ABSTRACT
Nasal vestibule squamous cell carcinoma (NVSCC) is an exceedingly rare malignancy, often misclassified due to its anatomical location and lack of a standardized definition. This review aims to consolidate current evidence on NVSCC, focusing on epidemiology, risk factors, classification, clinical presentation, treatment modalities, and prognostic factors. The NV anatomy is delineated, emphasizing the need for a clear definition to avoid misclassification. Risk factors include smoking, sunlight exposure, and debated associations with chalk exposure or viral factors. Clinical presentation includes symptoms like nasal obstruction, pain, burning, and bleeding, often misdiagnosed as inflammatory conditions. NVSCC exhibits distinct local spread patterns along cartilaginous surfaces, with the facial and submandibular lymph nodes at higher metastatic risk. Current classifications lack consensus, hindering comparison of outcomes. Treatment varies, with surgery or radiotherapy for early-stage tumors and multimodality approaches for advanced cases. The choice between surgery and radiotherapy is debated, with potential advantages and drawbacks for each. Radiotherapy, especially with Interventional RadioTherapy (IRT, previously known as brachytherapy), is gaining prominence, showing promising outcomes in terms of local control and cosmetic results. Prophylactic neck treatment remains controversial, with indications based on tumor characteristics. Prognostic factors include T classification, tumor size, surgical margins, nodal involvement, and histological features. Long-term survival rates range widely, emphasizing the need for further studies to refine management strategies for this rare malignancy. In conclusion, NVSCC poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, warranting multidisciplinary approaches and continued research efforts to optimize patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Nasal Cavity , Nose Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Nose Neoplasms/therapy , Nose Neoplasms/diagnosis , Nose Neoplasms/pathology , Nasal Cavity/pathology , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Combined Modality TherapyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The primary aim of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of high-volume steroid nasal irrigation (SNI) for treating chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: A systematic review of literature from 2012 to 2024 was conducted using PubMed to identify relevant studies. The search focused on terms related to AR, CRS, and steroid nasal irrigation. Studies were screened for relevance and duplicates removed, resulting in 20 studies being included in the final analysis. These studies were categorized based on their focus on efficacy, safety, or both, and underwent a risk of bias assessment using Cochrane and ROBINS-I tools. RESULTS: Of the 20 studies included, 13 examined the effectiveness of high-volume nasal steroid irrigations, 4 investigated safety, and 3 covered both. High-volume irrigations demonstrated superior efficacy in symptom improvement for CRS and AR compared to nasal sprays, particularly post-surgery. Budesonide was the most commonly used steroid. Safety evaluations indicated no significant hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression or increases in intraocular pressure, although minor adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: High-volume steroid nasal irrigations are more effective than standard nasal sprays for CRS and AR, particularly post-surgery, without significant safety concerns. However, no studies on cost-effectiveness were found, suggesting a need for further research in this area.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Accurate diagnosis and quantification of polyps and symptoms are pivotal for planning the therapeutic strategy of Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). This pilot study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis system capable of segmenting nasal polyps from nasal endoscopy videos. METHODS: Recorded nasal videoendoscopies from 52 patients diagnosed with CRSwNP between 2019 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Images extracted were manually segmented on the web application Roboflow. A dataset of 342 images was generated and divided into training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%) sets. The Ultralytics YOLOv8.0.28 model was employed for automated segmentation. RESULTS: The YOLOv8s-seg model consisted of 195 layers and required 42.4 GFLOPs for operation. When tested against the validation set, the algorithm achieved a precision of 0.91, recall of 0.839, and mean average precision at 50% IoU (mAP50) of 0.949. For the segmentation task, similar metrics were observed, including a mAP ranging from 0.675 to 0.679 for IoUs between 50% and 95%. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that a carefully trained AI algorithm can effectively identify and delineate nasal polyps in patients with CRSwNP. Despite certain limitations like the focus on CRSwNP-specific samples, the algorithm presents a promising complementary tool to existing diagnostic methods.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Endoscopy , Nasal Polyps , Humans , Nasal Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Polyps/diagnosis , Nasal Polyps/complications , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Endoscopy/methods , Sinusitis/diagnostic imaging , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Rhinitis/diagnostic imaging , Algorithms , Video Recording , Chronic Disease , Male , Female , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methodsABSTRACT
