Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Neurooncol ; 106(1): 127-33, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21725801

ABSTRACT

We report retrospective data on the feasibility and efficacy of prolonging adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) more than 6 months after chemoradiotherapy completion in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Molecular prognostic factors were assessed. Data from 46 patients were reviewed. Patients received postoperative irradiation, 60 Gy in 30 fractions, combined with concurrent TMZ, 75 mg/m(2). Four weeks later, adjuvant TMZ was prescribed, 150-200 mg/m(2) for a total of 24 cycles unless there was progression or toxicity. Tumor samples were tested for the following prognostic factors: EGFR overexpression, 1p19q deletion, p53 overexpression and proliferation index. Overall survival (OS) was 84.8% at 6 months, 54.3% at 12 months, 26.1% at 18 months, and 21.7% at 24 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 73.9% at 6 months, 34.8% at 12 months, 15.2% at 18 months and 10.4% at 24 months. In the adjuvant phase, no treatment disruption for toxicity was necessary but eight patients required dose adaptation because of side effects. No significant molecular prognostic factor was evidenced for OS. We found that p53 overexpression was the only significant prognostic factor for PFS, with a median PFS of 9.3 months versus 7 months for patients without p53 overexpression (P = 0.031). This study suggests that delivering adjuvant TMZ therapy for more than 6 months is feasible in patients with GBM. Efficacy data warrant further prospective assessment with the focus on molecular prognostic factors, such as p53 overexpression, which was found to be the only significant molecular prognostic factor for outcome.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Dacarbazine/analogs & derivatives , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/genetics , Genes, p53/genetics , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/adverse effects , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Cell Proliferation , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Dacarbazine/adverse effects , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , ErbB Receptors/biosynthesis , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Female , Glioblastoma/genetics , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Temozolomide
2.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 35(1): 18-21, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21278560

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combined with gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients in a phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All breast cancer patients with HER2-negative status, hormone refractory tumor, assessable targets, with preserved performance status, and who had not received chemotherapy earlier as treatment for their metastatic disease were eligible. The patients received pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m(2), venous injection, day 1) concurrently with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2), venous injection, days 1 and 8), 1 cycle every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Although 38 patients should have been included, this study was prematurely discontinued after recruiting 20 patients because of excessive toxicity: 75% of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxicity, including neutropenia, thrombopenia, hand-foot syndrome, and stomatitis, which significantly affected the quality of life. Cardiac toxicity was mild. With regard to efficacy, 50% of the patients (95% confidence interval, 26%-74%) experienced tumor response. The response rate was 40% in patients who had earlier received anthracyclines as adjuvant therapy. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 8.8 months and 19 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This combination was efficient, but not well tolerated. From these results, we could not recommend these doses for further assessment and lower doses should be preferred.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Disease-Free Survival , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Doxorubicin/analogs & derivatives , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Hand-Foot Syndrome/etiology , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Middle Aged , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Stomatitis/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Treatment Outcome , Gemcitabine
3.
Med Dosim ; 37(2): 152-6, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21925864

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to analyze and revisit toxicity related to chest chemoradiotherapy and to correlate these side effects with dosimetric parameters obtained using analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) in locally unresectable advanced lung cancer. We retrospectively analyzed data from 47 lung cancer patients between 2005 and 2008. All received conformal 3D radiotherapy using high-energy linear accelerator plus concomitant chemotherapy. All treatment planning data were transferred into Eclipse 8.05 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) and dosimetric calculations were performed using AAA. Thirty-three patients (70.2%) developed acute pneumopathy after radiotherapy (grades 1 and 2). One patient (2.1%) presented with grade 3 pneumopathy. Thirty-one (66%) presented with grades 1-2 lung fibrosis, and 1 patient presented with grade 3 lung fibrosis. Thirty-four patients (72.3%) developed grade 1-2 acute oesophagic toxicity. Four patients (8.5%) presented with grades 3 and 4 dysphagia, necessitating prolonged parenteral nutrition. Median prescribed dose was 64 Gy (range 50-74) with conventional fractionation (2 Gy per fraction). Dose-volume constraints were respected with a median V20 of 23.5% (maximum 34%) and a median V30 of 17% (maximum 25%). The median dose delivered to healthy contralateral lung was 13.1 Gy (maximum 18.1 Gy). At univariate analysis, larger planning target volume and V20 were significantly associated with the probability of grade ≥2 radiation-induced pneumopathy (p = 0.022 and p = 0.017, respectively). No relation between oesophagic toxicity and clinical/dosimetric parameters could be established. Using AAA, the present results confirm the predictive value of the V20 for lung toxicity as already demonstrated with the conventional pencil beam convolution approach.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Algorithms , Humans , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL