ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antitumor activity of the combination of somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been reported but not confirmed in prospective trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase II EVERLAR study evaluated everolimus 10 mg/day and the SSA octreotide 30 mg every 28 days in patients with advanced nonfunctioning well-differentiated gastrointestinal NETs (GI-NETs) that progressed in the last 12 months (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01567488). Prior treatment with SSAs and any systemic or locoregional therapy was allowed except for mTOR inhibitors. Patients continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months; secondary endpoints included early biochemical response, objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.0, overall survival (OS), AEs, activation of mTOR pathway (insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor [IGF1R] and phosphoS6 [pS6] expression). RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included in the intent-to-treat analyses. After 12 months of treatment, 62.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48%-77%) of patients had not progressed or died. The 24-month PFS rate was 43.6% (95% CI 29%-58%). The confirmed ORR was 2.3%, and stable disease was 58.1%. Median OS was not reached after 24 months of median follow-up. Dose reductions and temporary interruptions due to AEs were required in 14 (33%) and 33 (77%) patients, respectively. The most frequent AEs were diarrhea, asthenia, mucositis, rash, and hyperglycemia. No correlation was observed between IGFR1 and pS6 expression and PFS/OS. CONCLUSION: The everolimus-octreotide combination provided clinically relevant efficacy in nonfunctioning GI-NETs, similar to the results of RADIANT-2 in functioning setting. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The EVERLAR study reports prospective data of somatostatin analogue in combination with everolimus in nonfunctioning gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors suggesting meaningful activity and favorable toxicity profile that supports drug combination in this setting.
Subject(s)
Everolimus/therapeutic use , Intestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Octreotide/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Everolimus/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Intestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Octreotide/pharmacology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest determinants of sporadic breast cancer (BC). In this study, we compared MD in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers from BRCA1/2 mutation-positive families and investigated the association between MD and BC among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers per type of mutation and tumor subtype. METHODS: The study was carried out in 1039 female members of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-positive families followed at 16 Spanish Genetic Counseling Units. Participants' density was scored retrospectively from available mammograms by a single blinded radiologist using a 5-category scale (<10 %, 10-25 %, 25-50 %, 50-75 %, >75 %). In BC cases, we selected mammograms taken prior to diagnosis or from the contralateral breast, whereas, in non-cases, the last screening mammogram was evaluated. MD distribution in carriers and non-carriers was compared using ordinal logistic models, and the association between MD and BC in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was studied using logistic regression. Huber-White robust estimators of variance were used to take into account correlations between family members. A similar multinomial model was used to explore this association by BC subtype. RESULTS: We identified and scored mammograms from 341 BRCA1, 350 BRCA2 mutation carriers and 229 non-carriers. Compared to non-carriers, MD was significantly lower among BRCA2 mutation carriers (odds ratio (OR) =0.71; P-value=0.04), but not among BRCA1 carriers (OR=0.84; P-value=0.33). MD was associated with subsequent development BC (OR per category of MD=1.45; 95 % confidence interval=1.18-1.78, P-value<0.001), with no significant differences between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (P-value=0.48). Finally, no statistically significant differences were observed in the association of MD with specific BC subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study, the largest to date on this issue, confirms that MD is an independent risk factor for all BC subtypes in either BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, and should be considered a phenotype risk marker in this context.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Family , Mammary Glands, Human/abnormalities , Adult , Breast Density , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/genetics , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/pathology , Heterozygote , Humans , Mammography , Middle Aged , Mutation , Odds Ratio , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Metabolic profiling is a valuable tool to characterize tumor biology but remains largely unexplored in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Our aim was to comprehensively assess the metabolomic profile of NETs and identify novel prognostic biomarkers and dysregulated molecular pathways. DESIGN AND METHODS: Multiplatform untargeted metabolomic profiling (GC-MS, CE-MS, and LC-MS) was performed in plasma from 77 patients with G1-2 extra-pancreatic NETs enrolled in the AXINET trial (NCT01744249) (study cohort) and from 68 non-cancer individuals (control). The prognostic value of each differential metabolite (n = 155) in NET patients (P < .05) was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for multiple testing and other confounding factors. Related pathways were explored by Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA) and Metabolite Pathway Analysis (MPA). RESULTS: Thirty-four metabolites were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) (n = 16) and/or overall survival (OS) (n = 27). Thirteen metabolites remained significant independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis, 3 of them with a significant impact on both PFS and OS. Unsupervised clustering of these 3 metabolites stratified patients in 3 distinct prognostic groups (1-year PFS of 71.1%, 47.7%, and 15.4% (P = .012); 5-year OS of 69.7%, 32.5%, and 27.7% (P = .003), respectively). The MSEA and MPA of the 13-metablolite signature identified methionine, porphyrin, and tryptophan metabolisms as the 3 most relevant dysregulated pathways associated with the prognosis of NETs. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a metabolomic signature that improves prognostic stratification of NET patients beyond classical prognostic factors for clinical decisions. The enriched metabolic pathways identified reveal novel tumor vulnerabilities that may foster the development of new therapeutic strategies for these patients.
