameters. Patients in study 2 additionally received pantoprazole for 28 days. Safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS: In study 1, 43 patients were randomized; 42 were included in the single-dose pharmacokinetic evaluation (15 females, 27 males; mean postnatal age 6.3 months). In study 2, 17 patients were randomized, and all were included in the single-dose pharmacokinetic evaluation (6 females, 11 males; mean age 3.2 years). In both studies, exposure increased with dose. Mean (standard deviation) maximum (peak) plasma concentration values for the low and high doses were 503 (506) ng/mL and 1318 (1307) ng/mL, respectively, in study 1, and 229 (196) ng/mL and 653 (645) ng/mL, respectively, in study 2. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve values for the low and high doses were 1046 (1043) ng · h/mL and 3602 (3269) ng · h/mL, respectively, in study 1, and 293 (146) ng · h/mL and 2448 (2170) ng · h/mL, respectively, in study 2. There was a trend for increasing clearance with increasing age across the ages 1 month through <6 years. There was no evidence of drug accumulation after multiple doses. On-treatment adverse events (AEs) occurred in 19 of 43 patients in study 1 and in 11 of 17 patients in study 2. Serious AEs occurred in two patients in study 1 (gastroenteritis in one patient and acute gastroenteritis from rotavirus infection resulting in discontinuation of one patient); the serious AEs resolved and were not considered by the investigators to be drug related. No other safety-related discontinuations occurred in either study. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure increased with increasing doses of pantoprazole granules, even though wide interindividual variability was observed. Compared with that in adults receiving pantoprazole 40 mg, exposure obtained with the 1.2 mg/kg dose was similar in study 1 and slightly lower in study 2. Pantoprazole was generally well tolerated in infants and children aged 1 month through <6 years with GORD. Trial registration numbers (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT00259012 (study 1) and NCT00141817 (study 2).

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, pharmacokinetics and safety study of pantoprazole tablets in children and adolescents aged 6 through 16 years with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may benefit from gastric acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors such as pantoprazole. Effective treatment with pantoprazole requires correct dosing and understanding of the drug's kinetic profile in children. The aim of these studies was to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of single and multiple doses of pantoprazole delayed-release tablets in pediatric patients with GERD aged 6 to 11 years (study 1) and 12 to 16 years (study 2). Patients were randomly assigned to receive pantoprazole 20 or 40 mg once daily. Plasma pantoprazole concentrations were obtained at intervals through 12 hours after the single dose and at 2 and 4 hours after multiple doses for PK evaluation. PK parameters were derived by standard noncompartmental methods and examined as a function of both drug dose and patient age. Safety was also monitored. Pantoprazole PK was dose independent (when dose normalized) and similar to PK reported from adult studies. There was no evidence of accumulation with multiple dosing or reports of serious drug-associated adverse events. In children aged 6 to 16 years with GERD, currently available pantoprazole delayed-release tablets can be used to provide systemic exposure similar to that in adults.

Bioequivalence among three methods of administering pantoprazole granules in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: The bioequivalence among three methods of administering pantoprazole granules was studied in healthy subjects. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, three-period, crossover study, 25 healthy adults received a single 40-mg dose of pantoprazole granules with applesauce orally, with apple juice orally, and with apple juice administered via a nasogastric tube. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of six treatment sequences. Blood samples were collected within 2 hours before treatment administration on study day 1 and at 0.33, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, and 24 hours after treatment administration. Plasma pantoprazole concentrations were analyzed by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The plasma pantoprazole concentration-time data for each subject were analyzed using noncompartmental methods. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the test:reference geometric mean ratio were calculated for the peak pantoprazole concentration (C(max) ) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). RESULTS: Of the 25 subjects enrolled, 100% completed the study. The mean C(max) and AUC values were similar for the three administration methods. The 90% CIs for the ratios of the geometric means of the granules in apple juice orally (92.4-112.5%) and in apple juice administered through a nasogastric tube (102.7-125.2%), relative to the granules administered with applesauce orally, were essentially within the bioequivalent limits of 80-125%. No serious adverse events or study discontinuations occurred. CONCLUSION: Three methods of administering pantoprazole delayed-release granules for oral suspension-with apple juice orally, with applesauce orally, and with apple juice through a nasogastric tube--were bioequivalent in healthy subjects.