Role of up-front autologous stem-cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma for patients in response after induction: an analysis of patients from LYSA centers.

Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) remains a therapeutic challenge. Due to the rarity and the heterogeneity of PTCL, no consensus has been achieved regarding even the type of first-line treatment. The benefit of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is, therefore, still intensely debated. Patients and methods: In the absence of randomized trials addressing the role of ASCT, we performed a large multicentric retrospective study and used both a multivariate proportional hazard model and a propensity score matching approach to correct for sample selection bias between patients allocated or not to ASCT in intention-to-treat (ITT). Results: Among 527 patients screened from 14 centers in France, Belgium and Portugal, a final cohort of 269 patients ≤65 years old with PTCL-not otherwise specified (NOS) (N = 78, 29%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) (N = 123, 46%) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK-ALCL) (N = 68, 25%) with partial (N = 52, 19%) or complete responses (N = 217, 81%) after induction was identified and information about treatment allocation was carefully collected before therapy initiation from medical records. One hundred and thirty-four patients were allocated to ASCT in ITT and 135 were not. Neither the Cox multivariate model (HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.69-1.50 for PFS and HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.68-1.69 for OS) nor the propensity score analysis after stringent matching for potential confounding factors (logrank P = 0.90 and 0.66 for PFS and OS, respectively) found a survival advantage in favor of ASCT as a consolidation procedure for patients in response after induction. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any further difference for patients according to response status, stage disease or risk category. Conclusions: The present data do not support the use of ASCT for up-front consolidation for all patients with PTCL-NOS, AITL, or ALK-ALCL with partial or complete response after induction.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of plasmablastic lymphoma patients: analysis of 135 patients from the LYSA group.

Background: Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL), initially described in 1997 in the oral cavity of HIV positive patients, is now recognized as a distinct aggressive and rare entity of diffuse large B-cells lymphoma by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Since the original description, others cases have been reported. However, these are largely derived from case reports or small series limiting any definitive conclusions on clinical characteristics and outcome. Patients and methods: The clinical, biological, pathological features and outcome of a cohort including 135 patients with PBL, from LYSA centers in France and Belgium, were reported and analyzed. Results: The median age was 58 years, with a male predominance. The cohort was divided into 56 HIV-positive patients, 17 post-transplant patients and 62 HIV-negative/non-transplanted patients. Within HIV-negative/non-transplanted, a relative immunosuppression was found in most cases (systemic inflammatory disease, history of cancer, increased age associated with weakened immune system). We have also described a new subtype, PBL arising in a chronic localized inflammatory site, without any sign of immunosuppression. At presentation, 19% of patients showed oral involvement. Immunophenotype showed CD138 positivity in 88% of cases and CD20 negativity in 90% of cases. Chemotherapy was administered to 80% of patients, with a complete response (CR) rate of 55%. The median overall survival (OS) was 32 months. In univariate analysis, HIV positive status showed better OS when compared with HIV negative status. In multivariate analysis, International Prognostic Index score, chemotherapy and CR were associated with survival benefit. Conclusion(s): This cohort, the largest reported to date, increases the spectrum of knowledge on PBL, rarely described. However, specific guidelines to clarify treatment are lacking, and may improve the poor prognosis of this rare disease.

Chikungunya outbreak in Montpellier, France, September to October 2014.

In October 2014, an outbreak of 12 autochthonous chikungunya cases, 11 confirmed and 1 probable, was detected in a district of Montpellier, a town in the south of France colonised by the vector Aedes albopictus since 2010. A case returning from Cameroon living in the affected district was identified as the primary case. The epidemiological investigations and the repeated vector control treatments performed in the area and around places frequented by cases helped to contain the outbreak. In 2014, the chikungunya and dengue surveillance system in mainland France was challenged by numerous imported cases due to the chikungunya epidemic ongoing in the Caribbean Islands. This first significant outbreak of chikungunya in Europe since the 2007 Italian epidemic, however, was due to an East Central South African (ECSA) strain, imported by a traveller returning from West Africa. Important lessons were learned from this episode, which reminds us that the threat of a chikungunya epidemic in southern Europe is real.