Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Infect Dis ; 223(9): 1522-1527, 2021 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33556961

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for stopping coronavirus disease 2019 patient isolation are mainly symptom-based, with isolation for 10 to 20 days depending on their condition. METHODS: In this study, we describe 3 deeply immunocompromised patients, each with different clinical evolutions. We observed (1) the patients' epidemiological, clinical, and serological data, (2) infectiousness using viral culture, and (3) viral mutations accumulated over time. RESULTS: Asymptomatic carriage, symptom resolution, or superinfection with a second severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 strain were observed, all leading to prolonged infectious viral shedding for several months. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding underlying mechanisms and frequency of prolonged infectiousness is crucial to adapt current guidelines and strengthen the use of systematic polymerase chain reaction testing before stopping isolation in immunocompromised populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/immunology , Immunocompromised Host , SARS-CoV-2 , Superinfection/virology , Virus Shedding , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing/methods , Humans , Male , Patient Isolation
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 812, 2021 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34388990

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of lockdown in containing the COVID-19 pandemic has been reported in different studies. However, the impact on sociodemographic characteristics of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to describe the changes in sociodemographic characteristics of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and to compare the transmission risk factors of COVID-19 before and during lockdown in France. METHODS: An observational retrospective study was conducted in a University Hospital in Paris, France. Data from patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in the Infectious Diseases Department between February 26 and May 11, 2020 were collected. The study population was divided into 2 groups: group A of patients infected before lockdown, and group B of patients infected during lockdown, considering a maximum incubation period of 14 days. Sociodemographic characteristics and transmission risk factors were compared between the 2 groups using Student's t-test for continuous variables and Chi-2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-three patients were included in the study, 305 (79.6%) in group A and 78 (20.4%) in group B. Patients in group A were significantly younger (60.0 versus (vs) 66.5 years (p = 0.03)). The professionally active population was larger in group A (44.3% vs 24.4%). There were significantly more non-French-speaking people in group B (16.7% vs 6.6%, p <  0.01). Most patients from group A had individual accommodation (92.8% vs 74.4%, p <  0.01). Contact with a relative was the main transmission risk factor in both groups (24.6% vs 33.3%, p = 0.16). Recent travel and large gathering were found only in group A. The proportion of people living in disadvantaged conditions, such as homeless people or people living in social housing, was significantly higher in group B (11.5% vs 4.3%, p = 0.03) as was the proportion of institutionalized individuals (14.1% vs 3.0%, p <  0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study conducted in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in Paris, France, the likelihood of being infected despite the lockdown was higher for people who do not speak French, live in social housing, are homeless or institutionalized. Targeted measures have to be implemented to protect these populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Pandemics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/transmission , Communicable Disease Control/methods , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quarantine , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(11)2021 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34833377

ABSTRACT

There are a number of potential implications for the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD) stemming from the global spread of "SARS-COV-2". Many studies that were conducted by Cleveland Clinic researchers identified a link between COVID-19 infection and brain abnormalities seen in people with AD. This article explains the association between COVID-19 and AD and how people with AD are affected by COVID-19, whether directly or indirectly. First, this article begins by explaining AD and its types, then giving an overview about COVID-19, its symptoms and the associated complications. Then, direct and indirect consequences of COVID-19 on people experiencing AD are discussed briefly. Some management strategies are recommended at the end of this article in addition to a future perspective on this topic. This article concludes by summarizing the main points mentioned about the association between COVID-19 and AD.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , COVID-19 , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
8.
PLoS One ; 18(10): e0291860, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797039

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study described the demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes of solid organ transplant recipients who were admitted to our center for infection. It also determined factors associated with a poor outcome, and compares early and late period infections. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, conducted at a tertiary care center in France between October 2017 and March 2019, infectious outcomes of patients with solid organ transplant where studied. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included with 158 hospitalizations for infection. Among these 104 patients, 71 (68%) were men. The median age was 59 years old. The most common symptoms on admission were fever (66%) and chills (31%). Lower respiratory tract infections were the most common diagnosis (71/158 hospitalizations). Urinary tract infections were frequently seen in kidney transplant recipients (25/60 hospitalizations). One or more infectious agents were isolated for 113 hospitalizations (72%): 70 bacteria, 36 viruses and 10 fungi, with predominance of gram-negative bacilli (53 cases) of which 13 were multidrug-resistant. The most frequently used antibiotics were third generation cephalosporins (40 cases), followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (26 cases). We note that 25 infections (16%) occurred during the first 6 months (early post-transplant period). Patients admitted during the early post-transplant period were more often on immunosuppressive treatment with prednisone (25/25 VS 106/133) (p = 0.01), mycophenolic acid (22/25 VS 86/133) (p = 0.03), presented for an urinary tract infection (10/25 VS 25/133) (p = 0.04) or a bacterial infection (17/25 VS 53/133) (p = 0.01). Patients with later infection had more comorbidities (57/83 VS 9/21) (p = 0.03), cancer (19/83 VS 0/21) (p = 0.04) or were on treatment with everolimus (46/133 VS 0/25) (p = 0.001). During 31 hospitalizations (20%), patients presented with a serious infection requiring intensive care (n = 26; 16%) or leading to death (n = 7; 4%). Bacteremia, pulmonary and cardiac complications were the main risk factors associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Infections pose a significant challenge in the care of solid organ transplant patients, particularly those with comorbidities and intensive immunosuppression. This underscores the crucial importance of continuous surveillance and epidemiologic monitoring within this patient population.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , Organ Transplantation , Urinary Tract Infections , Male , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Paris , Retrospective Studies , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy
9.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 15(6): 791-797, 2021 06 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34242188

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We lack data on the epidemiology and management of brain abscesses in the Middle East. The aim of this study is to report a case series of brain abscesses admitted at a tertiary care center in Lebanon, between January 2008 and December 2018. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study aimed at determining the demographic data, treatment, and correlations between different studied variables with prognosis of patients that received treatment. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (30 males) were included with a median age of 37 years (2-85). The analysis showed that the classic triad of fever, headache and neurologic deficit was only present in 12% of patients on admission. The source of infection was contiguous in 36.5%, post surgical in 32%, and distant in 17% of cases. Stereotactic biopsy was performed in 41.5% of patients, and craniotomy in 19.5%. A microorganism was isolated in 63% of patients (26 cases). The most used antibiotics were carbapenems (46%) and glycopeptides (66%). Eighty percent of patient (33) had a good outcome. A worse prognosis was significantly correlated with immunosuppression and multiple cerebral abscesses. CONCLUSIONS: Brain abscess remains a relatively rare condition.


Subject(s)
Brain Abscess/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Abscess/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Craniotomy , Demography , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lebanon/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Young Adult
10.
IDCases ; 26: e01267, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34485077

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (CoVID-19) is a viral disease. Although the predominant presentation is respiratory disease, other manifestations such as gastrointestinal manifestations are commonly reported. Nevertheless, it has not been associated with chronic cholangitis or hepatic injury. In this study, we report three cases of severe CoVID-19 infection that required ICU admission, intubation, and sedation with ketamine. All three patients had abnormal liver function despite recovery and were diagnosed with cholangitis in the context of CoVID-19.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL