ABSTRACT
Background: In recent years, resistance to antibiotics has become a global threat, and alternatives to antibiotics have become an area of research. The main alternative methods are briefly described in this review. However, the main focus is bacteriophage-related therapy. Bacteriophages are viruses which, due to the production of the enzyme endolysin, are able to kill bacterial host cells. Bacteriophage therapies have a long tradition. Their potential to function as antibiotics lies in their bactericidal activity and specificity in killing bacteria without infecting or affecting eukaryotic cells. Objective: To systematically review the outcomes of bacteriophage therapy in patients with bacterial infections. Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and CENTRAL databases were searched electronically using search terms referring to bacteriophages, endolysins and antimicrobial resistance. After the literature was screened for their titles and abstracts, full-text reviews considering inclusion/exclusion criteria were performed. Data concerning patients with bacterial infections, treatment with either bacteriophages or its enzyme endolysin and their outcomes were extracted and analysed. Results: Thirteen publications were identified that met all inclusion criteria. Data extraction shows that bacteriophages or endolysins have the potential to combat bacterial infections and significantly reduce inflammatory mediators. However, 3 out of 4 randomized controlled trials revealed that there was no significant difference between phage/endolysin treated patients and control group. Significant clinical improvements were seen in cohort and case studies. A few minor side effects were reported. Conclusions: Although there are countries in which bacteriophages are prescribed as an alternative to established antibiotics, this valuable experience has yet to be examined sufficiently in clinical trials conducted to modern standards. Despite improvements in symptoms shown in the reviewed clinical trials, the infection and the bacteria themselves were rarely completely eradicated. Therefore, no definite answer can be given as to effectiveness, and further clinical trials are necessary.
ABSTRACT
The aims of this study were to diagnose iron-restricted erythropoiesis (functional iron deficiency) in patients with classic iron deficiency (ID), anemia of chronic disease (ACD) and the combined state of ID/ACD with the use of two hematological methods for the measurement of reticulocyte hemoglobinization. In comparison, the biochemical markers of iron status were determined. We studied 474 anemic patients admitted to hospital with a broad spectrum of diseases. We measured indicators of reticulocyte hemoglobinization. CHr was determined on an Advia 120 hematology analyzer. A Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer was used to determine RET-Y, the forward scatter of fluorescence-labeled reticulocytes, which can also be expressed as the reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent (RET-H(e)), as well as RBC-Y, the forward scatter of fluorescence-labeled erythrocytes, which can be expressed as the erythrocyte hemoglobin equivalent. Ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and the sTfR/log ferritin ratio (sTfR-F index) were used as biochemical markers. The comparison of RET-Y with CHr demonstrated an excellent curvilinear relationship between the two parameters. The normal reference range for Ret-Y was 1630-1860 arbitrary units (AU); mathematical transformation to RET-H(e) gave a range of 28.2-35.7 pg. Correlations of biochemical iron markers with RET-H(e) were as weak as with CHr in patients with ACD and acute phase response. In a diagnostic plot to identify iron status, RET-H(e) could replace CHr without any loss of sensitivity or specificity. Patient mismatch analysis between RET-H(e) and CHr in the diagnostic plot demonstrated agreement for 449 of 474 patients (94.4%). Patient specific anemia mismatches were 2.9-6.2%. According to our results, the indicators of reticulocyte hemoglobinization, RET-H(e) and CHr, measure the same phenomenon. RET-H(e) is as valuable as CHr for the diagnosis of iron-restricted erythropoiesis. The combination of RET-H(e) and the sTfR-F index in a diagnostic plot offers an attractive tool for the evaluation of iron status and identification of the progression of ID.