Subject(s)
Neuroendocrine Tumors , Porphyrins , Humans , Metabolomics , Methionine/therapeutic use , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Porphyrins/therapeutic use , Tryptophan , Case-Control StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary syndrome. Previously, we published the largest cohort of FH mutation carriers in Spain and observed a highly recurrent missense heterozygous variant, FH(NM_000143.4):c.1118A > G p.(Asn373Ser), in 104 individuals from 31 apparently unrelated families. Here, we aimed to establish its founder effect and characterize the associated clinical phenotype. RESULTS: Haplotype analysis confirmed that families shared a common haplotype (32/38 markers) spanning 0.61-0.82 Mb, indicating this recurrent variant was inherited from a founder ancestor. Cutaneous and uterine leiomyomatosis were diagnosed in 64.6% (64/99) and 98% (50/51) of patients, respectively, and renal cell cancer was present in 10.4% (10/96). The pathogenic FH_c.1118A > G variant is a Spanish founder mutation that originated 12-26 generations ago. We estimate that the variant may have appeared between 1370 and 1720. Individuals carrying this founder mutation had similar frequency of renal cell cancer and a higher frequency of renal cysts and leiomyomas than those in other cohorts of this syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: In the Spanish province of Alicante there is a high prevalence of HLRCC because of the founder mutation FH c.1118A > G; p.(Asn373Ser). The characterization of founder mutations provides accurate and specific information regarding their penetrance and expressivity. In individuals with suspected HLRCC from the province of Alicante, genetic testing by direct analysis of the founder FH c.1118A > G; p.(Asn373Ser) mutation may be a faster and more efficient diagnostic tool compared with complete gene sequencing.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Leiomyomatosis , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary , Skin Neoplasms , Uterine Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Leiomyomatosis/genetics , Leiomyomatosis/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Mutation/genetics , SyndromeABSTRACT
BRCA2-c.2808_2811del (3036delACAA) is one of the most reported germ line mutations in non-Ashkenazi breast cancer patients. We investigated its genetic origin in 51 Spanish carrier families that were genotyped with 11 13q polymorphic markers. Three independent associated haplotypes were clearly distinguished accounting for 23 [west Castilla y León (WCL)], 20 [east Castilla y León (ECL)] and 6 (South of Spain) families. Mutation age was estimated with the Disequilibrium Mapping using Likelihood Estimation software in a range of 45-68 and 45-71 generations for WCL and ECL haplotypes, respectively. The most prevalent variants, c.2808_2811del and c.2803G > A, were located in a double-hairpin loop structure (c.2794-c.2825) predicted by Quikfold that was proposed as a mutational hotspot. To check this hypothesis, random mutagenesis was performed over a 923 bp fragment of BRCA2, and 86 DNA variants were characterized. Interestingly, three mutations reported in the mutation databases (c.2680G > A, c.2944del and c.2957dup) were replicated and 20 affected the same position with different nucleotide changes. Moreover, five variants were placed in the same hairpin loop of c.2808_2811del, and one affected the same position (c.2808A > G). In conclusion, our results support that at least three different mutational events occurred to generate c.2808_2811del. Other highly prevalent DNA variants, such as BRCA1-c.68_69delAG, BRCA2-c.5946delT and c.8537delAG, are concentrated in hairpin loops, suggesting that these structures may represent mutational hotspots.
