ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Acute brain dysfunction (ABD) in pediatric sepsis has a prevalence of 20%, but can be difficult to identify. Our previously validated ABD computational phenotype (CP ABD ) used variables obtained from the electronic health record indicative of clinician concern for acute neurologic or behavioral change. We tested whether the CP ABD has better diagnostic performance to identify confirmed ABD than other definitions using the Glasgow Coma Scale or delirium scores. DESIGN: Diagnostic testing in a curated cohort of pediatric sepsis/septic shock patients. SETTING: Quaternary freestanding children's hospital. SUBJECTS: The test dataset comprised 527 children with sepsis/septic shock managed between 2011 and 2021 with a prevalence (pretest probability) of confirmed ABD of 30% (159/527). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CP ABD was based on use of neuroimaging, electroencephalogram, and/or administration of new antipsychotic medication. We compared the performance of the CP ABD with three GCS/delirium-based definitions of ABD-Proulx et al, International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference, and Pediatric Organ Dysfunction Information Update Mandate. The posttest probability of identifying ABD was highest in CP ABD (0.84) compared with other definitions. CP ABD also had the highest sensitivity (83%; 95% CI, 76-89%) and specificity (93%; 95% CI, 90-96%). The false discovery rate was lowest in CP ABD (1-in-6) as was the false omission rate (1-in-14). Finally, the prevalence threshold for the definitions varied, with the CP ABD being the definition closest to 20%. CONCLUSIONS: In our curated dataset of pediatric sepsis/septic shock, CP ABD had favorable characteristics to identify confirmed ABD compared with GCS/delirium-based definitions. The CP ABD can be used to further study the impact of ABD in studies using large electronic health datasets.
Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Shock, Septic , Humans , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Female , Male , Child , Shock, Septic/diagnosis , Shock, Septic/physiopathology , Infant , Electroencephalography/methods , Glasgow Coma Scale , Adolescent , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/physiopathology , Neuroimaging , Delirium/diagnosis , Infant, Newborn , Datasets as TopicABSTRACT
The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Reviewer Academy seeks to train and establish a community of trusted, reliable, and skilled peer reviewers with diverse backgrounds and interests to promote high-quality reviews for each of the SCCM journals. Goals of the Academy include building accessible resources to highlight qualities of excellent manuscript reviews; educating and mentoring a diverse group of healthcare professionals; and establishing and upholding standards for insightful and informative reviews. This manuscript will map the mission of the Reviewer Academy with a succinct summary of the importance of peer review, process of reviewing a manuscript, and the expected ethical standards of reviewers. We will equip readers to target concise, thoughtful feedback as peer reviewers, advance their understanding of the editorial process and inspire readers to integrate medical journalism into diverse professional careers.
Subject(s)
Mentoring , Peer Review , Humans , Health Personnel , Mentors , Peer Group , Peer Review, Research , Societies, MedicalABSTRACT
The September 2023 issue and this year has already proven to be important for improving our understanding of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS); Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) has published 16 articles so far. Therefore, my three Editor's Choice articles this month highlight yet more PCCM material about PARDS by covering the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV), the trajectory in cytokine profile during illness, and a new look at lung mechanics. The PCCM Connections for Readers give us the opportunity to focus on some clinical biomarkers of severity and mortality risk during critical illness.
ABSTRACT
This is another excellent issue of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) for July; congratulations to our authors and many thanks to all reviewers. This month, my Editor's Choice articles cover three topics: clinical pathophysiology in pediatric patients supported using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); unplanned extubation of endotracheal tubes in pediatric cardiac ICU (CICU) patients; and sepsis biomarkers in the low-middle income (LMIC) resource setting. The PCCM Connections for Readers focuses on a novel pediatric theme in lung mechanics physiology, i.e., mechanical power in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS).
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To model bolus dosing, infusion rate, and weaning rate on theoretical serum concentration of midazolam and pentobarbital used in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE). DESIGN: One- and two-compartment in silico pharmacokinetic models of midazolam and pentobarbital. SETTING: Not applicable. SUBJECTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: We compared the model variables used in midazolam and pentobarbital protocols for standard RSE. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Standard RSE treatment protocols result in steady-state serum concentrations that are 6.2-9.0-fold higher for the one-compartment model and 2.3-4.7-fold higher for the two-compartment model. In the model, not including bolus doses delays the achievement of serum steady-state concentration by 0.5 and 2.7 hours for midazolam and pentobarbital, respectively. Abrupt discontinuation of these medications reduces modeled medication exposure by 1.1 and 6.4 hours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our in silico pharmacokinetic modeling of standard midazolam and pentobarbital dosing protocols for RSE suggests potential variables to optimize in future clinical studies.