This article, accompanied by technical notes and video, presents a case of an 85-year-old patient with a cT2N0 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated using CO2 transoral laser exoscopic surgery (TOLES). The procedure achieved en bloc tumor removal with negative margins, preserving laryngeal and swallowing functions, demonstrating TOLES as a viable alternative to traditional microsurgery with enhanced visualization and ergonomics. Laryngoscope, 2024.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To summarize current knowledge on the indications, surgical strategies, and auditory outcomes of revision stapes surgery (RSS) for otosclerosis. DATA SOURCES: The search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science online databases, including papers published since 2000. REVIEW METHODS: The study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. We considered original series describing RSS for otosclerosis, reporting postoperative hearing outcomes according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines for conductive hearing loss (CHL) for at least 30 consecutive cases. The quality of included studies was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Pooled proportion and odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis were conducted using random effect models. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included, for a total of 2602 patients (2735 ears) and 2359 postoperative hearing results. RSS was mostly performed for recurrent CHL with air-bone gap (ABG)>20 dB. Multiple concomitant causes were often present, with prosthesis placement defect and incus necrosis as the most common causes. The pooled proportion of postoperative ABG<10 dB and ABG<20 dB was 57.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.8%-61.4%) and 79% (95% CI: 76.0%-81.8%), respectively. Dead ears were 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7%-2.1%). Compared to primary surgery, RSS had a significantly lower rate of ABG<10 dB (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24%-0.54%; P < .001). Both revision incudostapedotomy with/without incus reconstruction and malleovestibulopexy are viable options with nonsignificant differences in ABG closure rates (P = .182). CONCLUSION: RSS is challenging and requires the surgeon to carefully evaluate all potential causes of previous failure and tailor the intervention according to intraoperative findings. In most cases, ABG closure within 20 dB can be achieved with a relatively low risk of dead ears.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Epistaxis is the most common otorhinolaryngological emergency and historically there have been an important debate whether there is a cause-effect relationship with high blood pressure. AIM: This retrospective study explored whether hypertension is a significant risk factor for epistaxis in Emergency Department (ED) patients and examined associations between blood pressure levels and epistaxis episodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups were studied: Group A (patients with epistaxis) and Group B (control). Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and medication use were recorded. Blood pressure measurements were taken upon ED arrival and after specialist evaluation. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, T-test, χ2 test, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Group A, enrolled from April 2014 to February 2015, included 102 patients, mean age 67, male-female ratio 2:1. Blood pressure on arrival was over 140/90 mmHg in 73%, decreasing to 26% after 30 minutes. Group B, enrolled from May 2023 to August 2023, included 126 patients, mean age 59, male-female ratio 2:1. Blood pressure on arrival was over 140/90 mmHg in 60%, decreasing to 23% after 30 minutes. Both groups showed reduced blood pressure post-evaluation. Logistic regression identified anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy as the main independent risk factor for epistaxis. Age, sex, blood pressure levels, and hypertension did not significantly influence epistaxis occurrence. CONCLUSION: No significant correlation between hypertension and epistaxis was found. Anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy was the primary independent risk factor, highlighting the importance of considering medication history in evaluating epistaxis.
Subject(s)
Blood Pressure , Emergency Service, Hospital , Epistaxis , Hypertension , Humans , Epistaxis/epidemiology , Epistaxis/physiopathology , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Middle Aged , Aged , Hypertension/physiopathology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Blood Pressure Determination , Chi-Square Distribution , Aged, 80 and over , AdultABSTRACT
Objective: In this study, we aimed to describe the prospective implementation of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol in an Italian tertiary academic centre. Methods: Adult patients receiving surgery for primary or recurrent clinical stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx were enrolled. The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of the ERAS protocol on length of hospital stay (LOS). The secondary objective was to assess its impact on complications. To evaluate the results of the ERAS protocol, a matched-pair analysis was conducted, comparing ERAS patients with comparable cases treated before 2018. Results: Forty ERAS and 40 non-ERAS patients were analysed. There were no significant differences between the cohorts regarding age, gender, stage of disease, comorbidity, ASA score, and duration of surgery. A significantly shorter LOS for the ERAS group (median, 14 days; range, 10-19) than for non-ERAS patients (median, 17.5 days; range, 13-21) was observed (p = 0.0128). The incidence of complications was not significantly different (p = 0.140). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the introduction of an ERAS protocol in the daily practice is feasible, and can result in significant reduction in LOS.
Subject(s)
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Adult , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Matched-Pair Analysis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The Coronavirus epidemic quickly spread in Italy from China. In particular, it affected Bergamo province where Romano di Lombardia hospital is situated. Therefore, this hospital felt the urgency to requalify its activity in no time. It transformed itself into a unique centralized subintensive department to treat COVID-19 patients. The factors that made it possible to adequately face the stress due to patients' hospitalization were human resources and innovative elements to provide oxygen therapy. It is to underline that the logistic and methodological reality was not planned to cope with this emergency.