Subject(s)
BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Haplotypes/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Base Pairing , Base Sequence , Family , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutagenesis , Polymorphism, Genetic , Prognosis , SpainABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Approved systemic therapies for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) have shown limited capacity to reduce tumor burden and no antitumor activity after progression to targeted agents (TAs). We investigated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients with previously treated advanced GEP-NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial with two parallel cohorts (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02678780) involving 21 institutions in 4 European countries. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed advanced grade 1-2 pancreatic (panNET) or GI (GI-NET) NETs with documented tumor progression after treatment with a TA (panNET) or somatostatin analogs (GI-NET). Patients were treated with lenvatinib 24 mg once daily until disease progression or treatment intolerance. The primary end point was overall response rate by central radiology review. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, and safety. RESULTS: Between September 2015 and March 2017, a total of 111 patients were enrolled, with 55 (panNET) and 56 (GI-NET) patients in each cohort. The median follow-up was 23 months. The overall response rate was 29.9% (95% CI, 21.6 to 39.6): 44.2% (panNET) and 16.4% (GI-NET). The median (range) duration of response was 19.9 (8.4-30.8) and 33.9 (10.6-38.3) months in the panNET and GI-NET groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 15.7 months (95% CI, 14.1 to 19.5). The most common adverse events were fatigue, hypertension, and diarrhea; 93.7% of patients required dose reductions or interruptions. CONCLUSION: We report the highest centrally confirmed response reported to date with a multikinase inhibitor in advanced GEP-NETs, with a particularly strong response in the panNET cohort. This study provides novel evidence for the efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with disease progression following treatment with other TAs, suggesting the potential value of lenvatinib in the treatment of advanced GEP-NETs.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Phenylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Europe , Female , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/mortality , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neuroendocrine Tumors/mortality , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Phenylurea Compounds/adverse effects , Progression-Free Survival , Prospective Studies , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Quinolines/adverse effects , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Whether risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in BRCA1/2 carriers reduces the breast cancer (BC) risk is conflicting, potentially due to methodological issues of prior analysis. We analysed the association between premenopausal RRSO and BC risk in BRCA1/2 carriers after adjusting for potential biases. METHODS: We analysed data from 444 BRCA1 and 409 BRCA2 carriers under age 51 with no cancer prior to genetic testing or during first 6 months of surveillance (to avoid cancer-induced testing bias and prevalent-cancer bias). Observation started 6 months after genetic testing (to avoid event-free time bias), until BC diagnosis, risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) or death. A multistate model with four states (non-RRSO, RRSO, RRM and BC) and five transitions was fitted to characterise outcomes and to calculate the BC risk reduction after premenopausal RRSO (before age 51). A systematic review was performed to assess the association between premenopausal RRSO and BC. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, 96 women (11.3%) developed BC (54 BRCA1, 42 BRCA2). The risk of BC after premenopausal RRSO decreased significantly in BRCA1 carriers (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.45 [95% confidence interval (CI):0.22-0.92]), but was not conclusive in BRCA2 carriers (HR = 0.77 [95%CI:0.35-1.67]). The systematic review suggested that premenopausal RRSO is associated with a decrease of BC risk in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Premenopausal RRSO was associated with BC risk reduction in BRCA1 carriers, which can help guide cancer risk-reducing strategies in this population. Longer follow-up and larger sample size may be needed to estimate the potential benefit in BRCA2 carriers.
Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Germ-Line Mutation , Premenopause , Risk Reduction Behavior , Salpingo-oophorectomy/methods , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genetic Testing , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer syndrome (HLRCC) is a very rare hereditary disorder characterized by cutaneous leiomyomas (CLMs), uterine leiomyomas (ULMs), renal cysts (RCys) and renal cell cancers (RCCs). We aimed to describe the genetics, clinical features and potential genotype-phenotype associations in the largest cohort of fumarate hydratase enzyme mutation carriers known from Spain using a multicentre, retrospective study of individuals with a genetic or clinical diagnosis of HLRCC. We collected clinical information from medical records, analysed genetic variants and looked for genotype-phenotype associations. Analyses were performed using R 3.6.0. software. We included 197 individuals: 74 index cases and 123 relatives. CLMs were diagnosed in 65% of patients, ULMs in 90% of women, RCys in 37% and RCC in 10.9%. Twenty-seven different pathogenic variants were detected, 12 (44%) of them not reported previously. Patients with missense pathogenic variants showed higher frequencies of CLMs, ULMs and RCys, than those with loss-of-function variants (p = 0.0380, p = 0.0015 and p = 0.024, respectively). This is the first report of patients with HLRCC from Spain. The frequency of RCCs was lower than those reported in the previously published series. Individuals with missense pathogenic variants had higher frequencies of CLMs, ULMs and RCys.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This was a two-stage, phase II trial of the dual phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor BEZ235 in patients with everolimus-resistant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) (NCT01658436). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In stage 1, 11 patients received 400 mg BEZ235 orally twice daily (bid). Due to tolerability concerns, a further 20 patients received BEZ235 300 mg bid. Stage 2 would be triggered by a 16-week progression-free survival (PFS) rate of ≥60% in stage 1. RESULTS: As of 30 June, 2014, 29/31 patients had discontinued treatment. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in eight (72.7%) patients at 400 mg and eight (40.0%) patients at 300 mg, including hyperglycaemia, diarrhoea, nausea, and vomiting. The estimated 16-week PFS rate was 51.6% (90% confidence interval=35.7-67.3%). CONCLUSION: BEZ235 was poorly tolerated by patients with everolimus-resistant pNETs at 400 and 300 mg bid doses. Although evidence of disease stability was observed, the study did not proceed to stage 2.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Everolimus/therapeutic use , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroendocrine Tumors/enzymology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/enzymology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/metabolism , Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors , Prospective Studies , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Quinolines/administration & dosage , Quinolines/adverse effects , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are relatively rare and complex neoplasms that present many clinical challenges. Most GEP-NETs are sporadic, but they can be multiple and a component of a familial syndrome. Assessment of the location and extent of GEP-NETs is crucial for management and a number of novel imaging modalities are under evaluation with the principal goal of increasing sensitivity for the detection of micro-metastases while retaining specificity. The appropriate diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors often involves collaboration between specialists in multiple disciplines, using specific biochemical, radiologic, and surgical methods. Management strategies include surgery, radiological intervention, cytotoxic chemotherapies, somatostatin analogs and novel biological agents such as sunitinib and everolimus. Other biological agents, new chemoteraphy regimens and somatostatin-tagged radionuclide therapies are also under investigation. In spite of this, comparison between therapeutic modalities is currently difficult. Further studies are warranted to individualize and optimize the diagnosis and treatment of these tumors.