Subject(s)
Pentobarbital , Status Epilepticus , Humans , Pentobarbital/therapeutic use , Midazolam , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Status Epilepticus/drug therapy , Clinical ProtocolsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A scoping review of literature about mechanisms leading to intracranial hypertension (ICH) in syndromic craniosynostosis (sCS) patients, followed by a narrative synopsis of whether cognitive and behavioral outcome in sCS is more related to genetic origins, rather than the result of ICH. METHODS: The scoping review comprised of a search of keywords in EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of science, Cochrane Central Register of Trials, and Google scholar databases. Abstracts were read and clinical articles were selected for full-text review and data were extracted using a structured template. A priori, the authors planned to analyze mechanistic questions about ICH in sCS by focusing on 2 key aspects, including (1) the criteria for determining ICH and (2) the role of component factors in the Monro-Kellie hypothesis/doctrine leading to ICH, that is, cerebral blood volume, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and the intracranial volume. RESULTS: Of 1893 search results, 90 full-text articles met criteria for further analysis. (1) Invasive intracranial pressure measurements are the gold standard for determining ICH. Of noninvasive alternatives to determine ICH, ophthalmologic ones like fundoscopy and retinal thickness scans are the most researched. (2) The narrative review shows how the findings relate to ICH using the Monro-Kellie doctrine. CONCLUSIONS: Development of ICH is influenced by different aspects of sCS: deflection of skull growth, obstructive sleep apnea, venous hypertension, obstruction of CSF flow, and possibly reduced CSF absorption. Problems in cognition and behavior are more likely because of genetic origin. Cortical thinning and problems in visual function are likely the result of ICH.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To assess the relationship of surface area of the cerebral cortex to intracranial volume (ICV) in syndromic craniosynostosis. METHOD: Records of 140 patients (64 males, 76 females; mean age 8y 6mo [SD 5y 6mo], range 1y 2mo-24y 2mo) with syndromic craniosynostosis were reviewed to include clinical and imaging data. Two hundred and three total magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were evaluated in this study (148 patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor [FGFR], 19 patients with TWIST1, and 36 controls). MRIs were processed via FreeSurfer pipeline to determine total ICV and cortical surface area (CSA). Scaling coefficients were calculated from log-transformed data via mixed regression to account for multiple measurements, sex, syndrome, and age. Educational outcomes were reported by syndrome. RESULTS: Mean ICV was greater in patients with FGFR (1519cm3 , SD 269cm3 , p=0.016) than in patients with TWIST1 (1304cm3 , SD 145cm3 ) or controls (1405cm3 , SD 158cm3 ). CSA was related to ICV by a scaling law with an exponent of 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.76) in patients with FGFR compared to 0.81 (95% CI 0.50-1.12) in patients with TWIST1 and 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.93) in controls. Lobar analysis revealed reduced scaling in the parietal (0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.59) and occipital (0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.80) lobes of patients with FGFR compared with controls. Modified learning environments were needed more often in patients with FGFR. INTERPRETATION: Despite adequate ICV in FGFR-mediated craniosynostosis, CSA development is reduced, indicating maldevelopment, particularly in parietal and occipital lobes. Modified education is also more common in patients with FGFR.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/abnormalities , Craniosynostoses/complications , Malformations of Cortical Development/etiology , Adolescent , Cerebral Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Child , Child, Preschool , Craniosynostoses/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Infant , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Malformations of Cortical Development/diagnostic imaging , Young AdultABSTRACT
Over the past two decades, pediatric intensive care research networks have been formed across North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia/New Zealand. The U.K. Paediatric Critical Care Society Study Group (PCCS-SG) has over a 20-year tradition of fostering collaborative research, leading to the design and successful conduct of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). To date, the PCCS-SG network has delivered 13 different multicenter RCTs, covering a spectrum of study designs, methodologies, and scale. Lessons from the early years have led PCCS-SG to now focus on the entire process needed for developing an RCT, starting from robust preparatory steps such as surveys, data analysis, and feasibility work through to a definitive RCT. Pilot RCTs have been an important part of this process as well. Facilitators of successful research have included the presence of a national registry to facilitate efficient data collection; close partnerships with established Clinical Trials Units to bring together clinicians, methodologists, statisticians, and trial managers; greater involvement of transport teams to recruit patients early in trials of time-sensitive interventions; and the funded infrastructure of clinical research staff within the National Health Service to integrate research within the clinical service. The informal nature of PCCS-SG has encouraged buy-in from clinicians. Greater international collaboration and development of embedded trial platforms to speed up the generation and dissemination of trial findings are two key future strategic goals for the PCCS-SG research network.
Subject(s)
Critical Care , Research Design , Child , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , United Kingdom , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To validate a computational phenotype that identifies acute brain dysfunction (ABD) based on clinician concern for neurologic or behavioral changes in pediatric sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: Four thousand two hundred eighty-nine index sepsis episodes. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: An existing computational phenotype of ABD was optimized to include routinely collected variables indicative of clinician concern for acute neurologic or behavioral change (completion of CT or MRI, electroencephalogram, or new antipsychotic administration). First, the computational phenotype was compared with an ABD reference standard established from chart review of 527 random sepsis episodes to determine criterion validity. Next, the computational phenotype was compared with a separate validation cohort of 3,762 index sepsis episodes to determine content and construct validity. Criterion validity for the final phenotype had sensitivity 83% (95% CI, 76-89%), specificity 93% (90-95%), positive predictive value 84% (77-89%), and negative predictive value 93% (90-96%). In the validation cohort, the computational phenotype identified ABD in 35% (95% CI 33-36%). Content validity was demonstrated as those with the ABD computational phenotype were more likely to have characteristics of neurologic dysfunction and severe illness than those without the ABD phenotype, including nonreactive pupils (15% vs 1%; p < 0.001), Glasgow Coma Scale less than 5 (44% vs 12%; p < 0.001), greater than or equal to two nonneurologic organ dysfunctions (50% vs 25%; p < 0.001), and need for intensive care (81% vs 65%; p < 0.001). Construct validity was demonstrated by higher odds for mortality (odds ratio [OR], 6.9; 95% CI, 5.3-9.1) and discharge to rehabilitation (OR, 11.4; 95% CI 7.4-17.5) in patients with, versus without, the ABD computational phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: A computational phenotype of ABD indicative of clinician concern for new neurologic or behavioral change offers a valid retrospective measure to identify episodes of sepsis that involved ABD. This computational phenotype provides a feasible and efficient way to study risk factors for and outcomes from ABD using routinely collected clinical data.
Subject(s)
Brain Diseases , Sepsis , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Hospital Mortality , Sepsis/diagnosis , Brain Diseases/diagnosis , Brain Diseases/etiology , Phenotype , Brain/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses show a variable relationship between optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and the presence of raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Because optic nerve sheath (ONS) tissue can be deformed, it is possible that ONSD reflects not only the current ICP but also prior deforming biomechanical exposures. In this post hoc analysis of two published data sets, we characterize ONS Young's modulus (E, mechanical stress per unit of strain) and calculate threshold pressure for plastic deformation. METHODS: The authors of two previously published articles contributed primary data for these unique post hoc analyses. Human cadaveric ex vivo measurements of ONSD (n = 10) and luminal distending pressure (range 5 to 65 mm Hg) were used to calculate E and the threshold pressure for plastic deformation. Clinical in vivo measurements of ONSD and ICP during endotracheal tube suction from patients with traumatic brain injury (n = 15) were used to validate the ex vivo cadaveric findings. RESULTS: Ex vivo ONS estimate of E was 140 ± 1.3 mm Hg (mean ± standard error), with evidence of plastic deformation occurring with distending pressure at 45 mm Hg. Similar E (71 ± 10 mm Hg) was estimated in vivo with an average ICP of 34 ± 2 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo, ONS plastic deformation occurs at levels of pressure commonly seen in patients with raised ICP, leading to distortion of the ICP-ONSD relationship. This evidence of plastic deformation may illustrate why meta-analyses fail to identify a single threshold in ONSD associated with the presence of raised ICP. Future studies characterizing time-dependent viscous characteristics of the ONS will help determine the time course of ONS tissue biomechanical behavior.
Subject(s)
Intracranial Hypertension , Intracranial Pressure , Cadaver , Humans , Intracranial Hypertension/etiology , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Optic Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Plastics , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze clinical characteristics and outcomes in children with acute catastrophic brain injury (CBI). METHODS: This was a single-center, 13-year (2008-2020) retrospective cohort study of children in the pediatric and cardiac intensive care units with CBI, defined as (1) acute neurologic injury based on clinical and/or imaging findings, (2) the need for life-sustaining intensive care unit therapies, and (3) death or survival with a Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13 at discharge. Patients were excluded if they were discharged directly to home < 14 days from admission or had a chronic neurologic condition with a baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13. The association between the primary outcome of death and clinical variables was analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Outcomes assessed after discharge were technology dependence, neurologic deficits, and Functional Status Score. Improved functional status was defined as a change in total Functional Status Score [Formula: see text] 2. RESULTS: Of 106 patients (58% boys, median age 3.9 years) with CBI, 86 (81%) died. Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies was the most common cause of death (60 of 86, 70%). In our multivariable analysis, each unit increase in admission pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score was associated with 10% greater hazard of death (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.17, p < .01). After controlling for admission pediatric sequential organ failure assessment scores, compared with those of patients with traumatic brain injury, all other etiologies of CBI were associated with a greater hazard of death (p = .02; hazard ratio 3.76-10). The median survival time for the cohort was 22 days (95% confidence interval 14-37 days). Of 23 survivors to hospital discharge, 20 were still alive after a median of 2 years (interquartile range 1-3 years), 6 of 20 (30%) did not have any technology dependence, 12 of 20 (60%) regained normal levels of alertness and responsiveness, and 15 of 20 (75%) had improved functional status. CONCLUSIONS: Most children with acute CBI died within 1 month of hospitalization. Having traumatic brain injury as the etiology of CBI was associated with greater survival, whereas increased organ dysfunction score on admission was associated with a higher hazard of mortality. Of the survivors, some recovered consciousness and functional status and did not require permanent technology dependence. Larger prospective studies are needed to improve prediction of CBI among critically ill children, understand factors guiding clinician and family decisions on the continuation or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments, and characterize the natural history and long-term outcomes among CBI survivors.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Brain Injuries , Brain Injuries/therapy , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the clinical profile and outcomes of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in children, and investigated the relationship between fever onset and status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: Patients with refractory SE (RSE) between June 1, 2011 and October 1, 2016 were prospectively enrolled in the pSERG (Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group) cohort. Cases meeting the definition of NORSE were classified as "NORSE of known etiology" or "NORSE of unknown etiology." Subgroup analysis of NORSE of unknown etiology was completed based on the presence and time of fever occurrence relative to RSE onset: fever at onset (≤24 h), previous fever (2 weeks-24 h), and without fever. RESULTS: Of 279 patients with RSE, 46 patients met the criteria for NORSE. The median age was 2.4 years, and 25 (54%) were female. Forty (87%) patients had NORSE of unknown etiology. Nineteen (48%) presented with fever at SE onset, 16 (40%) had a previous fever, and five (12%) had no fever. The patients with preceding fever had more prolonged SE and worse outcomes, and 25% recovered baseline neurological function. The patients with fever at onset were younger and had shorter SE episodes, and 89% recovered baseline function. SIGNIFICANCE: Among pediatric patients with RSE, 16% met diagnostic criteria for NORSE, including the subcategory of febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). Pediatric NORSE cases may also overlap with refractory febrile SE (FSE). FIRES occurs more frequently in older children, the course is usually prolonged, and outcomes are worse, as compared to refractory FSE. Fever occurring more than 24 h before the onset of seizures differentiates a subgroup of NORSE patients with distinctive clinical characteristics and worse outcomes.
Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy/diagnosis , Seizures, Febrile/diagnosis , Status Epilepticus/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Electroencephalography , Female , Fever/complications , Humans , Infant , Male , Prospective Studies , Seizures, Febrile/cerebrospinal fluid , Status Epilepticus/cerebrospinal fluid , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to describe long-term clinical and developmental outcomes in pediatric refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and identify factors associated with new neurological deficits after RSE. METHODS: We performed retrospective analyses of prospectively collected observational data from June 2011 to March 2020 on pediatric patients with RSE. We analyzed clinical outcomes from at least 30 days after RSE and, in a subanalysis, we assessed developmental outcomes and evaluated risk factors in previously normally developed patients. RESULTS: Follow-up data on outcomes were available in 276 patients (56.5% males). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up duration was 1.6 (.9-2.7) years. The in-hospital mortality rate was 4% (16/403 patients), and 15 (5.4%) patients had died after hospital discharge. One hundred sixty-six (62.9%) patients had subsequent unprovoked seizures, and 44 (16.9%) patients had a repeated RSE episode. Among 116 patients with normal development before RSE, 42 of 107 (39.3%) patients with available data had new neurological deficits (cognitive, behavioral, or motor). Patients with new deficits had longer median (IQR) electroclinical RSE duration than patients without new deficits (10.3 [2.1-134.5] h vs. 4 [1.6-16] h, p = .011, adjusted odds ratio = 1.003, 95% confidence interval = 1.0008-1.0069, p = .027). The proportion of patients with an unfavorable functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score ≥ 4) was 22 of 90 (24.4%), and they were more likely to have received a continuous infusion. SIGNIFICANCE: About one third of patients without prior epilepsy developed recurrent unprovoked seizures after the RSE episode. In previously normally developing patients, 39% presented with new deficits during follow-up, with longer electroclinical RSE duration as a predictor.
Subject(s)
Status Epilepticus , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Child , Epilepsy, Generalized/drug therapy , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/drug therapy , Status Epilepticus/diagnosis , Status Epilepticus/epidemiology , Status Epilepticus/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate benzodiazepine (BZD) administration patterns before transitioning to non-BZD antiseizure medication (ASM) in pediatric patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE). METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study in the United States and Canada used prospectively collected observational data from children admitted with rSE between 2011 and 2020. Outcome variables were the number of BZDs given before the first non-BZD ASM, and the number of BZDs administered after 30 and 45 min from seizure onset and before escalating to non-BZD ASM. RESULTS: We included 293 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 3.8 (1.3-9.3) years. Thirty-six percent received more than two BZDs before escalating, and the later the treatment initiation was after seizure onset, the less likely patients were to receive multiple BZD doses before transitioning (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .998, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .997-.999 per minute, p = .01). Patients received BZDs beyond 30 and 45 min in 57.3% and 44.0% of cases, respectively. Patients with out-of-hospital seizure onset were more likely to receive more doses of BZDs beyond 30 min (IRR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.73-3.46, p < .0001) and beyond 45 min (IRR = 3.75, 95% CI = 2.40-6.03, p < .0001) compared to patients with in-hospital seizure onset. Intermittent SE was a risk factor for more BZDs administered beyond 45 min compared to continuous SE (IRR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.01-2.06, p = .04). Forty-seven percent of patients (n = 94) with out-of-hospital onset did not receive treatment before hospital arrival. Among patients with out-of-hospital onset who received at least two BZDs before hospital arrival (n = 54), 48.1% received additional BZDs at hospital arrival. SIGNIFICANCE: Failure to escalate from BZDs to non-BZD ASMs occurs mainly in out-of-hospital rSE onset. Delays in the implementation of medical guidelines may be reduced by initiating treatment before hospital arrival and facilitating a transition to non-BZD ASMs after two BZD doses during handoffs between prehospital and in-hospital settings.
Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Status Epilepticus , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/drug therapy , Status Epilepticus/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Enteral nutrition delivery is limited by intolerance and interruptions in critically ill children. Anticholinergic properties of frequently administered medications may contribute to altered gastric motility and enteral nutrition intolerance in this population. We examined the association between the anticholinergic burden of administered medications using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale and adequacy of enteral nutrition delivery. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a previously characterized PICU cohort. SETTING: Multidisciplinary PICU in a quaternary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Younger than or equal to 18 years, on mechanical ventilation and received enteral nutrition within the first 3 days of PICU admission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Daily Anticholinergic Drug Scale score, demographic data, and clinical data were obtained from the primary study. Percent enteral energy adequacy ([kcal delivered ÷ kcal prescribed] × 100) during the first 3 days of PICU admission was calculated. Forty-two patients received enteral nutrition, with median age (interquartile range) 5 years (1.09-12.54 yr), and 62% were male. Median Anticholinergic Drug Scale score was inversely correlated with energy adequacy, with a median 9% decline in energy adequacy per 1-point increase in Anticholinergic Drug Scale score (coefficient, -9.3; 95% CI, -13.43 to -5.27; R2 = 0.35; p < 0.0001). Median hours of enteral nutrition interruptions directly correlated with Anticholinergic Drug Scale score (coefficient, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.531-2.54; R2 = 0.19; p = 0.004). Severity score was greater in patients with less than or equal to 25% enteral energy adequacy and directly correlated with median Anticholinergic Drug Scale score. CONCLUSIONS: Anticholinergic burden from medications administered in the PICU is a potentially modifiable factor for suboptimal enteral nutrition delivery.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Enteral Nutrition , Child , Child, Preschool , Cholinergic Antagonists/adverse effects , Critical Illness/therapy , Energy Intake , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Male , Respiration, ArtificialABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the pediatric super-refractory status epilepticus population by describing treatment variability in super-refractory status epilepticus patients and comparing relevant clinical characteristics, including outcomes, between super-refractory status epilepticus, and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data between June 2011 and January 2019. SETTING: Seventeen academic hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: We included patients 1 month to 21 years old presenting with convulsive refractory status epilepticus. We defined super-refractory status epilepticus as continuous or intermittent seizures lasting greater than or equal to 24 hours following initiation of continuous infusion and divided the cohort into super-refractory status epilepticus and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus groups. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 281 patients (157 males) with a median age of 4.1 years (1.3-9.5 yr), including 31 super-refractory status epilepticus patients. Compared with nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus group, super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of first nonbenzodiazepine-antiseizure medication (149 min [55-491.5 min] vs 62 min [33.3-120.8 min]; p = 0.030) and of continuous infusion (495 min [177.5-1,255 min] vs 150 min [90-318.5 min]; p = 0.003); prolonged seizure duration (120 hr [58-368 hr] vs 3 hr [1.4-5.9 hr]; p < 0.001) and length of ICU stay (17 d [9.5-40 d] vs [1.8-8.8 d]; p < 0.001); more medical complications (18/31 [58.1%] vs 55/250 [22.2%] patients; p < 0.001); lower return to baseline function (7/31 [22.6%] vs 182/250 [73.4%] patients; p < 0.001); and higher mortality (4/31 [12.9%] vs 5/250 [2%]; p = 0.010). Within the super-refractory status epilepticus group, status epilepticus resolution was attained with a single continuous infusion in 15 of 31 patients (48.4%), two in 10 of 31 (32.3%), and three or more in six of 31 (19.4%). Most super-refractory status epilepticus patients (30/31, 96.8%) received midazolam as first choice. About 17 of 31 patients (54.8%) received additional treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of nonbenzodiazepine antiseizure medication treatment, higher number of medical complications and mortality, and lower return to neurologic baseline than nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients, although these associations were not adjusted for potential confounders. Treatment approaches following the first continuous infusion were heterogeneous, reflecting limited information to guide clinical decision-making in super-refractory status epilepticus.
