Outcome of early treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with haematological disorders.

Outcome of early treatment of COVID-19 with antivirals or anti-spike monoclonal antibodies (MABs) in patients with haematological malignancies (HM) is unknown. A retrospective study of HM patients treated for mild/moderate COVID-19 between March 2021 and July 2022 was performed. The main composite end-point was treatment failure (severe COVID-19 or COVID-19-related death). We included 328 consecutive patients who received MABs (n = 120, 37%; sotrovimab, n = 73) or antivirals (n = 208, 63%; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, n = 116) over a median of two days after symptoms started; 111 (33.8%) had non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); 89 (27%) were transplant/CAR-T (chimaeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) recipients. Most infections (n = 309, 94%) occurred during the Omicron period. Failure developed in 31 patients (9.5%). Its independent predictors were older age, fewer vaccine doses, and treatment with MABs. Rate of failure was lower in the Omicron versus the pre-Omicron period (7.8% versus 36.8%, p < 0.001). During the Omicron period, predictors of failure were age, fewer vaccine doses and diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS). Independent predictors of longer viral shedding were age, comorbidities, hospital admission at diagnosis, NHL/CLL, treatment with MABs. COVID-19-associated mortality was 3.4% (n = 11). The mortality in those who developed severe COVID-19 after early treatment was 26% in the Omicron period. Patients with HM had a significant risk of failure of early treatment, even during the Omicron period, with high mortality rate.

Simplification to dual therapy containing lamivudine and raltegravir or dolutegravir in HIV-infected patients on virologically suppressive antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral dual regimens including lamivudine and one boosted PI or dolutegravir are warranted in order to optimize combination ART (cART), prevent long-term toxicity and reduce the cost of treatments. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that a maintenance dual regimen of lamivudine plus raltegravir would be effective and as well tolerated as the dual maintenance combination of lamivudine plus dolutegravir. METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective study of HIV-infected patients on suppressive ART who switched to a dual regimen containing lamivudine 300 mg once daily plus raltegravir 1200 mg once daily or dolutegravir 50 mg once daily. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients (79 men; mean age 46.4 years; mean CD4+ T lymphocyte count 605 cells/mm3) were enrolled. Overall, 50 subjects switched to lamivudine plus raltegravir (Group A) and 59 to lamivudine plus dolutegravir (Group B). After 12 months, 45 patients (90%) in Group A and 52 (88.1%) in Group B had HIV RNA <20 copies/mL. No patients had severe adverse effects in either group, and the percentages of patients with mild adverse effects were comparable, except for a higher incidence of headache and sleeping disturbances in Group B than in Group A (30.5% versus 14%, P < 0.001). A comparable and non-significant weight increase was reported in both groups (+1.91 kg in Group A and +2.28 kg in Group B). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, dual therapies containing lamivudine plus raltegravir or dolutegravir in virologically suppressed patients showed high and comparable efficacy, as well as good tolerability.

Hormonal Treatment Effect on Sexual Distress in Transgender Persons: 2-Year Follow-Up Data.

INTRODUCTION: As far as we know, no studies to date have investigated the psychobiological correlates of sexual distress (SD) nor the impact of hormonal treatment (HT) on SD in transgender persons. AIM: To evaluate the psychobiological correlates of SD and assess the effects of HT on SD in transgender persons without gender-affirming surgery. METHODS: A consecutive series of 301 transgender persons (160 transwomen and 141 transmen) was considered for the cross-sectional study, and a subset of 72 subjects was studied in a 2-year follow-up. A physical examination was performed. Blood samples were drawn for determination of cortisol levels. Subjects completed psychometric measures. During 2 years of HT, the evaluation of SD was prospectively repeated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Psychobiological correlates of SD in transgender population. Changes in SD during gender affirming hormonal treatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Knowing how hormonal treatment influence SD will help care providers when counseling transgender people. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study prospectively evaluating the impact of gender affirming hormonal treatment on sexual distress in transgender individuals. The main limitations are represented by the small size of the sample and the use of questionnaires validated only in the cisgender population. RESULTS: SD showed a positive correlation with body uneasiness (P < .0001) and with dissatisfaction toward gender-related body parts or shapes (all P < .05). In addition, SD correlated positively with general psychopathology (P < .0001), alexithymia, social anxiety, and humiliation scales (all P < .05). In transmen, SD was positively associated with autism levels (P < .005), as well as with cortisol levels (P < .02). A significant correlation between SD and perceived discrimination was observed in transwomen (P < .05). In transwomen, SD was positively associated with hair density and negatively with breast growth (both P < .05). Finally, in transmen, a negative correlation was found between SD and hair density (P < .05). When the impact of HT on SD was evaluated, a significant reduction of SD was observed across time in both transwomen and transmen (P = .001 and P = .01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The present results support the efficacy of HT in reducing SD in transgender persons. Ristori J, Cocchetti C, Castellini G, et al. Hormonal Treatment Effect on Sexual Distress in Transgender Persons: 2-Year Follow-Up Data. J Sex Med 2020;17:142-151.

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for early treatment of hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection in hematologic patients.

Efficacy of early treatment with anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection in hematologic patients is unknown. Retrospective, cohort study conducted in four Italian teaching hospitals. We included adult patients with hematologic malignancies and hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed between November 2020 and December 2021. The principal exposure variable was administration of mAbs. The primary endpoint was clinical failure dea composite outcome of mortality and/or invasive and noninvasive ventilation within 90 days from infection onset. We included 52 patients with hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection. Males were 29 (60%), median age was 62 (interquartile range [IQR] 48-70). Forty-five (86%) patients were on chemotherapy or had received chemotherapy within 30 days. MAbs were administered in 19/52 (36%) patients. Clinical failure occurred in 22 (42%) patients; 21% (4/19) in mAbs group versus 54% (18/33) in non-mAbs group (p = 0.03). Other predictors of clinical failure were older age (median [IQR] 69 [61-72] versus 58 [46-66], p = 0.001), and higher Charlson comorbidity index (median [IQR], 5 [3.25-5] versus 3 [2-5], p = 0.002). At multivariable Cox regression model, mAbs were independently associated with a significantly lower rate of clinical failure (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.85, p = 0.01), after adjusting for confounders. In conclusion, mAbs are promising for early treatment of hematologic patients with healthcare-related SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Short Communication: No Significant Changes in Weight and Body Fat Mass in Suppressed HIV-Infected Patients Switched to Dual Combination Lamivudine Plus Dolutegravir or Raltegravir.

Weight gain associated with integrase inhibitor-based treatment has become a critical issue in the clinical management of HIV infection. We analyzed changes in weight and body fat mass in 54 virologically suppressed patients who switched to lamivudine plus raltegravir or dolutegravir. Overall, after 12 months we reported a not significant increase in weight (median, +1.74 kg; p = .223) and total fat mass (median, +1.13 kg; p = .188), and these changes were comparable between groups. The median change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) [interquartile range (IQR)] was +0.02 g/cm2 (-0.02, +0.05; p = .786), and the median change in femur neck BMD (IQR) was +0.04 g/cm2 (-0.03, +0.06; p = .598), and changes were comparable between groups. In conclusion, the switch to dolutegravir/lamivudine or raltegravir/lamivudine dual therapy in virologically suppressed patients did not produce significant increases in weight and body fat mass after a 12-month follow-up, in association with not significant changes in BMD.