ABSTRACT
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the United States. Despite numerous studies proving the safety and efficacy of the HPV vaccine, immunization rates remain low, especially among underserved populations. To identify factors contributing to low HPV vaccination rates, patients at a federally qualified health center in Kalamazoo MI were surveyed. Surveys were administered during routine patient visits to determine self-reported vaccination status and vaccination barriers. A total of 98 vaccine-eligible (males/females, ages 9-26 years old) patients/guardians completed the survey. In all, 46% of respondents completed the multi-dose vaccination course, and 56% of those identified as female. White patients reported higher vaccination rates (50%) than patients of color (45%). Of those vaccinated, the most common reason was "physician recommendation" (39%). Those not fully vaccinated most commonly reported being "too young" (39%). Importantly, individuals who had begun, but not completed, the vaccination course reported that their provider had not spoken to them about future vaccines in the series (74%). This study revealed disparities in vaccination rates between the sexes and racial groups, and emphasized the influential role of physician's recommendation on vaccination. Interestingly, other frequently cited barriers to vaccination-an association with sex, personal/religious beliefs, efficacy-proved to be insignificant barriers for this population. Instead, age-related misunderstandings and lack of consistent physician communication about vaccination provided significant barriers. Based on our results, education and reminders about the HPV vaccine by providers is a significant tool to maximize vaccination coverage.
Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Vaccines , Vaccination , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Male , Michigan , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
Trafficking of women and children for sexual exploitation is the fastest growing criminal enterprise in the world. This is a public health crisis; as physicians who have direct contact with victims, we have a unique opportunity to intervene. The authors developed a specialty clinic for survivors of sex trafficking in 2013 at an academic medical center in New York City. Twenty of the 24 women seen in the Survivor Clinic saw a physician while being trafficked. Sex trafficking violates basic human rights, which include the rights to bodily integrity, dignity, health, and freedom from violence and torture. The stories of the patients seen in the Survivor Clinic bear witness to the health consequences of commercial sexual exploitation and reinforce the previous literature on the rates of physical and psychologic harms of trafficking. Health consequences of trafficking include traumatic brain injuries, drug addiction, depression, and neglect of chronic health conditions. All physicians, but gynecologists especially, need more education about the prevalence and dynamics of trafficking and how to assess and intervene on behalf of survivors.
Subject(s)
Gynecology , Human Trafficking , Physician's Role , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Contraception Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Female , Human Rights , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Ectopic/epidemiology , Public Health , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Survivors , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Young AdultSubject(s)
Education, Medical/trends , Female , Gynecology/education , Humans , Obstetrics/education , Pregnancy , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the knowledge on pelvic floor disorders among a cross section of pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: This was an institutional review board-approved cross-sectional survey study of pregnant women with a gestational age of more than 18 weeks at a single tertiary care institution. Participants completed the validated 24-item Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire, and responses were graded to determine a raw accuracy score (0-100%). Proficiency in the topic was defined as a score greater than 80% on the urinary scale and greater than 50% on the prolapse scale. RESULTS: Four hundred two women completed the survey. Mean ± SD raw accuracy in urinary incontinence was 66% ± 12%, and mean ± SD raw accuracy in pelvic organ prolapse was 41% ± 17%. These results were not significantly different among age or ethnic groups. Pregnant women were more likely to know that delivery could lead to incontinence (62%) than to pelvic organ prolapse (42%; P = 0.02), and 83% knew that pelvic floor exercises could prevent urinary incontinence. Proficiency was low among the population on both scales. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women have limited knowledge about pelvic floor dysfunction despite being at increased risk for these conditions during and after their pregnancies. This is an area where patient education and empowerment during routine prenatal care could improve.