Subject(s)
Status Epilepticus , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Midazolam/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/drug therapy , Status Epilepticus/drug therapyABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Severe brain injury in children resulting in coma and disorders of consciousness (DOC) is a catastrophic event for the life and function of children and their families. The present article summarizes the recently published pediatric literature on validated diagnostic assessments, potential predictors of recovery, and outcome measures used in children with catastrophic brain injury (CBI). Literature search terms included variants of consciousness, diagnostic tests, predictors of outcome, and outcome measures. RECENT FINDINGS: Developmentally appropriate diagnostic tools, outcome predictors, and outcome measures are lacking for children with CBI leading to coma and DOC. Individual case prognosis relies on serial clinical examinations and experience. Evidence regarding optimal diagnosis of the highest level of consciousness and management of children with CBI is needed. Global efforts through the ongoing Curing Coma Campaign are aimed at: developing common data elements for information capture; streamlining the classification of coma endotypes; describing trajectories with biomarkers to monitor recovery or disease progression; and devising effective treatments for adults and children. SUMMARY: Standardized, developmentally appropriate diagnostic and outcome assessments for CBI in children are needed. Future research should use these content standards to update our understanding of children with CBI leading to coma and DOC, and evaluate effective practices using acute adjunctive and rehabilitation therapies.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries , Catastrophic Illness , Brain Injuries/complications , Child , Coma/etiology , Consciousness Disorders/etiology , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The scope of transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the practice of pediatric neurocritical care is unknown. We have surveyed pediatric neurocritical care centers on their use of transcranial Doppler and analyzed clinical management practices. DESIGN: Electronic-mail recruitment with survey of expert centers using web-based questionnaire. SETTING: Survey of 43 hospitals (31 United States, 12 international) belonging to the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A 67% (29/43) hospital-response rate. Of these centers, 27 reported using transcranial Doppler in the PICU; two hospitals opted out due to lack of transcranial Doppler availability/use. The most common diagnoses for using transcranial Doppler in clinical care were intracranial/subarachnoid hemorrhage (20 hospitals), arterial ischemic stroke (14 hospitals), and traumatic brain injury (10 hospitals). Clinical studies were carried out and interpreted by credentialed individuals in 93% (25/27) and 78% (21/27) of the centers, respectively. A written protocol for performance of transcranial Doppler in the PICU was available in 30% (8/27 hospitals); of these, two of eight hospitals routinely performed correlation studies to validate results. In 74% of the centers (20/27), transcranial Doppler results were used to guide clinical care: that is, when to obtain a neuroimaging study (18 hospitals); how to manipulate cerebral perfusion pressure with fluids/vasopressors (13 hospitals); and whether to perform a surgical intervention (six hospitals). Research studies were also commonly performed for a range of diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: At least 27 pediatric neurocritical care centers use transcranial Doppler during clinical care. In the majority of centers, studies are performed and interpreted by credentialed personnel, and findings are used to guide clinical management. Further studies are needed to standardize these practices.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial/methods , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Cerebrovascular Circulation , Child , Critical Illness , Hospitals , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Pediatrics/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Stroke/diagnosis , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is a novel cause of organ dysfunction in children, presenting as either coronavirus disease 2019 with sepsis and/or respiratory failure or a hyperinflammatory shock syndrome. Clinicians must now consider these diagnoses when evaluating children for septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-associated Organ Dysfunction in Children provide an appropriate framework for the early recognition and initial resuscitation of children with sepsis or septic shock caused by all pathogens, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. However, the potential benefits of select adjunctive therapies may differ from non-coronavirus disease 2019 sepsis.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Pediatrics/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Sepsis/therapy , Algorithms , Attitude to Health , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Child , Critical Care/standards , Humans , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Multiple Organ Failure/therapy , Pandemics , Resuscitation/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Sepsis/etiology , Shock, Septic/etiology , Shock, Septic/therapy , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children (including infants, school-aged children, and adolescents) with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. DESIGN: A panel of 49 international experts, representing 12 international organizations, as well as three methodologists and three public members was convened. Panel members assembled at key international meetings (for those panel members attending the conference), and a stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in November 2018. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the chairs, co-chairs, methodologists, and group heads, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development process. METHODS: The panel consisted of six subgroups: recognition and management of infection, hemodynamics and resuscitation, ventilation, endocrine and metabolic therapies, adjunctive therapies, and research priorities. We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or as a best practice statement. In addition, "in our practice" statements were included when evidence was inconclusive to issue a recommendation, but the panel felt that some guidance based on practice patterns may be appropriate. RESULTS: The panel provided 77 statements on the management and resuscitation of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Overall, six were strong recommendations, 52 were weak recommendations, and nine were best-practice statements. For 13 questions, no recommendations could be made; but, for 10 of these, "in our practice" statements were provided. In addition, 49 research priorities were identified. CONCLUSIONS: A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Despite this challenge, these recommendations regarding the management of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction provide a foundation for consistent care to improve outcomes and inform future research.