ABSTRACT
While traditional cytotoxic drugs have shown limited efficacy in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), their biological features have been characterized and can be exploited therapeutically. Their most prominent trait is an extraordinary vascularization in low-grade NETs and an hypoxia-dependent angiogenesis in high-grade NETs, which is associated to a significant expression of many proangiogenic molecules. Therefore, several antiangiogenic compounds have been tested in these malignancies, and among these, sunitinib has demonstrated activity in pancreatic NET patients by dually targeting the VEGFR and PDGFR pathways. In spite of these efficacious clinical results, apparent resistance to antiangiogenic therapies has been described in NET animal models and in clinical trials. Therefore, overcoming antiangiogenic resistance is a crucial step in the subsequent development of antiangiogenic therapies. Several strategies have been postulated to fight resistance, but preclinical studies and clinical trials will investigate and address these therapeutic approaches in the coming years in order to overcome resistance to antiangiogenic therapies in NETs.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Neuroendocrine Tumors/blood supply , Pancreatic Neoplasms/blood supply , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Neovascularization, Pathologic/drug therapy , Neovascularization, Pathologic/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
A lo largo de la consulta de Asesoramiento Genético se hace un gran énfasis en la necesidad de comunicar la información del riesgo familiar y del estudio genético a los familiares. Además, los informes clínicos especifican los familiares en situación de riesgo. Sin embargo, desconocemos el patrón de comunicación intra-familiar de los resultados genéticos diagnósticos tras el asesoramiento. Objetivo: Realizar un estudio descriptivo sobre el patrón de comunicación de resultado del estudio genético diagnóstico en predisposición hereditaria al cáncer en la Unidad de Asesoramiento Genético del ICO. Método: Se ha realizado un estudio descriptivo mediante entrevista telefónica a una muestra de casos índice atendidos en la Unidad de Asesoramiento Genético que recibieron el resultado de un diagnóstico genético, explorando a qué familiares han comunicado estos resultados (patrón de comunicación familiar). Del mismo modo, se han recogido variables demográficas, personales y del propio resultado genético, para explorar si alguna de ellas pudiera modificar el patrón de comunicación. Resultados: La mayoría de los pacientes comunican los resultados de los estudios genéticos a sus familiares. Sin embargo, esta comunicación no es completa, por lo que es posible diseñar estrategias de intervención que mejoren el patrón de comunicación de los pacientes que reciben estudios genéticos diagnósticos en el contexto de la predisposición hereditaria al cáncer
Throughout the Genetic Counselling process a great emphasis is done on the need to communicate the familial risk information and the genetic study to the relatives. In addition, the clinical reports specify the relatives at risk situation. However, the familial communication pattern of genetic results after the counselling remains unknown. Objective: To conduct a descriptive study about the communication pattern of results of the diagnostic genetic test in hereditary predisposition to cancer at the ICO Genetic Counselling Unit. Methods: A descriptive study has been performed by telephone interview on a sample of index individuals attended at the Genetic Counselling Unit. Patients were asked whether if they had communicated their genetic study results and to whom. Similarly, demographic, personal and genetic result itself variables have been collected to explore whether any of them could modify the communication pattern. Results: Most patients report the results of the genetic studies to their relatives. However, this communication is not complete, so it is possible to design intervention strategies which may improve the communication pattern of the patients who receive diagnostic genetic tests in the context of the hereditary predisposition to cancer